Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Older Women

Visit Site
Older Women Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Mature Women
2. MILF Porn

Offworld Media Group Inc.
6 Sites Listed
Partner: Niche Bucks

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $54.95 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $79.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all Older Women Site Facts at TBP.

70.0
Feedback History  (4)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

82.5
TBP Review

Date: 09-29-08

Type: Official

Vanessa
+  Images look sharp.
+  Updates often.
+  Large archive of mature content.
-  No listing of models by age.
-  Older videos are lesser quality.
-  Not enough download options.
-  Not enough browse/user features.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
70
messmer (57) 10-18-08  02:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Plenty of mostly attractive, mature models.

Site is easy to navigate and gives you the choice of looking up the models by name or to seek for them under the various niches like hardcore, lingerie, upskirt, office, sports etc. that you might be looking for.

Picture sets after 2007 are of a respectable size, some that I downloaded weighed in at 2001x1343, some at 1700 x 1133, that should be big enough for most. The complete set can be downloaded in one zip file.

Download speed was around 700 KB/s for me, not too bad for what is primarily a picture site.
Cons: And that's basically all the pros I could think of.

The picture sets are large but with little to differentiate one picture from another. A set half the size after some editing would be fine. A whole page (approx. 25 pictures) dedicated to a lady taking her suit jacket off is not my idea of excitement.

Quite frankly I found the ones I took a look at terribly boring as well. The photography is done by rote and lacks excitement. There is nothing bold, nothing "rude," nothing that would make you sit up, especially when it comes to the solos.

A search engine is badly needed.

The videos are a joke. Tiny in resolution and tiny in length. If you should be tempted to watch anything in full screen, forget it. Each video is split up four, five ways into files of approx. 20.000 KBs each, which have to be downloaded separately.

Non exclusive content that is shared in part with Aunt Judy's.

Non-exclusive streaming video scenes offered as a bonus but there is only a choice of maybe ten clip
Bottom Line: I re-subscribed to Aunt Judy's and took out a first time subscription to OW because, as an ex-member they made me an offer I couldn't resist, but in my estimation both sites are not even worth the special price I paid.

I could have written an identical review for Aunt Judy's because they could be clones of one another when it comes to boredom.

My suggestion would be that they drop their present bunch of photographers and hire some who demand more of their models than an almost stiff, lifeless little strip that usually leads to nowhere ... or nothing much. Even my favorite niche, lingerie, contains very little that would offer any excitement.

I would not recommend this site to any lover of mature women until they get some models that show some life, or some photographers who can coax it out of them.

They would also have to dramatically improve the quality of their videos before I ever thought of subscribing to this site or its sister site again.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
79
mudman (36) 02-14-07  10:04am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

messmer (57) 01-31-10  09:41am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)

Don't do it!

Former members will be getting e-mails informing them that Aunt Judy's, Older Women and Older Women Videos have now been combined into one super-site called "Aunt Judy's Collection." Be aware that the whole is not greater than its parts. Quality is still not the greatest and their Older Women video section is a joke. Clips that are being promoted as WMV HD are actually 640x480 at around 2300 bitrate and every video I've looked at so far lacks crispness. Updates alternate between AJ and OW and for the past two days I have seen no updates at all. Just a heads up. You might be quite content with their new site, I'm not!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

messmer (57) 06-09-08  06:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)

Aunt Judy Clone!

No wonder I had the uncomfortable feeling that "Aunt Judy's" wasn't making much of an effort to grow with the times when I was a member there. "Older Women" is owned by the same company and they appear to be concentrating on making this their quality site. Too bad it will be same old, same old for anyone who ever subscribed to AJ's. An improvement in quality is obvious, crisp pictures for one, even though they could be larger and the sets could contain more landscape format pics (granted, a subjective and personal thing.) But all the old "Aunt Judy's" props are found here: Model getting herself made-up in bathroom, model ironing a shirt etc. etc., only the faces are different. So, former AJ members be forewarned .. you'll be bored very quickly. Lovers of mature women who've never subscribed to the mother site will probably like it .. for a month.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Older Women Activity - Older Women Reviews - Older Women Comments - Older Women News

Visit Older Women

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Kelly (0)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Aunt Judy's (1) 73.0 79.8
2. Older Women (1) 70.0 82.5
3. Full Bush (1) 65.0 73.9
4. Office Gals (0) N/A 75.5
5. AJ Archives (0) N/A 73.9
6. Big Older Women (0) N/A 73.8

RSS Feed : Offworld Media Group Inc. Activity

View All: Company Sites (6)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.08 seconds.