*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Big mistake joining the site. The largest pic size that gives decent quality is 1200 pixels. Come on, nowadays at 1200s. Sad!
3000 or above the become grainy, blurred. It's like 1200s resized to 3000s. No resolution at all.
I joined the site two weeks back, looking for some nice softcore photos and I must say that I'm a bit disappointed here:
- Download speed is limited to 300 k/s, with and without download manager. I tried contacting their support right in the beginning, but no reply.
- Lots of repetition (as Denner pointed out - I would even add a few exclamation marks to that). At times, it seems that they only have 3-4 models around, plus they use the same location over and over again - very unimaginative. In some of the galleries, I had a strong feeling of a deja vu.
- Older photos are partially of bad quality, photographically speaking. Unfocussed, grainy, overexposed (especially those sets taken outside). Doesn't look as if their QA really is working.
On the positive side, most of the girls do look nice and all in all, there's lots of content for TBP's special price. But definitely nothing 90-ish. Maybe 80, but definitely not more than that. If you look for better quality and more creative content, try femjoy.
This is a great softcore with a few girl-girl action, but this site has 3D photos (using anaglyph glasses) which is the first I've seen on any site. The videos are 1280x720 for the highest resolution and are in great quality. For the discount price on The Best Porn site compared to other porn review sites, this is the best deal.
mc-nudes now offers 3-D photos. You need 3-D glasses to get the 3-D effect, and I don't have 3-D glasses. But even the porn sites are now starting to jump on the 3-D wagon.
I haven't seen a 3-D movie since the 1950s, but I guess I will try to see one of the 3-D movies that are coming out now.
It's time for us to move into the space age, with 3-D vision and supercomputers and whatnot.
Maggie, Maggie...my old favorite at TBP.
Please reconsider - 91 for MC Nudes - how can that be?
Oh, I love/dig those new fine "smileys' - happy and not so happy. And those well founded words..
But MC Nudes does NOT deserve a 91 - and the reasons are obvious:
The videos are all just simply boring or very close to.
The photosets are - like the videos - all in fine tech-quality - but still no where near (for instance) Met Art or 1ByDay - when it comes down to fine softcore porn.
I tend to the average of our PUs at about 80 (still a BIT high) - and please see both Droolers (a bit old) and jd1961's newer reviews...
The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.