Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Excellent selection of models (350+)
Mostly 18-26 or so.
All shapes and sizes but mostly petite
Very large collection (650+ vids, 200k+ images)
A few of the most popular European models
Older sets of spectacular popular models
Navigation is good
All galleries are dated
Generally very good photo quality
Newer sets use good file naming convention
Videos have been in 720p for several years
Newer sets up to about 5800x3500 pixels.
Lots of new models you've never seen before
The site is often slow.
I had difficulty logging in a few times
All zips named small.zip,medium.zip,large.zip
(meaning zip files are not unique)
Videos are mostly from photo shoots
Good lighting/imagery, but not consitenly great
Color/white balance on some of the sets is off
Some of the sets are pretty short
Top rated model, though beautiful, is from 2005
Not that many new stand-out models
Lots of models you'll never see again
Oddball, quirky 3D sets
Bland color scheme
This is a very good site that anyone who is into solo or two-girl modeling should absolutely visit. It has tremendous variety of mostly eastern European girls that are perhaps a tad more natural than what you might see elsewhere.
That said, I find it very difficult to rate this site up there with the best of this class. I've been a member of this site off and on for about 8 years. When I first joined, the site was way up there with the best. It is still very good, but there is just a little something that makes it less appealing for me personally. The folks at MC-Nudes put together a very nice site and I know from my experiences with them that they are conscientious enough to read this, so I'll explain as carefully as I can.
The first thing I notice are the colors...or rather the lack of them. Everything is in tan or cream or some color of rice, wheat or straw. Everything. Even the sets are mostly in these nuetral colors with very low color saturation. I am pretty sure that this is because they think they might want to convert sets into 3D and the red-blue 3D doesn't work well if there are bright colors. But sadly, it is detracting from all the sets and the entire site. Go look at Met Art or Watch4Beauty and the colors on the site and in the sets leap off the page. MC-nudes? The colors stick to the page like this mornings oatmeal sticks to the bowl. If this reduced band of colors is to support 3D, I really think you should dump 3D. The site needs more POP.
OK, next. Years ago, MC-Nudes utilized mainstream models that were among the most beautiful on the planet. Marketa, Monika Vesela, Bambi, Zafira, Eufrat, etc. There are some fantastic sets here if you are into these mainstream models from 2004-2010 or so. They still have several models that have recently become very popular (like Nika and Dominika).
At the same time, they managed to find some ungodly beautiful models that you'd never seen before or since. This unknown but beautiful girl Simona is still their top rated model (from 2005 and with only 3 sets...)
More recently, I think they've gotten into using new and unknown models a little more. This is a great thing for those of us who like a lot of variety, but you have to go through a LOT of girls to find one or two true stars in this field. Nearly all of the MC-Nudes models have spectacular figures, but because of either the lighting, the make-up, the inconsistent eye contact with the camera or perhaps because they are new and don't seem to be having much fun, many of these girls just aren't as appealing as they could be. Some of the brighter or more popular models have figured out how to tease and play with the camera a little. But a really good photography team should be teaching them ALL how to be playful. It makes a huge difference.
Couple of peeves. The site is often very slow. I also could not get in a few times, getting an Apache server-type error message instead of the web site. I know that account management is tricky, but I have several subscripions (and several computers) and I have not had this kind of trouble before...pretty much ever.
Although the file management is better than it used to be, the zip files still need to be named and dated or coded in such a way to make them unique. Webmaster, if you do that once for each set, your thousands of customers won't have to do it at all.
Bottom line? Go check it out! If you like what you see in the samples, sign up! There is enough quality material to keep you busy and happy for quite a while. If you don't stay, check back every year or so. With daily updates, it will be worth your while.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
+lots of models
+high quality images
+great amount of content
-some photos are grainy
-no various scenery
This is a great softcore site with some GG scenes with a great variety of gorgeous models. The site is very easy to navigate with archive list of the side and where you can sort either the model, photos, videos by most recent, name and by rating. MCN does update regularly with a lot more diverse models.
There are over 180k images on the site with 5616 being on the long side for larger images. Each set has an average of 40-75 images per set. MCN does offer zip files and really good download speed. All 3D images are (long sided) 2000 by 1333.
I don't have any info about the videos, for I didn't have time to download them. But, I do know that they have over 500 videos.
This site has to be in my top five softcore sites I've been a member of and I think any softcore fan would like this site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Big mistake joining the site. The largest pic size that gives decent quality is 1200 pixels. Come on, nowadays at 1200s. Sad!
3000 or above the become grainy, blurred. It's like 1200s resized to 3000s. No resolution at all.
I joined the site two weeks back, looking for some nice softcore photos and I must say that I'm a bit disappointed here:
- Download speed is limited to 300 k/s, with and without download manager. I tried contacting their support right in the beginning, but no reply.
- Lots of repetition (as Denner pointed out - I would even add a few exclamation marks to that). At times, it seems that they only have 3-4 models around, plus they use the same location over and over again - very unimaginative. In some of the galleries, I had a strong feeling of a deja vu.
- Older photos are partially of bad quality, photographically speaking. Unfocussed, grainy, overexposed (especially those sets taken outside). Doesn't look as if their QA really is working.
On the positive side, most of the girls do look nice and all in all, there's lots of content for TBP's special price. But definitely nothing 90-ish. Maybe 80, but definitely not more than that. If you look for better quality and more creative content, try femjoy.
This is a great softcore with a few girl-girl action, but this site has 3D photos (using anaglyph glasses) which is the first I've seen on any site. The videos are 1280x720 for the highest resolution and are in great quality. For the discount price on The Best Porn site compared to other porn review sites, this is the best deal.
mc-nudes now offers 3-D photos. You need 3-D glasses to get the 3-D effect, and I don't have 3-D glasses. But even the porn sites are now starting to jump on the 3-D wagon.
I haven't seen a 3-D movie since the 1950s, but I guess I will try to see one of the 3-D movies that are coming out now.
It's time for us to move into the space age, with 3-D vision and supercomputers and whatnot.
Maggie, Maggie...my old favorite at TBP.
Please reconsider - 91 for MC Nudes - how can that be?
Oh, I love/dig those new fine "smileys' - happy and not so happy. And those well founded words..
But MC Nudes does NOT deserve a 91 - and the reasons are obvious:
The videos are all just simply boring or very close to.
The photosets are - like the videos - all in fine tech-quality - but still no where near (for instance) Met Art or 1ByDay - when it comes down to fine softcore porn.
I tend to the average of our PUs at about 80 (still a BIT high) - and please see both Droolers (a bit old) and jd1961's newer reviews...
The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.