| User Reviews (8) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Stunningly beautiful girls. Some of the best on the internet. The girls are from the US, Canada, Hungary or the Czech Republic and the scenes are shot in those locations also.
-Huge site. Despite not being part of a network, there is really a lot here. There are 271 updates, each is about 3 to 6 clips of between 3 to 15 minutes. Some are longer.Three download options, only WMV.
-Nice text description and screenshot for each video. Truly helpful.
-Most videos can be downloaded as almost 1080i HD 1280x720 or 1080p superior HD 1920x1080. This is truly great quality and as good as any site I have ever joined-very highly recommended.
-High quality photo sets for each update. |
| Cons: |
-No search engine. Just like FTVgirls, the updates are listed in order. There are multiple videos and photo sets for each girl, but no easy way to find all of them. The so called search engine doesn't function well. It looks for keywords in the text describing each video. If you look for "black" you may get "black dress" or "black earrings" etc. Not helpful if you want to find all the peeing videos or the strip ones.
-No support for download managers. Very slow tedious downloads if you have to look at descriptions of easily 1000 videos and then download the ones you want one at a time.
-No ethnic, age or bodyshape variety. I found two Asian models and two Black ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has solo girl videos (there are also a few lesbian videos that are ok) that focus on either stripping, displaying assets, masturbation, looking inside with a speculum, or peeing. Most videos showcased their pussy or ass or both, but some focused on their face or moving erotically while fully clothed. Nice mix that provides some variety.
While I did not find all of the videos to be my taste, there are lots and lots of scenes to choose from.
The girls on the site are professional models, and a few are pornstars. This is both a big plus as well as a minus. The plus is that they are quite attractive, are well made up and know how to move erotically. They manage to not look like typical pornstars-no fake boobs, only a few fake blonds, no fake moaning or overacting.
Generally they play up to the camera in a sensual way that works well. Picture a girl pushing her pussy right in your face and then opening her lips to show you what's inside. By looking directly at the viewer, they generally create a personal link that can be very appealing as well as arousing. The minus to professionals is that they are totally dispassionate and are just doing a job. No enthusiasm, no feeling of daring exhibitionism as you would get with real non pro amateurs. The camera work is close to perfect. I feel most porn camera work is terrible and hurts more than helps videos. Here it is done right.
Specifically, the shots are straight ahead, no diagonals except for the earliest videos. Next each video starts with a focus on whole girl and only gradually moves in for closeups. This is a slow process that creates a buildup to the best parts at the end. Many times I preferred the buildup to the the extreme closeups.
The sets are a big plus also. Most sites use a house, even a hotel room. Here you get outdoors in the Virgin Islands or great homes in the Czech Republic, for example. Makes for a very professionl, polished, well planned video.
The only reasons for not giving the site an even higher score is the lack of a search engine, the lack of support for download managers, and the lack of variety in the models. It is very good for what it is, but it cannot be described as all that I hope for in a 90 level website. Overall a very creative and interesting way to showcase solo models that I hope other sites imitate. |
| Respond: |
15 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The pictures are fant-ass-tic: If you have a flat screen monitor that can fit these 2400 X 1700; 2200 X 1800;2400 x 1600
# new model every 2 days
#video comes in 2 min; 8-10minute; or 15+ min size; 3-10 videos per model
# about 240 models issues
some models have multi shoots
#this is a must site for hi def vid lovers; ass jiggling lover; upskirt lovers; in your face panty vids; in your face ass grabbing and shake the booty in you face; spread cheeks apart; pee videos--get ready to lie on the floor facing skyward, because thats the view..
# oh and pussay in your face; dildo in pussay in your face, and speculum shots
#the models are gorgeous and top notch
#If you have hi speed internet and a large screen monitor and love porn; this site is an easy top five site..
# top five site for hi rez pictures
#download zip files; small or large; 14.6 mb for small; 56.4 mb for large pics (per 20) pics..
#vids come in 640 x 360; 1280 x 720; 1920 x 1080 |
| Cons: |
# the pics blow up so big, I can't see them on my tiny laptop screen...
#will have to have the latest technology to fully enjoy this site.
#my wireless internet takes two hours to download a 12 minute video!
#the hi def vid files are huge and you will have to have the harddrive space; or an exterior hard drive to save them all.
$34.95 month membership price is higher than avg.
# there is ususally just one photo series per model issue avg 85-140 pics ( though some of the models have multiple issues.
# their is no sex on site.. |
| Bottom Line: |
I reccomend this site as a must see for those with hi speed connections; large flat panel screens; and a love for a lot of Hi def video and pics. This site very much is for those with this technology to enjoy what it has to offer.In fact, I would reccomend In the crack collections of vids and pics against the top video sites; including FTV girls. In the crack no doubt is shot a lot closer thatn FTv girls, titties jiggling in your face; tons of bootay shaking; speculum, masterbation, dildoes, upskirts and picture views as if you are looking straight up.
