| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exclusive content featuring POV dirty talking models with the concept that you are looking in on them and masturbating (and they know it).
- Model selection has some good variance in nationality, ethnicity, and age.
- Weekly updates with one video and one photo still set.
- NO DRM protection.
- No Download limit.
- Video quality is average with 3 different options in terms of quality with one format being in WMV. Highest format available in 640 X 480, ~1200 to ~1400 kbps.
- 13 extra adult games available to play if interested.
- About 20 or so short sex stories available to read if interested.
- I joined at their lower price of $24.95 and got the gold membership which includes access to 5 other sites (the actual gold membership was $10 more and I think it's the same access). Don't quote me on this that you will get access but there was no clear special when I joined, so it may work for others. However, there are cons. |
| Cons: |
- Photo sets are not proper shoots, but are video stills and are not available in zip format. For the actual content, they are quite pointless but worth mentioning. Average resolution found was 1200 X 900.
- Extra sites in the network are quite terrible. Access to a handjob site, a forced asian masturbation site, a spreading site featuring women, and a female dominating men site. However, I found myself downloading about 3 or 4 videos from only the handjob and spreading site. Needless to say, they are not very good extra sites.
- Navigation for the site is a bit on the weak side. There is no model index and to download the videos, the link takes you to another page where it streams the video selected and another link is available to download the video at the bottom of the page.
- The concept of the website is a bit misleading (I will fully discuss this in bottom line).
- Most of the videos are quite short at only 5 to 10 minutes long. |
| Bottom Line: |
Masturbation Instructors is the name of the site. However, the site name and preview is a bit misleading when it comes to the actual concept of the site. The expectation is that the site delivers POV instructions from the model captured on how fast to go, what to do, how well you are doing, and how much the model likes it. However, the site is a lot different than this. The content within the site is actually POV dirty talk with mostly teasing the 'watcher' to the fact that he cannot have the model within the video, usually for reasons such as being a loser, a small penis, or other humiliating reasons. Most of the time, the content will display the model on the same couch as the others, notices you are 'there', get mad, and therefore will talk down to you as they know you are masturbating. However, in a few, the model will not get mad and actually like the fact that you are masturbating to her. In a large amount of the content, the model will not even get undressed or even show a nipple. This is all fine and dandy but I think if the site made a clearer picture as to that this was going to be what the content was, I'd be more happy.
The videos are average in resolution and quality. I was not entirely disapointed dispite the stats but they could be better. Plus, the camera work is quite amateurish (if there is camera work at all). Sometimes, it is just a camera on record on top of a tripod. The editing can be choppy and poorly done because sometimes the model can clearly be improvising and say something that makes no sense or even laugh. Also, sometimes they just don't know what else to say and just repeat the same thing over and over. The only 'instructing' I got from any of the models is to maybe go faster or slower with the classic masturbating 'hand motion' but any elaborate instruction is non-existant. However, anyone looking for some women talking dirty and degrading directed at the viewer, the site does deliver within the videos. There are weekly updates and at the time of the review, there are 76 different videos.
The model selection is great in terms of variance. However, there are only a handful of true gems on the site when it comes to looks. I know differences between people when it comes to looks is plenty, but I can assure you there are a lot of unattractive models here. Many appear to be amateur women off the street that keep their clothes on and just talk dirty to the camera. I don't mind some teasing with the clothes staying on, but I think this just adds to site in negativity with the concept already being misguided, camera work being poor, and model quality.
The site does have some positives in terms of being a bit in the realm of its own in terms of innovativeness. However, the site immediatley gets shot down from poor technical deliverance and the inability to put this innovative concept in to play correctly. Up the quality of videos, add more actual instruction, get better models, undress more, and it's a winner. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Masturbation Instructors Activity - Masturbation Instructors Reviews - Masturbation Instructors Comments - Masturbation Instructors News
