|User Reviews (1)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
||-Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
||-Primitive site layout.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes
Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels
This is a hardcore teen site.
Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.
I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.
The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.
The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
- Add Reply
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|User Comments (0)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Magic Porn!