| User Reviews (54) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A good mix of favourite and new models
- Diverse themes
- Easy navigation
- User friendly |
| Cons: |
- Live archives are only quicktime format
- Past scenes have been deleted, notably in Naughty Latin Maid and Socal Coeds
- Some dead sites
- A few too many upsells and advertisments |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the best networks out there! It does have some minor things, but they can easily be fixed. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ a lot of quality HQ content
+ a lot of sexy girls
+ you get acces to alof of various sites with different themes
+ very use friendly
+ AMAZING, and I mean AMAZING, pornstars in various scenes |
| Cons: |
- too much AMAZING content ; you hesitate on what to download hehe
- lesbian scenes are meh...the girls are not dirty and most of the time it' obvious they don't want to do lesbian scenes
- not many creampies/ creampie eating scenes
- feet lovers...this is not the site for you |
| Bottom Line: |
3 letters...WOW...such an amazing website. It provides with different website, and every one of them has tons of Quality vids with beautiful babes. I will register with them eventually for I missed out on alot of content. I have NOTHING bad to say about Naughty America |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Top notch content
-Hottest women in the industry
-Nice variety of girls TO AN EXTENT (See cons)
-Good lighting and camera work for the most part
-Great download speeds
-HD videos and standard both look really good
-Nice location variance
-13 Updates a week
-HUGE collection
-Staff very receptive to suggestions
-Fully Downloadable content
-No daily download limit (at least I dont think) |
| Cons: |
-HD videos arent as good as other sites, but not bad
-While they offer a better variety of hot girls than Brazzers and BangBros, they still dont seem to use enough ethic girls. Mainly all white chicks
-Site ideas are basically all the same, but not a big deal.
-SOMETIMES scenes randomly disappear, but its pretty rare
-Older videos, aside for some remastered scenes, look pretty rough by todays standard.
-May be too soft for some |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, in my opinion, NA is the best of the big 4 networks (NA, Brazzers, BangBros and RK) at this point in time (March 2012). Obviously, opinions vary, but I love what they are doing right now. I am not into the super hardcore stuff, so this stuff is right up my alley. A few years ago I was really on the fence about them and thought they were heading downhill, but they really upped the production value and dont hire uggos or grandmothers anymore. All the girls they hire are either very in demand or hot up and cummers.
I seen the previous review before this one, and I have to comment on it briefly. Yes, this site wont appeal much to those who are into the super hardcore stuff, but IMO, its silly to judge a site for something it doesnt try to be. NA is like the Playboy of hardcore porn. Its fairly straight forward and regular, but thats what it sets out to be. The preview area of the site doesnt suggest in anyway that its anything other than that, so I cant see how people can complain that its not hard enough. Thats like walking into Kentucky Fried Chicken and getting pissed because they wont serve you a hamburger.
NA is great for what it is. If you are into harder stuff, there are many other sites that will appeal to your tastes better. But it does annoy me when people complain about a site not doing something it never claims it does. It would be one thing if they promised "extreme hardcore porn", but they dont.
Beyond that, the only real complaints I have is that it doesnt offer more ethnic women. No, they dont promise that either, but when it comes to girls, its a bit different. Even their Latin site hardly gets updated anymore.
Bottom line: If you are into basic, straight forward hardcore porn that isnt over the top, but offers high quality content regularly and consistent updates, this site is absolutely for you. But if you love the real raunchy hardcore (regular DPs, gaping, etc...), do not join...and if you do, well, go order a hamburger at KFC. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
MiztaBlu wrote 2 reviews (05-22-09, 03-21-08) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site has some decent generic sex scenes with some attractive women. Big titted women with tattoos should appeal to the Brazzers crowd. Videos come in a variety of formats and there is a growing HD content. Price is reasonable. |
| Cons: |
Your basic porn site with predictable action and content. They use a formula and apply it over and over with the same camera angles, distance, cum shots, tempo etc. Many newer videos star horrible fake titted women with lots of tattoos. Search options help overcome this. Repetitive content, very low bandwith and aforementioned skankazoids, make this site boring, arduous, and unpleasant. The photos are archaically small - even the ones that they claim are hi- rez. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site goes out of its way to keep porn at its most generic, mundane, banal, insipid, quotidian, vanilla best while giving you the most sparing bandwidth I've encountered - |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Large number of sites in network
-Mostly hardcore (sex) content
-Multiple updates per week days (I didn't see weekend updates) |
| Cons: |
-No weekend updates? Maybe they should invest in a content management system to auto post updates 7 days a week.
