| User Reviews (22) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site appears geared more toward photos - which is what I personally enjoy.
- This site has a huge concentration of the sexiest woman in porn that I have seen.
- There are about 3 photo updates 6 days per week.
- There's about 2 video updates 5 days per week.
- Plenty of HighRes photos. The high resolution photos are 1000x1500
- It seems like half of the site is in their higher resolution format.
- The newer photo sets have well over a hundred pics each – enough to get the shots that you want.
***Best upper body boob shots I've seen on any website.***
***My number #1 Standout is that the photo shoots has almost the perfect model poses and it seems standard in almost every photo shoot – at least with the newer shoots. I haven't found this anywhere else.***
- Site layout is great and very clean without any confusion.
- I think the overall site navigation was great with good search categories. |
| Cons: |
- The high resolution photos are 1000x1500 are pretty small for those with a larger monitors.
- The quality of the photos can be a little better.
- The older photos lower resolution photos are so small that they are useless – should bump off site.
- Way too much make-up – need more natural.
- Some bad lighting – either too dark or too bright degrading detail.
- Unnatural skin colors
- Not enough butt shots for those who like that.
- The solo masturbations vids are boring, rushed, no moans, not much looking into camera, no words.
- The hard core videos are pretty boring – a little realistic clean roughness sometimes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Potential Score: 95-100
I know there's quite a bit of personal negatives – that's because I am a critical person – however, this site is actually the most satisfying site that I have visited to date.
During my month of membership, I never got bored – that was a first. There's so much content and good content to look through that it'll keep you busy.
My biggest issue is the small photo sizes – but I hear they will be increasing the sizes very soon
When the larger photos come in, the site score should go through the roof.
For those who have smaller monitors this site is great, but if you're like me and have a larger monitor – you may be a little discouraged in the beginning. After a bit, I actually got a little use to it – but I'm looking forward to the larger images. My monitor size 26”
Boob shots: The closer-up portrait photos of the models from the belly up are perfect boob shots and they look absolutely amazing on my monitor.
The photos can use a little boost in quality especially for the landscape photos – but the quality is as good as any site.
I highly recommend this site – you won't be disappointed.
The customer service is great and they actually work with you and answer your concerns. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 900 hardcore videos.
-Over 2800 softcore videos.
-Over 11,000 photosets to choose from and more than 1900 of these are hardcore shoots.
-Over 2000 models to choose from
-They have a search system that helps members find a specic type of video or photoset.
-They update daily and all their content is dated |
| Cons: |
-This is primarily a softcore photoset site.
-A little more than half of the hardcore videos are B/G. 1/3 are G/G only and the rest are solo stuff.
-About half of the hardcore videos are in parts only. It's much worse for the softcoire videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a hard site for me to review beause I can see how amazing it must be for people that like photosets. There is such a large amount to be found here that a month may not be enough to find all that you would want. I'm primarily a video guy so this site leaves me a disapointed because there is just not enough to satisfy my needs. You then add the fact that many models have hardcore photosets but no accompanying video and that just increases my frustration.
-I was able to find about 5 rare videos that I don't believb can be found anywhere else and they are of models that have only done hardcore for this site.
-People that prefer photosets should find more than enough to satisfy their desires.
-This might also satisfy some video fnas but this depends on the type of hardcore you prefer.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I was able to download. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Almost 4.000 models
- Zip files for all pictorials
- HD videos
- High-rez images that aren't over-sized
- Great photography
- Over 10 years of archives to browse through
- 99% of the content is exclusive
- No download limit
- Great download speeds
- Videos can be transferred to DVD
- Can subscribe by snail mail |
| Cons: |
- Not the best deal in town at $30 a month
- Pictorials are very redundant, 10 pics for the same pose, that kind of thing
- A lot of photos that are "cut short"
- Poor videography (the directing, not the quality) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a pretty good glamor site that offers nearly four thousand models to browse through, many of which are unheard of or relatively new to the business, a lot of the more popular euro stars early work can be found here. 99% of the content is exclusive and not found anywhere else on the web.
All of the videos from '07 on are in HD and the overall quality of them are pretty good, but could be a lot better in my opinion. I found the videography to be extremely poor, the director(s) have no idea how to film solo scenes. There's too much "tease" crap going on, ten seconds of what you want to see, followed by a minute close-up of her face, then 8 seconds of what you want, then 2 minutes of her hand in the way, they're worthless and most of them aren't even worth downloading, time for some videography lessons I say, I'm SURE they have schools for that. I though the videography on Karups HA was bad but it's worse on this site, if that's possible.
