| User Reviews (21) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of models. Most tend to be teens or early twenties.
Varied content from clothed interviews to hardcore.
Original content. All shot by the w/m supposedly.
Newer videos in fairly good quality formats.
Good price. At 19.95 and a 9.95 offer when you cancel.
Recent models are quite nice. |
| Cons: |
Solo shoots tend to be formulaic.
Older video is not good quality. Only the most recent videos are acceptable quality.
Updates are a little slow. Could be more content. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good site for amateur videos and early videos of pornstars just starting out. I would recommend to those looking for amateur videos. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
very good amateur site
videos are shot well especially considering it is amateur
I called this site about a minor problem August 2008 and Matt the owner answered my call. He was very helpful and immediately made good on my concern. |
| Cons: |
updates...especially the videos are infrequent |
| Bottom Line: |
very good amateur site |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# most models(18-23) are genuine amateurs; first timers flown into LA from all parts of the country
#pretty girls- I did not see very many models that I would pass
# nice shoots; provocative poses; girl next door; amateur quality; pretty girls-
I respect their model quality- poses; none have a stripper look to them- girl next door.
1303 x 2000 rez pics ( sets shot in 2009)
1063 x 1600 pic size; 2008 shoots.
884 models; 1048 vids; 249,995 pics
some models set pic count up to 200 per set.
videos: masterbation, interview; backstage, audition tapes- get to know models; lesbian; boy
girl hardcore all have links that seperates them out- dont have to got to fill in the box search page
recent 06'-09' vids 797 X1200 size; good quality. ##windows media or quicktime
#photoshoots start with sofcore- with plenty of nakedness towards the end
# behind the scenes photoshoots
#ccbill processor- reliable cancels and join |
| Cons: |
# great looking models are spoiled by poor resolutions for any shoot shot between 2001- 2004. 2005 set sizes are bare minimum
acceptable size. Sets any older than 2005 and get tinier and tinier.
797 x1200 pics rez shot in 2006
546 x 683 pics sets shot in 2001 (who wants to see sets this small?)- 2001 sets should should
be scrapped- save the space
800 x 1067 sets shot in 2002.
711 x 1056; 711 x 1091 rez pics for set shot in 2005
# updates are inconsistent; and pic count inconsistent.
#vids are broken down into clips; and aren't offered in various sizes.
# they should resize or drop the sets from 2001-2004 and then reduce the membership price to 24.95. #29.95 is a bit too high. Though I'd pay that if they upgrade 2001- 2004. But may be better to drop it and then charge $24.95 for a smaller site.
# some models portfolios are three updates or less- though most are four or more with about three photosets to one vid ratio |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a complete man slut this month and joined a new site to look at pretty girls. It was a long time since I tried a new site. Matts Models was one site that I was looking at for a while. i saw some great reviews on it- which is why I gave it a shot.
This site is for those who like pics; amateur models, lesbian vids; masterbation vids. The models are mostly students from all over the country who are flown in to LA for a few days. Some are genuine first timers- others can be found on other sites. Some have never done this before- others are not.
Most vids are shot in an apartment setting which give it an amateur look.
The pic quality is good- not great; the same goes for the vids.and I liked both the pics and vids. The pics primarily should satisfy pic lovers.
The problem with trying new sites is that you don't know what you are getting. The reviews don't always help either.
They did deliver on the models; beautiful models; provocative poses; with good resolution.
a lot of the models are from all over the country- and are flown in to LA for the shoots.
but this site is the best dating back to 2006 with 2005 being the last real year for acceptable quality. Any older than that- there are still beautiful models; but the size starts getting too small.
I would say- from 2006 on, Matts Models is a pretty decent site. The photosets are not
watch4beauty quality. I am a pic lover and they satisfied me.
This sites videos are fair to good quality and comes in 797 x 1200 size on screen; full screen mode is available.
Some random videos come through in a larger; hi rez size larger than 797 x 1200.
Photo quality 2006 to present is 8/10
model quality is 8/10- they said amateurs and most are
vid quality 7/10
updates 6/10
So, again, Matts Models is a good site 2006 to present.. Anything older than 2005 starts to get pretty sub standard. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some new faces. |
| Cons: |
Bad lighting. Average or mediocre video quality.
Inconsistent and rare updating.
Hidden bandwidth limit...was shut off with no warning for 24 hours. No notice of bandwith limits.
Horribly small jpegs. Some real small videos (even 10megs or less) |
| Bottom Line: |
Probably worth 14.95 because of different non-pro models but boring presentation. Overall, I would skip it and pay xtra for a better sight. Teen Dreams is only 17.95 and has a lot more. However, it is nice to hear a conversation in English once in a while. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This is one of my favorite sights.
