PornUsers Newsletter!   Exclusive Discounts, News & Prizes  
E-mail:
Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit In Focus Girls

Visit Site

In Focus Girls

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. HD Porn
3. Amateur Girls

Final Whistle Ltd.
4 Sites Listed
Partner: Sapphic Cash

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (2 months, non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all In Focus Girls Site Facts at TBP.

92.0
Feedback History  (47)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 3
Comments 20
Review by TheBestPorn:

91.5
TBP Review

Date: 07-26-11

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Variety Of Original Content & Hot Models.
+  Advanced Browse Tools.
-  Model Index Browsing Could Be Better.
-  Content Page Browsing Is Cumbersome.

User Reviews (22)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 22 Next Page >

Active
92
Helvetic (8) 02-16-10  07:12am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Young nice-looking European models
+ Actions varying from masturbation to peeing, fisting, etc
+ Pictures up to 2000px
+ Downloads in zips
+ High Def Videos (1280*720, 4Mbit WMV; .MOV is also available)
+ no DRM
Cons: - more types of models would be nice
- price conversion $1 = €1 for Europe (but still not so bad:
€20/month)
- some lack of passion in models
Bottom Line: A nice site for those looking for masturbating and doing other funny things, from peeing to fisting, young European girls. Even though it looks like the diversity of actions is decreasing with time (at least fisting has hardly been observed in the latest updates), this may distract only some long-term users; for site beginners it is fully compensated by the total amount of content.

It would probably be better to have more types of models, but, at least, all existing ones are really very nice-looking (and, well, is it possible at all to satisfy both conditions?). And, in addition, it's a really great number of different faces there, so one will spend rather a long time before memorizing all of them.

A special word should be written about resolution of pics and up to 2000px for pictures and 4Mbit WMV for video it practically covers what most home systems can process; presence of .MOV format for video can be good for Mac users. And, note, all that comes even for Europe for only €20/month (some special offer); for those paying in $$ it's even better,
as the figure is the same ($20)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
89
anyonebutme (14) 02-05-10  06:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
78
propaGhandi (5) 12-09-09  12:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
90
GCode (99) 04-17-09  10:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Expired
87
Aide (7) 01-03-09  02:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
89
xbigvmanx (14) 10-31-08  07:09am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
79
Cybertoad (77) 10-20-08  08:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
88
PinkPanther (44) 09-06-08  09:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
88
plan b (15) 07-01-08  11:52pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Expired
86
mr smut (40) 06-16-08  06:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 22 Next Page >
User Comments (20)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-20 of 20 < Previous Page

badandy400 (103) 03-30-08  09:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (50), NO (0)

Cacelling

Just wanted to add that if you cancel here they give you until the end of the of your paid time, same as many sites. They even send you an email before cutting you off letting you know that later that day you wont be able to get in anymore. Thats not bad service at all!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (218) 02-08-08  11:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)

Pussy and toys

(to the tune of "Panama Red")

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
Got a fixation? Subscribe and boy, oh boy
There's loads of

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
Join expecting something else, you'll be annoyed
By all the

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
They've got 'em all lined up and ready to deploy

Pussy and toys, pussy and toys
At this site they think there's only one thing to enjoy
Pussy and toys!

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

MargulisAZ (84) 01-16-08  08:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)

Sad there isn't much fisting anymore.

Just expressing my discontent with this fact. That was the main content I always looked forward to on the site and it seems to have been abandoned from their formula. When the site launched there was considerable content and updates with this, but it's been about 1 set every 4 months or more now. :(

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

nygiants03 (160) 11-23-07  09:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (62), NO (0)

Not sure

Can anyone help me out and tell me which is better infocusgirls or onlycuties. They both look great, but I can not decide. If you had a choice between the two, what would you choose?

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Schnitzel (29) 07-11-07  02:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)

A reasonable site.

In Focus Girls to me, is a smaller version of Sapphic Erotica with better video.

Perhaps when the site's been live for longer and has more content it'll be great, but I could download the entire site in a few days as it is currently.

Download speeds (I'm in the UK) aren't that great, but the videos are extremely clear. Do beware of this if you have an older PC. This is beacause the HD videos may stutter on older machines.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

kkman112 (12) 05-05-07  09:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)

Consideration

I am considering this site as my next join. They seem to have some pretty good stuff here. I have seen some of their content and it is definitely good. Clearly I see they don't have a lot yet, but may not be as big of a clincher for me with this site. They seem to have a variety of content, but seems to focus mostly on being playful. The models seem to laugh and have fun in the content I have seen. HD is a plus, very few have HD video. If I do join I will surely write a review!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

littlejoe (17) 02-03-07  08:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)

for more hc content

for those of you wishing there was more hardcore content you should check out paul markham teens @ http://www.pornusers.com/review/paulmarkhamteens/ this is where the website gets its content (tho it is original)

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

elephant (47) 01-21-07  01:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (0)

Just OK

This site in my opinion just isn't as good as the reviews Id read say it is, its good yeah but just not that excited. I was left wanted something else quite soon into the membership, maybe they need to add hardcore scenes. I do like the fetish scenes cause they are different and they quality of pics and movies are great but girls masterbated I do find very boring now, I'd like to see some public nudity of them, maybe that would spice the site up, or getting a few of them tegther and playing some girly games together and getting nude. Anyway its worth it if you like solo girls scenes.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

nyaakun (0) 01-09-07  05:14am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Good - but could be better.

This site has good looking models, and multiple download options. It also caters to people with different kinds of fetishes. It's updated often enough to be worth the money, but it's missing in the erotic or sensual department. They could act more interested in what they're doing. The site also needs more varied looking models.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

PinkPanther (44) 01-08-07  09:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)

In Focus Girls

This site ought to excite me more than it does. I wasn't a huge fan of the sister site Sapphic Erotica either. There's some great stuff, and some of the close-ups are pretty wondrous, but there's something bland about the whole thing to me.

It's a matter of personal taste, really.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 11-20 of 20 < Previous Page

RSS FeedsAll In Focus Girls Activity - In Focus Girls Reviews - In Focus Girls Comments - In Focus Girls News

Visit In Focus Girls

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. In Focus Girls (1) 92.0 91.5
2. Sapphic Erotica (4) 89.9 92.0
3. Only Cuties (1) 80.0 89.5
4. Hanna's Honeypot (0) N/A 83.5

RSS Feed : Final Whistle Ltd. Activity

View All: Company Sites (4)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.58 seconds.