Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Rookie Babe

Visit Site

Rookie Babe

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Communities
2. Amateur Girls

Webstar
1 Site Listed
Partner: Rookie Babe Partners

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all Rookie Babe Site Facts at TBP.

70.0
Feedback History  (11)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 8
Review by TheBestPorn:

N/A
TBP Review

Date: None

Type: None
Review Status:

Medium

This review is not a top priority for a new review assignment.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
70
dracken (246) 05-28-12  04:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Roughly 100 models, 225 photo scenes and 100 videos.
- Most of the images are at 8000x1200, but a handful are as high as 2048x3072 and some go higher (maybe 25 go as high as 5120x).
- Most girls have a video interview, but it's usually only 5 minutes or less with some pretty standard questions that get repeated for each girl (where do you like to shop, what couldn't you live without etc), some girls also have a bonus video where they talk about themselves, put some make-up on or get dressed. There are one or two solo masturbation scenes, but they are less than 5 minutes as well and not terribly exciting.
- Good light and good framing for the photos. Some great shots of good looking models.
- You also get a written interview with the girl with some playboy like questions (describe your personality, what do you love about your body, etc)
- Decent navigation, easy to download content, good model pages. Overall very decent webdesign, functional and pleasant to use.
Cons: - Very basic site, the photos are the highlight of the site and with only around 40 images in each scene not much is going on here, think Playboy level of softcore. The girls get undressed and pose around a bit, but no close-ups and just one outfit per shoot.
- Videos are here only as a way to help you get to know the girl, but with some very basic questions and only 4 minutes of footage per clip it's hard to get excited about the movies available here.
- While some of the more recent updates are in 5120 resolution some are as low as 1200, when the biggest selling point of the site is the high resolution of the images this is not good. All updates should be high resolution.
- Videos are in pretty bad resolutions 640x400 and not really well lit.
- When trying to stream a video I sometimes got an error that the video wasn't found..not sure why. It was rather infrequent, but still
Bottom Line: I joined the site because several of the girls looked incredibly hot and I expected something similar to the cyber playboy club or met art.

I didn't go into the site expecting hardcore action or even seeing the girls masturbate, but even so I ended up being disappointed by the content here. A lot of the scenes have around 30 images and they are all shot in the same location and same outfit.

Several of the galleries are just the girl standing in front of a white wall or a brick wall or on a couch in front of a white wall. In fact I noticed that they don't even like to move the girls around too much. If a scene is shot in a hotel on a bed, don't expect the girl to also maybe pose in a chair or standing up next to the bed, they will have her maybe stand on the bed, but that's it. I understand that you would need to set the lights again and move equipment around, but when your entire site is dedicated to images you have to offer a bit more.

I also mentioned the outfits, the vast majority of girls are dressed in jeans and t-shirts or very plain skirts. There are maybe one or two scenes where the girl is wearing a corset or stockings and high heels. But for the most part there is nothing here that I couldn't see walking down the street.

Now don't get me wrong I don't mind that the girls bring their own clothes to these shoots, but the reason I would pay for a site that has only softcore images and under 100 images per set would be because I get to see the girls in different outfits, in different poses and under different angles, in glamor shots as well as outdoor shots, here the diversity is minimal.

The content just doesn't feel worth it. I could go to Met-art or X-art and get the same gorgeous looking models in a lot better looking images. (mind you not technically speaking, the photos here are great, well lit and professionally taken, but most of the time the photographer could have chosen better ways to present the girls.)

The other attractive aspect of the site for me was the idea that you could get to know the girls, get to know their unique personality, at least that's what the FAQ of the site promised. I guess the videos are meant to help here, but the low resolution, short length makes it hard to enjoy the limited clips available. The interviews are very brief and don't really help. Compared to Littlemutt for example, you don't get any feel for the models here.

The one area the site shines in is the diversity of the models, they have some gorgeous looking black and asian models. This is one area that I really enjoyed and is lacking from many other photo sites.

In the end the site has some great models but just doesn't use them as well as they could. If we had more outfits, more locations, more video interviews and daily updates in high definition this would be a great site. As it stands now I would recommend Met-art, X-art even Nubiles over this site.

P.S. It only gets a 70 because the site design is very well done and the models themselves are incredible looking.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
85
qualsite34 (33) 03-22-07  03:13am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (8)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Drooler (218) 03-12-10  10:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Hey, Let's Go Forward with SMALLER PICS!