The photography is great and I really like the overall style but I was annoyed by the redundancy of the pictorials, there's way too many pictures for the same pose, which makes the pictorials seem long and drawn out. I also noticed that there is an abundance of pictures that would be great but were cut too short, not revealing the models figure and such, completely ruining the photo.
This may not be the best glamor pay site on the web but it certainly is a far cry from being the worst. Compared to Karups other two pay sites this one is the "cream of the crop" for that company and I don't think any porn afficionado would be disappointed joining this site, maybe a little bit with the videos but don't take my word for it, I'm a picky son of a bitch! |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An exorbitant amount of material
+ You can go on for days/weeks/months in your search
+ You'll find a lot of exclusive/licensed material here, that's hard to find anywhere else.
+ Even with the use of licensed material (too!), you'll find stuff here that might take you a lot of time to locate anywhere else (and save you some money)
+ Easy navigation - it's generally fun to browse all this content.
+ A lot of exclusive vids and photosets - even if they generally got external providers.
+ Fine updates - every day. (Except weekends)
+ Much better vid-quality - lately.
+ DM allowed and zip for pix
+ Almost ALL vids in WMV |
| Cons: |
Not so damn much in the cons. - but:
- The new/newer vids quality could still be a bit better!!
- In spite of the enormous amount of material, quite a lot - or at least some of the models are VERY average.
- I like old stuff, by all means - but too much of this are in low quality.
- Most of the vids here are in average quality - only the very new are in HD - wish they would update some of the old vids.
- The navigation is generally fine - but the design is an 'old timer' - they need to renew that - with a touch, though.
- A lot of model-name confusion.
AND - Cons bottomline: Why not get together a Karups network, too! |
| Bottom Line: |
Karup's PC - man, I've been here a LOT of times over the years - it's porn - no: PORN - from when things where a little bit greener/younger.
This site - and the Karup's Hometown Amateurs - and the later Karup's Older Women kind of reminds me of the old days - not so much bullshit - just a lot of fine material in vids and pix-sets - and hours and hours of browsing - and enjoying.
Like the deal where you can find models with pix and vids from long time back:
MAN, dig this - I even found the greatest vids and sets of an hungarian model - Chanel - who's now a 'working girl' (escort-service) here in Denmark/Europe - always wanted to fuck her - and now she has very fine vids and sets here - funny!
You can go on at this Karup's PC - and locate girls/models that you have not seen in a long time - and wow, suddenly, you'll find material - sometimes a little older stuff than you'll find at 21. Sextury or DDF or elsewhere. BUT the same model.... I like that!
Generally the pix/photosets of just a little older material seems/are better than the older vids.
The quality of newer vids - from late 2009 and 2010 has increased a lot. Most now in HD - whatever that means - because even if they're ok in viewing quality - none of the vids - even the latest are in the same league as what you can watch from 21. Sextury/DDF/and alike - and very far from In The Crack - if Karup's PC would ever get there, I'd put another 5 on the score...
But bottomline Karup's PC is a very decent site with a hell of a lot of fine material for the serious pornbrowser - but bare in mind 2/3 of the vids/sets are softcore - only 1/3 hc (aproxx.) - the same goes for the pixsets.
(BTW: That my score is the same as the DUKE's (TBP), says more about the DUKE than this user, but we agree here... LOL) |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
Denner wrote 1 review (07-29-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Great customer feel and good reputation. No dirty tricks. You do not find yourself signing up unknowingly for some other site or promotion. Advertising and promotion is mimimal, and they have no download limits or drm.
The proverbial wealth of material is here, going back years, so great value for money.
The girls look for the most part like genuine amateurs rather than porn stars. I would say some have that girl next door look, except she looks and sounds like a rottweiler.
Refreshingly few tattoos, piercings, and fake breasts.
The focus is on the girls. The males are not irritating and do not get in the way. There is no back to front baseball cap, trying to act black, while waving their arms at the camera and yelling "yo" or slapping the girls ass while shouting "whore." Here kid, just hold this pin for a few seconds will you? Oh yeah and the grenade too.
Material is exclusive.
Quality zipped pics.
No choking and spitting, girls treated with respect.
Bonus material from H.A. |
| Cons: |
Biggest negative for me is the real scarcity of hardcore.
Beautiful girls but a disappointing small number of girls outside the white slim category. There are only a few latin, black, or asian girls, and not that many full figure girls.
