+ Fun Reality/Video Hardcore, Hot Girls & Nice Mix of Site Themes.
+ Huge Archive Going Back Over a Decade, Constant Updates.
- Site Content Quantity & Updates Vary, Some Non-Updating Sites.
- Download Limit & Lower Formats/Options on Older Content.
User Reviews (47)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
RK supports Roku. This is a big plus for Roku users.
Thousands of high quality scenes and movies.
No hang-ups or lockups downloading scenes to Roku.
Weekly updates to most content.
Exclusive content can't find elsewhere.
Many channels and interests served.
Average price/month, not too expensive.
Can rate movies/scenes. I like this feature.
Ads bombard you when you first sign on. A serious pain. You will have to navigate through these before getting to main site. They try to up sell their other websites. Too easy to accidentally join something you don't want.
I wish there were more frequent updates.
I would like a category for vampire films.
Lots of content only available on web. To get to Roku, needed to add to favorites to see.
Some scenes shown, only available if you subscribe to that other channel RK offers, like Girlfriends Revenge.
With all the competition out there, RK needs to focus more on providing a better customer experience. Their ads and cross selling distract and confuse customers looking for their content. The ads are really distracting.
Updates once a week are nice, but offering them daily would be preferred. Their competition offers more frequent updates.
Still, if you don't mind the ads, you can't go wrong with RK. The site offers exclusive content, lots of young stars and has been a top performer over the years. The high quality videos are the icing on this cake. I would recommend them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
This is my second or third time on Reality Kings, and it has some great content featuring women with great curves and very hot sex.
Unfortunately there is now a very low download limit of 10 GB per day. The HD movies are about 3 GB in size or more and so you can expect to download around 3 or 4 movies before being locked out. There are lower resolution movies available but the resolution is very low, around 300 to 400 MB. There are no file sizes in-between very low and very high.
Reality Kings has good content but the limited download guidelines and huge file sizes make the site impossible to utilize. Without a substantial increase in their download limit , and the availability of an assortment of file sizes that are more in keeping with current storage standards, resolution and download limits, I cannot recommend this site- unless you are just doing streaming.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Great models. These guys find some really hot girls and get them on camera.
Variety: They have a lot of different sites with a wide array of tastes.
Picture Quality: All of the newer scenes are in HD and the quality is really good.
Exclusive Content: All of the work is produced for the website only.
I thought the site was overall great, but not for me for the following reasons:
I know it says reality in the title, but their take on it really turned me off. I had myself fast forwarding to the part where the guys were no longer in the picture and/or talking. I have never been a fan of having the girl and the camera man/woman talking to each other. Overall not enough fantasy for my tastes.
Great site if you like younger girls and Latinas. They have some really hot looking girls. Not so great if you like MILFs, curvy, big boobs, or big ass girls. You won't be seeing much of that here (they do have some). Their MILF sites don't update that much. I'd say go with Brazzers for the MILFs, Big Tits and Ass. That said, both sites use similar models. Reality Kings model niche is, as pointed by others, Eastern European, Brazilian and South America. They get some really hot looking girls, but most of them on the young end. If you can't deal with the talkative camera people and off-screen interactions between the actors then don't join...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
+Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising.
-The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site.
**This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.
*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.
*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.
*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.
**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Fantastic choise of models. Natural goodlooking young girls. Most of them do their best scenes at Reality Kings.
Super chrystal clear 1080p videos.
Real hard explicit porn.
Good download speed.
Pictures could improve a lot. They have good photo sets but do not release them in highest available resolution. Some of the competition is much better in this department.
Download limit although it was very high for me. Almost downloaded 65gb the first day before I was turned off and at the time I was very tired so it was good for me to have a break.
Maybe a choise of 720p resolution would be nice. Smaller files but with my eyes they look very alike. No big difference.
I have subscribed to RK maybe four times before and everytime they have improved in quality. In my opinion they offers the best package of porn in the market at the moment the autumn of 2012. But the photos sets could improve a lot. The good pics are there but not as sharp as they were meant to be. I have a lot of porn scenes in my computer from a lot of providers. If I was to make a top ten list out of them maybe half of them should come from Reality Kings.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
-Gorgeous Amateur Girls you dont really see anywhere else.
-Nice array of niches to cater to different tastes.
