Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Met Art

Visit Site

Met Art

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. European Girls
3. Young Adults

HLP General Partner Inc.
17 Sites Listed
Partner: Met Art Money 2

Monthly: $29.99  Our Price $19.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $29.99 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.99 (recurring)

View all Met Art Site Facts at TBP.

99.0
Feedback History  (148)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 8
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 12
Comments 82
Review by TheBestPorn:

95.0
TBP Review

Date: 06-19-14

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Sexy, exclusive collection.
+  Large site!
-  Older videos aren't as sharp, lack options.

User Reviews (44)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 44 Next Page >

Active
99
lk2fireone (194) 02-14-13  07:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line: As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.

Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.

Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.

The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.

The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.

Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.

One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.

Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.

Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.

I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.

I am giving the site a score of 99.

How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?

That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.

2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.

Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.

For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply
Archived: lk2fireone wrote 1 review (11-14-08) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

Expired
88
luv lickn clit (21) 12-18-12  01:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
55*
omberman (0) 10-06-12  10:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (5)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
95
skippy (46) 08-23-12  10:19pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
90*
asaiaa (0) 07-20-12  03:02pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
95
mbaya (356) 05-06-12  05:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
92
tangub (151) 02-13-12  11:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
88
rearadmiral (340) 01-10-12  03:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (10 Replies)

Expired
80
otoh (54) 12-30-11  01:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

Expired
90
Cybertoad (Disabled) 09-22-11  06:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 44 Next Page >
User Comments (82)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 21-30 of 82 < Previous Page - Next Page >

lk2fireone (194) 01-30-13  07:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Metart options.

I've been a member of Metart for many years, off and on. But I just realized you can set some options on how the site is displayed.

You can show measurements in metric or imperial.
Imperial is the British system of measurements: Feet and inches for length, pounds for weight.

Although they have taught the metric system in the United States for many years, I still have to translate metric to the British system, because I grew up with feet-inches and pounds, and metric measurements just aren't natural for me; I have to translate them to feet-inches and pounds to understand what they mean.

This is a simple thing, really. But it makes the Metart site easier to use.

Also, you can select the language the site is displayed:
Deutsch (which is German, I assume)
English
Espanol (Spanish)
Nederlands
Chinese? (I'm guessing, it's some kind of oriental language)
Japanese? (I'm guessing, it's some kind of oriental language)
? (Some other oriental language

So I guess that Metart truly is an international site, promoting softcore porn throughout the world.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 01-10-13  09:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Metart model age.

Depending on where you look on the Metart site, you can find the current age of the model, and also the age of the model at the time of each photoshoot.

When you download a zip file of a photoshoot, you get a text file of the model's bio included. That text file bio lists the current age of the model, instead of her age at the time of the photoshoot.

It would be better for the downloaded text file included with each photoshoot to give the age of the model at the time when the photoshoot was shot, instead of her current age.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

tangub (151) 11-14-12  05:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Rylsky going solo

I found an email today with a promo join offer for a new site Rylsky Art featuring the work of one of Met-Art's top photographers Rylsky. He's been one of the most prolific contributers at Met in recent times with a new Rylsky set being added almost every day or two. I'm wondering now if the new Rylsky sight will see a gradual decline in his work being show-cased at Met-Art.

The new Rylsky site only has about a month's worth of updates so I couldn't decide if it's worth a subscription yet even at the $7.99 promo price I was offered but the $15 cross-sell to rejoin Met-Art that comes with it might just clinch the deal

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 11-05-12  08:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Useful facts about Met-Art.

From Wikipedia:

1. MET-Art (originally Most Erotic Teens) is a softcore pornography website owned by HLP General Partners Incorporated of Santa Monica, California. The site features erotic photographs of partially or completely naked women, and has been online since circa 1999.

2. Not to be confused with the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

But much easier to visit than the New York City museum. And the price to visit the online site is much cheaper.

3. Headquarters: Santa Monica, California
Parent HLP General Partners, INC

It surprises me that the headquarters are in Santa Monica, California.
Almost all the models used in the early years of Met-Art were Eastern European girls.
And the photographers were mainly from Europe, as well.

Most of the models are still from Eastern Europe.
And most of the photographers are still from Europe.


What I want to really know:
If I drive down to Santa Monica, California, how many of the Met-Art girls will I be able to meet?

My guess is: Zero to none, since the site uses very few models from the United States, and almost all the photoshoots are done in Europe.

Can anyone explain to me the benefit of having a headquarters in Santa Monica, California? Versus some place in Europe. I can understand not locating in Russia or some area around there, because the authorities might turn against porn and shut the operation down or force it to move. The same thing happened with Abby Winters in Australia, I think, which is why Abby Winters moved from Australia to Europe.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

lk2fireone (194) 10-22-12  01:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Error with Metart model age.

When you download a photoset of a model, it includes a small bio sheet for the model.

The model sheet includes:
Age
Eye color
Hair color
Height
Weight
Breast size
Country

And maybe a few small details about what the model likes or is doing.

