| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Lana Lopez is very cute and photogenic. She has a nice tan, too.
+Nearly 100% exclusive material
+To date, 53 “glamour” photosets are available to members
+All “glamour” photos are 1800x1200, except for “Royal Room” (1024x683, from 24MainStreet)
+25 “candid” photosets to date are 1200x800 or smaller (less professional BTS or “Lana’s lifestyle” material)
+Zips for all photosets
+On photo pages, number of photos included for each set, and thumbs are nice and big
+Nice slideshow feature: can select among 6 different photo sizes and 6 time intervals between slides (the “timeout” setting)
+48 videos to date, 640x480 or less, wmv
+No DRM
+Mostly good, straightfoward navigation, but see con’s
+$19.95 is not a bad price for this
+Diary, bio, and wishlist (Lana’s, so you know her clothing sizes and recommended brands) |
| Cons: |
-“Glamour” photosets and videos update just once per week.
-Some “glamour” photosets are brief. 8 have 30 pics or fewer, and a few have little or no total nudity.
-Downloads are kind of slow, but not bad. 625kbps reached on video download with 20 Mbps IPS service.
-One photoset zip, “Blue Dress,” wouldn’t open (tried download and extraction twice).
-Thumbs for "Little Black Dress" gallery (new as of 6/3/08) just "X" out. There's no excuse for that.
-“Glamour” photo quality very good, but not top pro.
-Video quality varies from marginally OK (“Backyard strip” 6480x480, 891 Kbps bitrate) to not (“Tiger Stripes” at 400x300, disappointing). Video dimensions not posted on video page.
-“Member’s Area Homepage” and “Updates” page seem pointless. They duplicate each other. What’s more, the links on them just open to the most recent page of photosets (or videos), not to the specific one you click on. |
| Bottom Line: |
In her bio, Lana says that she finds clothes uncomfortable. Photosets in which she doesn’t get completely naked (like “Girl Scout” and “Rollerblades”) put me a little on edge, too.
All the same, as individual model sites go, this one is certainly better than average. What needs improvement most is the video quality. “Backyard Strip" had me drooling (naturally) with Lana squirming around belly down naked on a blanket, making sweetly inviting facial expressions, but I wish it had been less “fuzzy.”
Second, I’d like Lana to get totally naked in every photoset and really show her stuff more, especially her delicious behind! “Passion Purple” #47 and #48 are what I’m talkin’ ‘bout.
I need to add to the cons the slowness of getting back from a gallery page to the main listings. Example: if you're at page 4 of gallery, the only way back is 4 clicks, but the wait is too long.
BTW, there’s NO hardcore on this site, i.e., as part of the membership, but in closing I should mention the “hardcore” “zipsets.” There’s just one up so far, and the description and 4 preview pics show that it’s a 17+ minute masterbation vid. However, it’s NOT available with the site membership. It’s a separate purchase. Price? $17.95.
Think about it. Webmasters would pay more than that (for licensing, anyway). But would an averaqe consumer pay nearly the same price for one video as for a month of site membership?
Don't think so! |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Next Door Lana!
Add Comment
|
RSS Feeds : All Next Door Lana Activity - Next Door Lana Reviews - Next Door Lana Comments - Next Door Lana News
