Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit MC Nudes

Visit Site
MC Nudes Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Soft Content
3. HD Porn

MCN
1 Site Listed
Partner: MC Nudes Partners

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all MC Nudes Site Facts at TBP.

76.7
Feedback History  (18)

Active Reviews 5
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 5
Review by TheBestPorn:

91.0
TBP Review

Date: 08-29-09

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Beautiful exclusive content.
+  Great-sized collection.
-  Could still use more browse tools.

User Reviews (11)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 11 Next Page >

Newbie
92*
Bumble B (1) 12-01-09  10:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + a nice spectrum of unique models
+ daily updates
+ easy to navigate
+ professionally designed and produced
+ pics in 600, 1200, 4300 and sometimes even 5000 px
+ zip-archives
+ fast and unlimited downloads
+ HD Videos in 1280x720
+ new 3D pictures
+ exclusive content and downloads (DVD)
Cons: - too many outdoor sets
Bottom Line: Greetings earthlings,

I joined MC Nudes in january 2007 and I never regreted it. Over the last two ... nearly three years I saw MC Nudes grow a beast in style, design and functionality. They recently added a new 3D feature which rocks.

Truly, there are a lot of softcore sites on the internet featuring nude girls but in my opinion MC Nudes is absolutly inimitable. Their models have a natural look, nice discreet make-up and are simply unique.

I for myself think that nudity calls for quality and a nice fine touch of art. So, if you are looking for something similar like I do, than MC Nudes is definitely worth a try.

Sincerely,
Bumble B
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Active
88
adrenalinrush (5) 11-27-09  12:16pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: # 3D galleries (NEW)
# great girls / good mixture of babes and woman
# HDV Videos with big archive *1
# galleries with big archive
# modelvoting
# bonus stuff

*1 they seem to spend more effort in cutting scenes and give everything a more gentle and artistic touch (I like that, you maybe not)
Cons: ~ little more variance in settings would be good
~ more exotic girls
~ modelnames in videos are missing
Bottom Line: I have just went into my 2nd month membership on mc-nudes and was really surprised about the feature upgrade.

The new 3D galleries are top notch and something I haven't seen anywhere else before. The girls seem really to pop out of my monitor and the archive grows fast (nearly 1 per day).

Beside that everything stay is as good as it was before. Daily updates, good erotic content and since some time they shoot more girls in lingerie.

The site is nothing for people who seek for hardcore except for those who want settle down and a bit to see their favorite hc model's sensual side ;)

They have known girls and unqiues ...
MCN is softcore at it's best.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
70
mbaya (266) 09-23-09  06:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM or any download limits.
-Works with download managers. I downloaded 88 videos, 12.8 GB in an hour and a half without a single problem.
-Nearly all models top notch attractive.
-Huge website. See TBP for details.
-Beautiful HD quality videos, 1280x720 over 3000 kbps.
Cons: -Others have commented that the photo sets are not numbered. The videos are numbered, but don't have the models name. If you don't rename each video, you would have no idea who the model is. The site itself has names for the videos such as slinky or bubbles. Why not some name that helps?
-As several others have commented, the videos are more like art than erotic. Not recommended.
-Far too many outdoor videos. This makes most of them have backlighting, uneven lighting or are simply shot from too far away.
Bottom Line: I have come to appreciate videos that are HD. After recently joining sites of lesser video quality and being disappointed, I came to feel that without HD I don't want to join. The HD videos here are of stunning quality.

But is that enough? Apparently not. I made two fundamental mistakes when I joined this site. Both Denner and JD 1961 hit the nail on the head in their comments/reviews. The videos are just boring. Being arty in their style, you get for example, a nude girl rolling around in bed covered by a sheet. Wow. I am truly impressed. No great posing, moving too fast for you to really get into the scenes. They just miss the point of why I want to join a site. Nude women are very sexy, but this site manages to remove the erotic qualities that should be here. I realize it is a matter of taste, but two of the reviewers I trust the most said the same things. I should have just gone by what they said about the site.

The other mistake I made was that this site is just not about videos. If you go to a seafood restaurant, don't order the steak. Don't go to a fast food and expect top notch lobster. Once again, I have not found a site that is about photos to be a place where the videos are of great nudes. I would love to find sites that are erotic videos without masturbation.

