| User Reviews (8) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
If you're a fan of softcore erotica and you're looking for something different, this could be it. If you log on and watch the intro video, you'll have a pretty good idea of what to expect. A woman reports on the news and slowly takes off her clothes (or sometimes it's lingerie, or even costumes). If that sounds intriguing, you'll love the site. If not, well, that's pretty much the entire site.
Surprisingly, the news reporting is actually decent. It's a fun way to stay up on current events. The video quality is excellent and available in a variety of formats for both Mac and PC. You can download the two most current programs in very high resolution, or you can download the last 150 days shows in your choice of low/medium/high resolution. However, you'll need to buy the "gold" membership to get the very high quality videos.
Additionally, various years old segments are available for streaming, but not downloading. |
| Cons: |
I'll try to address some common complaints so that prospective subscribers know what they're getting:
The show is not really about sex. Some people may not find it erotic in the slightest. There's no romantic component and, more than anything, it feels kind of silly and carefree. It's actually a fun site, but it's not about sex.
There are about 20 downloadable pictures for some of the anchors, but for some bizarre reason, they're only semi-nude. You won't see things that you see in the video. Think of Demi Moore on the poster for "Striptease." The pics are really more like a bonus than anything else.
It's impossible to tell who the actual current anchors are. You'd think Michelle and Yukiko were still involved, but they're not. This is a bit frustrating. Not all of the anchors are amazing. Some have fake breasts and some are very skinny, but mostly they're pretty hot.
Finally, not everyone is nude all the time. If that's a problem, you'll be frustrated by the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've subscribed off-and-on for years and I've always been pleased with the content. There is a real sense of teamwork and friendship between the anchors, and you get a real sense of their personalities.
The video quality, as I said, is outstanding and the download speeds are fast. Add to that the extremely low cost of membership, and you can't lose.
The fundamental question is, do you find the content stimulating? I suspect that for many, the answer is no - it's just too soft and has nothing to do with sex. However, you may find it irresistible.
There are a few specious notions floating around this forum, so please post a response if you want clarification on any point. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good Looking Models
-Good Programing
-Decent Quality Video
-Some Amateur Models
-Price is Low ($14.95/month) |
| Cons: |
-Daily/Hourly Download Limit
-Very Few Pictures with NO NUDITY
-Archives are Limited (See Below)
-No Close-ups of Models Naked Parts
-Videos are Quick Time ONLY
-Some FAKE BOOBS (Not to my liking) |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of this site for on and off over the last 7 years (this is my 7th time joining). While they have improved the programming of the show a great deal, the site quality is lacking compared to what it could be. Placing limits on the number of downloads you can do in an hour/day is ridiculous given that the largest videos are 30MB and most are under 10MB. I was restricted after downloading only 4 days of material! That is about 28 2min clips at moderate resolution. That is simply crap given that only 1/3 of that contains nudity(-10pts)!
This brings me to my other point. While the site advertised .H64 high rez video (which isn't all that great), they do have it---but only for the last two days are available for download(-10pts).
Next we have the Quick Time only video. Although QT is not horrible the videos should be in multiple formats given that this site is basically a TV show. Video is their thing and they are failing with presenting it (-5pts).
Finally, the models may be hot but by the time you wade through the limited downloads, the so-so video quality, and the QT only you essentially get to see a pussy that is composed of about 10-15 pixels. This would not be a problem IF there were quality pictures of the models to accompany the videos. And there are, but they are NON NUDE (-15pts).
So why have I rejoined. Long story short, besides Lily Kwan and April Torres, in 2001 the quality of the video was good for the time and there were no download limits. By 2005 the models had changed and the video quality was somewhat better. Last year the video quality was starting to suck and I was told it was going be HD soon. Now that they have the .H64 QT video they have imposed limitations that are ridiculous for the user.
If you want to check the site out it may be worth it if it is your first time. Too bad you will not be able to see the older anchors since the archive is pitiful (i.e. the older videos have NOT been improved but rather are shown AS IS circa 2000 like 100 X 70). This site is in need of a major reality check given how well other adult sites treat their material. This will be the last time I join given the restrictions imposed which ruins the experience. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ very original idea
++ video quality is EXCELLENT
++ mood/attitude/personality of the girls is EXCELLENT - they enjoy it
+ fun to see news anchor undressing
+ different outfits and strip patterns
+ pussy haircuts
+ cheap |
| Cons: |
-- about 50% of the time there is no undressing, girls start nude
-- there is at least one girl which is outright UGLY
- very few REALLY good-looking girls |
| Bottom Line: |
I've re-joined "Naked News" recently, and shall say I've got mixed feelings about it.
