Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
uge collection of over 35 gigs.
Most of the models are extremely attractive.
The models are all amateurs some of who continue on to make a name for themselves. Like Gianna Michaels.
There are multiple pictures of the same pose so if one picture is blurry the other will cover it.
There is a model directory set up an alphabetic form.
Photos go up to 2000x1333 in size
Photo collections are set up in zip files
Cons:
I ran into download problems and had to resolve it by switching back and forth between two browsers.
Some of the older material had problems with picture quality like blurriness and redeye. There would be pictures where the models eyes were cut off. Some of the pictures it seemed that the photographer was just as big of amateur as a model.
Bottom Line:
It was a good amateur site and it was only $15 a month. The pros greatly outweighed the cons.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Well I am only going to critique his video solos. Thats all I ever watch...not into pics, hardcore ect.
I have talked with matt about his video work in the past via his forum. He doesnt seem to be interested in my opionion and pretty much told me hes doing fine the way it is.
You can tell matt is a photo guy. He moves way too much for video. Almost to the point that its sickening to watch. I mean from frame to frame. Once he finds a good shot (which sometimes can take 1/2 the video) its only there for a sec or 2 then hes moving somewhere else....shaking ect.
He does have a lot of good solo videos. Newer concepts (for websites that is) with the introduction of the magic wand. Im glad hes not going into the sybian like a lot of others are. If he would hold his shots steady.....find good angles...good framing....stop moving shots so much..concentrate on what hes doing...instead of leaving his patrons asking "I wonder why he did that?" then he would be his proclaimed king. From a solo video standpoint that is.
All in all...still needs a lot of work on the solo videos....think its about time for him to contract out.
But is still a site I would recommend if for nothing else the chantelle video (which is probably the best solo video I have found yet). Its been sometime since I have signed up but did so lastnight. He did get some other nice shots in there....that wasnt a shot of the back of the vibrator...or a close up of the models face while shes cumming.
Honestly, friends at TBP!
I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?
The content should be in the 70...and that's better than fair...
The photos are not swell and most of the videos are just bad/average.
This is one of the FEW situations at TBP (and thank you!) where I have just a slight idea of somethings are not right.
This site is NOT worth the high points at TBP - 90,8- for me it looks like an inflation in points....
Don't you guys wonder why it's so much less among us users????
I'm with DigglerFL on this one: Poor photos and poor videos.
Haven't had time to join any new sites in a few weeks, but that changes this week. I've never been a member on Matt's Models, but did take the preview tour and see that he has some very early content, pre-implants w/glasses Eva Angelina content. I've read the different reviews and they do vary a great deal. Are there any other models on the site that are now much bigger stars? I always miss those if I'm not paying attention. For that price, I'd just about join it just for the Eva Angelina content.
Having read the several reviews here about Matt's, I'm a bit surprised at the differences of opinion. Guess it's really differences of preference, and maybe experience with Matt's vs. other sites. (Yes, that means better sites.)
Matt has made major improvements fairly recently in pic size (now 1600 px are pretty much the norm) and even in navigation, now "enhanced" so that it bothers people in new ways. (It took me awhile to figure out some of the features. Simpler, more transparent navigation would be better, doncha think?)
He's also had many of the finest looking women in Netland (as well as plenty of so-so's), and some of his comments on the models are fun to read.
Lack of good lighting is my #1 gripe with Matts. #2 is lack of image clarity too often. But hey, he's the self-proclaimed King of Anti-Glam, so I guess I should just get a life, huh?
One thing I wish he'd do is republish some of his earlier stuff in 1600 px size. Sweet dreams!
Matt is one of the true pioneers of net porn, someone with real entrepreneurial spirit. For that he deserves much praise.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All Matt's Models Activity - Matt's Models Reviews - Matt's Models Comments - Matt's Models News
