| User Reviews (11) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls) |
| Cons: |
-There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.
Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404) |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-22-10 01:50pm (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
|
| Pros: |
-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.
I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some. |
| Respond: |
9 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor. |
| Cons: |
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent |
| Bottom Line: |
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...) |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning. |
| Cons: |
Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused. |
| Bottom Line: |
A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.
The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.
The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.
In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.
The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.
A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.
For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.
The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.
It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.
Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!
CONTINUED IN A "REPLY" |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Oldje Activity - Oldje Reviews - Oldje Comments - Oldje News