I let this site build up for some time before rejoining. I only rejoined for the large-sized pics (at least 2048 pixels!). Guess what? The 53 most recent galleries go no larger than 1200!

I've really fucking had it with web sites that do this shit.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (218) 09-12-09  05:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Stopped Updating

Sept. 7th was the last update in photos for this site. The thumb shows "Holly" wearing glasses and pulling her panties down to her ankles, standing on a red shag (of course) carpet. One peculiar thing is that there is no model name or title on the thumb pic itself, unlike all of the others.

So what happened? Did their lettering and layering maestro skip town?

Just want people to know since they don't date stamp the updates. And I'm not too pleased since it means that I've paid for updates I'm probably not getting.

Was going to rewrite a review. This will now suffice.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

roadie (11) 07-16-09  12:58pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)

trial

I usually prefer HQ photos but join the occasional site that does not have HQ photos if the smaller resolution provided is of good quality. I thought I might have a look using the trial option but this seems to have disappeared ? has this option been discontinued ?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Drooler (218) 05-16-09  04:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Pricing Corrections; Followup

Rookie Babe claims to have a 3-day trial for 5.95, but I tried both the ccbill and epoch billing options and they both came up with only 29.95 for a month.

And TBP still shows the price at 24.95.

Later ... OK, I did join for the trial price. Most of the women there are really good looking and the photography is good, too.

The photosets are small when they're under, say, 20 pics, but they're generally sequenced in a way that doesn't often have me asking for more.

What there does need to be more of is server speed. It hovers between 90-120kbps. Slow is the word.

Also wish they'd allow saving of individual pics at the largest size. That would ease up the server load for sure, instead of the user having to download entire zips of pics at 3-5000 pixels.

Right now, when you open up a single shot, it immediate goes into automated slide show mode and there doesn't seem to be any way of stopping it. That ought to be fixed, too.

Thanks to Khan and the TBP staff for getting the pricing snafu taken care of in what must be record time. Can you imagine how different things would be without TBP and PU?

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Xororos (14) 04-23-09  01:16am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

The new site has launched

After missing three public deadlines for launching the new version of Rookie Babe, the site is finally public. It has received something of a facelift (although it looked decent to begin with). Sets are now available to download as zip files and the photo resolution is MUCH higher (between 3000 and 5000px). Finally! The video quality is much higher as well and available for download in a variety of formats including .mp4, .wmv, and whatever the iPod format is.

Now the bad news. This is probably due to the site just now being launched, but it's so slow. If you're downloading something, you cannot load another page. Simultaneous downloads are not an option right now. Hopefully that's just because the server is swamped.

The real bad news is the amount of content is drastically reduced. I suppose they will re-upload old content as they prepare it. However, after stringing along subscribers for over a month, you'd think they would at least build on what they already had rather than taking ten steps backwards.

I like Rookie Babe's content a lot, but this whole website transition has given me a pretty negative impression. I don't think they were completely honest with subscribers and posted unrealistic launch dates. Now that the new site is here, I'm happy, but where is the old stuff? If you're not a subscriber now, I say, wait for a while.

Stay tuned for a full review once the site starts functioning properly and allows me to navigate *while* downloading a file!

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Xororos (14) 03-22-09  10:14pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

Another update on videos

RookieBabe advertises downloadable videos on their site. This applies to a small number of 'new' videos (those less than a year old), and is not applied retroactively to previous videos. The vast majority of the videos are not downloadable. The quality of the downloadable videos is not great and they're only available in .wmv format with no choice of resolution.

I joined the site over a year ago and when I re-joined this month, I was disappointed to find that the site hasn't really expanded much at all. The site is getting a major overhaul in the near future, but this new version release date has been pushed back a few times. I'll believe it when I see it.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

ILIKEVIDZ (0) 10-21-07  11:07am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Update on downloads

So I did the trial and found that only a few of the most recent models have downloadable videos ( 4 girls, 16 movies). Still worth the trial cost for the photos, however, no zip download options make it painfully slow to save photos.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

ILIKEVIDZ (0) 10-20-07  02:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Download videos

The home page says you can now download wmv files of the videos. I am going to the trial to check it out and will update if it is not true.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Rookie Babe

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Rookie Babe (1) 70.0 N/A

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.