| User Reviews (11) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
incredibly lot of content
original content.
good models
regular update every day |
| Cons: |
download speed too low
does not authorise download manager
limited serch engine |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is really a good one, the content is one of the best I have seen.
BUT, the download speed is awfull AND they don't allow us to use a download manager.
So all in one, it's to expensive. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful natural-looking girls on the internet. Nicely shot. Large selection of material. Large amount of content. |
| Cons: |
Video and picture quality not very good. More search options would be nice (i.e.; hair color, toy type, skin tone, foot fetish, etc.) |
| Bottom Line: |
Paul Markham has hands-down some of the cutest girls on the net. If the picture and video quality were upgraded to today's highest standard, I would probably be a life-long member. I would like to see picture quality and size in the 4k range and HD video with avi and wmv options. Overall this is a great site that could use some upgrading as far as quality and navigation/search features. If you like some of the most natural-looking beautiful teens on the net in a variety of content types and do not place a high value on video and picture quality, this may be your site. Would like to see the quality up there with sites like ALScans or SaphicErotica, etc. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Download Speed was fast.
Good sizes for both Photo and Video files (but not Hi-Res quality)
Exclusive content.
This is one of those sites where you find gems. You find girls who previously you've only seen doing fairly tame shoots, or semi-hardcore (holding it, not using it), and bam, on this site they are definitely using it.
I like European, and this site has a lot of European. Girls are Beautiful and Lots (Loads) of them.
Any site that has what it puts on its preview pages and ten times more behind it deserves a high score.
Layout is simple and I like that, get me to my journey as soon as you can please.
With this site you are there the minute you click once. Can't beat that. |
| Cons: |
The files are big but don't equate to the quality inside. This is probably their best attempt at remastering older content to make it appealing again, and if you are after older content being reworked and made available again, I have seen it done better anywhere else so this is a good effort.
Some of the models names are not the same as they are on other sites. This is really frustrating.
Everyone knows who Zuzana is but on this site her name is called Susane? and Klara (the tall Czech with the blue eyes) is called Ulrika.
There is a sense of their content is never ending, but it becomes a struggle to find gems the further into their archive you got and the quality starts to disappear, which is I guess what you would expect with a site that does keep its archives online. |
| Bottom Line: |
But to follow on from the Cons, I think this is where this site suffers. Its not fresh anymore. It's like the last runner across the finishing line in a race. It seems to struggle and looks tired.
Their attempts to remaster old content is a good effort but because the bulk of their site is this type of format, you sense that the site is not trying hard enough in ensuring new content is coming online.
There are some classics, and some real beauties on this site doing hardcore where I've never seen them doing hardcore elsewhere, but because of the size of the site, you need patience and the mind of a detective to work out what the Girls names were when they were doing dirty things in the past.
Finally, I do not regret joining. I spent a lot of bandwidth filling up missing classic material at what is the best quality I've seen for this type of older material, and found some absolute gems. Money well spent.
Beautiful Girls. Just the site is a bit stale and relying on its back catalogue too much.
Update. I had a reply from paulmarkham. aka the site webmaster. Why did I want add this to my review? To tell browsers of the pornusers website. TAKE NOTE. Site Webmasters are registered on pornusers.com. What better way to get your message across to the Sites under review. AWESOME to have that level of contact here. I looked at his reply and I have edited my review because I agree with him. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large number of models
- Easy Navigation
- User interaction (ratings and feedback)
- Directory of almost all models
- Preview options for vids
- Numerous vid download options including podcast
- Small Medium & Large pics with zip available
- Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions
- For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong |
| Cons: |
- Nonexlusive content that has been around for years
- When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory
- Repetive content
- Content rotates
- Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen |
| Bottom Line: |
I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets.
For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site.
I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory.
I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive.
If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial.
I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (13) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Paul Markham Teens Activity - Paul Markham Teens Reviews - Paul Markham Teens Comments - Paul Markham Teens News
