| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Well Produced Scenes
Stays On Topic
Hi Res Photos
Large Archive
Interactive Forum
Good Extra Site
Screen Caps
Exclusive Material
NO DRM |
| Cons: |
No Zip Files :(
Older Scenes/Less Appealing
Hassle To Enter Extra Site
Could Be Updated More Frequently
Needs Improved Navigation |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the best HJ site out there, mostly because they do it right. It stays on topic and doesn't stray from the niche, which a lot of niche sites do, to my great annoyance. The producer and director here make a real effort to do it right. They are aware of one of the real problems in western porn, especially with niches like this: the "stunt dicks" (their term!) often ruin scenes in niches like this. We don't want to see the male props giving themselves handjobs! This site tries their best to avoid this spectacle, although sometimes it's a losing battle, through no fault of their own. And---importantly---they understand that the viewer does not desire to hear the director talking. You don't get that here, and high marks to them for that. You can discuss these and other issues with them in their forum. All sites should have a forum.
The videos are 640x480 (wmv). As of this writing, there are 297 of them. They are well produced. You can download them whole, in small parts, or in very small parts. Each scene also includes a slow motion climax, and a behind the scenes video. The oldest videos have some not very appealing girls in them, but generally the latest updates are just fine. You get screencaps with every scene.
The photos are 1500px, and very well photographed. However---no zip files! Come on guys, get those zip files up! Photos are not a side attraction, lots of us like them better than the vids. No excuse for not having zip files in this day and age.
There are 2 extra sites, the "Dicksuckers" being tha main attraction. It isn't real easy getting there though, and you have to sign in again when you do. That should be fixed. But it also is a good site, and mirrors Mano technically, with a lot of the same girls (obviously they do 2 separate scenes for the site).
You can bookmark your favorite scenes, which is handy (all sites should have this feature), but the site's navigation needs some work. Could be more user friendly and attractive, they have a model listing that is a bit of a mess.
I like niches like HJ/BJ, and when it's done properly (as this site is) it's unique in the online porn world. The site gets a high mark primarily for not disappointing in this regard, and for the fact they make a conscious effort to please the paying customer. And it's apparent that the site keeps improving. Hand Job niche lovers will not be disappointed. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Videos are HQ 640x480
+Two download qualities available, and scenes available in full or split-scene
+Site search, works well
+Movies come with associated HQ image set and screencaps, 100+ images in each.
+When viewing images you have the age old next/previous/gallery controls
+Haha, they provide short clips of the cumshot in slow motion. Hilarious. The one with newbie Amia Moretti is splatterific.
+Associated forum. But stupid thing requires secondary login, though.
+Long description of each movie seems like it comes genuinely from the girl, but I have a hard time believing it.
+*APPLAUSE* Every scene, from the most recent to the earliest, is available in the same high quality format. I can't say that older videos were ever poorer quality, but its good to know that everything is standardized, something many other sites have failed to do with their OWN PRODUCED VIDEOS WHICH THEY HAVE THE SOURCE!
+100% exclusive content |
| Cons: |
-Watermarked videos
-Poor update schedule - 1 update/wk. I can't determine the update schedule on ChelciFox because videos aren't date-tagged, but TheDickSuckers is date tagged, and it too is 1 per wk, so update schedule is more like 2 per wk.
-Poor organization. So they apparently are at v2 of their layout, but v2 is no better than v1. 5 updates per page, 49 pages...are you kidding? They really need a gallery page - 5 columns, 10 rows, 1 page. Not hard at all.
-No ZIP downloads for picture galleries
-You get access to TheDickSuckers and ChelciFox but you would never know because they do not advertise it well. And the links are not auto-login, you have to login again.
-Login process includes image verification
-Generic file names (01.wmv)
-Lower quality download is non-natural 448x336 resolution. 480x360 is a better choice in my opinion.
-Expensive $30/mo |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, it is a decent network of sites but it is nothing to get excited over. Both of the network sites (that arent ChelciFox.com) are dedicated to girls performing POV-style on a guy's hardware. It works for a little while, but it gets tired fast. Some of the vids involve sex of some sort (watch the Amia Moretti scene, she tells the guy behind the camera that she is going to FUCK HIM and tells him NOT to fuck her...very hot), but again, POV-style...works for a bit, but gets tired fast.
The organization is piss-poor terrible. 5 updates per page, with a shitload of text and all download links. It makes a verrrrrrry long page, lots of scrolling. 5 per page, 49 pages...what a waste. They need to look at sites like AdultRealityPass, or Brazzers, or NaughtyAmerica or any SANE porn site...hell, just take a look at Google Images. EMPLOY A GALLERY!!! Yes, it will make your archive look smaller, but it will at least make it easier to find and enjoy content. 5x49 = 245 videos (approximate)...if you make it 5 rows and 5 columns you get 25 updates per page, 10 pages - not all that hard, and 10 pages is still a lot of updates. When I use ManoJob (and the network site TheDickSuckers) I feel like I'm browsing one of those poorly made sites on the AdultBouncer or DeluxePass network...yuck.