To sum up my feelings, don't join for the videos alone. I realize this site is all about opinions, but Maggie, not a 91!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
propaGhandi (5) 01-28-09  09:26am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-09-09  12:22am  (Update History)
Reason: After being a member of MCN for quiet a while now I decided to stick with it at as my personal favorite of all available sites in the niche I know.
Pros: · great mixture of top teens and women
· daily gallery updates
· huge HDvideo archive (in different formats)
· bonus sets, model voting
· unlimited downloads (Zip format)
· unique site design for easy browsing
· DVD DOWNLOAD FOR MEMBERS!!!
Cons: · one update a day
· models could smile more
· some sets have just a few images
· some locations are overused
· more outdoor sets
Bottom Line: I just joined MC-Nudes because of the free DVD for members. The DVD is the best what I've ever seen so far.

The site itself has a great archive for galleries + videos going back into year 2004. Compared to other sites MC-Nudes doesn't have so many models but a wonderful mixture of them.

In case you're seeking for a site full of wonderful girls that turn your imagination on, you're at the right spot.

My personal favorites are Gabrielle, Nikky, Zafira and Mia.


I have experienced the site for some time now and have nothing to add to my review except other positive aspects of browsing through the whole site. I love it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
79
jd1961 (95) 01-01-09  08:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Hi-Res Photos
Zip Files
HD Video
NO DRM
Lot Of Models
Cons: Erotically Mild
A Chore For Collectors
Bottom Line: Finally joined this site after thinking about it for a long time. Decided to because it offers high quality, high resolution photography.

The photos are very professionally produced. And they come in 3 sizes: 600, 1200, 4000 px. They can be downloaded in zip files. The download speed is fair to good.

The vids are HD, 1280x720, very lush. They are not DRM protected.

There are 10 pages of models, many well known. All told, there are about 1400 sets. They have (to date) 382 videos. A good solid archive.

So why the low score? A couple reasons. Much of the photography is as unerotic as it comes. I will give them big credit for not having repetitious shots (ie 14 in a row of a model standing around in the same pose). But many of their sets are, well, kind of bland.

Another problem is if you are a true collector of fine nudes, it is very difficult and time consuming to use this site. For instance, when you download a set and unzip it, the folder is named "Large", or "Small", whichever size you downloaded. So you will have to rename the folder after the set. And the cover of the set is not included in the folder. Therefore you must download it separately. All very time consuming, a real drag. What is so difficult about labeling a set's folder, and including the set's cover in the folder? Makes one wonder if this is a deliberate action to force the paying customer into spending more time at the site than he would wish. Every file being labeled exactly the same? You see the problem. Downloading should be fun, and not a chore.

If you're thinking, I don't care, I just want to download some hot nekkid girls---forget it. This site isn't for you either. You'll be bored quickly.