The look of the site is imo really boring and dreary. The index and home sections just look, well...uninspiring and as exciting as a phone directory. Okay, just my opinion and it is a small negative.
I personally found the navigation hard. It's been mentioned before but it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the girls, because of the small photos in the uninispiring index, the way they are named, and my cross referencing problems. Others think the navigation is fine, so maybe it's me.
For girls who do both hard and soft, instead of mixing the softcore shoots together with the hardcore ones they are separate, which is a shame because you cannot get a slow strip to naked, softcore poses, then hardcore.
No build up in hardcore videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Pics are 1001x1500 or 684x1024. Top spec downloadable wmv videos are 960x540 then 640x480.
MP4 streaming.
Regarding navigation, from the index you can choose from categories like "teens, "exotics" "hardcore" or just an A-Z of all the girls in chronological order. You can look up a girl and find the categories they comes under like "teen " or "hardcore" and find all their shoots and videos. I found it really hard to navigate and cross reference, for instance - teen amateur hardcore video.
There are tons of pages but the navigation is a mess with all the material they have.
The naming system and the index are not great and add to the fog of trying to find out what there is, where it is, and who it is. There is a wealth of material but it was a real chore, not a pleasure looking through the site.
The videos and pics have a samey look about them, but are professionally done, with good camerawork and lighting which makes the best of the models.
The videos do not take long to get down to action. There is no real build up, stripping or teasing. Oral is followed by mainly straight sex. Not a lot of anal. The videos show the whole girl as well as the close ups. I hate too many close ups but thankfully the cameraman allows you to see the whole girl while having sex, not just a groin.
The whole style of the photos and the videos is a little old fashioned. I don't mean that in a bad way. It is like it used to be before they started slapping the girl's ass, pulling her face, choking her, and generally doing stuff that made the girl and the porn shoot less attractive. I personally could have done with more anal and more hardcore videos. There is a great shortage of hardcore on the site. Despite that I consider my money well spent. I will probably join Hometown Amateurs at some stage when I can bring myself to brave the navigation problems.
Their videos and pics although not top high res, are still good quality.
The older pics and videos situation is similar to other older sites. They are not up to the quality of the new material and the videos are split into smaller segments. If they had removed all that it would not be noticed as a negative, and some sites do remove it. It cannot be considered a negative because they have so much to see plus you get the old material as bonus. They also update fairly regularly.
For me, the main negative is the scarcity of hardcore material. I have seen other reviews so knew what to expect, but was still a little disappointed. You will notice a lot of my pros are negative negatives along the lines of no download limits and no irritating males, which you would hope most sites wouldn't have anyway. But in the real world a lot of sites get it wrong whereas mostly this site gets it right.
I hope this review stays as the latest review for a while and gets em some customers and isn't replaced by some 3 line newbie review consisting of great videos, great pics, great girls, what more can you ask, 100. |
| Respond: |
14 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Really a lot of photographs and movies.
A recent movie and the photograph are big sizes.
Various content that equals network site.
Lovely women in various countries.
The woman who has the chest of the imitation is few. |
| Cons: |
Photographs of the same title.
Some errors. |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a site with very various content.
There are a movie and a photograph that two or more photographers made from each individuality. It is possible to enjoy it like the network site. I chiefly enjoyed the movie and the photograph of B/G.
Contents of a lot of movies and a lot of photographs are various like the thing etc. of the thing of the Club Seventeen style, the thing of the Only Cuties style, and the Nubiles style. It is very happy.
I think everyone for me to be able to find the liked thing from among movies all.
This is a subjective opinion. There are two men with a bad feeling to perform to Karup 's Hometown Amateurs a lot, too. There is no dissatisfaction because their movies are fewer than Karup 's Hometown Amateurs though they are on this site, too.
There is a dissatisfied point about the photograph.
There are a lot of photographs of the same title. When they are downloaded at the same time, it is stored in the file as which two or more women's photographs are the same. Inconvenience. Unkindness.
Reality Kings has very a lot of photographs. They are putting a different title on all photographs. Convenience. Kindness.
The size in some larger photographs cannot be downloaded. They that is smaller can be downloaded. Maintenance shortage.
I like this site very much as the overall opinion. I think that I like this site if you like ATK Galleria.
I will regularly become a member on this site in the future. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (7 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (16) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Karup's PC Activity - Karup's PC Reviews - Karup's PC Comments - Karup's PC News
