Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Oldje

Visit Site
Oldje Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Old N Young
2. Hardcore Sex

Class Media
6 Sites Listed
Partner: None

Monthly: €29.95 / $40.96 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: €74.95 / $102.49 (3 mo, recurs €54.95/3 mo)
1 Year: €254.90 / $348.57 (non-recurring)

View all Oldje Site Facts at TBP.

86.0
Feedback History  (10)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 1
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

80.6
TBP Review

Date: 06-15-06

Type: Express

Spencer
+  All exlcusive content.
+  Videos look decent.
+  Not too small of a site.
-  Very expensive!
-  Updates aren't dated.
-  More video options would be nice.
-  Navigation could be a little better.

User Reviews (7)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
89
Denner (200) 06-01-09  06:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Young easteuro-models at their best.
+ Fine style in videos - fine style of fantasy.
+ Video-quality is almost crisp (the newer ones) and even some of the .rm-files are ok.
+ Young girls being very seducive - thanks to a good working editor, I guess.
+ Entirely exclusive.
+ Ok/fine number of video-scenes (almost 300)
+ Well done for a special kind af fantasies.
Cons: Price a bit high - euro 29.95 - but at TBP the $-price seems much to high compared to the price in euros. Compared the price in $ should be about 35. Guess this one is the other way around with those infamous currency-problems.
No "real" photosets - the photos in each set are way too few and the quality (960x640) are not that great.
Could not find any zip for those sets.
Very simple navigation/browsing - no search engines or name-search for girl-models. You nhave to browse through the now 27 pages with aproxx 10 videos pr page.
Most videos in split files. (But they are joinable).
No bonus sites.
Couold not find any update-schedule - now it looks like one or two pr week.
Repeated login.
Very early videos (2-3 years old or more) not worth much.
Bottom Line: I have quite a few cons for this site - BUT still it's as close to a 90 in score as it gets.
Foremost this is a site with a very speciel fantasy for older porn-lovers and lovers of teens.
This is a dutch site with a slogan for their videos:
"The fantasy you deserve" - pretty good marketing, because it tends to older guys (like this user close to 50) with the everlasting dream of sweet young things - but well married and no more ideas about trying to catch/or cheat with an 18-19 years old girl.
Here you get it on videoclips. Must scenes are definitely fantasy, because the main theme is the teen seducing the 50-65 year old guy.
See the fine previews - and you'll get the idea.
The videos are (almost) all set in different ways - and thats a fine plus. Not much stereotype here.
And once in a while you get a little surprise with some minuttes slow-motion of the best blowjob/fuck in the middle of the scene.
A little over half of the aproxx 300 videos comes in both wmv and Real Media (I normally dislike rm-files) - the wmv quality is FINE - 720x404.
BUT most of the rm-files are certainly not bad in quality either - I'm just not crazy about the only way to play them.
The models are simply great here - for most of them. Fine looking young teen - blondes, brunettes and redhairs - and the way they act here seems much sweeter ( and somewhat sexier) than at some other productions.
Some are well known: Sharka Blue, Black Angelica, Jenny/Wibeke or Bijou ect. (man, just watching that natural-titted Bijou-brunette seducing this old guy....)
Others are quite rare/almost never seen at other sites.
But the way the seduction of older guys are done here makes this site - probably - the best of its kind.
Visited the site some years ago - today it's simply way better.
More regular updates - and I'd stay here (for some time, anyway).
To be recommended.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
90*
tikkit (3) 05-19-09  01:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + The girls here are more attractive than other Euro Old & Young sites such as Old Farts & Young Tarts, and Grandpas Fuck Teens
+ Cinematography - Yes, you can laugh but much thought and work goes into the art side of things, with style, slo-mo's, zooming, and such
+ I love oldje's style of video, the videos are Unique, stories are not repeated very often, I geniually look foward to the updates
+ tour provides an accurate representation of what will be available when/if you subscribe
Cons: - scenes are short
- the amount of sex in scenes is SHORT, though the more recent videos have improved upon this.
- Expensive for American Subscribers, may be only worth it to join for one month and thats it.
- No full scene files, though this really does not bother me much
- the actors in the scenes try to speak english, just speak in your native language, who cares!
- Updates come every two weeks on Friday, not that often but understandable
- no zip picture files, Beauty and the senior has much better picture sets
- Older videos are of Real Player Only and BAD quality
Bottom Line: Oldje is great, but has flaws, why don't they combine Oldje and B&TS for one really great site with pictures and videos.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
83
Drooler (192) 02-28-09  04:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many of those hot Euro girls – Cayenne, Stracey, Leanna Sweet, Rachel Evans, Julie Silver, Lucky, etc. – enjoying sex with older men.
+All exclusive content
+Total of about 268 scenes to date
+The most recent 116 scenes available in WMV 720x404.
+Scenes split into usually 2 vids means you can just get the best action in scene 2 if you like (though sometimes the first blowjob is in scene 1)
+Creativity in storylines and a sense of humor as well as sex
+Arranged with 10 updates/scenes per page; 27 pages to date
+Follows your browsing, so after you finish with a scene and then click “Updates,” it takes you back to the updates page you were on.
+Good visitor’s preview of the content
Cons: -Slow downloads (for me anyway): around 140Kbps (“20 Mbps” connection. Maybe my ISP is lying.)
-The first 152 scenes are only in Real Player and those vids aren’t so good
-Model name not mentioned in some of the scenes
-“Medium-sized” watermark on the vids; prefer “small” or none
-No all-in-one vids; scenes are split into 2 or 3 segments (usually 2)
-No streaming, should you prefer that
-Action in vids starts before the “Oldje” branding graphics have disappeared
-Some vids have “slow motion” parts you may or may not like
-Photos are only 960x640; screenshots are 720x576
-No zips of screenshots or photos
-Found a few screenshot or photo pages with missing links
-Priced in Euros, so dollar-buyers will pay more than $29.95
-Only updates about 1x per wk
-Some of the oldsters have big guts that block the view
Bottom Line: The first time I joined this, over two years ago, I was disappointed. The babes were hot, but those RealPlayer vids were skimpy in quality and the screen dimensions were small.

