| User Reviews (42) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous Amateur Girls you dont really see anywhere else.
-Nice array of niches to cater to different tastes.
-Nice selection of download options (HD, standard, MP4)
-Consistent daily updates
-High quality videos (HD nice...standard looks good too on newer videos)
-Most of the male stars they hire are decent (except JMac IMO, but thats a personal preference)
-Good pictures and screencaps of every scene
-Multiple Membership options
-Good prices, especially for a year membership
-Alot of older videos remastered for better quality. |
| Cons: |
-Lacks "star power" (big name pornstars), which hurts it in some peoples eyes.
-Cameramen on some sites (mainly MilfHunter) are extremely annoying...STFU douchebag!!
-They remastered a bunch of older videos, but neglected to remaster alot of the more popular older videos, which I assume is to make people go get their DVDs if they want those in better quality.
-No update schedule IN TERMS OF WHO SPECIFICALLY will be on the sites. They have an update schedule for when each site is updated, but you never know who is coming up.
-No way to really interact with staff like NA and Brazzers has.
-They ruined a few sites IMO...InTheVIP, FirstTimeAuditions and to an extent, MILFHunter, because they changed the format of them without notice.
-Daily Download Limits- I THINK its like 5 GBs a day, which aint bad, but with the size of HD videos, Im sure it can annoy some people trying to catch up on some downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
There isnt really a whole lot bad to say about RK. I know alot of people dont like them, but the reason Ive always liked this site is because they are good with updating the site regularly and they provide alot of really hot girls that you dont see elsewhere. RK shoots in Florida while most other companies shoot in Cali. Now, that does mean that RK doesnt get as many big time names, but I am fine with that because other sites offer that.
RK IMO has alot to offer if you can look past the lack of star power. There are 5 girls in particular on that site that I never seen anywhere else that were fucking amazing.
And while I dont love all of their updates and sites, I do enjoy most of them. They provide a wide array of different tastes. I am a fan of black girls and RoundandBrown is one of the very few, original, black girl sites that is updated consistently. Go find me black girls on NA and Brazzers....few and far between. RK offers, that, latinas, Euros, Brazillians, MILFs, teens, lez and others. None of the other sites offer ALL of that.
In the end, it will come down to what YOU like which will determine how much you enjoy RK. Its not perfect, but its easily one of the better network sites out there and neck and neck with NA and Brazzers IMO.
I highly recommend it to anyone who has a wide array of tastes and isnt too hung up on seeing big named stars all the time.. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very good streaming media player (time-coded screen shots, jump-to links)
-Huge library of 6K+ videos
-Lots of variety in content |
| Cons: |
-Huge HD file sizes, and not enough download options (1080p mp4, SD mp4, SD wmv, mobile) for even newer videos
-Confusing site navigation
-Bad actor tagging/actor pages
-Small photo sizes (600px by 900px)
-Page and site layout seems dated |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing that I noticed when I joined the site was the breadth of videos that they had. Not just the amount (the over 6000 basically exclusive videos is a large number and impressive in and of itself), but the variety of the selection as well. If you like European women, there's two sites dedicated to that. Black or Latina women? Each get their own site. Teens get two sites. MILFs get a couple as well. Big asses? There's a site for that. Lesbian sex? That too. Basically, as long as your taste runs somewhere along the general line that is mainstream porn, there's gonna be something here for you, and not just a small amount of it either.
Which brings me to my first negative point: Finding that content is not as easy as it should be. When I first join a site, the first thing I do is look for videos of actresses that I know I already like. When you do that here, there's no guarantee that all you'll actually find all the scenes that feature that actress. The first problem is that, for two of the sub-sites in particular, the tags are inconsistent and occasionally incomplete. One of the sites' (In the VIP) issue is that they basically tag every girl in the scene, even if they aren't the girls having intercourse in that scene. The other (Money Talks) only tags the last girl in the scene, even though there is usually more than one part of the scene that contains sex, so you have to hope that someone in the comments below the scene can identify the other girls so you can find them. Even beyond that issue, when you try going to the individual actor pages, it will only show you the most recent 9 scenes. There's a link on the bottom of the actor page if they have more than 9 scenes to help you find the rest, but my first couple times that happened I kinda glanced over that link and didn't realize it was there. It just all seemed a little confusing, and there has to be a way they can make it easier.
