| User Reviews (35) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-05-09 08:33am (Update History)
Reason: Joined the site again, and looked at the updates. Big improvement
|
| Pros: |
FIRST OF ALL this is a very subjective review so keep that in mind as I list my pros and cons for this site.
-nice young looking teenagers (barely legal but all are 18 as far as I could tell) I think the quality of the girls (cute faces, petite) increased significantly.
-nice navigation+ easy downloading
-large amount of content
-a lot of info about the models helping you know them
-members board
- a lot of options for leaving feedback. The webmasters really care about your opinion.
- much more hardcore than before (my main con argument is slowly proving to be a mute point) |
| Cons: |
- there are teens who do hardcore and teens who do softcore and rarely do the two mix. Which means that instead of watching a girl go from solo shots to anal or, something hard like that, you get some newcomers who only do the hard and the cute teens who only do solo and toy scenes. This makes the site actually feel like two different sites, one with good looking solo cute teens and one with random hardcore girls.
Out of the top ten rated girls only four have sex, but wait the four are actually two girls placed in the top rated twice. Which brings me to the website owners attitude. I feel like they are trying to cheat us their approach is just to bring in more hardcore girls instead of getting the cutter teens to do the hardcore and the softcore...
This attitude makes me wish they had made two sites but instead they chose to make one single site that brags it has teens doing both softcore and hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
EDIT: I re-joined this site recently and felt I simply HAD to re-view my review. I tried to leave as much of the original review there (the opinion below is from before joining the site again) but damn this site improved a lot since I last visited it. The girls were hot back then, they are awesome now and so many of them do hardcore as well as softcore. Thank you! That was exactly what I wanted from this site a progression of teens going through all the stages from stripping to hardcore. Thank you! This site is a must on my list now. Keep up the good work guys.
I am a fan of hardcore teen porn and I felt cheated by the Nublies team and I disliked their approach to the website as well as the direction they were taking the project. I expected the girls they highlight to go all the way in a nice progression.
If you can look past the difference in hardcore and softcore models the website has a nice, big collection of photos and videos. But if you like hardcore I'd recommend other teen sites before this one, to be honest. |
| Respond: |
11 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nubiles.net:
The models are very cute and sexy girls - all in the 18 - 22 age range, the vast majority being 18-20. Both American and East European girls are heavily represented, with an occasional Latina and Canadian.
Very large selection of very hot videos and photos sets - with 3 new models weekly. At least one does hardcore, with the other two doing masturbation scenes or playing with toys.
Nubiles.net is the easiest and most viewer-friendly site.
Everything loads very quickly, the videos and photosets download rapidly and in high quality.
Search features such as the photographic and alphabetic directories of the models make it wonderfully easy to search and navigate. And the search capability by various model characteristics and video/photo features is the easiest and fastest I have come across.
Large amount of content of photos and videos of girls on the site to search and enjoy. |
| Cons: |
For those wishing a great deal of hardcore, the site only adds one new hardcore model per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have yet to find another site with so many quality updates per week, very cute and hot models, and with such excellent viewer-friendly and navigation features. |
| Respond: |
11 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Claimed 647 models! Yes, they are quite nubile; very hot, in their late teens, early 20s
+ Newer full length videos are 1280 x 720 @ 3500 kb/s .wmv (smaller sizes available in .avi, .mp4, .mpg)
+ No download limits, no DRM, download managers are allowed
+ 3 to 4 updates every day, and 3 new models every week
+ Newer photos are 2400 x 1600, with zips for each photo set
+ Download speeds of at least 500 kbs/s
+ Some models do hardcore content
+ Pretty clear breakdown at top of each model's page of what she does; from "topless" to "sex"
+ "Interview" pages give some info on each model
+ Navigation is pretty straightforward, and search engine works well
+ Billing through CCBill, with special PU discount of $24.31/month |
| Cons: |
- Overall repetitive and boring feel, and hardcore in particular, at least for me (see Bottom Line)
- Virtually no girl-girl content (less than a dozen scenes, if that)
- Little anal or fetish content beyond vaginal and lots of toys
- "Bonus" content is negligible, and mostly to advertise other pay sites
- Navigation within photo set pages is a little annoying
- Individual video clips are not highest quality, only 1280 x 720 when you DL the whole video
- Photos are professionally shot, but a few look a bit too Photoshopped, or as if they should not have been been released at all
- Purely my personal preference, but a few too many European models |
| Bottom Line: |
I originally approached this site as a girls only site, even though I was well aware that it had hardcore content. But come on, it's not the guys that are nubile -- it's the hundreds of hot girls! That's the one thing that is indisputable: the models here are young (late teens through mid twenties) and very attractive. Quite a few are American and new, but there are also plenty of Europeans (mostly Eastern Europe, in particular a growing number from Russia) as well as models that have been on quite a few other girls-only sites (Franziska, Sarah Blake, Kacey Jordan, Angelica Black), but none I would really call bona fide porn stars.
