PornUsers Newsletter!   Exclusive Discounts, News & Prizes  
E-mail:
Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Visit Site

Pantyhose Lane

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Legs and Nylons
2. All Fetishes
3. Porn Stars

The Broman Group
3 Sites Listed
Partner: Akira Lane Gold

Monthly: $19.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $23.95 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $44.95 (2 months, non-recurring)

View all Pantyhose Lane Site Facts at TBP.

85.0
Feedback History  (3)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 0
Review by TheBestPorn:

N/A
TBP Review

Date: None

Type: None
Review Status:

Medium

This review is not a top priority for a new review assignment.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
85
mbaya (344) 06-27-10  08:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Daily updates of the photo section only.
-Good size site with 145 models and 33 guest models. Each has multiple shoots, so my guess is about 600 to 700 photosets.
-Most recent photos are 1200x1800.
-Although primarily a photo site, there are 125 video shoots as well. The most recent update is WMV 864x480, 595 kbps. Very weak and poor quality.
-Nice mix of mostly European and American models with a lot of Asian Americans and Black ones as well. If you love Asian women you will feel that you have died and gone to heaven.
Cons: -No zipdownloads.
-No easy way to search. Listings for photosets are under the models' names, in the order from the most recent update going back. You can also search by model name and a tiny thumbnail. Videos are listed separately, also in update order or in a separate listng of just videos. Only clips, no whole videos.
-Not updating the videos. There is no date on the site for each video, but the most recent is copyright 2009.
Bottom Line: Usually after downloading from a site, I gradually lose interest in the content. I get the feeling of been there, done that and it is on to the next website.

That didn't happen here. I wrote a review almost exactly a year ago and was primarily interested in the videos at that time. I did not appreciate the quality of the photography or its degree of erotic value. Gradually over the last year I have come to appreciate more the photos I downloaded and saved.

While the videos are of poor quality, the photo sets are nicely done. There is plenty of tease, as you might expect from a site with pantyhose in its name. Many of the outfits are quite classy and the stripping sequences work for me. While softcore, they often, but not always, go to full explicit. Sometimes there is complete nudity, but mostly you see before and after pussy shots of stripping off pantyhose. Some sets do not feature explcitness and the model stays clothed.

The model selection is first rate. You will recognize some familiar faces, but by no means all. Many are simply gorgeous, with great legs that are showcased in pantyhose. Many have nice breasts as well. Overall, very much glam in style, but with much more nudity and explicitness than for example Only Tease. The quality of the Asian women makes this site stand out. While the Americans and Europeans are also first rate, the Asian women alone make this site worth trying.

As far as a comparison with other pantyhose focused sites, much better looking models, more teasing and more delivery of explicitness. I feel it is the best in this niche.

I found the site to be fun and worth a shot if you are into softcore. Definitely a good value for a reasonable price. If they would make the photos zipdownloadable and added a decent way to search, I would not hesitate to give this site a score in the 90's.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply
Archived: mbaya wrote 1 review (06-04-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

Expired
82
cucuta (6) 05-27-09  06:40pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (0)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

 Be the first to comment on Pantyhose Lane!

 Add Comment

RSS FeedsAll Pantyhose Lane Activity - Pantyhose Lane Reviews - Pantyhose Lane Comments - Pantyhose Lane News

Visit Pantyhose Lane

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Pantyhose Lane (1) 85.0 N/A
2. Akira Lane (0) N/A N/A
3. Akira Lane Bound (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : The Broman Group Activity

View All: Company Sites (3)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.09 seconds.