-Nice selection of download options (HD, standard, MP4)
-Consistent daily updates
-High quality videos (HD nice...standard looks good too on newer videos)
-Most of the male stars they hire are decent (except JMac IMO, but thats a personal preference)
-Good pictures and screencaps of every scene
-Multiple Membership options
-Good prices, especially for a year membership
-Alot of older videos remastered for better quality.
-Lacks "star power" (big name pornstars), which hurts it in some peoples eyes.
-Cameramen on some sites (mainly MilfHunter) are extremely annoying...STFU douchebag!!
-They remastered a bunch of older videos, but neglected to remaster alot of the more popular older videos, which I assume is to make people go get their DVDs if they want those in better quality.
-No update schedule IN TERMS OF WHO SPECIFICALLY will be on the sites. They have an update schedule for when each site is updated, but you never know who is coming up.
-No way to really interact with staff like NA and Brazzers has.
-They ruined a few sites IMO...InTheVIP, FirstTimeAuditions and to an extent, MILFHunter, because they changed the format of them without notice.
-Daily Download Limits- I THINK its like 5 GBs a day, which aint bad, but with the size of HD videos, Im sure it can annoy some people trying to catch up on some downloading.
There isnt really a whole lot bad to say about RK. I know alot of people dont like them, but the reason Ive always liked this site is because they are good with updating the site regularly and they provide alot of really hot girls that you dont see elsewhere. RK shoots in Florida while most other companies shoot in Cali. Now, that does mean that RK doesnt get as many big time names, but I am fine with that because other sites offer that.
RK IMO has alot to offer if you can look past the lack of star power. There are 5 girls in particular on that site that I never seen anywhere else that were fucking amazing.
And while I dont love all of their updates and sites, I do enjoy most of them. They provide a wide array of different tastes. I am a fan of black girls and RoundandBrown is one of the very few, original, black girl sites that is updated consistently. Go find me black girls on NA and Brazzers....few and far between. RK offers, that, latinas, Euros, Brazillians, MILFs, teens, lez and others. None of the other sites offer ALL of that.
In the end, it will come down to what YOU like which will determine how much you enjoy RK. Its not perfect, but its easily one of the better network sites out there and neck and neck with NA and Brazzers IMO.
I highly recommend it to anyone who has a wide array of tastes and isnt too hung up on seeing big named stars all the time..
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-Very good streaming media player (time-coded screen shots, jump-to links)
-Huge library of 6K+ videos
-Lots of variety in content
-Huge HD file sizes, and not enough download options (1080p mp4, SD mp4, SD wmv, mobile) for even newer videos
-Confusing site navigation
-Bad actor tagging/actor pages
-Small photo sizes (600px by 900px)
-Page and site layout seems dated
The first thing that I noticed when I joined the site was the breadth of videos that they had. Not just the amount (the over 6000 basically exclusive videos is a large number and impressive in and of itself), but the variety of the selection as well. If you like European women, there's two sites dedicated to that. Black or Latina women? Each get their own site. Teens get two sites. MILFs get a couple as well. Big asses? There's a site for that. Lesbian sex? That too. Basically, as long as your taste runs somewhere along the general line that is mainstream porn, there's gonna be something here for you, and not just a small amount of it either.
Which brings me to my first negative point: Finding that content is not as easy as it should be. When I first join a site, the first thing I do is look for videos of actresses that I know I already like. When you do that here, there's no guarantee that all you'll actually find all the scenes that feature that actress. The first problem is that, for two of the sub-sites in particular, the tags are inconsistent and occasionally incomplete. One of the sites' (In the VIP) issue is that they basically tag every girl in the scene, even if they aren't the girls having intercourse in that scene. The other (Money Talks) only tags the last girl in the scene, even though there is usually more than one part of the scene that contains sex, so you have to hope that someone in the comments below the scene can identify the other girls so you can find them. Even beyond that issue, when you try going to the individual actor pages, it will only show you the most recent 9 scenes. There's a link on the bottom of the actor page if they have more than 9 scenes to help you find the rest, but my first couple times that happened I kinda glanced over that link and didn't realize it was there. It just all seemed a little confusing, and there has to be a way they can make it easier.