For those who like some variety in their model choices, this site might be a tad bland. The focus is on the nubile and skinny females in this world, but not necessarily of all races and elasticities it seems. I would not call the models themselves bland, but I really could not find any variety of girls that would include those of Asian, African, or Central and South American descent. It really was not an issue for me, as there is every hair color to choose from, most are shaven bare, though some still have pubic hair if it matters, plus tattoos and piercings, but nothing over the top. And if these girls simply are not in your preferred age range, you might want to check out their sister (mother?) site, Anilos, which looks to be much the same setup and price structure, though noticeably smaller amount of content.
So, how are all these lovely ladies captured? Well, the equipment and technology almost matches the beauty of the models. Newer videos are 1280 x 720 HD, but only in full length. Videos are broken down into one to two minute clips as well, but if you only download these clips, it's lower resolution. I guess this is good if you want to check out the content of a video before downloading the whole thing, but a letdown nonetheless if you just want that special clip. Videos are well lit, relatively well shot (no "Blair Witch" shake-'em-up contests), and have basically no apparent off camera distractions, spoken or otherwise. There are some interviews where the cameraman speaks, but it's only in interviews where I could find this happening.
Here's where my 81 score starts to really come in; though well shot, videos just did not do it for me. I would say the site is still photo-focused (more on that in a minute) but the videos are not too special for me. These ladies are eye candy, no doubt, but often somewhat reserved in videos, even in the hardcore scenes. I felt it was as much a case as just keeping the models comfortable (the solo, as well as the hardcore, content is never abusive or degrading, if you were wondering) as it was not asking enough of them. They enjoy themselves for sure, but not as much as I was expecting, and it felt as if it was too formulaic and toy focused to really make things stand out.
(Bottom Line continued below.) |
| Respond: |
9 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge selection of beautiful, gorgeous teens / young girls
- Consistent high quality - both for videos and pictures
- EXCELLENT navigation, directory and search function - these guys got it right! See details below
- Rating system
- Around 3 - 4 updates a day regularly, mixed of photo sets and videos
- Chance to read girl's BIOs and also to email them
- 3 - 4 different video formats + streaming option
- ~$25 / month - good price
- Good DL speed (see below for details though)
- A few Bonus Sites and sets, but really no big deal, don't sign up for them |
| Cons: |
- Not too much HC, and considerably less videos than pictures (a con for me personally)
- Download speed is acting a kind of weird
- Some sets just end before you'd get to see what you've been waiting for (although it is indicated if you pay attention, as it being only 'topless')
- It can't make me put a few more things in here without being incorrect myself and list cons that are not really cons, just not a part of what this site offers in the first place :) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site delivers exactly what it promises.
Nubiles.net truly offers an exceptional value at around $25 a month. Their selection of really young, hot, beautiful girls is almost unbelievable.
Design / Navigation: As I've always said, I don't care for some fancy design with crappy function. In this case, function is 100% right, and the design is OK as well. The first thing I really liked about the site is that the "Model Directory" can be accessed all the time, as you can see the 'starting letters of names' and a scroll down menu to select a particular model just below the menu. I mean, it just shows that the site is all about the girls on it - and we, members are all about seeing the girls too. :-) The "Video Page" gives you nice list of all the videos, with direct download links to all formats and part and / or full movies. Then you've got a "Search" option, which gives you all the preferences you can think of, such as attributes (like cup size, nipple type, hair color, length, pussy hair style, etc), outfits (bikini, glasses, socks, etc), actions and environment, and then if you only want to see girls, videos or pictures. So yes you got it right, 5 stars for their search function. :-) If this was not enough for you to find what you're looking for, you've got the "Hardcore Girls", the "Top Rated","Tags" and "Community Hub" sections.