However, if you don't have this technology or a lot of room on your hard drive; then I can't suggest it for you. I don't have hi speed internet so I can't download the 17 minute video. unless I am willing to be downloading for three hours.. for this reason, I probably will wait to rejoin when I have hi speed connection...I really can't see the whole sight.
you will see lots of pee video with her puss inches from your face; some vids have the model sit in the chair with their legs spread apart peeing straight up like a geyser. Also, some Virgin Island shoots with beautiful models on the beach in their bikinis.
they will shake their titties and booty in your face. Trust me, your face is always inches away the whole time makeing some great vids..
but I can look at the pics are spectacular; some beautiful loaclas; all with with bead of water, pore of skin sharpness..
If I had hi speed internet; I would be on this site all the time; but I don't so I likely will be missing out on a lot of the site... |
| Respond: |
10 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
09-06-08 05:59am (Update History)
Reason: My opinion has been modified, having had some time to re-evaluate the material.
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of rude, rude (I mean RUDE) anal girls
-Highly original site, quite unlike any other
-Technically brilliantly shot movies (seriously some of the best filming in porn I have ever seen)
-Ditto picture sets
-Movies available in range of download sizes
-Nice big archive
-Despite no official support - DMs do tend to work
-Responsive customer support |
| Cons: |
-Girls in the movies tend to lack passion
-Can get a bit repetitive and boring
-Not too clear on regularity of updates, or when new ones are due
-Some of the shots are very very close-up - when you see a pussy or asshole filling the entire screen, it can cease to be sexy, and start to look like a biology lesson
-No long all-in-one movies - but this is not a big prob - the parts are often several minutes and can be loaded into your media player's playlist for one long continual experience
-Picture sets have lots of near-identical shots, and need some serious pruning. Many could easily be a third the size, and be better for it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine you have hired a sexy escort girl to come back to your place to give a private show, just for you. You're sitting back in your chair, and she stands right in front of you. She turns round, pulls her panties aside, and parts her ass cheeks to give a birds eye view of her tight asshole getting stretched open.
Well, that is how many of these movies start, and what a way to start! The girls often progress to striking all kinds of incredibly rude poses, generally focusing on their anuses. The camera gets in close, and doesn't miss a thing. Eventually, the girls masturbate, again with much ass play. Happily, dildos are not overused - you are as likely to see disappearing fingers as you are vibrators and toys.
There are also a few 2-girl sets inc. sensual massage + ass play.
The downside is, the action often seems contrived, moves at a very leisurely pace, and is very repetitive. The girls are clearly putting on a show for the viewer - which in itself is not a bad thing. But they never seem to lose themselves in abandoned passion. It's much more about showing off their bodies and sexual bits - rude exhibitionism, rather than images of girls masturbating and having fun getting off.
The picture sets have some amazing individual pics in them - but too often you will get about 9 pics in a row, all close-ups of an open pussy, and its like playing 'spot the difference'.
Still, top marks for originality. Ass fans should visit this fine site at least once.
UPDATE
I have lowered my score from 89 to 80, having had some time to re-evaluate the material. This is still within the 'very good' range as this is a very original site. But I find the passage of time since downloading the content has not been kind. The movies have become boring to me very quickly; I find myself fast forwarding through too many movies to get to an exiting part. There's just a lack of passion. Likewise, the photo sets have too much uninteresting filler, and too many near-identical shots that the webmaster probably couldn't bring himself to edit out.
Bottom line: this is a highly original site, but there are still hotter all-girl anal sites out there. |
| Respond: |
17 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large amount of content
- Very good visual quality in pics & videos
- Videos available up to full 1080p @ 8mbps
- Pictures up to 2000px on the long end with zip downloads
- Fast, I mean FAST download speeds
- Simple, yet straightforward navigation
- More frequent update schedule as of July 08
- Their "tour" allows you to see everything |
| Cons: |
- Very expensive
- Some pictures cropped to lower pixel resolutions
- Too much focus on the ass (may be a "pro" for others)
- No official support for download managers |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my 3rd tour with ITC. I used to buy their videos using their antiquated token system but it got prohibitively expensive. Now that they're all inclusive, I can go back and complete the old video collections.
If you're looking at reviews for this site, you're probably interested in this very unique type of content. Those into "glamour" or "artsy" porn need not apply. But if you want nothing left to the imagination, this site is in a world of its own.
The quality of models have improved a lot since I was last on their site. But the focus on more professional models means that some of the fresh faces they had in the past aren't likely to crop up again (Rachel & Natasha were my 2 faves).
All their videos are segmented, I didn't list this as either pro or con since everyone will see this a little differently. i.e... I love pissing scenes but not everyone does so it's nice to be able to grab just the videos you're interested in. If you like it all, I've got good news for you. If you have bandwidth, you wont have too many problems downloading the 1080p videos. I routinely saw one megabyte/second avg speeds. A few videos came in _averaging_ 1.8 megabytes/sec which surprised me since that's faster than my connection's theoretical max.