That confusion also extends to the general layout of the site. The whole thing looks like it was developed around 2007-2008 and hasn't been updated since, which is ages in internet time. This seems most evident on the page for each scene, which are tab based and reload each time you click on one of the tabs. This would make sense in the past, when not everyone had high-speed internet and you just wanted to get the entire page loaded as fast as possible, but nowadays everything should should all be loaded on one page, and I shouldn't, for example, have to leave the streaming video page just to go back to the preview page to look for other scenes featuring the same actress. Another small issue I have is with the way the top layout bar works. When you click the part that says home from watching a scene, it only takes you back to the home page of the sub-site that that scene is from, not back to the main homepage, which you get to by clicking the logo instead. Clicking the favorites tab works the same way. This was something else that I didn't notice at first and took me a while to figure out, when it really didn't need to.
Once you find a scene you want to watch, there are many ways to enjoy it. The best way is the site's Flash video player, which is pretty much the best I've seen on any website. At the bottom of the video is a scrolling group of thumbnails, and clicking any of these takes you to the specific point in the video that that thumbnails is from. Right above that are links that take you to specific sex acts in the scene (blowjob, cunnilingus, etc). Both of these make it incredibly easy and fast to get to exactly the part that you want to see. The download options are relatively standard, but the 1080p sizes are huge (2-4 GB per scene), and the next option down is only slightly better than SD. They would benefit greatly from having a 720p option like many other sites do, that would be a nice balance between size and video quality. There's also a picture gallery, but the pictures are pretty small (900x600), and many times the whole set seems more like screenshots than actual photographs.
Even though this was my first time joining the site, Reality Kings content is some of the earliest internet porn that I ever watched, as I first obtained a high speed connection in 2001 and proceeded to download nearly everything I could get my hands on. A lot has changed about porn and the internet and internet porn in the past decade, and a lot of companies have come and gone, but they have stuck around and blossomed. After having joined, while I think the content is still generally top class, the website itself is falling behind the times a bit, and in need of an update.
Also, while there has been talk in other reviews and comments of a download limit, I downloaded about 16GB worth of video over the course of about 2-3 hours and was never cut off from browsing or downloading. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-- Large Amount Of Content, both in quantity and variety. Enough to satisfy many interests.
-- High Quality Videos.
-- Sexy models. Model-types range from bra busters to thin and petite.
-- Good number of sub-sites with decent content(mostly) |
| Cons: |
-- Streaming and Downloading can be hit or miss.
-- No High-Resolution Photos.
-- Repetitive photos in sequences.
-- Downloading Limit of 10 G daily. |
| Bottom Line: |
A little background to put things in perspective:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
With that being said, I have found the site to be somewhat lacking for my preferences, not in content or quality of the presentations, but in the medium available.
If you are looking for sexy models and high quality videos you will not be dissapointed. If you have a bias for high-resolution photography, you are likely to find the site lacking a bit in terms of photographic standards. However, given that I do view many of the images on an Ipad at times, this hasn't been a show-stopper. When viewed on a high-resolution flatpanel monitor, the images are lacking, simply due to the smaller formats and low pixel counts.
The videos themselves are of high-quality and the camera work is fairly decent. Many of the scenes start with the model fully clothed and do not jump right into the action.
Navigating the site is very simple and straightforward. It is designed quite well and is not lacking here, IMO. Jumping from one site to the other is seamless. Getting to the downloads is also seamless and straightforward. Everything is a click away.
