+ Site design and navigation are well-done.
+ Price is good, too.
+ Content looks great all around.
+ Good update schedule (daily). - Video updates are slower than photos. - Could be considered repetitive due to softcore nature.
User Reviews (8)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-09-0912:22am (Update History) Reason: After being a member of MCN for quiet a while now I decided to stick with it at as my personal favorite of all available sites in the niche I know.
Pros:
· great mixture of top teens and women
· daily gallery updates
· huge HDvideo archive (in different formats)
· bonus sets, model voting
· unlimited downloads (Zip format)
· unique site design for easy browsing
· DVD DOWNLOAD FOR MEMBERS!!!
Cons:
· one update a day
· models could smile more
· some sets have just a few images
· some locations are overused
· more outdoor sets
Bottom Line:
I just joined MC-Nudes because of the free DVD for members. The DVD is the best what I've ever seen so far.
The site itself has a great archive for galleries + videos going back into year 2004. Compared to other sites MC-Nudes doesn't have so many models but a wonderful mixture of them.
In case you're seeking for a site full of wonderful girls that turn your imagination on, you're at the right spot.
My personal favorites are Gabrielle, Nikky, Zafira and Mia.
I have experienced the site for some time now and have nothing to add to my review except other positive aspects of browsing through the whole site. I love it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hi-Res Photos
Zip Files
HD Video
NO DRM
Lot Of Models
Cons:
Erotically Mild
A Chore For Collectors
Bottom Line:
Finally joined this site after thinking about it for a long time. Decided to because it offers high quality, high resolution photography.
The photos are very professionally produced. And they come in 3 sizes: 600, 1200, 4000 px. They can be downloaded in zip files. The download speed is fair to good.
The vids are HD, 1280x720, very lush. They are not DRM protected.
There are 10 pages of models, many well known. All told, there are about 1400 sets. They have (to date) 382 videos. A good solid archive.
So why the low score? A couple reasons. Much of the photography is as unerotic as it comes. I will give them big credit for not having repetitious shots (ie 14 in a row of a model standing around in the same pose). But many of their sets are, well, kind of bland.
Another problem is if you are a true collector of fine nudes, it is very difficult and time consuming to use this site. For instance, when you download a set and unzip it, the folder is named "Large", or "Small", whichever size you downloaded. So you will have to rename the folder after the set. And the cover of the set is not included in the folder. Therefore you must download it separately. All very time consuming, a real drag. What is so difficult about labeling a set's folder, and including the set's cover in the folder? Makes one wonder if this is a deliberate action to force the paying customer into spending more time at the site than he would wish. Every file being labeled exactly the same? You see the problem. Downloading should be fun, and not a chore.
If you're thinking, I don't care, I just want to download some hot nekkid girls---forget it. This site isn't for you either. You'll be bored quickly.
The site has it's good points, but I don't have the time for all the chores it demands. Met-Art is much simpler to use than this site!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-has some very sexy models
-interesting layout for site
-good varitey of body types
-has an interesting comment feature at bottom of photoset/viedo page
Cons:
-as others have said seems to rely on a few models to keep a steady update stream
-site speed can be terriable
-some photosets just seem to lack "energy"
Bottom Line:
This site is great when its better parts show through but fizzles out a bit with its vices come through.(hey that rhymes ha ha) On the upside this site has some really hot models namely Gabrielle a very well endowed hour glass shaped slap yourself in the face and keep your dick from tearing a whole through your underwear goddess of a woman. There are several other nice girls as well. The photo sets that are good are some of the best errotic sets on the net. But then other sets they just dont seem to have good shots one area that they seem to really lack is the ass 'n tits type shot in other words a pic where you can see the models ass,back,shoulders and some boobs let me see the models curves from that angle there where many sets where you did not see this at all or only one pic or so.Another photo set issue is the lack of energy in some sets some of them just lack feeling and in errotic art you need to focus on body shape and model expression and some sets just seem to lack it. The other issue is that it seems that some models have tons of sets and others have few it seems like they use some models often to keep their updates at a regular basis. The site layout is pretty good and has a feature to change the back ground theme form grayish to a creamy color that is neat but it would be nice if there where a few more themes to choose from. The biggest issue is the sites speed it can be very slow at times I have downloaded vids from the site that where about 250-300mb and they took about 20-30 minutes to come in on other sites files of the same size normaly take 8-10 minutes. And at certin times of day the pages can take some time to load. I have a 1.5mbps connection so I adivse anyone who has a dialup connection to be aware that you may have trouble in this regard. Bottom line MC Nudes has great potential they just need to get a bit more consistant with their quality and really need to get some more servers to improve their sites speed a bit. I hope they improve in these areas if they do then MC Nudes would be one of the best errotic art sites on the net. This is a site that I will prob join again but not for at least 6 months to see if they have imporved or not.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful models
- Daily updates
- Photosets are zipped and DL quickly (they claim to have technology that accelerates downloads. I can't verify, I use a download manager anyway).