That confusion also extends to the general layout of the site. The whole thing looks like it was developed around 2007-2008 and hasn't been updated since, which is ages in internet time. This seems most evident on the page for each scene, which are tab based and reload each time you click on one of the tabs. This would make sense in the past, when not everyone had high-speed internet and you just wanted to get the entire page loaded as fast as possible, but nowadays everything should should all be loaded on one page, and I shouldn't, for example, have to leave the streaming video page just to go back to the preview page to look for other scenes featuring the same actress. Another small issue I have is with the way the top layout bar works. When you click the part that says home from watching a scene, it only takes you back to the home page of the sub-site that that scene is from, not back to the main homepage, which you get to by clicking the logo instead. Clicking the favorites tab works the same way. This was something else that I didn't notice at first and took me a while to figure out, when it really didn't need to.
Once you find a scene you want to watch, there are many ways to enjoy it. The best way is the site's Flash video player, which is pretty much the best I've seen on any website. At the bottom of the video is a scrolling group of thumbnails, and clicking any of these takes you to the specific point in the video that that thumbnails is from. Right above that are links that take you to specific sex acts in the scene (blowjob, cunnilingus, etc). Both of these make it incredibly easy and fast to get to exactly the part that you want to see. The download options are relatively standard, but the 1080p sizes are huge (2-4 GB per scene), and the next option down is only slightly better than SD. They would benefit greatly from having a 720p option like many other sites do, that would be a nice balance between size and video quality. There's also a picture gallery, but the pictures are pretty small (900x600), and many times the whole set seems more like screenshots than actual photographs.
Even though this was my first time joining the site, Reality Kings content is some of the earliest internet porn that I ever watched, as I first obtained a high speed connection in 2001 and proceeded to download nearly everything I could get my hands on. A lot has changed about porn and the internet and internet porn in the past decade, and a lot of companies have come and gone, but they have stuck around and blossomed. After having joined, while I think the content is still generally top class, the website itself is falling behind the times a bit, and in need of an update.
Also, while there has been talk in other reviews and comments of a download limit, I downloaded about 16GB worth of video over the course of about 2-3 hours and was never cut off from browsing or downloading.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
-- Large Amount Of Content, both in quantity and variety. Enough to satisfy many interests.
-- High Quality Videos.
-- Sexy models. Model-types range from bra busters to thin and petite.
-- Good number of sub-sites with decent content(mostly)
-- Streaming and Downloading can be hit or miss.
-- No High-Resolution Photos.
-- Repetitive photos in sequences.
-- Downloading Limit of 10 G daily.
A little background to put things in perspective:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
With that being said, I have found the site to be somewhat lacking for my preferences, not in content or quality of the presentations, but in the medium available.
If you are looking for sexy models and high quality videos you will not be dissapointed. If you have a bias for high-resolution photography, you are likely to find the site lacking a bit in terms of photographic standards. However, given that I do view many of the images on an Ipad at times, this hasn't been a show-stopper. When viewed on a high-resolution flatpanel monitor, the images are lacking, simply due to the smaller formats and low pixel counts.
The videos themselves are of high-quality and the camera work is fairly decent. Many of the scenes start with the model fully clothed and do not jump right into the action.
Navigating the site is very simple and straightforward. It is designed quite well and is not lacking here, IMO. Jumping from one site to the other is seamless. Getting to the downloads is also seamless and straightforward. Everything is a click away.
As far as DL and Streaming speeds, this is where I give the lowest marks. At times, it was difficult to even stream videos at standard quanity. Most of the time, I was getting nowhere near the claimed DL speed and bit-ratre transfer when I did attempt to download videos at standard resolutions. The times I did try a HD download, I would often timeout and have to restart. On weekends, the problem was particularly noticeable. Slow connections are quite understandable at this time of the week. However, the server seemed to slow to a crawl and would often become asburdly slow.
To sum up, if variety, quality content, and video presentations are your primary interests, it's a safe bet that you probably will not be dissapointed. If transfer rates and streaming connectivity are of paramount importance, I would take this into consideration.
Cancelation: Just a note on this as I know this is one of my concerns when I sign up over the net. When I read reviews, I sometimes hear of extra charges taking place after an order has been canceled. I experienced no issues and giving notice of intent to cancel was no issue and took place as requested.
Grades: (obviously subjective calls, so take that into consideration as well.)