As far as DL and Streaming speeds, this is where I give the lowest marks. At times, it was difficult to even stream videos at standard quanity. Most of the time, I was getting nowhere near the claimed DL speed and bit-ratre transfer when I did attempt to download videos at standard resolutions. The times I did try a HD download, I would often timeout and have to restart. On weekends, the problem was particularly noticeable. Slow connections are quite understandable at this time of the week. However, the server seemed to slow to a crawl and would often become asburdly slow.
To sum up, if variety, quality content, and video presentations are your primary interests, it's a safe bet that you probably will not be dissapointed. If transfer rates and streaming connectivity are of paramount importance, I would take this into consideration.
Cancelation: Just a note on this as I know this is one of my concerns when I sign up over the net. When I read reviews, I sometimes hear of extra charges taking place after an order has been canceled. I experienced no issues and giving notice of intent to cancel was no issue and took place as requested.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades: (obviously subjective calls, so take that into consideration as well.)
Presentation and Site Navigation: A
Overall Quality of Content: B+
Subject Matter Variety: A +
Content Variety for Varied Interests: A
Standard Video Quality: B
HD Video Quality: A
Scene Content and Videography: B+
Photo Gallery Compositions and Content: C+
Photo Resolution and Image Quality: C-
The Models Themselves: A
The Action: B
DL Speed and Streaming: D-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My favorite sub-sites within the URL--relative to my interests and not quality:
Dangerous Cuvres, Big Naturals.
Least Favorite: Pure 18 and Cum Fiesta. (Models too thin and young-looking for my tastes)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other things to note: There is a download limit of 10 GIG daily. This was of no concern to me as I stream videos mostly and did not download much in the way of videos. If you are a massive user of downloadable HD video content, this very well might be soemething to consider. If you aren't downloading HD more than twice a day, it shouldn't be a problem. In fairness to these guys, you would have to be downloading a lot of content every day to hit the max.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:
-- Address concerns with streaming connectvity and download speeds. Slower speeds are to be expected on weekends but not weekdays.
-- Add high-resolution image galleries. The days of CRT monitors have long since passed. 800 pixel-width images images no longer cut it in the day of 2800x1900 high-resolution monitors. |
| Respond: |
15 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive ladies
-Original content
-Excellent download speeds
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Good price through TBP
-Decent navigation, scene scores, search (although can be glitchy), model index, user comments
-Large network
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent photo quality
-Several updates a week, 10-12 on average it seems |
| Cons: |
-Odd biller
-Download limit, enforced regularly for me although others have reported otherwise (10 Gb)
-Video quality is okay on mid-sized videos, didn't download any HD videos due to limit
-No sizes given on videos
-Many of the sites are dead or infrequently updated
-Content can get repetitive
-A subjective opinion, but girls are too "porn" for me, lots of tats, large breasts
-Seem obsessed with ass, I like an ass and all, but move on after a while
-Camerawork is mediocre to downright annoying
-Male talent can get grating
-Lack of variety, even though it is a network serving several niches, all of the content has the same feel
-Too many ads, all over the damn place |
| Bottom Line: |
This site used to be one of my favorites years ago, and everytime I join I am less and less impressed with it. I read my review from before and am surprised I scored it so high, perhaps I was just in a good mood. Regardless, I don't think I will be giving them another chance.
The site does some stuff well, navigation is pretty good, download speeds were excellent (I maxed my connection at 1.4 MB/s). Their is some good material, and I enjoy the concept of some sites.
I am just unsure as to why some of these sites even exist - if it has less than 10 updates and hasn't had a new one in years can't you just merge the content somewhere? It just seems like an advertising gimmick.
There is still some good material, particularly the older stuff. But, it seems as though they have become far to focussed on the glam porn star look, even in their euro sites (Mike's Apartment and Sex Parties). For a supposed "reality/amateur" site, it just doesn't seem to fit anymore. For those that are fans of the typical late 90's-style porn star, this site might still be for you, but it is no longer for me. I grant you that this opinion is subjective, but they have definitely moved away from what I liked about the site. Also, it seems as though they get more and more focussed on asses over time. I like to see the entire woman, not 2 minutes of ass shots.