- Artsy and erotic photo shoots
- Very high res pictures (more recent updates are usually around 4-5000px, earlier updates are usually in the 1-3000px range)
- Resolution options on photosets (smaller zips range from about 1 - 5MB in size if space is a concern)
- Classy softcore (no intense masturbation, extreme closeups, gaping, etc.) This is definitely a pro if that's what you're looking for. I've signed up for sites before only to find it wasn't what I expected.
- High def videos
- Easy to navigate
- Nice site design
Cons:
- Not a huge variety of models. The site relies on regulars to maintain daily updates (a few models have dozens and dozens, the rest only a few).
- Not many videos
- Sets can be repetitive after awhile
Bottom Line:
If you're looking for gorgeous softcore models, I recommend MC Nudes. The models are very attractive, and the photosets are artsy and erotic. It stands out from other softcore sites in that the models are classy. Many softcore sites offer the same thing: Women with way too much makeup in pornstar/stripper outfits (not that that's necessarily bad, but it can get old). Also, if you like your softcore soft, this site is also for you. As mentioned above, no extreme closeups, gaping, massive toys (none at all as I recall actually), or similar.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of Content
- Good Quality Images
- Fast Downloads
- Nice Layout
Cons:
- Lousy Photography
- Disappointing Model Quality
- Can't download just the photos you like
Bottom Line:
For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+All exclusive content
+Many stunning women, 93 in all
+Daily photoset updates from March 2005, but still more back to Oct. ‘04.
+3 sizes: 600, 1200, and 2-5000px (zips or singles) from Feb. 07 (prior to then only 1000’s and very large)
+Voting on models and photosets
+Zips at good download speeds
+78 artsy videos (17 are g/g) in avi (1280x720 by far the best), wmv, qt and ipod
+Extensive public preview area
+Very attractive site design
+Not many g/g pics
+NO TOYS!
Cons:
-VERY sluggish when navigating
-Some photos are way too grainy/have too much noise, some are too dark, and there’s too much “detached” posing. (It’s “art,” you see.)
-Photosets vary from only 1 page to 5 or more
-Model index is disorganized
-Model search engine OK by hair color or bra size, but by country, name, or age it’s hit or miss. Example: The very popular Hungarian blond Britney/Brigitte Hunter is here as “Luisa” from the United States.
-Video d/l is slow, around 100K
Bottom Line:
#1: They need to get their page (and video) servers up to speed. They update at precisely 11 p.m. GMT, and apparently lots of eager droolers (self included) know this. Sometimes it’s been impossible to log on around this time, and once I finally do, each page load takes the better part of a minute. Even in off hours, a 35 sec. click ‘n wait is no surprise. Every time.
I also wonder about security. I had a 365-day membership that ended earlier this year, and just days before it did my access got blocked; it had been hacked and shared. Their support promptly gave me a new pwd along with some barely veiled allegations. Did I get hacked or did they? (If interested, see replies to this review.)
About their models: They’re very selective overall. Aneta Smrhova, Ariel/Piper Fawn, Ellena, Ivette Blanche, Katy Gold, Klara/Zoe, Lenka Horokova, Marketa Belonoha, Simi (as Olivia), Susana Spears, Zuzana Zeleznovova, ETC.
Some of the photos are among the finest I’ve seen, but it’s still a crap shoot because others literally made the con’s point above. Example: Zuzana in the sauna -- so grainy that the silo ends its life as a double entrendre.
Of course there’s no hardcore, but asking for hardcore at a site like this is like expecting Twinkies at a hardware store. Do we ask hardcore sites to go softcore? See what I’m saying?
I’d certainly go from “might recommend” to “recommend” to lovers of softcore if they’d fix those persistent server problems.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (3)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
I've been a long-term subscription member of MCN and they are showing improvements. Zip files of galleries from Feb 19th, 2007 are available in 3 sizes: really small, 1200px, or large in 2000, 3000,4000, and sometimes even 5000px.
Prior to then, they only have two sizes: really small or huge. The zip file sizes display as, for example, 1.87 mb OR 47.9mb! So adding the medium size was a very good idea, and in any case it's a nice courtesy to the user that they tell you in advance how big the zips are.
The 3s and 4s are most common for large size.
My occasional gripes about the site are (as usual) blurriness and lack of light. Maybe that's 'cause it's "art," but the turn on happens when the "art" is clear and well lit, if you ask me ...
The women on this site are usually lusciously beautiful thanks to the very often highly professional photography. The archives go back into late 2004.
And two big pluses are that the content is exclusive and there are no blasted toys being licked and shoved in (very tiresome, that).
Finally, it has a really attractive design like none other I've seen.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All MC Nudes Activity - MC Nudes Reviews - MC Nudes Comments - MC Nudes News
