*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
I've been a long-term subscription member of MCN and they are showing improvements. Zip files of galleries from Feb 19th, 2007 are available in 3 sizes: really small, 1200px, or large in 2000, 3000,4000, and sometimes even 5000px.
Prior to then, they only have two sizes: really small or huge. The zip file sizes display as, for example, 1.87 mb OR 47.9mb! So adding the medium size was a very good idea, and in any case it's a nice courtesy to the user that they tell you in advance how big the zips are.
The 3s and 4s are most common for large size.
My occasional gripes about the site are (as usual) blurriness and lack of light. Maybe that's 'cause it's "art," but the turn on happens when the "art" is clear and well lit, if you ask me ...
The women on this site are usually lusciously beautiful thanks to the very often highly professional photography. The archives go back into late 2004.
And two big pluses are that the content is exclusive and there are no blasted toys being licked and shoved in (very tiresome, that).
Finally, it has a really attractive design like none other I've seen.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.