| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+some very lovely women (59 models total)
+231 galleries posted so far, all exclusive
+3 viewing and zip (or by-the-pic) download options for photos: “preview” (800px), “screen” (1600px), and “printable” (3000+ px)
+under each gallery image you’re given the photo dimensions and file size (a nice feature!)
+simple, straightfoward navigation |
| Cons: |
-only updates every 3 days or so
-only 4 videos. Viewed one. It sucked.
-some women are not very appealing
-design is simple … make that “dull”
-“free tour” doesn’t show much
-galleries are often short (20-30 pics) and can be boring; too many shots of the women looking away somewhere
-some shoots are broken into galleries posted at different times
-“galleries” means all of 2007; “archives” means 2006 and 2005. (?)
-earlier photo content often very poor quality (esp. early ’06 and '05) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very softcore nude photo site of Russian and Ukrainian women. A few of them, such as Inna (aka Inez), Kelly, Lidia (aka Kamila), Maria S, Masha, and Yana, are on other nude sites (ATKP Premium, FemJoy. JustTeenSite, MPL). They are the really appealing ones.
I agree with TBP that it has made improvements, but hopefully it can go further by
1. improving photo quality. It’s not exactly amateur, but it’s not professional either. (Doesn’t have the quality found on FemJoy or MetArt.)
2. increasing the sensuality. The girls need to “interact” with the photo viewer, not look up into a tree for bird nests or whatever.
3. getting more consistently attractive models.
4. adding more pics per gallery.
5. improving the videos. The one I viewed, of the mysterious and magnetic Masha, had so few frames per second it was like watching a VERY old movie.
6. bringing the design up to current standards.
7. completing the model bios and the photographer bios. Partly done, they look unprofessional.
All of this would surely increase membership and member interest. For the past 12 months, they’ve had an area for members to post their “comments” (just 13 so far) and for the site to respond (just 6 so far). They last one was in May. It's not exactly bustling with activity.
The updated TBP review renewed my interest in this site, but I think their praise and rating were overdone. I “might recommend” it if you like the niche and the girls and want more. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Just Nude Activity - Just Nude Reviews - Just Nude Comments - Just Nude News
