| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Full access trial, 3 days
Still updating
Zips for photo sets
Most photo sets have 3 size options
Pictures have Hi-Res option, up to 4000
Many great looking models
No download limit
No DRM
Watermark is small and out of way
Some girl-girl shoots, but could use more
Site very simple, you can not get lost
Videos look very nice, hires and high bit rate
Several video options as well
Use CCBill, I prefer them |
| Cons: |
File named only by gallery number
Trial a bit expensive at $10
Needs many more videos, only 18
First month is expensive if joining without using trial
The girl-girl shoots are dubbed under each models name
Videos are of photo shoots only |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are a fan of nude art or softcore photo shoots than this place is well worth a look. It is a lot like Met-Art, so if you enjoy their stuff than join this one and forget about the rest of this review.
The photos are of a very high quality and really bring out the beauty in the models. They scale nicely too, so do not worry about them looking worse as the size decreases to match your screen, you can even go larger if you like....in case you want to look into her eyes of course! :)
The site is still growing since the last review was posted. The now have 482 photo galleries and 18 videos. Now keep in mind that a the number of unique galleries is lower but still well over 400, when they have two or more models in the shoot they assign a new gallery for each one and do not mention this.
The videos look stunning. They do vary a bit in quality, but most are of two qualities. Some are 768x576 at 6 MBit and some are 1280x720 at 8 MBit. The videos are mostly outdoors. In parks, by water, near statues, and one is even one a large pile of tires by a small skating park! I knew I should have gone to the park that day! The duration of the videos is between 6 to 15 minutes with most of them being about 10 minutes.
Many of the photo shoots feature the model already nude when it starts. Some do start clothed, but many times when they do it is only partially clothed which can be erotic in itself. i wish more of the shoots would start clothed.
The number of photos in each shoot varies anywhere between 20 and 80. It seems like they cut out only what they feel is the best. I usually like having as many photos as was taken, but I can understand this would require a huge amount of space since many of the photos are over 6 MB a piece.
Speaking of size again.
Photos - 482 files - 34.8 GB
Videos - 18 files - 4.6 GB - 2 hr 50 min
So as you can see the site is about 40 GB which makes it easily downloadable with in a month, or the three day trial. But it certainly is large enough to warrant joining.
If you enjoy outdoor photography with great looking younger women showing the beauty of several aspects of nature that this site is for you. This site has made my "join again" list and would do the same for any picture fan. If you are only after videos than this may not be the place for you.
If you intend on joining use the trial. Even if you intend on staying for a month, use the trial. If you join straight up you pay $30 and get 30 days. If you use the trial first you pay $30 and get 33 days since the site recurs at $20 instead of the initial $30. Plus if you are not satisfied in the first 3 days you can just cancel then and pay only the first $10 for the trial. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+some very lovely women (59 models total)
+231 galleries posted so far, all exclusive
+3 viewing and zip (or by-the-pic) download options for photos: “preview” (800px), “screen” (1600px), and “printable” (3000+ px)
+under each gallery image you’re given the photo dimensions and file size (a nice feature!)
+simple, straightfoward navigation |
| Cons: |
-only updates every 3 days or so
-only 4 videos. Viewed one. It sucked.
-some women are not very appealing
-design is simple … make that “dull”
-“free tour” doesn’t show much
-galleries are often short (20-30 pics) and can be boring; too many shots of the women looking away somewhere
-some shoots are broken into galleries posted at different times
-“galleries” means all of 2007; “archives” means 2006 and 2005. (?)
-earlier photo content often very poor quality (esp. early ’06 and '05) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very softcore nude photo site of Russian and Ukrainian women. A few of them, such as Inna (aka Inez), Kelly, Lidia (aka Kamila), Maria S, Masha, and Yana, are on other nude sites (ATKP Premium, FemJoy. JustTeenSite, MPL). They are the really appealing ones.
I agree with TBP that it has made improvements, but hopefully it can go further by
1. improving photo quality. It’s not exactly amateur, but it’s not professional either. (Doesn’t have the quality found on FemJoy or MetArt.)
2. increasing the sensuality. The girls need to “interact” with the photo viewer, not look up into a tree for bird nests or whatever.
3. getting more consistently attractive models.
4. adding more pics per gallery.
5. improving the videos. The one I viewed, of the mysterious and magnetic Masha, had so few frames per second it was like watching a VERY old movie.
6. bringing the design up to current standards.
7. completing the model bios and the photographer bios. Partly done, they look unprofessional.
All of this would surely increase membership and member interest. For the past 12 months, they’ve had an area for members to post their “comments” (just 13 so far) and for the site to respond (just 6 so far). They last one was in May. It's not exactly bustling with activity.
The updated TBP review renewed my interest in this site, but I think their praise and rating were overdone. I “might recommend” it if you like the niche and the girls and want more. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Just Nude Activity - Just Nude Reviews - Just Nude Comments - Just Nude News