Content: like I mentioned earlier, pictures are emphasized over videos, but it's not too bad. As a result for a search for pictures, I got around 3500 results, and around 2600 for videos. But for videos I have a suspicion that video parts count as well - UPD: ACCORDING TO WEBMASTER THEY DON'T! Picture quality was almost always very satisfying for me,usually getting a large and small resolution choice, where large is 2400 x 1600, and small is 1200 x 800, which is still OK. I loved that there's a quick gallery view, where I can navigate quickly, and had the option all the time switch between large/small, and also to download the whole set in a zip file. Number of pictures is usually around 80 - 100. I found the variety of locations to be satisfying, with quite a few outdoor settings, but I do have to agree with one of the previous reviewers: WE WANT MORE WET STUFF! :) The videos' resolution is around 640 x 480 most of the time, and are usually being offered in parts and as a whole, and full movies can be downloaded in 3 - 4 different formats (avi, mpg and wmv, +mp4), where wmv is the highest quality (1280 x 720), but for me .avi-s worked as a perfect compromise between size and quality.
DL speed: if I started downloading one single file, I'd get around 80kb/s-180kb/s. Interestingly enough, if I start downloading 6 files at a time, I still get the above speed for EACH of them. So overall, DL speed is excellent if you download more at the time (at least this how it worked for me).
Conclusion: if you like teens, and not only HC stuff, at $25 / mo you can't go wrong here!
[had to cut it short cause of char.limits :(] |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great navigation
Updates weekly (3 or 4 per week)
Beautiful young girls
Cool features
Lots of content |
| Cons: |
Over priced 37 dollars
Some Old stuff should be remastered
(ie videos, and pics)
Not a lot of variety as far as themes (hardcore, lesbian, threesomes)
Bonus websites |
| Bottom Line: |
Its a pretty decent website to pluck down your hard earn cash on. There's a large content to satisfy many porn users like myself. Here's what you will get:
-There are over 600 models from this website most are exclusive
-There are three different formats on movies .avi, mpg, and wmv. Most of their old stuff are either .avi .mpg which is usually between 40-150 mbs while their HD .wmv can be from 150-300 plus mbs. (not all models have HD .wmv formats)
-photos are either 800 x 1200 and 1200x1800
-feature to contact the model via e-mail (don't know if this is legit or not personally I think its BS)
-voting, leaving comments to the photographer
-message board for the community
bonus sites if you stay on longer (which are not worth it IMHO).
This is a barely legal teen websites. Majority of the girls are beautiful wearing very little makeup. There are hardcore themes of one-on-one but that's pretty much it. There are not threesomes at least I haven't found any yet. There are a few lesbian themes but the majority is either masturbation or stripping. You can supposedly contact the model which I am doubtful if the model from the other end will even respond or if she is legit so take this with a grain of salt. I do have a few complaints about this website one is the price 37 dollars is a lot for a website especially when the standard is 30 dollars and you can get a better deal somewhere else. My other complaint are the pics and movies definitely need a face-lift on quality. Its not to say there's nothing bad about it but they should try to remaster the movies especially on a daily basis. This is a kind of website that should be subscribed just one month. With a good connection you can download the entire website in that time frame. |
| Respond: |
10 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Beautiful, young and slender "nubiles" for your viewing pleasure
+ Large amount of content (2000+ videos). Hardcore & solo
+ Movies offered in divx, mpeg & wmv formats.
+ wmv movies HD quality.
+ Sufficient site navigation for amount of content.
+ Model profiles
+ Download manager friendly |
| Cons: |
- Site design needs an update.
- What's up with the girl in the ski hat?
- 2 network sites are a tease. Not much there worth seeing. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles lives up to the hype. If you enjoy the young and perky niche this site is for you! It's not limited to the solo, artsy-fartsy photo shoots either. Nubiles have some great galleries but there is also some good hardcore, lesbian and masturbation videos to download and enjoy. (Check out the hardcore vids with Emy, Sage and Tiacox!)
