Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of Content
- Good Quality Images
- Fast Downloads
- Nice Layout
Cons:
- Lousy Photography
- Disappointing Model Quality
- Can't download just the photos you like
Bottom Line:
For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+All exclusive content
+Many stunning women, 93 in all
+Daily photoset updates from March 2005, but still more back to Oct. ‘04.
+3 sizes: 600, 1200, and 2-5000px (zips or singles) from Feb. 07 (prior to then only 1000’s and very large)
+Voting on models and photosets
+Zips at good download speeds
+78 artsy videos (17 are g/g) in avi (1280x720 by far the best), wmv, qt and ipod
+Extensive public preview area
+Very attractive site design
+Not many g/g pics
+NO TOYS!
Cons:
-VERY sluggish when navigating
-Some photos are way too grainy/have too much noise, some are too dark, and there’s too much “detached” posing. (It’s “art,” you see.)
-Photosets vary from only 1 page to 5 or more
-Model index is disorganized
-Model search engine OK by hair color or bra size, but by country, name, or age it’s hit or miss. Example: The very popular Hungarian blond Britney/Brigitte Hunter is here as “Luisa” from the United States.
-Video d/l is slow, around 100K
Bottom Line:
#1: They need to get their page (and video) servers up to speed. They update at precisely 11 p.m. GMT, and apparently lots of eager droolers (self included) know this. Sometimes it’s been impossible to log on around this time, and once I finally do, each page load takes the better part of a minute. Even in off hours, a 35 sec. click ‘n wait is no surprise. Every time.
I also wonder about security. I had a 365-day membership that ended earlier this year, and just days before it did my access got blocked; it had been hacked and shared. Their support promptly gave me a new pwd along with some barely veiled allegations. Did I get hacked or did they? (If interested, see replies to this review.)
About their models: They’re very selective overall. Aneta Smrhova, Ariel/Piper Fawn, Ellena, Ivette Blanche, Katy Gold, Klara/Zoe, Lenka Horokova, Marketa Belonoha, Simi (as Olivia), Susana Spears, Zuzana Zeleznovova, ETC.
Some of the photos are among the finest I’ve seen, but it’s still a crap shoot because others literally made the con’s point above. Example: Zuzana in the sauna -- so grainy that the silo ends its life as a double entrendre.
Of course there’s no hardcore, but asking for hardcore at a site like this is like expecting Twinkies at a hardware store. Do we ask hardcore sites to go softcore? See what I’m saying?
I’d certainly go from “might recommend” to “recommend” to lovers of softcore if they’d fix those persistent server problems.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
MC-Nudes provide no hardcore but full nude-erotic in an appealing and mind twisting way.
Extract of the featurelist:
» daily updated sets and twice a week videos
» real HDTV Videos (1280x720 pixels) and imagesets up to 4000 pixels
» unique models (amateur and starlets)
» great usability and design
» steady envelopement in technologies and features
» backstage & special reports, desktops ...
Cons:
» NO - hardcore or intense masturbastion stuff
» NO - trial membership available
» NO - more things to criticise
Bottom Line:
MC-Nude provides maximum pleasure to your imaginary visions and is only dedicated to the lovers of the female body. They stay for beauty and quality only.
This site is a must for all who don't need big archives from the ancient times and explicite porn action.
Get your kicks on MC-Nudes and tease your synapses cause the differences come in details.
Follow-Up:
MCN has finally launched their 100% technically reinvented site. They increased browsing speed and even managed to provide maximum compatiblity on all browsers for MAC and PC even my IPhone!!!!
Sitestats today: GIRLS: 186; REAL HDV-Movies: 313; IMAGES: 74648
Their HDV-Archive is the largest in the niché and for me the best in sensuality.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-The photo sets are of a very high quality, with resolutions of up to 4000 pixels (although many are only 3000, or 2000 pixels)
-Good navigation with detailed search options.
-Some high-definition videos (1280 x 720 pixels)
-Some well known European glamour models like Anetta Keys (Aneta Šmrhová) and Markéta Belonohá.
Cons:
-All of the shoots are softcore, but, not limited to Playboy angles ;)
-A relatively small collection (as of 6 months ago): approximately 20,000 pictures.
-Photo sets are relatively small: approximately 30 photos each.
Bottom Line:
Most of the models are slender, European and 24 years of age or younger. If this is your taste then this site is a must. Personally, I was stunned by how gorgeous some of the girls presented here are. Despite the modest collection size, it will keep you busy for at least a month. So, as long as you aren't looking for hardcore only give it a look.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
I've been a long-term subscription member of MCN and they are showing improvements. Zip files of galleries from Feb 19th, 2007 are available in 3 sizes: really small, 1200px, or large in 2000, 3000,4000, and sometimes even 5000px.
Prior to then, they only have two sizes: really small or huge. The zip file sizes display as, for example, 1.87 mb OR 47.9mb! So adding the medium size was a very good idea, and in any case it's a nice courtesy to the user that they tell you in advance how big the zips are.
The 3s and 4s are most common for large size.
My occasional gripes about the site are (as usual) blurriness and lack of light. Maybe that's 'cause it's "art," but the turn on happens when the "art" is clear and well lit, if you ask me ...
The women on this site are usually lusciously beautiful thanks to the very often highly professional photography. The archives go back into late 2004.
And two big pluses are that the content is exclusive and there are no blasted toys being licked and shoved in (very tiresome, that).
Finally, it has a really attractive design like none other I've seen.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.