| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many beautiful women -- established stars and newbies, too
+Pic galleries and videos of softcore posing/masturbation, lesbian, HC b/g, bb/g, b/gg, bb/gg
+zips/pics in 5 sizes (800, 1200, 2000, 3000, 4000) starting May 2006; before then, many max at 1600
+Not nec. “exclusive,” but nice pic sizes!
+monthly “calendars” for access to content, or by model or “pet”
+additional features: chat with models, store, and “reading” (video reviews, sex advice, and reading for auto-erotic purposes) |
| Cons: |
-preview of current month's updates only; takes 4 clicks into the tour to reach it
-qty of pics per gallery varies a lot from < 20 to > 100
-movement to earlier calendar requires lots of clicking back, OR a change in the month’s URL (e.g., change ?m=7&y=2007 to ?m=3&y=2006 to see March 2006)
-calendars go no further back than June 2005 (and that’s just a partial one)
-video downloads even in their best quality (320x240) are below par; there is 640x480 for streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
1. It’s best as a photo site. July 2007 had 37 solo pic galleries, 11 g/g galleries, and 4 HC galleries, 18 HC videos (always broken into 3-6 scenes), and 9 softcore “BTS” videos.
2. The videos serve best as previews of professional productions. The quality of the vids here ain’t at the “keeper” level. Check the online “store” for DVDs.
3. It’s an erotic resource with the chat and the readings and, again, the store which sells, for example, an operationally viable replica of Cassia Riley’s pussy. (Nope. I don’t have one.)
So if you have it for Cassia, with this site it is possible to set up a multimedia blitz for yourself.
For awhile over the past year or so, they were posting “vintage” ‘70’s and ‘80’s photos in larger sizes, but not that many. It didn’t seem to catch fire. Wasn’t very good! That ‘80’s big hair looks ridiculous.
Yes, Penthouse has been around for a long time, but this site only starts delivering the really good stuff from May ’06 on. Enormous images of beauties like Hanna Hilton, Shay Laren, Jamie Lynn, and Crystal Klein baring their fine bee-hinds is very nice indeed … when they do. And you can vote on the photosets. The quality can sometimes be so-so.
Some galleries are from sources that have their own sites, like Digital Desire or MishaOnline, so don’t expect it always to be exclusive.
Wish they’d republish a lot of Hank Londoner’s work in 4000px. THAT would be great! But do they have rights to it? I dunno. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No DRM protection
-Zipped files for those picture lovers, also a selection of pixel choice for downloads
-Archives back to 1973
-Live Chat with a variety of models
-Add to your favorites
-Picture updates everyday
-Even videos for people of the go!! ipods and PSP |
| Cons: |
-Live chat doesn't seem to work well in firefox, need specific Windows Media Player, if anyone has a solution, let me know. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into videos, pictures, and/or stories, this is the place to find it. Live chat is nice, because there is live video with sound and the chance to type. The model index is another great way to find exactly who you want, there's even a search feature. I would highly recommend this site to others! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (4) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|