| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls on this site in general are all stunning, Fab bodies, natural tits and mixture of shaved and trimmed.
Lots of girls to choose from
Attractive website and reasonable navigation |
| Cons: |
This website is very deceptive... When I first had a look at it on the tour I was completely taken in my the beautiful girls... The are all stunning and the thought of getting to look at them all with there kit off was just so tempting so I signed up... Howewer very quickly I began to realise that many of the girls didnt get their kit of at all!!! Lots of the picture sets the models remain fully clothed or at least with their bra and panties on... This was very disappointing as it mainly seems its the most stunning models that dont show their bits...
The videos are also limited and not very good, they are a mixture of hardcore boy/girl and some solo but they are not directly connected to the models picture sets?? |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line is this is a very softcore site which is definitely not as described.Even the picture sets that show the models taking all off are very tame... There is mot a vibe/dildo in site!!! |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large selection (Approx 300-350 sets) of cute fresh faced (mostly European - If you believe the biographical data) teen amateurs
Updated weekly
Very sexy poses |
| Cons: |
Site is mostly softcore tease
No Videos available
Photographic quality is slightly below average.
The information regarding country of origin for each model seems phony. Girls listed from Korea, China, Mexico, etc.. look European to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a bit hard to classify. You might call it an amateur teen photo site, mostly softcore tease, with enough lingerie and feet shots to fall under the fetish banner. The site is updated weekly and there are currently over 300 sets available. I would like to see better quality photography, high definition web videos of the girls, and more credible biography information. However, I would still consider a subscription well worth the money, just as is.
Follow-Up:
I noticed this site now features hard core HDV videos. It looks like they started adding this feature in January of 2008, so the selection is still limited. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Photos mostly at 2048px (some larger, some only 1280px)
+Many lovely models (not all); several recognizable from MetArt, FemJoy, MPL, etc. Their names on this site are Annaliese, Bianca, Cherry, Dana, Donita, Doris, Elena (Helen’s Planet), Isela, Jamilla, Marbelle, Marit, Nica (Britney, nice ASS pics!), Raven, Ricci (Lena at TeenDreams), Rita N, Sophie, Vallerie S (Jasmine Gold, but only in 1280s)
+Most content from end of 8/07 is really brand new
+Visitor’s page shows all of the models |
| Cons: |
-No videos (sorry, old chap!)
-Claims on visitor’s page that are NOT true: 1. 325 models (I counted 300, and 1 has two names); 2. zips for both high and low rez (there’s just one); 3. the only site with photos up to 4000 pixels (yeah sure)
-Bulk of content has been migrated from other sites of this company
-Inexplicable drastic changes in light in many photosets
-Updates show only new models; must revisit top of member’s page every 1-2 days to see when a new set is added for a model |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this company decided to create a photos only site. Their sites TeenStarsMagazine, TeenCharms, Real8Teens, and TeenageDepot, all of which I’d been a member of at least once, have either gone “video only,” or have been languishing with few if any updates for awhile. Content I’d seen on those sites has been migrated to this one.
So the more you’ve been a member of those other sites, the less chance you’ll find much really new content here until late Aug. 2007, and saying that doesn’t preclude future “encore” presentations. If you’ve never been a member of those sites, though, there’s a LOT of fresh photo content here to enjoy.
But note these additional cons:
1. A few of the models never get completely naked
2. Some pics are very blurry
3. Thumbs sometimes don’t show the entire photo (not WYSIWYG)
4. Watermark looks completely out of place (ditch it!)
5. First time logging in, must enter UN and PWD twice. Train your password manager and you’ll only need to remember the first character for the first login.
6. Bloody annoying timeout that doesn't accept your login anymore (after an hour or more).
I’m actually fairly satisfied with the new content I’ve seen, but it’s certainly not loaded with truly exclusive material. And the photography is not really professional, but there's enough decent stuff.
An 82 is more than fair considering the problems with this site. It's equal parts delightful and irritating.
Follow-Up:
Update: 24 models added since last review, new pics are exclusive and usually 3500px (making that watermark much smaller), image quality is better, and updates are usually every day (not always). Raising it to an 84, but, NB: about 18% of the models are less than fully nude, not just "a few" (yes, I finally did a fuller accounting). Newer models, though, nearly always change into their finest birthday suits. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All My Precious Virgins Activity - My Precious Virgins Reviews - My Precious Virgins Comments - My Precious Virgins News