Funny how I quit just before they started offering the much better WMV’s. At this transition phrase, on their page 16, they even redid a few choice vids that I’d only been able to get in Real Player: Lucky in “Backstage with the Director” and Sarah in “Who’s the Boss” are among my faves, if only for fleeting minutes of the “belly-down flat.”

As for the men here, as an old Playboy cartoon once said: “There may be snow on the roof, but there’s still fire in the furnace.” Enter Big Pharma. I mean, PU’s have complained about some younger porn actors having trouble keeping Johnny at attention. Doesn’t seem to happen here.

A lot of these geezers appear over and over. They range from the middle-aged to the octogenarian. Some are in good shape, and some sport ample “table muscles.” One of them reminds me of gay Mr. Kidd from the old Bond movies; don’t think it’s the same guy, though.

But this isn’t your run-of-the-mill gonzo porn. Just check out the visitor’s area. What imaginations these people have! But the sex is still pretty much by the numbers, with a facial at the end.

I rather doubt that the more bright-eyed and bushy tailed of the PU community would much care for a site like this, but I’m getting up in years and this site helps. Hell, it could be ME on this one! With languid Leanna Sweet or foxy Cayenne! Mmmmmmm!

NB: BeautyandtheSenior is a clone. I've never been to that one. At least one PU member has provided a detailed comment on this.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
87
djwolf (61) 12-29-07  03:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
85
igolli (6) 08-10-07  05:25am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85
DutchDoctor (8) 04-11-07  04:08am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
60
DpornGuy (34) 01-08-07  09:56pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (4)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Denner (200) 06-14-09  07:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

Updates?????

Been a member for about three week here - and in that time:
No updates!!!

So now you know - I cancelled - and if they still have no updates before my membership expires - I'll be back with a change of my review of the site - TOO bad, because the content is overall pretty good, but concerning updates....lousy.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

djwolf (61) 10-15-07  03:55pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)

Quality?

Hi. I've checked out the preview pages here which look good. Just want to know a bit more. Are the girls all genuinely young with tight bodies? Does the action look realistic? Are there many blowjob/facial scenes?

Thanks.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Oldje Activity - Oldje Reviews - Oldje Comments - Oldje News

Visit Oldje

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Oldje (2) 86.0 80.6
2. Drawing Palace (0) N/A 74.4
3. Brutal Catfight (0) N/A N/A
4. Dr Schmutz (0) N/A N/A
5. Funny BDSM (0) N/A N/A
6. RT Bondage (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : Class Media Activity

View All: Company Sites (6)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.