On top of these somewhat subjective complaints, they have a relatively firm limit of 10GB now, although I never came within 500 MB of that limit I was cut off frequently. I don't really consider myself a heavy downloader by any means, I tend to go through the screencaps to see if it is a scene I actually want. If you are going to impose a download limit, you should take note of your file sizes, and let users know - a 10GB limit with files in excess of 1GB is just irritating.
Overall, I think this site still has some decent older material, maybe worth joining once to get it. If you are into their older material, and unless you are totally obsessed with ass (not necessarily anal sex, just ass) I don't think you will be pleased with the direction of the site and I would recommend looking elsewhere, there are plenty of decent networks out there, although you may have to pay more. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
slutty wrote 1 review (07-21-10) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 39 Sites on the network
- Some interesting niches
- Streaming available
- Downloads in at least two formats and three sizes
- Pics and screencaps available
- Most sites update regularly |
| Cons: |
- Several sites update irregularly
- Daily download limit (10GB +/- per day)
- Download limit appears to be applied unevenly to members
- ‘Cookie-cutter’ porn
- Download manager (Free Download Manager) wasn’t supported |
| Bottom Line: |
RK bills itself as “the World’s Best Adult Network” but by subjective and objective measures I don’t agree with that. It’s not a bad network, but it isn’t the world’s best.
The network is made up of 39 themed sites. The usual porn themes are here, like big breasts, MILFs, and 18-year-old ladies, but there are also some fairly unique sites too. There are three sites that cater to scenes with multiple models in party settings (VIP Crew, In the VIP and Bikini Crashers). These are among my favourites but I can understand why others may not be interested in them.
The sites vary in size, with the more mainstream sites having lots of material (some have over 500 scenes) and some of the niche sites have only a handful of scenes. Each site opens into a separate page that list the scenes with a large thumbnail for each. On the left of that page is a column of filters for sub-themes. The scenes usually have a unique name and the main star is also listed. Opening the page for each scene brings more details and tags. You can access screencaps and pictures (which I didn’t download so I can’t comment on them) and you can access the video in any of several ways. Streaming is available, as are downloads. Downloads are offered in a few different ways, usually as a WMV and MP4. MP4 is available in larger sizes and smaller sizes for handheld devices. For some reason, even the newer scenes are frequently broken down into shorter clips for easier download, though the full scene is also available.
HD video is available on some scenes, though I didn’t download any because of the daily limit.
RK has been around for a long time so the quality of their videos has obviously changed. Older videos are low quality, but I can’t fault the site for that because that was the standard back when they were shot. Most of the older scenes are only available in three or four clips, which also made sense back when they were uploaded. It would be nice if the site took the time to stitch them together into one full file now that most people have high-speed internet connections. The newer scenes (in WMV) still aren’t great quality: 640x480 @ 1600kb/s and 768x432 @ 1600 are common. Subjectively they aren’t bad, but they aren’t great either.
Objectively, the site is decent, but not any better than many other networks. RK isn’t any better (or any worse) than places like Mofos and Porn Pros. In terms of quality they certainly can’t be compared to sites like ALS Scan and Diesel Access.
Subjectively the network isn’t all that impressive. I’ll admit that a lot of that is personal taste because I’m not into large breasts and huge asses. Those attributes are better represented than most others. There are sites that cater to my tastes in smaller models between 18 and 22, and I will admit I like the number of relatively unknown models who appear here.
One serious and unforgivable sin, and I realize that this is entirely subjective, is that one scene was mis-labeled. No big deal normally, but I joined the network specifically to see one scene: a Tanner Mayes scene that was categorized as anal. It might be called ‘anal’ because she has an anus, but no real anal sex occurs in the scene. I will admit that the guy does insert the head of his dick a couple of times, but that doesn’t count as anal sex.
