Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit In Focus Girls

Visit Site

In Focus Girls

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Hardcore Sex
3. Extreme Porn

Final Whistle Ltd.
4 Sites Listed
Partner: Sapphic Cash

Monthly: $29.95  Our Price $19.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (2 months, non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $89.95 (6 months, non-recurring)

View all In Focus Girls Site Facts at TBP.

93.0
Feedback History  (52)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 3
Comments 23
Review by TheBestPorn:

90.0
TBP Review

Date: 11-21-13

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Variety Of Exclusive Content & Hot Models.
+  Advanced Browse & DL Tools.
-  Model Index Browsing Could be Better.
-  Older Content Quality is Not As Good.

User Reviews (23)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 23 Next Page >

Active
93
Cybertoad (104) 11-05-12  01:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice new clean look.
MP4 HDV UP To - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit (MP4)
Unique Material to this site.
Streaming Material is fast smooth
Many Vids have matching Photosets.
Navigation is good.
Very professional looking site.
Cons: Older Movies SDV - 640 x 480 @ 964Kbit (MP4)
Photos not accessed on video page.
Search engine did not accurately search.
Downloads on my 50MB connection was average not impressed.
Sameness in shoots.
Bottom Line: Toads over view:

The site has improved greatly since my last review in 2008. I did notice PU icon is not accurate to the new site format makes one think the site has not updated the look.
I found joining was easy and accessed with no problem. Girls are stunning and very nice bodies.
I was disappointed that most all the girls appeared under 24 and looked award when dressed in clothes for a person in their 30's. But were good non-the less.

Conerns I had:
I disliked the older material, some as old as 2005 and did not look or feel fresh. The newer
material was great and very high quality.
I was troubled by the poor results from a well designed search engine. The look of the search engine looked intuitive and clean but gave bad results. A search for blonds would bring up black hair and blond. Other niches did the same.
I ran a check on my PC and connection several times and took longer per movie then it should on this site.

Toads take:
This is one of the best overall sites out there, the search engine and old material are bothersome but the site over all is clean fresh and feel right. Those issues are the only reasons that kept me in the mid 90's score wise. If the search worked well I would have bumped my score up to 96.
The girls are amazing with many niches this is a girl only site there is some hardcore solo activity and some Lesbian shoots by over all is mostly solo. Allot more outside shoots then I would like, and would not make not of it but the search engine did not omit these well and added to the confusing finding the idea user material.
If you join any solo site make sure you do not miss this one. The unique material alone makes this a high mark site and quality is great except on older material which in my opinion should be archived and not included as total videos the site offers. I was also impressed that each video had picture sets. However in the video section there was " UNCLICKABLE" photos icon and access to the photo was done by a almost missed link. The link is fine but pictures should be clickble to the set. Just some small annoyances but the the site is great and worth the join.

CT
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply
Archived: Cybertoad wrote 1 review (10-20-08) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

Expired
96
Denner (233) 08-19-12  11:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (13 Replies)

Expired
92
Helvetic (8) 02-16-10  07:12am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
89
anyonebutme (14) 02-05-10  06:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
78
propaGhandi (5) 12-09-09  12:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
90
GCode (101) 04-17-09  10:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Expired
87
Aide (7) 01-03-09  02:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
89
xbigvmanx (14) 10-31-08  07:09am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
88
PinkPanther (46) 09-06-08  09:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
88
plan b (15) 07-01-08  11:52pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 23 Next Page >
User Comments (23)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-20 of 23 < Previous Page - Next Page >

turboshaft (24) 07-13-08  10:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (0)

Could they try linking model names?

I know I am not alone on this one. When you click on the description page for a video or photoshoot you get the model's name at the top along with the scene name, but the model's name is not a link!

There are preview photos for videos, thumbnails for photoshoots, and a nice little description, along with keywords such as anal, toys, etc., but no link to the model's page! Is it too hard to change these to links? Instead of being able to search for something, clicking on a video or photoshoot, and then checking out the rest of a model's material, you have to click the "Search by Model" link and find the model from there.

