| User Reviews (11) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ a nice spectrum of unique models
+ daily updates
+ easy to navigate
+ professionally designed and produced
+ pics in 600, 1200, 4300 and sometimes even 5000 px
+ zip-archives
+ fast and unlimited downloads
+ HD Videos in 1280x720
+ new 3D pictures
+ exclusive content and downloads (DVD) |
| Cons: |
- too many outdoor sets |
| Bottom Line: |
Greetings earthlings,
I joined MC Nudes in january 2007 and I never regreted it. Over the last two ... nearly three years I saw MC Nudes grow a beast in style, design and functionality. They recently added a new 3D feature which rocks.
Truly, there are a lot of softcore sites on the internet featuring nude girls but in my opinion MC Nudes is absolutly inimitable. Their models have a natural look, nice discreet make-up and are simply unique.
I for myself think that nudity calls for quality and a nice fine touch of art. So, if you are looking for something similar like I do, than MC Nudes is definitely worth a try.
Sincerely,
Bumble B |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# 3D galleries (NEW)
# great girls / good mixture of babes and woman
# HDV Videos with big archive *1
# galleries with big archive
# modelvoting
# bonus stuff
*1 they seem to spend more effort in cutting scenes and give everything a more gentle and artistic touch (I like that, you maybe not) |
| Cons: |
~ little more variance in settings would be good
~ more exotic girls
~ modelnames in videos are missing |
| Bottom Line: |
I have just went into my 2nd month membership on mc-nudes and was really surprised about the feature upgrade.
The new 3D galleries are top notch and something I haven't seen anywhere else before. The girls seem really to pop out of my monitor and the archive grows fast (nearly 1 per day).
Beside that everything stay is as good as it was before. Daily updates, good erotic content and since some time they shoot more girls in lingerie.
The site is nothing for people who seek for hardcore except for those who want settle down and a bit to see their favorite hc model's sensual side ;)
They have known girls and unqiues ...
MCN is softcore at it's best. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM or any download limits.
-Works with download managers. I downloaded 88 videos, 12.8 GB in an hour and a half without a single problem.
-Nearly all models top notch attractive.
-Huge website. See TBP for details.
-Beautiful HD quality videos, 1280x720 over 3000 kbps. |
| Cons: |
-Others have commented that the photo sets are not numbered. The videos are numbered, but don't have the models name. If you don't rename each video, you would have no idea who the model is. The site itself has names for the videos such as slinky or bubbles. Why not some name that helps?
-As several others have commented, the videos are more like art than erotic. Not recommended.
-Far too many outdoor videos. This makes most of them have backlighting, uneven lighting or are simply shot from too far away. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have come to appreciate videos that are HD. After recently joining sites of lesser video quality and being disappointed, I came to feel that without HD I don't want to join. The HD videos here are of stunning quality.
But is that enough? Apparently not. I made two fundamental mistakes when I joined this site. Both Denner and JD 1961 hit the nail on the head in their comments/reviews. The videos are just boring. Being arty in their style, you get for example, a nude girl rolling around in bed covered by a sheet. Wow. I am truly impressed. No great posing, moving too fast for you to really get into the scenes. They just miss the point of why I want to join a site. Nude women are very sexy, but this site manages to remove the erotic qualities that should be here. I realize it is a matter of taste, but two of the reviewers I trust the most said the same things. I should have just gone by what they said about the site.
The other mistake I made was that this site is just not about videos. If you go to a seafood restaurant, don't order the steak. Don't go to a fast food and expect top notch lobster. Once again, I have not found a site that is about photos to be a place where the videos are of great nudes. I would love to find sites that are erotic videos without masturbation.
To sum up my feelings, don't join for the videos alone. I realize this site is all about opinions, but Maggie, not a 91! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
03-09-09 12:22am (Update History)
Reason: After being a member of MCN for quiet a while now I decided to stick with it at as my personal favorite of all available sites in the niche I know.
|
| Pros: |
· great mixture of top teens and women
· daily gallery updates
· huge HDvideo archive (in different formats)
· bonus sets, model voting
· unlimited downloads (Zip format)
· unique site design for easy browsing
· DVD DOWNLOAD FOR MEMBERS!!! |
| Cons: |
· one update a day
· models could smile more
· some sets have just a few images
· some locations are overused
· more outdoor sets |
| Bottom Line: |
I just joined MC-Nudes because of the free DVD for members. The DVD is the best what I've ever seen so far.
The site itself has a great archive for galleries + videos going back into year 2004. Compared to other sites MC-Nudes doesn't have so many models but a wonderful mixture of them.
In case you're seeking for a site full of wonderful girls that turn your imagination on, you're at the right spot.
My personal favorites are Gabrielle, Nikky, Zafira and Mia.