Easily the biggest annoyance with RK is their daily download limit. While the limit itself would be annoying enough, they actually make it worse but applying it randomly. The limit is described in the membership contract using vague language so I emailed the support staff to ask for some clarification but never received a reply. Why bother having a ‘contact us’ button if you’re not actually going to respond to member’s questions? On several days I was cut off from downloading at less than the 10GB 24-hour limit. On other days I downloaded well in excess of the limit. There are PU members who report never having had a limit imposed on them. A site can certainly impose whatever conditions they want, but those conditions should be clear and applied equally to all members. And in 2011 10GB limit is absurdly low.
Another annoying choice that RK made is to not support download managers. I use Free Download Manager to queue up scenes that I want to download so I don’t have to sit at the computer for an hour or more, but FDM wouldn’t work with this site. I can’t say how it works with other managers, but if they bar one I’d guess they bar them all.
I’d recommend this site for someone who really wants a particular scene or is really into a specific niche that is represented here. But… anyone who does join should be aware that they MAY have a download limit imposed on them and that download managers don’t work. So unless you have a real desire to see a certain scene or model here, RK has nothing special to offer. |
| Respond: |
15 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-11-11 10:56pm (Update History)
Reason: SCORE CHANGE: It is NOT CLEAR how the dan limit works. It is not correct.
|
| Pros: |
- Cautions: Huge Network ! There are a lot of video scene, pictures, and variety of niches.
- Five sites worth the entire network: Pure18, Welivetogether, Mikesapartments, Cumfiesta, Eurosexparties. They are impressive sites, for girls and niches.
- Good speed download, different video options (mp4, wmv, HD videos only for recent ones, iPod, mpg, single clips)
- Good surfing ! For each scene you have: preview, pics, screen caps, trailer, comments, clips...
- Good monthly price
- Regular daily updates (only for half network) |
| Cons: |
- Download limit of 10gb daily (per site) makes impossible to dwn (and storage) or watch the HD videos (2 Gb size each) ! It is a nonsense...
- There isn't the size of the video files (it would be important with the presence of the daily limit)
- RK HAVE TO EXPLAIN IN THE NETWORK HOW THE DWN LIMIT WORKS (because without sense in one day you can dan more than 10gb files from more sites, and other day NOT). WHY ?
- A lot of sites aren't longer update (half of the sites of the network)
- In my opinion, the US-niche sites of the Net contains only few anal scenes... |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a huge network collection of AM and EU videos/pics ! There are about 30 sites but I've joined the network especially for some of those sites: Pure18, Mikesapartment, Welivetogether, Eurosexparties, Cumfiesta and Firstimeauditions that in my opinion worth the price of th entire Network.
At the beginning I was in doubt if join or not the site cause of the "download limit" of 10 gb/daily that the Netw impose for each site of the Net.
That is if you download/watch HD videos (about 2 Gb per video) it is very annoying, but if you download only the mp4 or wmv "midsize" videos (about 3-600 Mb per video, 768x432 format) you can see all the collection in two-three months !!
Yes there are a lot of amazing contents !!
The quality of the HD videos (only the most recent, 2011-2010 nd half) is very impressive, but you can collect only the most beautiful video in this format....(in my opinion) cause the limit of your personal storage size !!
I said that there are 2-3 site that are very very amazing !! That is Pure18 and Welivetogether; in my opinion they are the most worthy sites of the net. They deserve theirs reviews that I'do later....
But in few words: Pure18 i impressive for the girls. All the girls are very young, US-girls, semi-pro or at the first appearance but very very skilled !!
Welivetogether is a lesbian site and it is very impressive for the variety of the scene-locations, for the climax (the most video are 3 way lesbians), and for the kind of shoot (few toys, a lot of wet kisses and tongues, tongues, and a lot of tongues...).
The prices is good and it is right; I think that the Huge Network can't have a high prices cause it is impossible to view all their video collection in 1-2 months; with low prices you easy going on join the site for the time you want without spend an exaggeration ! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Well its a fairly huge site with what appears to be updating daily with 2 updates so theres plenty of bang for your buck here.