Technically Nubiles is a solid site. It has adequate navigation for the amount of content and good download speeds. Flash videos are available so you can get a quick preview of a movie before downloading. The Web site should be updated for modern monitor resolutions.
The bottom line is Nubiles is well worth the $24.31! |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Originally reviewed site over 2 years ago, original review expired, Nubiles is one of the few sites that has improved consistently and is now one of my favorite sites.
- New videos are 1280 high end with 3500 bitrates, new picture sets are 2400 high end, pictures come zipped in "low" or "high" size, videos have several options and can be downloaded in parts or whole scenes
- They really impress me with their constant "new" models that sometimes aren't really new to the world of porn, but are usually still pretty new and are new to the site.
- Shoots are more serious now than they used to be, not as much lollipops and bobbisocks and trying to make the model look one day over 18.
- Navigation is nice and smooth, model list makes for easy to find models, especially ones going by different names, nice size thumbnails that show the model so you can recognize her.
- Broad range of models from America, Europe, but not a lot of range in race.
- Some of the interviews are enjoyable |
| Cons: |
- Wish they would remaster some of the old sets, they have some really great content of Eve Angel, Sandra Shine and a few others that was from 2004-05 that would look exceptional in full scene HD and remaster the pictures as well.
- Some of the shoots are very softcore, though most at least show everything, many of the older videos are simply of the girls rolling around naked on the bed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles is one of those rare sites that has chased its potential, without giving up. Their model selection is one of the best on the internet.
One of my very favorite "newer" models is Tanner Mayes and Nubiles was one of the first sites that I know of, to shoot her.
One thing that I think can be confusing is when you look at their model list based on their member rankings. This is what I see in the top 10.
Katrina, Chasity, Lacey, Brea (Bree Olsen), Kacey, Summer, Franziska, Belinda, Arianna
Of those 10 I know two, Bree and Franziska, never seen or heard of the other 8. Also the top 3 look young enough that I would ID them. Maybe it gives off the wrong image of the site? I've never really been into the very teen group and those 3 practically define it!
Others on the site include early content of Amy Reid, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Tanner Mayes, and literally dozens of established stars.
The newer videos are 1280 with 3500 bitrate and look great, even the older videos are not bad, the Eve videos are from 5 years ago and are 640 high end, so that isn't bad at all.
The pictures have a nice crispness to them, but do agree with others that the watermark is a bit distracting.
The site updates daily, but not for sure on the exact amount of updates per day since they do seem to vary, I've seen some days that have as many as 6 updates per day, other days as few as 3. Either way, you get a lot of updates in a month's time and they have a nice sized amount of content overall.
The site in some ways reminds me of a blend between ALS Scan and FTV Girls, which should be taken as a 100% pure compliment. They really seem to be hitting their peak at their site at the right time. I've been a member 4 of the last 6 months and continue to enjoy the membership.
They have this update called "New faces" and this is where they add 3 new girls per week to their site. I like this, though I am not a big fan of amateur content, these girls usually are ones that I have not seen before or have seen very little content of if I have seen them.
Picture size continues to improve, zips are quick and easy to download, though they do limit your connections to 6 at a time.
As I said in the cons, the main improvements I would ask for is remastering of old content. ALS Scan has had a great deal of success with their remastering process and think it would make me move this site even up higher if they did it too. Also has a member forum, some bonus girls and bonus content that is mostly hardcore and the site has a nice blend of hardcore b/g, g/g, solo.
The content is also exclusive as far as I know though a few sets are in familiar settings that I have seen before, I still believe these are exclusive, probably just using the same shoot area that other sites have.
Well worth a month join and in my case, a multi-month join. Recommended to all! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
exotics4me wrote 1 review (04-22-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very big selection of models.
Most are beautiful, within an age range of 18 - 20 (some are older) therefore fitting the name "Nubiles" perfectly.
Picture sets are available in zipped form with most sets (since 2008) giving you a choice between normal (1200x1793) and large size (1600x2400). But since the "normal size" is still quite respectable it is a pleasure to be able to go back past 2008 and sample all the "older models."
Videos are crystal clear, the new ones in wmv format at 3500 kbps. Since there are so many updates (one daily, alternating between stills and videos) I have concentrated mostly on new contents, dating from 2008 until the present.
