Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Pure Mature

Visit Site

Pure Mature

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. MILF Porn
2. Mature Women
3. Hardcore Sex

SSC Group LLC
61 Sites Listed
Partner: Fuck You Cash

Trial: $1.12 Limited Access (1 day, recurs $39.94/mo.)
Monthly: $24.95  Our Price $17.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.37 (3 months, recurring)
1 Year: $119.40 (recurring)
Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.

Details: Pre-check is in right column.


View all Pure Mature Site Facts at TBP.

N/A
Feedback History  (2)

Active Reviews 0
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

80.0
TBP Review

Date: 08-23-14

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Exclusive milf scenes.
+  High quality videos.

User Reviews (0)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

 Be the first to review Pure Mature!

  Add Review - Quick Rating
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

host2626 (0) 10-15-12  11:00pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

Not much different from the rest

Looking at the preview area, I got the impression that the site was exceptional. Yes, I am familiar with the major players like Brazzers, RealityKings, Bangbros, DDF, 21Sextury, etc. PureMature had this aura of sensuality and passion in stark contrast with the fake cries of "yeah fuck me with that huge cock" and anal piledriving that seems to fill said major players' sites.

Most of the movies' large thumbnails showed what I would call "true POV". Not that commonly referred to "POV" where a single guy does everything including holding the camera, that would be the POV of your eyes if they were coming out of the navel - that is just some dick and face closeups. No, these movies thumbnails show the whole of the girl's body, legs spread, taken at the level of the head or higher, which gives an impression of intimacy. This, and the beautiful sweet lighting.

Unfortunately the actual movies are a letdown. First the quality. The HD formats include:
* MPG 1280x720 2600Kbps, yes, actual MPEG (MPEG-PS) video streams
* MPG 1920x1080 10Mbps MPEG
* WMV 1920x1080 9Mbps VC-1
The industry has moved to AVC in .MP4 container, MPEG is way too inefficient. The MPGs at a higher bitrate and and 15% larger size show more artifacts and less definition than the WMVs. But since the movies seem to use a lot of white natural light, even the latter at 9 Mbps don't show enough definition. Video quality is definitely much worse than that on the major sites listed earlier.

Now the contents. Well, the thumbnails were misleading. The camera work is the same as everywhere else. Positioned somewhere randomly on the side, or long face and boobs closeups, or the navel POV (dick and face closeups). The "true POV" shown in thumbnails is of the accidental kind that lasts a couple of seconds when the camera is moving, like everywhere else. The thumbnails are way more exciting than the movies themselves. So they know which shooting angles to use to entice people, yet fail to use said angles in the movies? (They even photoshopped out Tanya Tate's ugly belly tramp stamp on the thumbnail, I thought she finally did something to look like the classy woman she would have looked like without.)

So the only thing that sets the movie contents apart from that on the other sites is the lack of "fuck me!" cries. Only the guy from cougarsinheat.com had enough patience to stay for more than 5 seconds on the same spot (too bad the site is dead), the rest are just ADD afflicted guys randomly moving the camera, and puremature.com is no exception.

I felt the same way when I subscribed to orgasms.xxx expecting to see... wait for it... don't laugh... female orgasms :).

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

otoh (54) 07-23-12  02:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)

Nice idea, shame about the silicone

Taking a look at the samples on this site, it seems like a great idea - the X-Art/Joymii etc formula of well-shot, sensitive hardcore, but featuring slightly older models - I tend to find girls in their 30s very attractive.

Just a shame that many of them seem to have fake boobs... I know many here agree with me, but we seem to be in the minority in the industry!

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Pure Mature

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Casting Couch X (2) 85.5 81.0
2. Tiny 4K (1) 85.0 80.5
3. Passion HD (1) 83.0 82.5
4. POVD (1) 75.0 79.0
5. Porn Pros Network (0) N/A 90.0
6. Gay Room (0) N/A 85.5
7. Man Royale (0) N/A 83.0
8. 18 Years Old (0) N/A 82.5
9. Massage Creep (0) N/A 82.0
10. Disgraced 18 (0) N/A 81.0

View All: Company Sites (61)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.41 seconds.