| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Attractive European models, most of which I have never seen before
* Exclusive content
* High quality videos in a variety of formats
* Hot solo and lesbian content
* Updates daily
* More explicit content labelled with yellow "LSG Extreme", although tends to be more softcore
* VIP area with behind the scenes vids, extra photos
* Bargain pricing for members who stay with the site - $59.99 per year |
| Cons: |
* Some high def vids have digitizing problems
* Music in some vids
* Not alot of content (about 1 year's worth)
* Small, repetitive photo galleries
* VIP area costs extra (unless you join by the end of this year) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site offers a different take on glamour model content. The models are attractive and younger, in the 18-22 year old range. They wear some but not too much makeup. There are no fake breasts, the models appear very natural and comfortable. Many of the names/faces are unknown, which gives the site an amateur feel, although East European favorite Nella is here in a few vids.
The vids are offered in a variety of resolutions for download, and they can be streamed at a lower resolution so you can preview first. They offer HD resolutions of 480p and 720p. However, I had trouble with some of the 720p vids, they were grainy with digital artifacting issues, a sign of remastering problems. I really don't think it's my computer, since I can play other HD content just fine. Nonetheless, this was not a major issue, I stuck to the 480p vids which still look great (even at fullscreen), are quicker to download, and take up less space.
The site often plays up an artistic angle, with piano and other music in the vids. Sometimes this works, but I'd prefer if they offered an option with no music. In any case you can always hear the models. The photosets are small and more artistic than arousing, I stuck to the vids.
Lastly, there is not alot of content, but definitely some high quality solo and very hot lesbian vids. More explicit content is clearly labelled. If you like glamour content it's a good join for a month at $24.95, although I'd skip the extra $10 charge for VIP content |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Recent photos are of high quality up to 3000 pixels and well referenced with model name and set number.
Each photo set is around 40 photos which isn't the largest of files but most files include some nice close up with emphasis recently appearing to be quality not quantity but if thats truely the case a bump to 4000pixles would be nice.
Excellent search facility which includes ability to search by model name, age, nationality, hair colour, shaved and several other options.
Many sexy models |
| Cons: |
Older photo sets are numbered from 001 to last photo number. This of course means the next set you look at is numbered identically and when you save the photo you get the old "this file already exists do you wish to replace it" message when in fact it is a different photo. This problem has been corrected in the newer sets as mentioned above but it really is an annoying and very basic problem that could easily have been avoided.
The 2 Watermarks per photo is un-necessary videos slightly grainy. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just a bit slightly expensive for a site that is still growing and has still a small number of models and photo sets.
There are obvious attempts to improve the site such as changing the photo set numbering and higher quality photos.
I think it is still over rated when listed as excellent and would personally rate it very good with the potential to be an excellent site in about 6 months or so once the site grows and there is a bigger choice. That said there is already some very sexy models here and I will probably be back sometime in the future to see how it has grown. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
First of all: Great looking videos of solo girls - especially for a girl-video-freak.
Sexy teen girls, mostly european/east european.
Good price for what you get.
I'm not sure about updates at this early stage, but the amount has rissen lately - it seems. After checking out the site earlier this year.
Videos are generally better than photos - the atmosphere/color in the videos are great. |
| Cons: |
It's quite a newer site, so the amount of stuff here is still average, but ok for the price.
I agree with ofter PU-users that the way they number the photos in zips or confusing and, yeah, not good. And watermarks two places in a photo is nonsens.
Download speed needs work.
Videos are split up in 2 og 3 files which makes the amout seem larger - and there is no full download for a whole scene. Thats the most irritating about this site. I tried to do a movie-join - but could not. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'll probably take some heat again for too high score to this site.
But folks, I love this site just after browsing for a day.
Here are some extremely cute and sexy teens.
Their videos are top. Something in between Teen Dreams, Nubiles and European Glamour Girls - BUT this LSG-site has something special about their girl-videos.
If you try to brows the preview you'll see some fascinating young and slim teens - and some I've not seen anywhere else, like Mia, Juliet and Zoe - not in this great quality of video anyway.
Most videos come in WMV, Quicktime and MPG - and there is also a small file for preview. Average size of video files is 100 MB. Quality is just great.
If these guys keep up the standard and keep the updates comming, well I think. I'll be back and back again.
But please, make the movie-files in whole scenes too!
Follow-Up:
Interaction/feedback sucks - se comment.
I downgrade in spite of some extremely fine girls on video. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+exclusive content of familiar hot Euro babes (Demi, Marina/Euphrat, Suzie Carina, Hana Slavikova, etc.)
+everyday updates: a gallery one day, a vid the next
+pic sizes at 1000, 1500, and 2000px, singly or in zips
+HQ vid sizes 1280x720 or 854x480 (each in both WMV and Quicktime; some go to 1920x1080!); plus mpeg (512x288) and ipod (320x180)
+monthly membership price of $19.99
+nice public preview area |
| Cons: |
-just 5 ½ months of content buildup; 44 models
-only vids or pics of some models
-pics per gallery varies (some are brief)
-slow downloads (>120mbps for vids, broadband connection)
-confusing login: click “members enter here” and it looks like the public area -- but everything is accessible.
-for each model, galleries named by shoot location, and it’s erratic. Example: Normandy 2, Prague 2, Normandy 1, Prague 3, etc.
-large watermarks in two corners of pics |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a purely softcore site with some lez stuff and some applications coming out of the phallic toolkit.
The photos are very good quality, but I thought some lacked enough richness in color. I’d also like to see more personality coming out of the models more often. Both factors together sent me into boredom too many times.
But at least LSG seems conscious of its watermarks; I never saw any overlaid on a model’s image in pics. They could make them smaller, though. (If Hana spread her buns more, could she make them shrink?)
The poor organization of individual model galleries is distracting; it means that the user has to keep mental track of things. Sure, I’m being petty, but frankly there’s no good excuse for it, either. It would be very simple for LSG Models to fix this problem and organize their content better so that the user can concentrate on more important things, like Bente’s soft and yielding behind.
I’ve seen three vids in large dimensions, and the image quality is excellent – better than the pics.
As TBP’s common refrain goes, the site needs time to grow. Because it grows equally in pics and vids, whether you lean more towards one or the other, it’s a slow but fair and even process. It’s pretty easy to predict that six months from now, it will be twice as good, and I’d probably rate the site in the 80s.
Final suggestion: with the vid sizes so high, why not crank those pics up to 3-4000px? |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (6) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All LSG Models Activity - LSG Models Reviews - LSG Models Comments - LSG Models News
