| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
pros:
-a lot of content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-hi def pics listed as up to 2900x4300
-Very attractive European teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-Content quantity- Huge number of pix sets and vids.
models : 620
photos : 101282
HDV films : 179
(The HDV films are really video clips of the models, these are not hardcore or softcore movies with a storyline.)
-No DRM
-No downloading limits |
| Cons: |
pros (continued):
-secret word is easy to read.
-small, unobtrusive watermarks.
-updates: a new photoset or vid every 1-2 days.
Cons:
-expensive. $34.95 (recurring) monthly fee. This gives you membership to 2 sites, justteensite and justeenmovie. But the justteenmovie site has tiny content, that you can download entire site in a few days, if you think any of the content is worth downloading and keeping. There were no updates at justteenmovie in the 30 days that I belonged to that site.
-advertise friendly support, but I sent email asking for help over 30 days ago, never got a response.
-basic site navigation is OK, but could be much easier to use. Met-art has more models and picture sets, but it's easier to find models and picture sets at Met-art than at Justteensite.
The search feature could be improved a great deal.
-jitter in some of the HDV vids. While you get very sharp images, it's annoying to see the images jittering on the screen while you watch the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
cons (continued):
-minor annoyance-Timeout disconnected from the site and have to re-login.
-no resume support for zip file downloads of picture sets. These are large zip files, so if you get disconnected, have to restart the download from the start.
-zip files for the high resolution pic sets only. No zip file for the low resolution pics in a photoset.
-model bio data can often have errors or fantasy. Age of model is often given as 18 or 19, because
this is a teen site. But I've seen models who are in their 20s listed as 18 or 19 (these are
models I've seen on other sites or in pornstar databases). Also, country of origin can be wrongly listed. The site is selling youth, so don't let the facts get in the way, as for age. As for country, I've seen Russian girls listed as being from Argentina at 1 site. Porn is fantasy anyway, so why not Argentina?
Bottom line:
This is a major teen softcore site. Huge number of very attractive models, photosets, videos. Well worth a 1-month membership if you've never belonged to it.
Also it's worth revisiting the site after a 6-12 month absence to catch up on the updated photosets and videos. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+1178 updates (mostly galleries; a few videos) from Dec. 2004 to present
+All-exclusive to April 2007, then it starts to mix.
+623 different models, mostly European, many of them lovely
+From Oct. 2005, often has pics sized at least at 3000px, along with smaller pics at 1200px. “Hi rez” sometimes even 5000px.
+Zips
+Good download speed at 2MB/second
+Search feature: drop-down lists of names, ages, countries, and hair colors.
+Access to live cams, though I doubt they’re included in the membership price.
+Membership includes JustTeenMovie
+Very good visitor’s browsing preview of updates and models
+Overall quality continues to improve |
| Cons: |
-Pricey, with no trial
-Claims at the bottom of visitor’s home page to be “100% Exclusive.” Not true, but see the bottom line.
-Inconsistent updating; has taken as much as a week for new updates to show.
-Zips are only of the large pic size.
-Large/“hi-rez” pics usually at 1200px until around Oct. 2005 (2-3000px).
-Older, 2004-05 content too often has poor image quality
-Some pics have the usual problems such as blurriness, excessive backlight and forward shadowing, low lighting, stupid poses, goofy props, etc.
-“Country” in search feature lists only Ukraine, Russia, and Czech Republic. So they made Czechs out of Austrian Crystal Klein and Hungarian Eve Angel, etc. (Will this affect their tax situation?)
-Once you’re logged in as a member, you have to take care to mouse around their EXTREMELY ANNOYING “Live Cams!” link which constantly animates in the top right corner.
-Problem with customer support e-mail (see my comment and the reply) |
| Bottom Line: |
Maybe you could say that the real “salad era” for this site was from Oct. 2005 to April 2007, when all of the pics were large and exclusive. But it’s not that simple.
The first non-exclusive content I can identify is Marketa Belonoha, April 23, 2007, which I’d seen in lower quality at the highly dismissable Viewpornstars. From that point forward, there are at least 31 non-exclusive photosets that I’ve seen elsewhere. (Not counting redundant videos.)
I don’t see this as such a bad thing because the image quality is sometimes better and the pics are nearly always larger than at the other sites: KarupsPC, MyGlamourSite, TeenDreams, SexyBabes, Watch4Beauty, VirtualGirl, and VivThomas. (But at least you can download zips of smaller pics at those other sites.)
Besides, what has been non-exclusive in 2008, for instance, is only about 10% or less of the total output so far.
But that total output is waning. Here are the update totals per year:
2004: 10
2005: 152
2006: 400
2007: 362
2008: 254
Even if they updated once per day for the rest of this year (87 days), which I doubt, they’d end up with 341 for 2008 – less than last year. And that’s with the higher $34.95 price in 2008. (It was $24.95 in 2005 and $29.99 in 2006-07.)
And sure, it DOES include the video site now, but I joined it for a 6-month subscription before they added that and started slowing down on the photo updates. See, I'm a pic fan, which is why I joined! I'm not as happy with the site as I used to be.
And I’m scoring it as fairly as I can from that perspective. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (9) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Just Teen Site Activity - Just Teen Site Reviews - Just Teen Site Comments - Just Teen Site News
