| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+40 different adorable, natural young women who smile a lot and make eyes at the camera and aren’t usually photographed staring into some mysterious and distant void
+No fake tits, and very little in the way of tats (exception: Vlada, with a big one on her belly and a “V” right above the ...)
+Exclusive content
+Photo quality is pleasing to the eye with sharpness and color
+Variety of indoor and outdoor shoots (though I’m more of an indoor man myself)
+191 photosets and 212 videos to date, usually combined into a single set (the extra vids are b/g hardcore or masturbation)
+Fast downloads of zips and vids that peak between 660-670 kbps (20MB nominal connection; using Firefox)
+Built-in “Doofus Recovery System”: If you accidentally close all windows to the site, you can return without having to log in again
+Nice design and good, straightforward navigation
+Extensive blog area might be of interest
+Visitor’s area gives you a good idea of the content |
| Cons: |
-First post was late Oct. 2007. That’s 10-11 photosets per month.
-Pics are 1549 pixels on the long end; for a site at this price, there should at least be 3000px photos as well. (That would make it more competitive.)
-Some sets have less light than I’d like, but I guess that’s a matter of taste. They’re not overly dark.
-Vids are only downloadable in avi (576x320)
-Vids have gotten shorter than they used to be (approx. 10 min. to approx 5-6 min)
-Models who have the same names: Anna (4), Natasha (3), Tanya (4), etc. require you to give them additional (or alternative) names if you want to keep them straight
-Too much play with the props sometimes: body parts viewed through spaces in chaise lounges, flowers all over the body (or sticking out of the Miracle-Gro), sand all over like tempura batter, a star-shaped dollop of cake icing above the ass -- stuff like that
-They have stopped doing hardcore (OK by me, but maybe not for the die-hards); last time was end of Nov. 2008 |
| Bottom Line: |
Because the updates come approx. every 3 days, this site is better to join for the increasing size of its archives than it would be for the updates. And that’s what I’ve done, having not been a member since May of last year.
The girls are lovely for the most part, and as I said, natural in their charms. That’s a big plus for this site.
Some of them have been making their mark at other sites as well. "Anna S" at HegreArt (also at MetArt and FM Teens) is absolutely stunning! "Anna" the extremely alluring dark-eyed brunette is also at FM Teens, TeenDreams (as Tantsi), FemJoy as Paulina, JustTeenSite as Anita, and MetArt as Atena.
While I could list a few more, I'll just have to mention Viktoriya, who has smitten both Denner and I. This girl needs MORE exposure! I have seen her at JustTeenSite as Victa, but that was some time ago. Really, she should appear in oodles of updates at every high-quality softcore site in existence.
One little picky thing they could do is have each gallery open in a new window. It is a picky point, though, as I’ve discovered that right-clicking on a gallery link in Firefox allows for the same thing.
It seems that after a nearly year-long flirtation with occasional hardcore additions, they’ve decided to stick strictly to the softcore niche. Frankly, I’m glad just because it will be clear that this is a softcore site. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality in videos and photosets
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever)
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)
Updates looks ok for now - very new site
Updates seems to come almost dayly.
90 vids - a little less photosets
Most softcore - some hc
Good preview
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.
Exclusive material |
| Cons: |
Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been 350 Mb/sec. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was taken in by the preview - thanks!
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.
I've "cooled off" here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens. |
| Respond: |
12 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (5) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Nu Dolls Activity - Nu Dolls Reviews - Nu Dolls Comments - Nu Dolls News