The age of the model refers to the age she was at the time the photoset was posted to the site. (I believe that's what it's supposed to refer to. Less probable, it was the age the model was at the time of the photo shoot.)

Anyway, the computer program that is responsible for printing out the bio sheet has been, in error, I believe, now set up to print the age the model is currently.

On the Metart site, there is a bio section for each model, and that section gives the current age of the model.

But the downloaded bio sheet, that comes with a specific photoset, is supposed to give the age of the model at the time the photoset was posted to the site.

Instead, it now gives the current age of the model.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 10-18-12  12:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Met-Art keeps improving.

Met-Art is probably the biggest site for softcore teen photography, based on content.

And the site just keeps getting bigger. They add up to 6 photosets and videos per day. I don't know of any softcore teen photo site that comes close to that in terms of updates.

But over the years, they also tinker with the site to make it user friendly. They have a massive amount of content, but I feel the site is very easy to use.

One example of how they to make the contents more accessible/user friendly:

Years ago, the naming system for zip downloads of photosets used a combination of letters and numbers. Then they switched to a different system, where the filenames were much longer, but that tried to describe the file contents more clearly. The system they use now is much improved:

It gives the site name, the date the photoset was posted at Met-Art, the name of the photoset, the model(s) featured in the photoset, the photographer, and the definition of the photoset (low, medium, or high).

For example:

MetArt_2011-05-08_PRESENTING-FELICIA-FELICIA-B-by-DOLCE_a658d_high

Would be a photoset posted on 2011-05-08, with the title, "Presenting Felicia", featuring the model Felicia B, by the photographer Dolce, and the definition is high.

Personally, I would rather that the name of the model comes before the name of the photoset. And I would prefer the date of the set comes before the name of the photoset. For example:

Felicia B-2011.05.08-Presenting Felicia

That would make more sense, and make it easier to categorize, as far as I can see.

Because when you are looking over your photosets, you want to know who the model is, when the photoset was posted, and then the name of the photoset.

I pay less attention to who the photographer is. And I try to keep all the Met-Art sets in a common group for Met-Art.

But it's nice that Met-Art tries, on a constant basis, to make the site more user-friendly.

I visit Met-Art more often than I go to any museum. For one, it's easier to visit. For another, the contents are more interesting. For another, Met-Art is like a museum, that is cultural, uplifting, and stimulates the mind.

There are very few porn sites that fit that description.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 10-11-12  06:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Metart videos are boring.

This is not a news flash. They've always been boring.

I get more fun watching some commercials than I get out of watching most Metart videos. How do they make videos of beautiful, lovely models getting undressed so boring?

Many of their photosets are alluring, lovely, outstanding, really gorgeous to look at.

But my main question is: why can the Metart photosets be so alluring? And at the same time, their videos so boring?

Separately, when the downloaded Metart videos play back, there is sometimes a mosaic effect where the colors are sometimes pixellated, and that is just another distracting effect. What causes this? I don't get this effect watching videos I download from Diesel network or Teen Mega World or other sites I download from.

I don't have a gaming computer, that is set up for fast visual effects. But my laptop, and my desktop, are both fairly new, within the last year, so I should be able to play back even the 1080p videos with no problems, I would think.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 10-03-12  03:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Special $14.99 for first month.

It appears that Metart is having a special promotion of $14.99 for the first month.

Click on the PU/TBP link to the site, and click on the "join" link, and the price of $14.99 for 30 days, then $29.99 recurring every 30 days, appears.

I'm not sure how you would get the $19.99/month recurring price that PU/TBP lists.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 08-19-12  11:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

$14.99 signup special.

Apparently Metart is having a signup special.

Click on PU/TBP link, or just go to Metart signup page, and you see a price of $14.99 for 30 days, recurring at $29.99 every 30 days.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 08-09-12  09:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Is Met-art using robots or clones as models?

I've been watching the model named Eufrat, also known as Becki, Euphrates, Jana Hall, Jana P., Jana Potysova, Janette, Juliette, Lenka, Marina, Monique, Patty Glower, Ragan, Tricia, Jana Potyšová.

She's been modelling at least seven years.

You compare her earliest sets to her more recent ones, and you begin to realize she's not aging like a natural human should.

Are Met-art and other porn sites saving money by using robots or androids, instead of giving us the real deal?

Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Shown : 21-30 of 82 < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Met Art

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. ALS Scan (1) 100.0 89.5
2. Met Art (1) 99.0 95.0
3. Eternal Desire (1) 91.0 83.0
4. The Life Erotic (2) 89.5 89.0
5. Rylsky Art (1) 89.0 83.5
6. Goddess Nudes (2) 81.0 81.5
7. Sex Art (2) 78.8 90.0
8. Met Art Network (0) 75.0 N/A
9. Erotic Beauty (0) N/A 89.0
10. Errotica Archives (0) N/A 89.0

View All: Company Sites (17)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.54 seconds.