Great price has to be mentioned and competes well with similar styled sites on the price front. The variety of sites will keep you busy for a good long while.
Pure 18 is a great site though and I was a member years ago here and it's good to see it's improoved, theres now stories build up to the movies which I really liked and yeah the acting isn't the greatest but they do try and its quite creative.
Biggest pro of the site for me was Euro Sex Parties. |
| Cons: |
I wasn't a big fan of lots of the material though, this is a personal thing, I for one don't like women with huge tattoos and fake boobs. I also am not a huge fan of huge butts and big boobs curvy mamas either so my tastes are catered for with the lesbian site We Live Together, there are some gems in there if I ignored the tattoed women on some vids.
In the VIP sites too, just don't get those vids, 20 girls dancing and then 2 some of 3 somes in the end, seems dissapointing, I'd love to see them all get completly named and orgy it up, don't know if that ever happened I never watched them all, my guessing it never does. But yeah I found this to much teasing with clothes on and flashing a bit here and there, no really too exciting in my eyes so I moved on quick from this site.
File sizes too are too big for me. Explained below
Navigation isn't the best and model index is in alphebetic first letter only so all names beginning with S are jumbled in S category and hard to search. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its a good site and for some they would find it well above average for me I liked some stuff from the Euro Sex Parties of my fav euro stars and the reason I joined really, maybe would of liked to of seen more from some of them but there is a couple of excellent Sasha Rose flicks in there.
Mikes Apartment too I really like and another reason for joining, especially for Dominika, blimey o'Reilly she is hot, would loved to of seen more of her.
Also I did like some we live together girls too but nothing to write home about.
Lots of the sites don't interest me much but overall I do not regret the join and as I say some people will love this site, great range and if you like American girls mixed in with some cute European hotties then you might adore what the Reality Kings do here.
One thing I'd change though is up the resoluion on the medium quality vids, the highest is too large for me at in excess of 2.5gigs but some of the next ones down are too low at 400mb. Some of the 2005 stuff too is in 3 or more parts so they were not greatest of quality.
Too many tats as mentioned and you gotta lot of those type of girlies here, that said its hard to choose none tattoo girls only in America as it sems 90% of porn actresses seem to have them.
There must be tattoo parlours making some good trade over there in America.
I gave it a above average score here mainly cause it's got variety and lots of people's tastes will be catered for. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent video quality for the new updates.
Many different genres to surf. |
| Cons: |
The sex is borrrrrrrrrrring, I would compare it to something like having a Ferrari and driving it in a parking lot under 5 miles an hour at all times.
The one site with hot material "Flower Tucci" isn't even updating anymore.
Lots of the older vids are of poor quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
90% of the material is unfappable. The HD looks great, but they aren't filming any sex worth watching with it. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Decent amount of content |
| Cons: |
Where do I start
- Videos crash VLC 50% of the time
- Broken links to WMV videos
- Poor video quality
- Model information almost always limited to one model per video
- Videos that are dreadfully edited (download a 1.1 GB file for the thrill of 5 minutes of sex at the end!)
- Lots of missing screen caps
- Everything is designed to be difficult for anyone with a fast internet connection
- Download speeds acceptable if it doesn't decide to limit you to 3 videos downloading at a time |
| Bottom Line: |
Canceled my membership within 1 day. Downloaded 15 gigs of files and have 3.5 left after eliminating the unwatcheable ones (and that number will shrink, just too fed up to wade through them)
Honestly, just an awful experience...sites like Videobox have issues (new site design is horrible) but at least I never felt ripped off. |
| Respond: |
10 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.
Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.
Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.
Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.
Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.
The price is right. |
| Cons: |
Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.
No "official" provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file and the really big (1080p) one.
Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice. |
| Bottom Line: |
There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.
I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called "Flash and Video Download" or possibly through your RealPlayer movies downloader.
I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.
I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.
I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the "hunt" for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo.
All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a "re-run!" |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (73) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Reality Kings Activity - Reality Kings Reviews - Reality Kings Comments - Reality Kings News
