Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Penthouse

Visit Site
Penthouse Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Glamour Models
2. Magazines
3. Soft Content

GMCI Internet Operations Inc.
5 Sites Listed
Partner: Penthouse Partners

Monthly: $19.95 (recurring - Silver level)
Monthly: $24.95 (recurring - Gold level)
1 Year: $119.40 (recurring - Gold level)

View all Penthouse Site Facts at TBP.

80.0
Feedback History  (10)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 6
Review by TheBestPorn:

86.0
TBP Review

Date: 11-12-09

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Great-sized collection.
+  Original Penthouse content.
-  Older content doesn't look as sharp.
-  Average quality videos.

User Reviews (3)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
80
mbaya (266) 11-15-09  09:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge website. See Maggie's review for more details. The archives go back to 1973.
-Nearly every model extremely beautiful. I can't think of a site at this level so consistently.
-Many and I mean many, models have trimmed bush. I found this extremely hot. Since these are the oldest photo sets, most have low quality, but I still appreciated them.
-Quick downloads without restriction if you pay for the gold membership. At the silver level you get only five downloads per day. This option makes no sense on a site of this size.
-All exclusive material of many who went on to become big name models and/or pornstars. The site has some very well known names in exclusive photo sets. For example, Tera Patrick was Pet of the Year.
-Daily updates, sometimes even multiple updates.
Cons: -The photographic style is very much of the glamour type. A lot of artistic shots and not many are explicit. This made me search a lot for what I want to keep.
-Most photo sets are rather small, about a dozen photos each.
-No way to zipdownload the photo sets. I am happy to say there is a way. See Pink Panther's reply. This is one time I am glad to be wrong.
-I prefer videos to photos, so I did not appreciate the low quality of the videos.
-Needs ethnic variety. I saw only one Black model and only a few, maybe six Asian ones.
-Membership ends when you cancel. You don't get the remaining time that you have paid for.
Bottom Line: I rather enjoyed this site. It has so much to offer that I feel confident recommending it. I subscribed to the magazine in the 70"s and loved it then. I still apreciate their style, so trying their website was a natural.

I am more into videos than photos, so this site has a major flaw that keeps me from giving it a score in the 90's. The video quality is too low to watch on a HD television.

However, the pluses here are the consistent beauty of the models, the sheer quantity of the photos and their overall quality-some older photos are of lower size and resolution. The photo sets are solo, masturbation, b/g hardcore and softcore and g/g lesbian and softcore. I saw peeing photo sets, some where the girls were smoking and even some softcore bondage. If you can imagine something, it probably is here somewhere.

For me, another big plus was that since the archive goes back to 1973, there are huge numbers of photos where the models have trimmed bush. I enjoyed this site a LOT more than ATK Hairy, for example.

Just like the magazine, there is a section for erotic letters, an advice section, as well as a forum. Additionally there is a live chat option, a video store and VOD.

If you are into photos and don't care if the videos are weak, this site is one you must try.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
83
Drooler (192) 08-28-07  04:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
97
tcflashguy (Disabled) 01-09-07  05:07pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (6)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

bootiger (0) 10-26-09  05:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

early cancel

if you cancel your membership early they will drop you from their data base imediately

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 08-03-09  01:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

Somethin' stupid ... that I did

I like to cancel my memberships with enough time between the date I cancel and the date that access ends.

It was with this in mind -- too much in mind, as it turned out -- that I "cancelled" at Penthouse, because there, you don't "cancel," you close the account. So I did.

Well, I can't blame anyone but myself for the results: immediate lost access. And my subscription term wasn't completely over. Oh, f-- oh, well. "Close the account" is clear enough language, I believe. Maybe I should switch to a stronger coffee brew.

So this little cautionary tale is for anyone else who might (?) make the same mistake I did? Anyone?

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

hooterman (0) 05-15-08  11:59am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Added sites not avalivble

When I signed up for this site, I was under the impression that three additional sites were included in the price. There are listed on this web site. After I signed up I tried to get into the sites and was denied. When I contacted Penthouse, they said that the additional site are not included. Kind of a rip-off if you ask me. If you are not giving something don't advertize the fact. When I complained about it, basically I was told "too bad". Get any type of refund for the false advertizing, no.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

jd1961 (95) 03-24-08  08:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (1)

Phony Come On

Get this...when you hit the join button, you get taken to a page that says "Join For Free". Oh Boy, I better sign up right now!!! So you send in your email address, risking spam, and you get your magic password! Then everything you click on leads you to the real join page! Shame on you Penthouse for this antique P.T. Barnum sales technique---straight out of the 1970's porn world. It turned me off so much, I decided not to join.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 03-02-08  01:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

New Design

Penthouse now has a new design, which is brighter and more pleasing to the eye. The navigation is more straightforward. The galleries now show all the thumbs on a single page. It's looking good.

About a week ago, there were no zips made available for the newer galleries at least. Fortunately, that problem has since been fixed and zips are available in 5 different photo sizes.

One other thing is that sometimes thumbs in the lists of galleries don't all show, though most do.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 06-14-07  05:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

Phantom Galleries

I've been a member for over a year. One thing they have bad habit of doing is listing a gallery in their coming updates, but when the day comes, the gallery isn't posted, and in fact, it never is.

Take today, for example. Two galleries are supposed to go up, and one has, but clicking the other, of "Georgia Jones," just refreshes the gallery listing page.

This has happened several times over the past few months.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

RSS FeedsAll Penthouse Activity - Penthouse Reviews - Penthouse Comments - Penthouse News

Visit Penthouse

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Penthouse Mike (1)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Sexy Jamie (1) 86.0 N/A
2. Penthouse (1) 80.0 86.0
3. Penthouse Forum (0) N/A N/A
4. Penthouse Letters (0) N/A N/A
5. Variations (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : GMCI Internet Operations Inc. Activity

View All: Company Sites (5)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.32 seconds.