Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Visit Site

Petites Parisiennes

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. European Girls
3. Soft Content

PetitesParisiennes
1 Site Listed
Partner: Petites Parisiennes Partners

Monthly: $14.95 (recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (non-recurring)

View all Petites Parisiennes Site Facts at TBP.

79.0
Feedback History  (27)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 1
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 17
Review by TheBestPorn:

86.0
TBP Review

Date: 08-05-12

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Unique site & content.
+  Super High Res Content.
-  Roll Over Date & Model Info Provided But Doesn't Transition.

User Reviews (8)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
79
skippy (42) 02-17-13  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very unique, playful style - a true "indie" web site
Unique look and feel
Fairly exclusive European models
57 of the girls are French according to site
A few popular models
True High resolution images to 4000k- crisp images
HD videos for most models
Newer site so no old low res material!
Great search options
Model mouseover summary and "exposure limits" very helpful
Newer models/sets are very good
Coolest "Shop" area I'v ever seen.
A good deal for the price!
Cons: Collection is not that large, but growing
Information is sparce once at the model pages
Rating system is confusing (model or set?)
Can't search by model score.
Many Models are not very engaging
Many models are pretty but not knockouts
Many models/sets are not nude
Navigation/viewing options are limited
(i.e. 10 models per page, 18 sets per page)
There are a few minor navigation issues (page back does not work so you have to reload a lot)
A few broken/incorrect links (might be in the middle of upgrading )
Set dates are not universally available.
Bottom Line: This is the type of site that reminds me how incredibly difficult it must be to run a popular, successful porn site. They do many, many things really well here, but the overall package falls a little short, overall score-wise, of the big players.

This is currently a nude and non-nude modeling site. mostly passive, candid, single model, photography. No sex, nothing kinky in any way with the exception of a very small number of VERY light B&D sets. In this regard, it is kind of like the local strip club....the girls you WANT to see more of are not the girls you ARE seeing more of, if you catch my drift. If you have an appetite for sex scenes, toys, bondage, close-ups, spread legs, anything more than passaive nude modeling photogrpahy, this may not be the site for you at the moment, but check back as it looks like the folks here are making some very positive improvements in both the site and the collection. If you are the type who likes passive scenes, dressing room shots, that kind of thing, then this may be an EXCELLENT site for you. Frankly, there is a lot of variety here and my tastes, admittedly, run toward more engaging solo scenes.

Here are some basics from what I can tell...
About 100 models
About 350 sets
1 new set every 2-3 days
Sets have between 30 and 60 images
Models all seem to be 18-24
Model are, as the name implies, petite.
Most sets are in studio.

The design of this site makes it fun and different. I think the webmasters were trying to incorporate a Moulin Rouge kind of feel, and they came very close to pulling it off. Model thumbnails are shown full sized and they go nude with a mouse-over. Saw the technique in a french body study years ago and it is VERY effective here at showing you exactly what the models look like. Clicking on a model brings a pop-up that shows all of her sets. Once you select a set, you get about 36 images per page, a "stars" score, and a thumbnail slider that allows you to go to other sets of the same model. Very nice concept. In execution, though, the name of the model does not show up on the model page anywhere, only in the hard-to-read thumbnails, the stars scoring is not immediately clear (model or set? SET!), the model bio is not available from here, the sets are not dated here, the cover images are included for sets scheduled for up to a month away (so you click on a model and a set and THEN find that the set isn't on the site yet). Some navigation options are missing, but don't hit back-page here (or ANYWHERE) or you will have to reload your browser. (I also clicked on something once or twice and got dropped into a shell directory where I shouldn't have been...looks like they are in the middle of upgrades.) I love the navigation style here, but it could be much better with a few small tweaks.

When you first look at the site, it really does give a Moulin Rouge feel. The sample images are representatative, so you honestly see what you get.

The photography, though competent, is sometimes a little weak. There are some excellent studio sets, but many sets are passive, so you feel like you are following the model around through her apartment or something. There is a little model interaction with the photographer (and therefore the viewer), but not much. This may be more about the models,as the more popular models are more interactive (it is part of what makes them popular) than the neophytes. But the incongruity between the playful feel of the site and the passive feel of many of the sets is what makes things a little...off here. They need a little more of the sexual energy you find at Twisty's or ALSscan...you usually only get that with the hyper-confident pro-models or with a photographer/shoot team that is ungodly talented. I noticed that many commenters like the passive stuff and frankly have no idea how one would balance the two styles. I have to say, though, that the newer photography is much, much better in terms of interaction and content than the older stuff, so clearly somebody here gets it.