The site has it's good points, but I don't have the time for all the chores it demands. Met-Art is much simpler to use than this site!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
88
hondaman (7) 11-15-08  12:27am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -has some very sexy models
-interesting layout for site
-good varitey of body types
-has an interesting comment feature at bottom of photoset/viedo page
Cons: -as others have said seems to rely on a few models to keep a steady update stream
-site speed can be terriable
-some photosets just seem to lack "energy"
Bottom Line: This site is great when its better parts show through but fizzles out a bit with its vices come through.(hey that rhymes ha ha) On the upside this site has some really hot models namely Gabrielle a very well endowed hour glass shaped slap yourself in the face and keep your dick from tearing a whole through your underwear goddess of a woman. There are several other nice girls as well. The photo sets that are good are some of the best errotic sets on the net. But then other sets they just dont seem to have good shots one area that they seem to really lack is the ass 'n tits type shot in other words a pic where you can see the models ass,back,shoulders and some boobs let me see the models curves from that angle there where many sets where you did not see this at all or only one pic or so.Another photo set issue is the lack of energy in some sets some of them just lack feeling and in errotic art you need to focus on body shape and model expression and some sets just seem to lack it. The other issue is that it seems that some models have tons of sets and others have few it seems like they use some models often to keep their updates at a regular basis. The site layout is pretty good and has a feature to change the back ground theme form grayish to a creamy color that is neat but it would be nice if there where a few more themes to choose from. The biggest issue is the sites speed it can be very slow at times I have downloaded vids from the site that where about 250-300mb and they took about 20-30 minutes to come in on other sites files of the same size normaly take 8-10 minutes. And at certin times of day the pages can take some time to load. I have a 1.5mbps connection so I adivse anyone who has a dialup connection to be aware that you may have trouble in this regard. Bottom line MC Nudes has great potential they just need to get a bit more consistant with their quality and really need to get some more servers to improve their sites speed a bit. I hope they improve in these areas if they do then MC Nudes would be one of the best errotic art sites on the net. This is a site that I will prob join again but not for at least 6 months to see if they have imporved or not.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
82*
pjfry (2) 09-26-08  04:55pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful models
- Daily updates
- Photosets are zipped and DL quickly (they claim to have technology that accelerates downloads. I can't verify, I use a download manager anyway).
- Artsy and erotic photo shoots
- Very high res pictures (more recent updates are usually around 4-5000px, earlier updates are usually in the 1-3000px range)
- Resolution options on photosets (smaller zips range from about 1 - 5MB in size if space is a concern)
- Classy softcore (no intense masturbation, extreme closeups, gaping, etc.) This is definitely a pro if that's what you're looking for. I've signed up for sites before only to find it wasn't what I expected.
- High def videos
- Easy to navigate
- Nice site design
Cons: - Not a huge variety of models. The site relies on regulars to maintain daily updates (a few models have dozens and dozens, the rest only a few).
- Not many videos
- Sets can be repetitive after awhile
Bottom Line: If you're looking for gorgeous softcore models, I recommend MC Nudes. The models are very attractive, and the photosets are artsy and erotic. It stands out from other softcore sites in that the models are classy. Many softcore sites offer the same thing: Women with way too much makeup in pornstar/stripper outfits (not that that's necessarily bad, but it can get old). Also, if you like your softcore soft, this site is also for you. As mentioned above, no extreme closeups, gaping, massive toys (none at all as I recall actually), or similar.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
72
DigglerFL (16) 02-06-08  12:46pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
78
Drooler (192) 12-26-07  06:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
97*
Mayvary (2) 02-02-07  03:47am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 11 Next Page >
User Comments (5)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

mbaya (266) 09-22-09  07:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)

pricing

The site is no longer offering a trial as an option. However, the monthly membership price has been reduced to $19.95.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 08-29-09  09:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

a 91 - ?????

Maggie, Maggie...my old favorite at TBP.
Please reconsider - 91 for MC Nudes - how can that be?
Oh, I love/dig those new fine "smileys' - happy and not so happy. And those well founded words..
But MC Nudes does NOT deserve a 91 - and the reasons are obvious:
The videos are all just simply boring or very close to.
The photosets are - like the videos - all in fine tech-quality - but still no where near (for instance) Met Art or 1ByDay - when it comes down to fine softcore porn.
I tend to the average of our PUs at about 80 (still a BIT high) - and please see both Droolers (a bit old) and jd1961's newer reviews...

Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

CactusJack2 (0) 03-08-09  07:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Figured I'd give it a shot

The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 12-31-07  01:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

Late-breaking news

Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.

BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.

My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.

So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...

Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 05-08-07  03:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

Showing improvement

I've been a long-term subscription member of MCN and they are showing improvements. Zip files of galleries from Feb 19th, 2007 are available in 3 sizes: really small, 1200px, or large in 2000, 3000,4000, and sometimes even 5000px.

Prior to then, they only have two sizes: really small or huge. The zip file sizes display as, for example, 1.87 mb OR 47.9mb! So adding the medium size was a very good idea, and in any case it's a nice courtesy to the user that they tell you in advance how big the zips are.

The 3s and 4s are most common for large size.

My occasional gripes about the site are (as usual) blurriness and lack of light. Maybe that's 'cause it's "art," but the turn on happens when the "art" is clear and well lit, if you ask me ...

The women on this site are usually lusciously beautiful thanks to the very often highly professional photography. The archives go back into late 2004.

And two big pluses are that the content is exclusive and there are no blasted toys being licked and shoved in (very tiresome, that).

Finally, it has a really attractive design like none other I've seen.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll MC Nudes Activity - MC Nudes Reviews - MC Nudes Comments - MC Nudes News

Visit MC Nudes

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Andreas (3)

Date News Title Replies News By
01-29-09 Sinsation DVD for free 2 Andreas
06-18-08 Here we are ... 0 Andreas

View All : Site News (1)


      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. MC Nudes (4) 76.7 91.0

RSS Feed : MCN Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.