| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Hi-resolution content
No DRM
Good Looking women doing nasty stuff |
| Cons: |
Rip Off Network READ BELOW---WARNING!!!
Not enough updates
Some sites could be combined into one |
| Bottom Line: |
First, the site but then read on for the warning. The site has some decent content and that's why I'm not downgrading them further. They have some great girls showing and stuffing their butts in sites like Bubble Butt Tryouts, Solo Butts, Bottom Bang, Boobs & Bottoms and Butt Fetish. Why not combine these into a single "Butt" site. The guy filming is annoying and talks too much. Let the girls be the stars, no one wants to hear you.
The Handle My Wife site is basically scenes from the DVDs "Screw My Wife, Please" DMILF and Mouth Drillers have some decent stuff, although not enough. The updates are slow.
NOW THE WARNING===When you join the site, there is a box you must untick and if you don't, you will be joining about 3 other sites and charged for them. Then, when you figure this out, you go to unsubscribe and while doing, there is a tiny, little box and if you dont untick it, you've just joined another site. It took me a while to figure this out, but by the end of this experience, I had joined and been charged for 8 sites. THIS IS A RIPOFF SCAM THAT SHOULD BE STOPPED |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-high resolution videos, including a lot of HD.
-several resolution options: low, medium, high, super HD WMVs, some high MPGs, and both streaming and download options on everything.
-full-length and clips available for download.
-excellent site design and network navigation.
-good price ($17.95) through thebestporn.com.
-original content on four flagship sites. |
| Cons: |
-some bandwidth limiting on downloads.
-video quality is good, but file sizes are excessively huge.
-same models across many of the network sites
-sex is fairly vanilla
-many models are only "average", in both appearance and-or performance.
-pictures are uninteresting afterthoughts. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's a good network that includes a lot of true HD with full 1920 x 1080 WMVs, and even the medium (640 x 360) and high (1280 x 720) videos are huge. The low quality are dramatically poor (480 x 272), but then that's what low quality means. Everything is freely downloadable and all but the 1080p and MPGs can be streamed in Windows Media Player. The site layout is clean and smart, a good example of how sites *should* be laid out, and navigation from site to site is very easy with an everpresent dropdown list of the main network sites.
Despite the claim of 40+ sites, unless you are a fan of streaming-only, mediocre, poor quality (480x300) DVD material, only the first 14 sites of the network are of any note. Of the 14 noteworthy sites, only the first 4 are original content and the other 10 are DVDs. Not that there's anything wrong with that -- my favs in the network are not the original content sites -- but the front page is deliberately worded to allow the assumption they have 40+ (or at least 14) sites of exclusive content, which is not the case.
My main gripes are that the sex is surprisingly mundane, and that less than half of the performers are either known or talented. The taglines promise serious hardcore action, but none of the sites deliver anything extreme. and then bandwidth is throttled to around 250 KB/s, with a max of 3 connections allowed, so I can't use my full broadband, which is a megapain with HD file sizes up to 750Mb! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (5) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|