It is still news and the girls are still stripping while reading them, and it is still one show every day. The girls are still stripping to all-nude, but not more (not even anything "pink", no teasing, nothing). That's what the site is about, and I don't see any problems with it, just want to be clear.
The first problem I see with it is that while they have some variety by adding different outfits and strip patterns, about half of the time girls start nude, so there is no room to strip further, and no variety :-(.
The second problem is while they're hiring girls who enjoy it, and that's perfectly fine, but there shall be some minimal look standards; there is at least one regular girl which is IMHO OUTRIGHT ugly, and for me it is a major turn-off. I don't have problems with "average-looking" girls there (most of their girls are average-looking and I'm ok with it as long as they have nice personality, and they usually do), but this one is different.
On the positive side, it looks that site has started to pay some attention to make it a bit more erotic: while there is still no "pink" and no "teasing", it looks that girls have started to make nice pussy haircuts :-) (warning - you won't see any close-ups of it, the view is always like in the "normal" news - either full-height or above-waist).
Bottom line: a site which can be fun to see for a month (if you're ok with "just nudity"), but as a long-term fun I don't really see it happening. It IMHO even became a (tiny) bit worse than a year ago because of problems outlined above, and it's reflected in the score. If they would add more stripping variety (outfits, stripping patterns and so on), and pay a BIT more attention to girl looks (I REALLY like girls smiling and have no problems with "average looking" girls, but there shall be some minimal standard) it IMHO could help significantly. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
asmith12 wrote 1 review (10-17-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
unique and outrageous concept
convincingly performed by attractive women
high quality video
cheap |
| Cons: |
hourly/daily download limits
unhelpful file names in zip files
can only download last 6 months
can only download 1 scene at a time |
| Bottom Line: |
I love the concept of nude women stripping and reading the news naked, I couldn't quite believe it when I saw a clip on TV. The news is real and probably better quality than that in the English tabloid press. The models are attractive and many of them are shaved which is a big bonus when they aren't opening their legs.
When I join a site I aim to download a lot and watch it at my leisure, this is where I had difficulty. Only the last 6 months are available to download, and each day's news is only available as around 8 separate zip files, one for each news item which is rather tedious to download, and the zip file names aren't unique so you need to create a folder for each day. If I spend some time downloading I often run into a daily or hourly download limit which is frustrating.
If you want a daily ritual of watching the latest news then the site is perfect. Even if that's not your plan then the fun and well produced content is still worth a membership. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site bills itself as a real news program where the anchors happen to undress and present the news nude. Indeed, the female anchors do strip nude, they are indeed attractive, and they do present the news in a professional manner. There are also many special features, such as "News on the Street", where topless reporters interview the man or woman on the street about various topics. The news is real and there are a lot of new segments available each day. |
| Cons: |
Although this site claims that people keep coming back, not only for the nude women but also to get real news, that is debatable. The news is--although much more professional and real than you might expect on a softcore porn site--nevertheless not likely to be sufficiently hard hitting for anyone to really get their news from this site. Some of the features are a little silly, as well, and distracting if you want the illusion of getting real news from nude women. |
| Bottom Line: |
The women undress while presenting virtually all news, including news which might be seen as rather tragic. This can be strangely erotic when you see a woman undressing while announcing news of a serious tragedy. The women keep their clothes on only for the most extreme of tragic news stories like 9/11. The site is also quite inexpensive and the women are quite articulate and interesting in presenting the news. The bottom line is that this site does not quite reach the stated goal of being trying professional journalism, but it is close enough that it can be very erotic. Definitely recommended if you enjoy watching women undress but the 'Wall Street Journal' this site is not. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Ipod Downloads
-Choice Of Streaming Or Downloading Of Naked News Programming
-Anchors Are Very Attractive
-Fairly Good Priced
-Very Quick Download Speeds |
| Cons: |
-Ipod Downloads Can Only Be Accessed For Current And Last 2 Days
-News Broadcasts Could Be Longer
-Nothing Else Except For Naked News Programming Is Really Worth A Second Look |
| Bottom Line: |
If You Are Looking For News With Nudity Then This Is Defintely The Site You Want To Check Out.
This Website Is Not That Pricey So It's At Least Worth 1 Look Or 2. The "Extra" Content Is Okay, Like The Pics They Add Of Models Here And There. Ipod Downloads Are Great For People On The Go! That Was A Big + In My Book! :) |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Naked News Activity - Naked News Reviews - Naked News Comments - Naked News News