Presentation and Site Navigation: A
Overall Quality of Content: B+
Subject Matter Variety: A +
Content Variety for Varied Interests: A
Standard Video Quality: B
HD Video Quality: A
Scene Content and Videography: B+
Photo Gallery Compositions and Content: C+
Photo Resolution and Image Quality: C-
The Models Themselves: A
The Action: B
DL Speed and Streaming: D-
My favorite sub-sites within the URL--relative to my interests and not quality:
Least Favorite: Pure 18 and Cum Fiesta. (Models too thin and young-looking for my tastes)
Other things to note: There is a download limit of 10 GIG daily. This was of no concern to me as I stream videos mostly and did not download much in the way of videos. If you are a massive user of downloadable HD video content, this very well might be soemething to consider. If you aren't downloading HD more than twice a day, it shouldn't be a problem. In fairness to these guys, you would have to be downloading a lot of content every day to hit the max.
Suggestions for improvement:
-- Address concerns with streaming connectvity and download speeds. Slower speeds are to be expected on weekends but not weekdays.
-- Add high-resolution image galleries. The days of CRT monitors have long since passed. 800 pixel-width images images no longer cut it in the day of 2800x1900 high-resolution monitors.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-Some attractive ladies
-Excellent download speeds
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Good price through TBP
-Decent navigation, scene scores, search (although can be glitchy), model index, user comments
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent photo quality
-Several updates a week, 10-12 on average it seems
-Download limit, enforced regularly for me although others have reported otherwise (10 Gb)
-Video quality is okay on mid-sized videos, didn't download any HD videos due to limit
-No sizes given on videos
-Many of the sites are dead or infrequently updated
-Content can get repetitive
-A subjective opinion, but girls are too "porn" for me, lots of tats, large breasts
-Seem obsessed with ass, I like an ass and all, but move on after a while
-Camerawork is mediocre to downright annoying
-Male talent can get grating
-Lack of variety, even though it is a network serving several niches, all of the content has the same feel
-Too many ads, all over the damn place
This site used to be one of my favorites years ago, and everytime I join I am less and less impressed with it. I read my review from before and am surprised I scored it so high, perhaps I was just in a good mood. Regardless, I don't think I will be giving them another chance.
The site does some stuff well, navigation is pretty good, download speeds were excellent (I maxed my connection at 1.4 MB/s). Their is some good material, and I enjoy the concept of some sites.
I am just unsure as to why some of these sites even exist - if it has less than 10 updates and hasn't had a new one in years can't you just merge the content somewhere? It just seems like an advertising gimmick.
There is still some good material, particularly the older stuff. But, it seems as though they have become far to focussed on the glam porn star look, even in their euro sites (Mike's Apartment and Sex Parties). For a supposed "reality/amateur" site, it just doesn't seem to fit anymore. For those that are fans of the typical late 90's-style porn star, this site might still be for you, but it is no longer for me. I grant you that this opinion is subjective, but they have definitely moved away from what I liked about the site. Also, it seems as though they get more and more focussed on asses over time. I like to see the entire woman, not 2 minutes of ass shots.
On top of these somewhat subjective complaints, they have a relatively firm limit of 10GB now, although I never came within 500 MB of that limit I was cut off frequently. I don't really consider myself a heavy downloader by any means, I tend to go through the screencaps to see if it is a scene I actually want. If you are going to impose a download limit, you should take note of your file sizes, and let users know - a 10GB limit with files in excess of 1GB is just irritating.
Overall, I think this site still has some decent older material, maybe worth joining once to get it. If you are into their older material, and unless you are totally obsessed with ass (not necessarily anal sex, just ass) I don't think you will be pleased with the direction of the site and I would recommend looking elsewhere, there are plenty of decent networks out there, although you may have to pay more.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- 39 Sites on the network
- Some interesting niches
- Streaming available
- Downloads in at least two formats and three sizes
- Pics and screencaps available
- Most sites update regularly
- Several sites update irregularly
- Daily download limit (10GB +/- per day)
- Download limit appears to be applied unevenly to members
- ĎCookie-cutterí porn
- Download manager (Free Download Manager) wasnít supported
RK bills itself as ďthe Worldís Best Adult NetworkĒ but by subjective and objective measures I donít agree with that. Itís not a bad network, but it isnít the worldís best.
The network is made up of 39 themed sites. The usual porn themes are here, like big breasts, MILFs, and 18-year-old ladies, but there are also some fairly unique sites too. There are three sites that cater to scenes with multiple models in party settings (VIP Crew, In the VIP and Bikini Crashers). These are among my favourites but I can understand why others may not be interested in them.