Older contents is good and while not great by today's standards the mpg videos are still quite palatable.
Much thought has been given to the navigation of the site making it easy to get around.
The webmaster is very friendly and responsive, this is a big plus in my eyes.
Download speed is very good. |
| Cons: |
I love this site just as it is. My only con would be in connection with what it is NOT! Most who know me by now also know that I'm slightly out of place in a site that contains models under forty, but then it wouldn't be Nubiles any longer, would it?
Why am I here then? Because when I took the tour of its sister site "Anilos" I found the quality so good that I couldn't resist subscribing to a much younger site, just because it had the same quality of material and much more contents.
Strangely enough I haven't been sorry for a moment. And as you can tell by another review I just put in, I threw all caution to the wind when it came to "Anilos" and subscribed to that site as well. The site owners can thank "Berkley" for that!
I find both sites near perfect and am only stopped from giving a score in the high nineties because the older material doesn't quite live up to my taste for HD and near HD material yet. |
| Bottom Line: |
A great site for lovers of nubile women. I find it a very nice mixture of Europeans and Americans, and in contrast to some of my friends here I like the interviews in English as well as the beautiful models that America has in such abundance. Mind you, the Europeans aren't bad either!
I usually skip the hardcore stuff (m/f) but that's a personal preference.
Highly recommended! |
| Respond: |
9 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Probably the best site at this moment concerning quality and quantity of easteuropean girl-videos.
More US-girls has been added lately.
Solo-videos (I love them) are both sexier and sweeter than anywhere else (1ByDay included)
A splendid variation of types of girls - if you can't find at least 20 or more here that turns you on, you got a problem..
Fine updates. Three every day changing between videos and photosets.
Fine navigation. Navigation in many ways - see below.
Ok price for PUs.
3-5 videos of each model - with a very few exeptions.
Top preview (video and photosets) that gives you the idea of the deal here. |
| Cons: |
The h/c - b/g-scenes are sometimes a bit stereotype. (with exceptions - see the great fuck-scene with czech Jessica).
US-girls are more frequent - sorry folks, but I think some of the solo-scenes with US-girls has too much giggle and talking - probably because they feel more relaxed, but here it's the old problem with the cameraman/producer.
Some of the old video-stuff lack quality, but where does it not... |
| Bottom Line: |
Never would go for a 100 - but, man - this site keeps turning me on - and after the descent of the good ol' Teendreams, Nubiles rules.
The main pros. here are the fantastic selection of different types of girls - there are one, two and many others for every taste.
This user tends to the euro-teens here for the reason mentioned above. Most girls are both cute and sexy in the same deal.
In comparison with 1ByDay the girls/teens at Nubiles are a bit more on the amateur way, but their acting misses nothing - in sex, looks and general turn-on. Gotta give it to the producers here - so why not skip all the giggle and talk with the US-girls/teens.
For a year or more the quality of videos are just getting better - and still have the fine thing with parts and full-scene.
High-def wmv (typical 250 Mb) are not much better than the avi (typical 130 Mb) - and then you have mpg for viewing/downloading the parts - for a starter.
Also a pretty good sort of "preview" in streaming (Flash).
Photosets: the videos almost add up to the amount of photosets - a little more photosets for each girl in general - photos: 1200x800 - and with zips, of coruse.
Navigation is a pleasure: browse girls, browse updates, browse videos, browse photosets, browse toprated - you name it.
Currency: When joining from Europe via TBP, you'll get a bit higher price. But mail the webmaster, and he'll provide you with a link to get the good price.
And, yes: the feedback from the site/webmaster at Nubiles is fine- what any good ol' PU would expect.
This site is primarily for "lovers" of solo teens - video/photosets - with some hc b/g in between (aprox 1/5 or a little les is hc).
But for soloteen-videos this is the best it gets - right now - I think |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
Denner wrote 1 review (05-28-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site
- Model Descriptions and Interviews |
| Cons: |
- Content is a bit boring
- lacking of an editorial line (no real niche)
- Slow Downloads
- Not real HD in 1920x1080 |
| Bottom Line: |
Big disapointment for me. I was expecting something much more exciting. It's like stepping out of a Mc Donalds: you're still hungry and you ate sh**. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (22) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|