- real amateur looking girls
- real clothes stripping
- I love the anti-glam attitude
- the little stories about the girls are fun
- nice emphasis on butt shots
- I am a big fan of the laying down flat on the belly pose and he has 4 or 5 of these in each shoot
- good variety and quality of girls - blondes, latinas, skinny, a little chubby, TANLINES!!, asian, etc. |
| Cons: |
- Some complaints about photography may be justified. - red eye etc.
- videos are lame - but I don't do video
- |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the amateur feel of this sight and the huge amount of photos. Also, he poses the models very well. Maybe its just me, but I get nothing from the big glam sights like Met or Hegre but this sight is very stimulating - you can actually visualize yourself talking (okay negotiating) to these girls instead of the ice princesses on the other sights. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Well designed navigation with multiple content indexes
+ Roughly 1000 models
+ Very amateur spin, alot of unknown models
+ Many models who are now famous, but were just starting out when photographed
+ Interview "audition" videos are genuine and interesting, you get to hear what these girls are thinking about getting into the industry, Matt is respectful and not irritating
+ Matt seems to be very open to being contacted (although I never tried)
+ Good TBP price of $14.95
+ Bonus join of "Ownmymouth.com" for $4.95 for three days, really hot POV content
+ Matt likes to drink beer, play guitar, and photograph nude chicks! That's two things I have in common with him, and one I wish I did.
+ This was a top site in its day |
| Cons: |
- Most content is very dated, low quality
- Alot of "unattractive" models
- Not many new updates, Matt appears to be losing interest in his site
- Too many photos in sets (typically 150 or more), alot of repeat photos, takes a long time to make progress |
| Bottom Line: |
If I ever owned a website, and was just starting out, I probably wouldn't do half as good a job as Matt has. Finding the models, photographing them, administering the website, etc., is alot of work. Matt has certainly done an exceptional job for someone that started out almost 10 years ago, and in its heyday this must have been THE place to go for amateur and up-and-coming content.
Unfortunately by today's standards, the site's age really shows compared to other sites. Most photos are low resolution, and the newer higher res ones are poorly photographed (blurry, bad lighting, etc.)
A key reason I joined was to get some early content of many of my favorites: Destiny St. Claire, Sarah Blake, Peaches, Jaime Lynn, Jassie, Jana Cova, ... Unfortunately most of this content is low quality, and I was a bit disappointed. Some photos appear to have been originally shot with a digital cam many years ago, that gives an idea of the quality, but at the same time, adds to the "home-grown" nature of the site.
Not to be rude, but alot of the models are downright ugly, admittedly that's just my personal taste. If I was photographing nude models from a newspaper ad I'd probably shoot anyone that was willing! I'd recommend taking the tour and carefully perusing the model index. The actual site is just like the tour, except you have full access to the galleries and videos.
Bottom line: An interesting history lesson for collectors. Take the tour and judge this book by its cover. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of content
Easy to download, batch downloading
Great download speed. 40 MBit/s
Files named nicely
Nearly 3000 Zip sets
Close to 1000 videos
Newer videos look nice
$15 price is not bad |
| Cons: |
Very unprofessional
Picture on the small side, except for the newest
Site is a pain to get around
Mostly couch scenes
Download managers are not fully suported |
| Bottom Line: |
The price for this site makes it would a look. It is possible to download the zips in a batch download for you picture lovers. This makes download all 3000 zips pretty easy. The speeds are not bad either, I saw 40 MBit/s.
Be careful with download managers. They work to download the content once it is in queue, but if you use the manager to scan the site you will be locked out for browsing too many pages too quickly. This is not a huge issue though because they reset the lockout list every 15 minutes.
The videos vary on size and bit rate, but the newer half at least is 640x480 and around 1000 KBit/s. There are some that are half that, but those are older and that is usually to be expected.
The newest photo set, March 23, as about 100 photos in it and they are 1600x1067. They look nice, but of course the older ones are smaller 683x512.
A good portion of the videos are "audition" videos, then some masturbation videos. There is not a lot of G/G and some B/G, but not much. Some of the videos make you open separate browsers even when clicking the download link, and there are other things that make the site navigation a little of a pain.
They also claim to be the first to shoot Amy Reid, I am a big fan of her! :)
If you are bored on day and want a site that does not cost an arm and a leg, and do not mind less than perfect content then this site would be recommended. But if you want top rate photos and well planned scenes then you should look elsewhere |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (14) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Matt's Models Activity - Matt's Models Reviews - Matt's Models Comments - Matt's Models News