Visual quality of videos and pictures are great. My only complaint would be that color saturation tends to be a bit flat in most videos, but some might appreciate the truer, more natural color balance.
Also, their "tour" isn't so much a tour. You can actually go in and see all their video/photo shoots with full descriptions of every scene by clicking on the Models link. You just need a membership to access the photos or download videos. What you see is what you get. I wish every site approached acquiring new members this way.
What would make it perfect in their niche? A lower price for one. I think $25/mo is appropriate, even $30 would be acceptable. I'd like to see an even, 50/50 focus on pussy & ass. More clit shots! They have the perfect opportunity to capture what I consider the most elusive view in all of porndom.
Despite the high price, I'm letting this one renew. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of content available.
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.
- Detailed descriptions for each video.
- No DRM.
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set. |
| Cons: |
- Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.
- That "fish-eye" lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell. |
| Bottom Line: |
Ever imagine what it might be like to have Eve Angel park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.
While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and Eve Angel wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.
As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you.
I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of Eve Angel winking at me on my desktop.
You can see her eyes too. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ CLOSEUP exclusive content! This site lives up to its name
+ Clear, well-lit photography, w/ newer vids in HD
+ Hot models (though they certainly don't focus on faces) who get creative: speculums, anal, peeing, toys, veggies...
+ Photos available to all members, and now, finally, all video as well
+ Some girl-girl |
| Cons: |
- Pretty high price
- More girl-girl needed
- Closeups this closeup may not be for everyone
- Took them way too long to drop their token video system
- Older models have smaller pics |
| Bottom Line: |
Love closeup photography? Well, this site is so far in the crack it's practically in the hole; this site takes the genre so far that any closer and these girls' cheeks and lips would be smudging the lens. Their bigger photos (1600x1200, some 2400x1800) are huge, and you can easily end up staring at a crack (or hole) bigger than your monitor, or even real life. You will probably spend a few hours just admiring the pics, or at least getting a detailed lesson on female anatomy.
It's a blessing that they finally dropped their stupid pay-per-view token video system, especially considering the price. The fact that they were doing this for so long - screwing over members who had already paid (and losing potential business) - is probably the biggest reason for not giving them a higher score. I first learned of this site after a friend showed me a video, but I was let down when I found out they were separate from the regular membership. Still, their photography can practically stand on its own, though their vids are also quite entertaining (queefing vags, winking assholes, masturbation, pissing). I personally prefer shorter clips (5-10mins) than longer, boring vids, but it does mean more DLs.
I think anybody who joins this site already likes this stuff, but there are a few who probably think this is aimed at gynecologists and dermatologists, so it doesn't have universal appeal, but few sites do. For those who do like their porn up close, then this really hits the mark (crack?). |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
When they say In the Crack they mean it! If your into gyno, in your face closeups of ass and pussy meat you have to tour this site. These guys worship the ass in both pic's and videos. If your an ASSMAN your going to love their xxx focus on the ass and shaved cunt. Nice round and fatty ruby asses. The models are very XXX showing you everything, no holds bar extreme. Hardcore solo masturbation and exhibitionism. The girls lay it all out in the pics and the videos.
-cunt and ass worshiping; very strong focus on gyno upclose pics and video
-tons of pictures, three different series of each girl
-their style of video is unquie, I found the level of eroticism to be excellent
-the models are a bit older not teenie...great bodies
-erotic locations, outfits and posing
-they deliver what the say... Deep In the Crack |
| Cons: |
The videos are broken up into parts no option for a complete download. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like hot wet cunny, girls being totally xxx and explicit, lots of pussy finger and dildoe fucking and spreading gyno wide, lots of lube, nice amount of anal play, pissing, in your face close-ups of hot cunny... stop reading and join...I was a member previously but this is the first time where all the videos are available for downloading. Top quality porn...they got themselves a hot site. I don't fluff my ratings. To get a 90+ from me the porn site really would have to impress me. I only like solo girl or lezzie sites and I have been a memeber of all the top sites in that catagory and I never rated any of them a 90+. In the Crack is my first 90+ and the girls and site deserved it. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ASS is the emphasis here
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click “models” link, then click a gallery to see it)
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080 |
| Cons: |
-only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200). Purchase examples: 500 tokens for $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions |
| Bottom Line: |
What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning. What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time! Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!
But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one). Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices. Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates. Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity. This is what we call stretching.
Feminists say that porn objectifies women. This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds. Our dehumanized pretties include Eve Angel, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, Susana Spears, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more. And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Rivera’s toilet session. (I’ll bet she’s a vegetarian.)
The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin. It’s hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway. 200-350 photos per gallery is common here. Why can’t I get my wish? I do at lots of other sites. It’s really weird.
And the videos? Fuck that.
Follow-Up:
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95. I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like Susana Spears, Karlie Montana, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice! Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it. Boosted the score from 70 to 83. |
| Respond: |
9 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (13) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All In The Crack Activity - In The Crack Reviews - In The Crack Comments - In The Crack News