The sites vary in size, with the more mainstream sites having lots of material (some have over 500 scenes) and some of the niche sites have only a handful of scenes. Each site opens into a separate page that list the scenes with a large thumbnail for each. On the left of that page is a column of filters for sub-themes. The scenes usually have a unique name and the main star is also listed. Opening the page for each scene brings more details and tags. You can access screencaps and pictures (which I didnít download so I canít comment on them) and you can access the video in any of several ways. Streaming is available, as are downloads. Downloads are offered in a few different ways, usually as a WMV and MP4. MP4 is available in larger sizes and smaller sizes for handheld devices. For some reason, even the newer scenes are frequently broken down into shorter clips for easier download, though the full scene is also available.
HD video is available on some scenes, though I didnít download any because of the daily limit.
RK has been around for a long time so the quality of their videos has obviously changed. Older videos are low quality, but I canít fault the site for that because that was the standard back when they were shot. Most of the older scenes are only available in three or four clips, which also made sense back when they were uploaded. It would be nice if the site took the time to stitch them together into one full file now that most people have high-speed internet connections. The newer scenes (in WMV) still arenít great quality: 640x480 @ 1600kb/s and 768x432 @ 1600 are common. Subjectively they arenít bad, but they arenít great either.
Objectively, the site is decent, but not any better than many other networks. RK isnít any better (or any worse) than places like Mofos and Porn Pros. In terms of quality they certainly canít be compared to sites like ALS Scan and Diesel Access.
Subjectively the network isnít all that impressive. Iíll admit that a lot of that is personal taste because Iím not into large breasts and huge asses. Those attributes are better represented than most others. There are sites that cater to my tastes in smaller models between 18 and 22, and I will admit I like the number of relatively unknown models who appear here.
One serious and unforgivable sin, and I realize that this is entirely subjective, is that one scene was mis-labeled. No big deal normally, but I joined the network specifically to see one scene: a Tanner Mayes scene that was categorized as anal. It might be called Ďanalí because she has an anus, but no real anal sex occurs in the scene. I will admit that the guy does insert the head of his dick a couple of times, but that doesnít count as anal sex.
Easily the biggest annoyance with RK is their daily download limit. While the limit itself would be annoying enough, they actually make it worse but applying it randomly. The limit is described in the membership contract using vague language so I emailed the support staff to ask for some clarification but never received a reply. Why bother having a Ďcontact usí button if youíre not actually going to respond to memberís questions? On several days I was cut off from downloading at less than the 10GB 24-hour limit. On other days I downloaded well in excess of the limit. There are PU members who report never having had a limit imposed on them. A site can certainly impose whatever conditions they want, but those conditions should be clear and applied equally to all members. And in 2011 10GB limit is absurdly low.
Another annoying choice that RK made is to not support download managers. I use Free Download Manager to queue up scenes that I want to download so I donít have to sit at the computer for an hour or more, but FDM wouldnít work with this site. I canít say how it works with other managers, but if they bar one Iíd guess they bar them all.
Iíd recommend this site for someone who really wants a particular scene or is really into a specific niche that is represented here. ButÖ anyone who does join should be aware that they MAY have a download limit imposed on them and that download managers donít work. So unless you have a real desire to see a certain scene or model here, RK has nothing special to offer.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
It has been over 3 months now and RK still has no resolution for the access problem for Windows 8 users. They have stopped replying to my email support requests. I also submitted a request for TBP to check into the problem as well. No replies. RK was one of my fav sights. Sad that they seem to have turned a deaf ear to good customers.
RealityKings used to be my favorite site. Loads of content, all the hottest girls, consistently good production. However, it is now so bad, I am compelled to share my thoughts and see if others agree.
First, I had to come here because they censor and delete any negative comment you leave on any scene. Seriously, who does that? I often leave a comment that says, "please devote more time to producing better porn, then you wouldnt have to spend so much time deleting negative comments." Of course, they delete it.
The worst issue is the male talent. The site has often had a few go-to studs, Billy Glide, Voodoo, Manuel Ferrara, Ramon Nomar and now JMac. Unfortunately, the other male talent is so bad, the scenes are almost unwatchable. Guys with small, limp dicks....most of whom I cant list here cause I never heard of them and I dont feel like going to the site to get their names(their names dont matter cause you've probably never heard of them either). The women are consistently great, all the top names and all the new talent all come to RK, that is a positive and a great thing. However, when you pair them with some loser who can barely get it up and is ugly as hell......the result is not worth your monthly subscription, especially when there are so many alternatives.