-I expected more still photos
-Watch out for cross sells during your signup
-No real interaction with anyone on site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good site to join, and check out a lot of content, not so much a site I would stick around with for a long period of time. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A huge network of mostly reality themed sites.
- Very good TBP price
- Three new updates per day during the week, no updates on weekends, still balances out to a hair over 2 updates per day.
- Newer sets have 1080p option in .f4v files, recommend playing those with VLC.
- All sets as far as I can see, this site has been around for a long time, but all sets besides the "Live" sites sets include a picture set with zip feature to download.
- The "Live" sites will appear in cons too, but I do consider these a pro on one side. At one time, NA had live cam performances for their members. These live sites have all of those performances stored on them for you to download, so they are a bonus if you never saw them.
- Good download speeds
- Newer videos have 7 download options including mobile. Very crisp videos and for the most part, good camerawork.
- Lots of niches covered with costume themed sets. |
| Cons: |
- Can understand stopping the "live" sites, but I still think it's a con even with the archives, as those really separated NA from the other networks.
- The older content which includes some of NA's best scenes, often only offer a low quality video option.
- As with most of the reality sites you will run into the occasional "why won't that guy shut the fuck up?" video |
| Bottom Line: |
I really don't want this to come off as a review saying Naughty America isn't a good network. It's a great network, but I do think it is somewhat stuck in 2008.
This is a very professional network. To my eyes, those 1080p .f4v files are the clearest videos I've seen. There is a problem there. That is file size. Most of these range between 2 and 2.5 GB each. I actually found the 480p .f4v files to be more than acceptable, very clear also and really, the file size suggests they are still very high quality. A 480p, 30 minute video usually isn't near 900 MB, but these are.
Navigation works, I'm sure it could be better, but considering the amount of content they have, I am going to assume it's hard to squeeze all of it into an uncluttered space.
Where I think NA is running into a problem is the same place other networks have ran into a problem. They pigeonholed themselves with these niche themed sites and eventually those will become repetitive. I don't think it's a network's fault, but I would like to see them branch out a little. They have such a good collection of "older" models, why not throw in an older woman seducing her young female neighbor to having lesbian sex site? Just a thought.
The live archived content is a real goldmine for fans of solo porn. Since these were once live performances, you get the model talking to the camera, teasing, masturbating, and me being a solo fan, can really appreciate this content.
Having pictures with sets is always a plus. Much like their videos, NA's pictures are nice and clear, however, these pictures are well below average in resolution with a top out at 1000 high end, but they do look good.
The main draw of the content here, at least to me, are the themes. You've got Cougars, MILFs, Teens, they're all seducing or being seduced. Are you picking up my slacker vibe? I don't think Naughty America intends to slack, but 100-200 videos based on the exact same scenario does get boring. Hell, I don't know, let the student seduce the teacher. And again, not blaming NA for this. If they put scenes up that didn't fit exactly what the theme says there would be someone complaining that they were false-advertising.
I do think this is a very good network, especially at the $9.95 price. You just can't hardly beat that value, even stronger when you consider they are still releasing 15ish new scenes a week.
Over 1,000 "live" archived scenes. Never been to this network? These alone are worth a month's membership. Some do include more than one person, but most are solo and the Live Naughty Secretary, to me, is worth a membership just for those.
Of the regular sites, there are 26 and they are big on the "older" models, though as we have found out, older is quite subjective, in this case, most of these models are between 25-35. Over 4,000 scenes on those sites and they are all exclusive.
Model selection is pretty typical for a network, quite a few implants, quite a few tattoos, but I'm not really complaining since the site itself doesn't decide if these models get tattoos or implants.
Overall, recommended to nearly all porn fans and highly recommended if you do not have the content from the "live" sites. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
exotics4me wrote 1 review (10-29-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy
++ Very good tags and cross site search functions
++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p
+ Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie
+ Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff
+ Good monthly price through TBP
+ Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form.
+ Lots of American girls
+ Professional lighting and production value
+ Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue.
+ All the content besides the live shows is hardcore |
| Cons: |
-- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics)
-- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes
-- Slow site at times (they need more servers)
- Cross sales on signup
- Stupid social networking keeps popping up |
| Bottom Line: |
I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve.
PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help.
VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though.
OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes).
There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics.
The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen).
The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6.
So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (67) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
