Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Ron Harris

Visit Site
Ron Harris Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. Soft Content

Virtual Site Holdings Ltd
4 Sites Listed
Partner: Ron Harris Cash

Monthly: $34.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $39.99 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $45.99 (3 months, recurring)
Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.


View all Ron Harris Site Facts at TBP.

81.0
Feedback History  (14)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 4
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

87.0
TBP Review

Date: 08-26-09

Type: 2.0

Duke
+  Exclusive Professional Glamour Photography/Videos.
+  Sexy Models, Orgasm/Teasing/Backstage Shoots.
-  Video Shoots are Broken into Parts, No Full-Shoot Files.
-  Older Pics & Vids have Slightly Lower Specs.

User Reviews (8)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
73
Jeffrey99 (27) 11-06-08  06:25am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: +High quality photos.
+Good quality vidoes with closeups of girls during orgasm.
Cons: -Pricey $$$ for a month to month. Gets better if you pay for 2 months at once.
-Blair Witch porn. Dude has problems keeping camera still.
-Can't seem to decide if he wants to focus on her face or pussy. So in turn you get the top of her mouth in the upper left corner and the top of her pussy in the bottom right. So in turn your pretty much looking at her belly.
-One of those great camerman who won't shut the F up.
-Not updated enough and he seems to have gotten stuck on shooting 3-4 certain models
Bottom Line: My biggest poroblem with Ron Harris Studio is his video work. He seems to not be able to decide what he wants to focus on. So in turn you end up focusing on her belly most of the time. He also has a really hard time keeping camera still. Not sure if he's trying to jack it while taping them or what but it makes Blair Witch or Cloverfield look they were taped on a tripod. On top of that, he doesn't know when to shut up.

It seems from looking at the updates that he's starting focusing on a certin 3-4 models. And even with that, there just aren't enough updates.

Overall every once in a while I'd come across a video that he'd be less jerky and keep it focused down below for the big O. But that seemed to be few and far between.

EDIT:As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.

While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Active
89
exotics4me (365) 08-04-08  08:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - No longer has the $19.95 option, but if you join for two months, you get both months for $40, and you do get the Harris Archives also, so you may need two months!
- Picture resolution is very good, 2000 at the very least and nearly every set except the very earliest. You also get zip files.
- Videos are as high as 1280 high end, some of the older ones are lower quality though.
- Download speeds are coming in about average
- Navigation is good enough once you figure it out
- Models are either A class or AA class, very few average or plain girls on this site, all are knockouts.
Cons: - Site can be a bit artsy at times, which I am sure Mr. Harris considers himself an artist, so I guess I can look over that. By artsy, I also mean very softcore at times.
- Price for one month membership is too much, get this, $34.95 for one month, $39.95 for two months.
- Probably could blend the archives in and make it one huge site, and save the trouble of having to go to a different site to see the archives.
- This is pretty much a preference con for me, may be a strength for you, a lot of the pictures are dark, shadowy, I think that is a word. That may be the artsy side again.
Bottom Line: I wasn't going to join the site after seeing the new price that no longer includes the TBP discount. After thinking about it and realizing that I would also get the archives and could join for 2 months for $40, I went ahead and took the plunge.

I had been a member here before, I think it was one of the first sites I ever joined. Mainly because of my knowledge of Playboy and the Ron Harris name. Fans of Playboy will like this site, lots of artsy sets that show the beauty of a woman, more so than playing the carnal desires of us men.

Don't take that wrong, there is some beyond softcore here. My best way to describe the site compared to a more known site is FTV. And of course, that is a good thing, FTV is a great site too. There are girl/girl sets and the sets Ron calls, "Real Orgasm". Which goes into a similar situation as FTV with the girl's wetness, being visible as it drips out of her.

Very erotic in that sense and I am guessing that is what Ron is going for. The models are some of the best looking and best known in the business. He seems to really like blondes. As he has his exclusive model Kara, who is a very pretty blonde, and he also has a good amount of Sandy Summers, a beuatiful blonde from Brazil. He isn't sticking to just blondes though. He has a lot of new content of one of the most popular newer models in porn, Meggan Malone. Andi Valentino is also here, a lot of these girls are in that newer group, so it shows that he is keeping up to date with the newer models and not afraid to hire new talent to keep his site fresh.

The newer videos are available in HD, and the pictures are at the very least, 2000 high end, complete with zips. Overall, I really like this site, plus you get his archives, I just think you have to do the 2 month to get the real value, since $5 more for another month, on nearly any site is worth it.

Looking for a new site and got $40 to spend, give it a try, also check out model Jenna, who is my favorite on the site. Really cute brunette. Recommended and for two months to get the discount. I also will review the archives as a separate site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
74*
parahelion (3) 05-30-08  02:27pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Absolutely gorgeous women with high quality videos and photos
Cons: Worst part: the camera man doesn't stop talking through most videos, and his voice is very creepy. That alone drives me to cancel from this site. Also, the site navigation is a bit screwy, and the site has a lot of photos and videos of only a few women. There aren't enough choices of women to view.
Bottom Line: Ron Harris has taken a few beautiful women, concentrated all efforts on them, and produced videos that seem slightly more for personal use than for the public. It's not bad, but not worth my time and money for what I'm looking for.
If you really seek high quality awesome solo vids and pics, try FTV or AlisonAngel.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
83
PosterDude (14) 12-03-07  06:20am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
72
qualsite34 (29) 06-28-07  06:04am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (2)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85
nygiants03 (160) 06-27-07  01:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
65
Douggie (8) 03-01-07  08:40pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
78*
mikeyslooking (0) 03-01-07  07:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

TheRizzo (23) 03-01-09  10:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)

Video quality?

I saw this site is discounted on paysite discounts but wanted to see what current/recent members thought of the video quality before I try it out. I see people complaining of him talking a lot. Is it still that way, and overshadow the girls?

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

CactusJack2 (0) 02-26-09  11:18pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Ron needs to shut his piehole

I feel like I just got swindled out of $40. I really regret not finding these reviews sooner and not paying attention to my gut before hitting the join button. The whole time I'm previewing the site I'm thinking to myself why are there soooo many free video downloads on the teaser page? And why is the first month so expensive while the three and six month memberships are so massively discounted? And why aren't there any previews of a real photo set? The answer is deception.

Each photo set only has about a dozen pix or less, and most of them are with the girl in the same exact position. Plus the "life-size" pix are blurry, granulated and obviously Photochopped. Ron says on his site that the quality of his photography equipment isn't a priority...and it shows.

The site navigation just sucks, there's no other way to explain it. The video quality itself is pretty good, I'll have to give him that one, BUT HE NEVER SHUTS UP. He says on his site that he thinks the girls are insecure and need to be talked at constantly in order to feel safe enough to takeoff their clothes. Seriously. But even without his constant diarrhea-of-the-mouth, to me the bottom line is poor camera work, with an unsteady hand and a cockeyed point of view, plus they're just flat out repetitious and boring. Each girl uses this toothbrush vibrator thing while Ron rambles on and on trying to initiate these totally INANE conversations, plus his hyena laugh just grates on your nerves. Not good

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Ron Harris Activity - Ron Harris Reviews - Ron Harris Comments - Ron Harris News

Visit Ron Harris

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Harris Archives (1) 83.0 73.0
2. Ron Harris (2) 81.0 87.0
3. Kara Duhe (0) N/A 82.0
4. Aerobicise (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : Virtual Site Holdings Ltd Activity

View All: Company Sites (4)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.