Someone else commented about lack of customer support and responsiveness. I got great support recently on a technical issue, however, issues of content are ignored. For example, last yr, RK started a new site, "Moms Bang Teens." Its the bomb, site is awesome, Milf-Teen 3somes...all the hottest porn stars, great sex....easily the highest rated scenes on the site. Unfortunately, the updates started bi-weekly. After every new update, customers plead for weekly updates. So how do the producers at RK respond to their customers request for more updates? By giving us fewer updates. Now its at least 3 weeks, this month 4 weeks.
Call me crazy, but doesnt that seem a little like them saying "fuck you" to your customers? I really dont enjoy when people take my money and then say, "fuck you." Just to make sure I am being accurate, I checked....the last update for Moms Bang Teens was April 1st....amazing scene with Ava Adams and Dillion Harper, all the comments were positive and asking for weekly updates. Their response? Next update is April 29th.
So, in summary, RK used to be a great site with beautiful women and top male talent. Now? Second rate male talent, unresponsive producers who ignore customers requests, censor feedback and produce boring unimaginative, formulaic porn. All that can be yours for the discount price of $17.95/month. Hurry, hurry.....bad deals like that wont last long!!!!
As noted by others the HD downloads are too big but the others are too small. The HD movies are the right size(ca 800-1200) but the FlashAndVideo Firefox addon can't capture them anymore. (It did in the past.) Anyone have any suggestions?
Iv'e been a member of this site for a couple of weeks and I really enjoyed the content. Recently I had to get another computer because the old one died and come to find out the site doesn't support any computer that uses the new windows operating system. I contacted customer support and still haven't come up with a solution. Its not my computer because i can access any other site in the Manwin network. the company which owns reality kings ,Brazzers and Mofos. You would figure a multi-million dollar would try to address an issue that many of their members are dealing with. If you use Windows 8 please don't subscribe to this site you will regrete it
I have been a long time customer of Reality Kings and have enjoyed using the site until I recently purchased a Windows 8 computer. My member logon stopped working and their customer service center stated there was a current issue with Windows 8 users. No expected time of resolution was given so they gave me another site in their group. No refund was given. Windows 8 users should be aware of this problem.
Can you actually see if you are safe downloading and how much? From what I've read, it appears as if the limiter functions almost as a punishment for downloading too much so that you are better not going over it or you get locked out for longer period?
Very confusing and not encouraging. Still the site appears excellent stuff.
The DL limit seems to give me some kind of accrued limit. If I don't download anything for 3-4 days, I can go way over the limit of 10 GB per day. If I hit the limit everyday, it's giving me between 9-10 GB per day before shutting me out.
Still, I wanted to share the overall amount I downloaded in a month. I do not download the HD versions. I download the 720x480 videos and most picture sets. For the last month, I have downloaded 382 video scenes, 298 photo sets and hit the limit 5 times in one week. The total amount of filesize this equaled is 242 GB. I was going to do a re-review since it's one of my highest rated sites, but I can't see taking that much off my score since I just downloaded enough scenes to last me for one per day, for more than a year.
My score would lower just a little based on principle, maybe 3 points, but I wouldn't be able to justify it enough to write an entire new review for it, outside of saying, "Taking 3 points off for the DL Limit".
I am currently a subscriber to Reality Kings and I am having an issue with my account and my Roku Box and no customer support. Anyone considering subscribing to this site and plan on using the Roku Box app I would read below.
When accessing Reality Kings via a Roku Box you are prompted to input your login information which is fine. The problem is the login only allows for so many numbers and letters to be input and my login name I was given is one number too long so I cannot access the site via Roku which is why I subscribed to the site.
It has been a week an a half now and 3 emails later with no customer support at all to help fix this problem with the login.I am extremely disappointed and will cancel for sure. Which is a shame because most of the content is good.
I though I would write this just incase anyone else is considering this site for Roku use. There is a chance you may get a login name that is too long for the Roku App and you could be out of luck with no support.
I have been a member for over one year. Lately, Reality Kings is overusing a certain hired dick (Jmac). He may be experienced but 3 to 5 updates per week featuring him is a bit much. I joined the site for variety. I may not renew. If I had wanted a single stud site I would have made a different choice. Jmac may be good (he can get it up and get it off) but he is no Peter North or Rocco.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.