Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Just Teen Site

Visit Site
Just Teen Site Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Soft Content
3. Nude Photography

JustTeenSite
2 Sites Listed
Partner:   Just Teen Cash

Monthly: $34.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (2 months, recurring)

View all Just Teen Site Site Facts at TBP.

83.6
Feedback History  (10)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 0
Expired Reviews 0
Ratings 2
Comments 6
Review by TheBestPorn:

85.1
TBP Review

Date: 10-04-06

Type: Follow-Up

Spencer
+  Exclusive content.
+  Updates come daily.
+  Content look very nice.
+  Videos are now included as well.
-  Extras (model info) aren't on 100% of ths site yet.
-  Not very many videos yet.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
82
Drooler (150) 10-05-08  03:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: +1178 updates (mostly galleries; a few videos) from Dec. 2004 to present
+All-exclusive to April 2007, then it starts to mix.
+623 different models, mostly European, many of them lovely
+From Oct. 2005, often has pics sized at least at 3000px, along with smaller pics at 1200px. “Hi rez” sometimes even 5000px.
+Zips
+Good download speed at 2MB/second
+Search feature: drop-down lists of names, ages, countries, and hair colors.
+Access to live cams, though I doubt they’re included in the membership price.
+Membership includes JustTeenMovie
+Very good visitor’s browsing preview of updates and models
+Overall quality continues to improve
Cons: -Pricey, with no trial
-Claims at the bottom of visitor’s home page to be “100% Exclusive.” Not true, but see the bottom line.
-Inconsistent updating; has taken as much as a week for new updates to show.
-Zips are only of the large pic size.
-Large/“hi-rez” pics usually at 1200px until around Oct. 2005 (2-3000px).
-Older, 2004-05 content too often has poor image quality
-Some pics have the usual problems such as blurriness, excessive backlight and forward shadowing, low lighting, stupid poses, goofy props, etc.
-“Country” in search feature lists only Ukraine, Russia, and Czech Republic. So they made Czechs out of Austrian Crystal Klein and Hungarian Eve Angel, etc. (Will this affect their tax situation?)
-Once you’re logged in as a member, you have to take care to mouse around their EXTREMELY ANNOYING “Live Cams!” link which constantly animates in the top right corner.
-Problem with customer support e-mail (see my comment and the reply)
Bottom Line: Maybe you could say that the real “salad era” for this site was from Oct. 2005 to April 2007, when all of the pics were large and exclusive. But it’s not that simple.

The first non-exclusive content I can identify is Marketa Belonoha, April 23, 2007, which I’d seen in lower quality at the highly dismissable Viewpornstars. From that point forward, there are at least 31 non-exclusive photosets that I’ve seen elsewhere. (Not counting redundant videos.)

I don’t see this as such a bad thing because the image quality is sometimes better and the pics are nearly always larger than at the other sites: KarupsPC, MyGlamourSite, TeenDreams, SexyBabes, Watch4Beauty, VirtualGirl, and VivThomas. (But at least you can download zips of smaller pics at those other sites.)

Besides, what has been non-exclusive in 2008, for instance, is only about 10% or less of the total output so far.

But that total output is waning. Here are the update totals per year:
2004: 10
2005: 152
2006: 400
2007: 362
2008: 254

Even if they updated once per day for the rest of this year (87 days), which I doubt, they’d end up with 341 for 2008 – less than last year. And that’s with the higher $34.95 price in 2008. (It was $24.95 in 2005 and $29.99 in 2006-07.)

And sure, it DOES include the video site now, but I joined it for a 6-month subscription before they added that and started slowing down on the photo updates. See, I'm a pic fan, which is why I joined! I'm not as happy with the site as I used to be.

And I’m scoring it as fairly as I can from that perspective.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
DivBZero (13) 04-14-07  02:40pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The images here, especially the hi-res images are about as good as you'll find on the internet!!

The videos are smooth and well encoded.

The models are natural and flawless, which is pretty useful considering the 2,592 x 3,872 pixels image size.

The posing and the settings are great, well lit and fashionably chosen clothing. There is some very good use of form and natural lighting, the outside sets show this well.

The sets are basically solo and girl-girl.
Cons: To be fair the site is rated as 'softcore' and this is what you get. Its very gentle and hardly a finger strays where it perhaps ought.

The posing puts you into the frame of mind where one 'likes' the models rather than 'lusts' after them.
Bottom Line: A great photographic site with proper high res-images. Its softcore (as it says on the tin).

A few well chosen and well placed toys would lift this site to stratospheric heights.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (6)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Denner (142) 07-31-08  10:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (34), NO (0)

You get both sites

Just a tip for Just Teen Site/Just Teen Movie:

Though those two sites are not cheap, they got a deal now:

Join one and you get the other site too!

Will be back with a review (especially Just Teen Movie, since we don't have any PU-review of that one).

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (150) 07-10-08  01:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)

Just Not Just Teen Site

Try the link to visit the site; you'll be taken to JustTeenMovie. Then type in "justteenmovie," and you'll be taken to JustTeenSite.

OK, I get it. They're twin sites, but aren't they taking this Geminii thing a little too far?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (150) 06-04-08  02:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)

Support email doesn't work

Their general support email address doesn't work (isn't found as a legitimate e-mail address). I was trying to send them a comment on two of their latest galleries, but I couldn't because of that.

There's a disturbing trend. The last three galleries do not have the "hi res" image sizes such as DivBzero mentions in his review. Instead, Lilian's "Lustre" and Peaches "Neon" max at 1600. Making matters worse, "Nika"/Veronica Hanakova's "5-Star" maxes at a paltry 1204!

So WTF is going on? There's an unwritten rule, I'd say, that sites don't inexplicably downgrade their content like this.

I signed up, again, expecting what had been the norm in photo sizes for this site, especially given its high price. I'm pretty p-o'd about this.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

jd1961 (78) 01-08-08  08:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (2)

Another Site Increases Price :(

Up $5 to $34.95.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (150) 05-19-07  02:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)

When a date's not a date

Something I've been noticing: Content posted for one date gets moved to another, such as the "Purity" gallery first appearing for May 17th, '07 then being moved to today's date (5/19). So it has dated content ... but not quite.

Another thing: recently there's been a lot more of the "household name" Euro babes. This is great except I've seen a lot of the same content elsewhere (Babelicious, Viewpornstars, etc.). There still is lots of exclusve content, but it's ... not quite all exclusive anymore.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (150) 04-14-07  05:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)

One of the better if ...

I'd say that JustTeenSite is one of the better softcore sites with the large scale images. But there are some aspects I'd like to see improved/changed:
- there's no download option except for zips of the largest sized pics
- they sometimes overdo it on the odd mixing of colors (kind of like at Galitsin). I guess that's just personal taste.
- less girl/girl, which they've been doing too much of lately.
- pretty regularly the models are too waifish and look away from the camera in too many shots. MetArt more often has photogenic models (though not always).

They have been adding more videos, maybe in response to the TBP official review? I haven't checked out the vids, as usually the softcore stuff online is overedited as if we've all got really short attention spans.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Just Teen Site Activity - Just Teen Site Reviews - Just Teen Site Comments - Just Teen Site News

Visit Just Teen Site

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Just Teen Site (2) 83.6 85.1
2. Just Teen Movie (1) 68.0 N/A

RSS Feed : JustTeenSite Activity

View All: Company Sites (2)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.