I have experienced the site for some time now and have nothing to add to my review except other positive aspects of browsing through the whole site. I love it. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hi-Res Photos
Zip Files
HD Video
NO DRM
Lot Of Models |
| Cons: |
Erotically Mild
A Chore For Collectors |
| Bottom Line: |
Finally joined this site after thinking about it for a long time. Decided to because it offers high quality, high resolution photography.
The photos are very professionally produced. And they come in 3 sizes: 600, 1200, 4000 px. They can be downloaded in zip files. The download speed is fair to good.
The vids are HD, 1280x720, very lush. They are not DRM protected.
There are 10 pages of models, many well known. All told, there are about 1400 sets. They have (to date) 382 videos. A good solid archive.
So why the low score? A couple reasons. Much of the photography is as unerotic as it comes. I will give them big credit for not having repetitious shots (ie 14 in a row of a model standing around in the same pose). But many of their sets are, well, kind of bland.
Another problem is if you are a true collector of fine nudes, it is very difficult and time consuming to use this site. For instance, when you download a set and unzip it, the folder is named "Large", or "Small", whichever size you downloaded. So you will have to rename the folder after the set. And the cover of the set is not included in the folder. Therefore you must download it separately. All very time consuming, a real drag. What is so difficult about labeling a set's folder, and including the set's cover in the folder? Makes one wonder if this is a deliberate action to force the paying customer into spending more time at the site than he would wish. Every file being labeled exactly the same? You see the problem. Downloading should be fun, and not a chore.
If you're thinking, I don't care, I just want to download some hot nekkid girls---forget it. This site isn't for you either. You'll be bored quickly.
The site has it's good points, but I don't have the time for all the chores it demands. Met-Art is much simpler to use than this site! |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-has some very sexy models
-interesting layout for site
-good varitey of body types
-has an interesting comment feature at bottom of photoset/viedo page |
| Cons: |
-as others have said seems to rely on a few models to keep a steady update stream
-site speed can be terriable
-some photosets just seem to lack "energy" |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is great when its better parts show through but fizzles out a bit with its vices come through.(hey that rhymes ha ha) On the upside this site has some really hot models namely Gabrielle a very well endowed hour glass shaped slap yourself in the face and keep your dick from tearing a whole through your underwear goddess of a woman. There are several other nice girls as well. The photo sets that are good are some of the best errotic sets on the net. But then other sets they just dont seem to have good shots one area that they seem to really lack is the ass 'n tits type shot in other words a pic where you can see the models ass,back,shoulders and some boobs let me see the models curves from that angle there where many sets where you did not see this at all or only one pic or so.Another photo set issue is the lack of energy in some sets some of them just lack feeling and in errotic art you need to focus on body shape and model expression and some sets just seem to lack it. The other issue is that it seems that some models have tons of sets and others have few it seems like they use some models often to keep their updates at a regular basis. The site layout is pretty good and has a feature to change the back ground theme form grayish to a creamy color that is neat but it would be nice if there where a few more themes to choose from. The biggest issue is the sites speed it can be very slow at times I have downloaded vids from the site that where about 250-300mb and they took about 20-30 minutes to come in on other sites files of the same size normaly take 8-10 minutes. And at certin times of day the pages can take some time to load. I have a 1.5mbps connection so I adivse anyone who has a dialup connection to be aware that you may have trouble in this regard. Bottom line MC Nudes has great potential they just need to get a bit more consistant with their quality and really need to get some more servers to improve their sites speed a bit. I hope they improve in these areas if they do then MC Nudes would be one of the best errotic art sites on the net. This is a site that I will prob join again but not for at least 6 months to see if they have imporved or not. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful models
- Daily updates
- Photosets are zipped and DL quickly (they claim to have technology that accelerates downloads. I can't verify, I use a download manager anyway).
- Artsy and erotic photo shoots
- Very high res pictures (more recent updates are usually around 4-5000px, earlier updates are usually in the 1-3000px range)
- Resolution options on photosets (smaller zips range from about 1 - 5MB in size if space is a concern)
- Classy softcore (no intense masturbation, extreme closeups, gaping, etc.) This is definitely a pro if that's what you're looking for. I've signed up for sites before only to find it wasn't what I expected.
- High def videos
- Easy to navigate
- Nice site design |
| Cons: |
- Not a huge variety of models. The site relies on regulars to maintain daily updates (a few models have dozens and dozens, the rest only a few).
- Not many videos
- Sets can be repetitive after awhile |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're looking for gorgeous softcore models, I recommend MC Nudes. The models are very attractive, and the photosets are artsy and erotic. It stands out from other softcore sites in that the models are classy. Many softcore sites offer the same thing: Women with way too much makeup in pornstar/stripper outfits (not that that's necessarily bad, but it can get old). Also, if you like your softcore soft, this site is also for you. As mentioned above, no extreme closeups, gaping, massive toys (none at all as I recall actually), or similar. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (7 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (5) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|