I really want this site to be a success. It is different. It is unique. It is not a formula web site. It deserves to be successful. I could easily and rightfully compare it to an Indie in the movie industry. But the problem with indies is that, although they are often critically acclaimed, they just as often don't get the popular vote simply because they are not following the popular formula or because of one or two faults. This site COULD be a Kill Bill, a Pulp Fiction, A Quentin Tarantino kick-ass example of a web site. Unfortunately, it isn't quite there....yet. Clearly, I am rooting for it, though.

Bottom line: A very unique site that is worthy of a look. With a few tweaks in the site and content, this could be among the top players and it seems as though the webmasters here are figuring that out. I will absolutely be back in a year or so to see how things have progressed.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
80*
lutin (2) 12-17-11  09:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (12 Replies)

Expired
70
Denner (233) 08-01-11  08:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
86
tangub (151) 06-28-11  03:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (9 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
95
otoh (54) 01-08-11  01:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (9 Replies)

Expired
97
BradlyH (Disabled) 05-13-11  11:35am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
78
messmer (137) 01-24-11  10:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (10 Replies)

Expired
85
mr smut (42) 09-10-08  05:58am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (17)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-17 of 17 < Previous Page

mbaya (356) 07-01-10  07:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)

A Big Disappointment

Although I didn't expect much, I signed up for the full access trial. The first problem was that both Internet Explorer and Firefox were useless here. The links to the photos disappeared seconds after the screen loaded and I could not download a single video. The site recommended using Googlechrome, so I downloaded that. This finally let me get into the content. Some of the videos downloaded badly with constant stuttering and pixelation. I could have lived with that if the content had been any good. I think a softcore site should be either tease or explicit and this was neither. Boring, boring, boring, did I say the content was dull? I checked out quite a few of the photo sets to keep not even one single photo. The videos were even worse. Blabby, slow moving and never quite what I feel would be erotic. Many of the girls were cute, only one was much better than that. Most were very ordinary looking. Cancelling leads you to a billing company whose cancel page was 100% in French. If that is not something you can figure out, I don't recommend trying to cancel. This site just did not make sense in my opinion. It was not worth even the one day trial price. If I had to give it a score I think maybe 60, only because the photos were high quality and the videos HD.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

jutter (0) 03-27-10  03:06am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)

Slow download speeds

Some really sexy French babes on this site (French women are probably tops in my book, though I guess if you are American...)but the download speeds are really slow and there is no slide show facility. Only worth joing if you have really super fast broadband.

The trial is no longer a euro its six and make sure you cancel your trial straight away as I forgot to and have been hit with a month now-definitely not worth a month's subscription and too be honest 6 euro trial is steep for what you get-slow speeds and very soft content

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 11-29-09  08:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)

Thanks - no currency hideout

A site where you get the price (worldwide) without any bullshit - just fair and square....
BTW - again a fine review from mr smut, here.....take a look!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (220) 11-29-09  02:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Que c'est dommage!

My card got rejected by the billing company for this site. What a shame! They've got a 24-hour full trial for 6 euro, but alas, it is not for me!

Anybody else getting this? Anybody? ;)

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

mbaya (356) 05-05-09  07:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)

price update

The price is now 20 euros per month. There is no trial option.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

mr smut (42) 11-29-08  10:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)

Petites Parisiennes the book

Has this ever happened before that a photographer running a site with mature content published a book featuring his models? I was quite surprised to see that Jam who is the owner of this site is doing so :-)

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

mr smut (42) 09-09-08  06:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)

Somethings happening

They offer improved navigational features plus information about the release dates of models and updates.

Guess I'll give it a try soon even though I never heard of "Billing France". At least they offer on-line information about pricing in currencies other than .

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Shown : 11-17 of 17 < Previous Page

Visit Petites Parisiennes

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Petites Parisiennes (1) 79.0 86.0

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.61 seconds.