*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (3)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
I just got an email offering half off for former members.
$4.90 silver and $7.40 gold, which amounts to regular resolution and hi-res files. Gold access also gets extended archives and mobile access.
The big question is, has anyone been on the site since the last review on here? The last time I was signed up, their highest resolution wasn't "all that". I've looked through the site, trying to get details on the video quality and can't find anything. I'd like to know if they've brought things up to par. (Yeah - I'm being cheap - I don't want to waste a whole $7.40 to find out)
I found the site to be very different from the usual. I enjoyed the concept, but don't expect that you can get off on it. Even at its best it is very soft. Some attractive women who are wasted as there is no tease nor is it explicit. They really need to be one or the other. At least its cheap. I have even gotten it both by itself and as a bonus to joining another site, but don't remember which one.
I just finished a six month subscription to this site. Nostalgia made me do it because I remembered its earliest days when the novelty of naked women reading actual news made you gasp and when the anchor (Victoria Sinclair for the most part) would strip slowly and sensuously from business suit to very sexy lingerie, including nylons and garter belt, down to buff.
I found out very quickly that times had changed (along with subscribers' tastes?) because many times once that jacket came off the newsreader (model) would already be nude underneath, or, if you were lucky there might be a pair of panties or bra to get rid off. Commentators, too, were often fully nude right from the start.
The question is how often can one look at a limited pool of (admittedly) beautiful newspersons displaying their shaved pubes without getting bored. After only a few weeks I actually found myself watching the news more than the models and during my entire six month subscription I doubt I watched the show more than three weeks' worth altogether.
There should be more lingerie, more stripping, more variety in both rather than this confounded modern trend of getting to nude as quickly as possible. I realize it's a bit of a challenge for a model to strip and read the news at the same time but in its early days the site did manage to do just that.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.