The site itself is laid out cleanly and organized pretty neatly, but without a few strategic links it only looks nice - it doesn't actually work very well.

Linking model names would be a big improvement to this site's navigation. For now everything feels like dead ends that don't link to anything, and nobody likes backtracking.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

mr smut (42) 06-05-08  11:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)

Discount price for Europeans is 19,95

Hell, I was on adrenaline when I made my subscription. Still it is less then the normal charge of $29,95 but once again I feel a little sad because we Europeans have to pay more for the same content.

And beware of the fact that when joining using the link posted here you manually have to choose the lower charge. So calm down before joining. I'd say the site is quite good - surely over average - but there are a few cons. My review is coming soon!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

mr smut (42) 05-25-08  06:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)

Good site but with some cons

Overall the site seems to be exactly what I expected. I do see lots of pretty girls that satisfy lots of my favourite fetishs. Especially Hanna (the reason for me to join) does some crazy stuff e.g. slowly inserting a handful of pencils into her sweet pussy while being filmed. This movie has a good mixture of close-ups and normal camera angle - well done! I hope the rest of the movies is at least half as good :-).

The one thing that really drives me crazy is that infocusgirls.com does not work with my favourite download manager GetRight. Why can't the owners make sure that such a site works with the most common download managers? To me this is mandatory even if you have a fast connection to the Internet.
I can only hope that my faster connection will be available within the next 2 or 3 weeks ... I love the content but hate to sit in front of my PC waiting for sets and movies to download.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

badandy400 (103) 03-30-08  09:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)

Cacelling

Just wanted to add that if you cancel here they give you until the end of the of your paid time, same as many sites. They even send you an email before cutting you off letting you know that later that day you wont be able to get in anymore. Thats not bad service at all!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (220) 02-08-08  11:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Pussy and toys

(to the tune of "Panama Red")

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
Got a fixation? Subscribe and boy, oh boy
There's loads of

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
Join expecting something else, you'll be annoyed
By all the

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
They've got 'em all lined up and ready to deploy

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
At this site they think there's only one thing to enjoy
Pussy and toys!

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

MargulisAZ (84) 01-16-08  08:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)

Sad there isn't much fisting anymore.

Just expressing my discontent with this fact. That was the main content I always looked forward to on the site and it seems to have been abandoned from their formula. When the site launched there was considerable content and updates with this, but it's been about 1 set every 4 months or more now. :(

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

nygiants03 (162) 11-23-07  09:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (0)

Not sure

Can anyone help me out and tell me which is better infocusgirls or onlycuties. They both look great, but I can not decide. If you had a choice between the two, what would you choose?

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Schnitzel (29) 07-11-07  02:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)

A reasonable site.

In Focus Girls to me, is a smaller version of Sapphic Erotica with better video.

Perhaps when the site's been live for longer and has more content it'll be great, but I could download the entire site in a few days as it is currently.

Download speeds (I'm in the UK) aren't that great, but the videos are extremely clear. Do beware of this if you have an older PC. This is beacause the HD videos may stutter on older machines.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

kkman112 (12) 05-05-07  09:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)

Consideration

I am considering this site as my next join. They seem to have some pretty good stuff here. I have seen some of their content and it is definitely good. Clearly I see they don't have a lot yet, but may not be as big of a clincher for me with this site. They seem to have a variety of content, but seems to focus mostly on being playful. The models seem to laugh and have fun in the content I have seen. HD is a plus, very few have HD video. If I do join I will surely write a review!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

littlejoe (23) 02-03-07  08:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)

for more hc content

for those of you wishing there was more hardcore content you should check out paul markham teens @ http://www.pornusers.com/review/paulmarkhamteens/ this is where the website gets its content (tho it is original)

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Shown : 11-20 of 23 < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit In Focus Girls

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. In Focus Girls (1) 93.0 90.0
2. Sapphic Erotica (0) N/A 91.0
3. Only Cuties (0) N/A 90.0
4. Hanna's Honeypot (0) N/A 80.0

View All: Company Sites (4)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.45 seconds.