The quality of the material is good, but the lack of ZIP downloads, lack of a good update schedule and the lack of decent organization are big deal breakers. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is for fans of tugjobs, handjobs or whatever. And one of the best in it's field.
The amount of videos here are just great - and what you can expect from a "good" site.
Almost 300 videos of (mostly) fine tugjobs - with very different kinds of girls - some quite plain, though.
Some top-porn models included.
Fine video-producing with the GIRL in the front - no f....... cameraman-yap.
Fine bj-bonus site - and one more - not so exiting - bonus site.
Fine - for most videos - quality.
Download speed ok.
Average updates - what seems to be every third day - not impressive, though.
Fine preview - go for that, first - then you get the idea... |
| Cons: |
Misserable navigation - and ditto socalled "search-engine"
One of those site where you just have to keep on pressing the bottum going through the archives.
Some stereotype-style of filming (but generally it's better than average)
Price a bit high.
Too few euro-models - but ok, this is first and last a US-oriented site, so now you know...
Annoying file-names - all have the same, so you got to alter everything after download. |
| Bottom Line: |
Take a look at TBP and the handjob-sites, tugsites and whatever they're called. No more than a 81,5 for the top-rated one.
As somewhat a fan of those hj-sites, I think I've been through them all - untill now Her Sweet Hand was the best.
But ManoJob got a lot more. You get to know the model without any stupid talk from the cameraman, the girls are well guided/edited in the manner of speaking, teasing og talking directly to the viewer.
And that part is very well done here at ManoJob.
It's a pleasure to watch those US-girls talking to the viewer, only - and if you're into sexy-talk, this could be the site for you.
And here is why this site deserves above the 80: Well produced videos with girls remembering that the thing here is like: POV.
And another pros. is the tremendous amount of videos and ditto different types of girls - AND before you get to the hj-act most girls do fine teasing, masturbating and so on - pretty good, all together.
Very fine dealing with the video-files:
You can download every scene in small parts (wmv) or download the scene in three part - and, of course full scene. Typical size for an entire scene is 180-240 Mb.
And finally you can choose to download cumshots only.
But Man: Name those files better for the user to archive downloads - and not name all the files the same.
Photosets: Download vidcaps or fullsize jpegs (1500x1000) not bad.
Bottom line: This is a fine - at the moment maybe the best - handjob site around - if you can do without euro-models - they have a few at ManoJob - no, very few... |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large collection of videos.
- Vids are high quality.
- Tons of cute girls.
- Impressively frequent update schedule.
- Good camerawork, shooting angles, messy cumshots.
- None of the overly made-up, dime-a-dozen Eurogirls.
- Great handjob content.
- Full access to great BJ site, 'The Dick Suckers'.
- You get to see what's in the entire archive before joining, with trailers for every entry (same with DickSuckers)!
- Excellent download speeds. |
| Cons: |
- A search engine would be nice; thus far, you have to go page by page.
- Euro fans will be disappointed.
- If you want something other than handjobs or BJs, you will not be pleased. |
| Bottom Line: |
After giving it several months of thought, I finally joined this site. Let me tell you, I was quite pleased. It's the kind of site I felt compelled to check at least once every two days, if not more frequently. They are on the cutting edge of getting the freshest, cutest talent (ex. Sarah Shine, Reagan Maddox, Scarlett Pain), as well as making good use of the pros within fresh settings (ex. Aurora Snow). It ranges from unknown faces to "wow, she's still doing it" girls.
I'd have to say this is the best handjob site around. You can tell the creators value quality. There are no stupid stunt-cock antics or camera talk (who ever thought that was a good idea??) - the focus is solely on the girls. The girls interact with the camera, they talk, and a few even let the occasional blowjob action take place, which becomes even more exciting due to the self-imposed restrictions.
The girls always look cute and at their natural best, and the camera work and picture quality are great, with a variety of angles (good POV and profile shots). They use good erotic imagination. As a result, the girls aren't always naked, but rather sometimes have tits hanging out of the shirt and the skirt raised. You know, the little things that excite (complete opposite of Jizzbomb, for ex).
The loads are never fail to disappoint (if you dig that sort of thing), they provide generous camera time of the girl after the load, and they vary the load destination (Audrey Elison, in a cute dress, gets covered from chin to boobs to knees!).
The bonus membership to Dick Suckers makes these two a must. If you're curious, go to both sites, and look at their complete archives, which have trailers for every update. If you like the girls and content (the girls are quite diverse), then join! I'm glad I did, and I will again.
Also included is a decent site exclusively devoted to softcore videos of Chelci Fox, the one-time AmKingdom, big-breasted cutie. Nice site, but the other two will take up most of your time. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Mano Job!
Add Comment
|
RSS Feeds : All Mano Job Activity - Mano Job Reviews - Mano Job Comments - Mano Job News
