Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit I Feel Myself

Visit Site
I Feel Myself Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Reality Porn
2. Porn Videos
3. Soft Content

Feck P/L (Australia)
3 Sites Listed
Partner:   I Feel Myself Partners

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $69.95 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $99.95 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all I Feel Myself Site Facts at TBP.

86.3
Feedback History  (16)

Active Reviews 5
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 1
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 6
Review by TheBestPorn:

79.9
TBP Review

Date: 05-30-06

Type: Official

Maggie
+  Original content.
+  Near daily updates.
+  Nice quality video.
-  Not a huge collection.
-  Lots of non-nude content.
-  Needs more browse features.

User Reviews (9)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
95
RagingBuddhist (27) 03-15-09  04:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Still the most realistic masturbation site out there - no make-up encrusted, siliconed-injected models, just women enjoying themselves
+ Unlike other masturbation sites, the women here don't typically play to the camera
+ The site is moving into Hi-def (see bottom line and my comment at right)
+ Files available in high and low resolution wmv and high and low resolution mov
+ 1000+ episodes up, running an average of 5-10 minute each
+ Daily updates (with one con below)
+ They seem to be getting away from the same old "bird's eye view", dimly lit shoots. More women are doing shoots outdoors and in locations other than a bed
+ The member's forum is as alive as ever, with people commenting on the site and the girls daily
Cons: - Update schedule is still light with only one episode added per day
- Found out the hard way that there's a 3 gig a day download limit. Go over and you're locked out for 24 hours
Bottom Line: Well... I still don't have a job but I couldn't resist this one. This has always been one of my favorite sites and I just happened to be checking the site to see what's what. I saw exactly what I'd been looking for - IFM is moving to hi-def! So, the credit card took a hit and back in I went.

As of the date of this review there's about a week's worth of 720x576 video up and I have to say it's a most welcome addition. Bitrates have jumped from 900+ to 1600+ so the files look GOOD. Now I'm eagerly awaiting the the higher resolutions. The updates still just come one a day so I think this is still one of those sites you join, download for the month, then leave to join again after the content has built up. Just be careful when you go back and try to catch up that you don't download more than 3 gigs a day or you get locked out for 24 hours.

Definitely tops in it's niche as it is, if they could get more than an episode a day up, I'd say this site would be about as perfect as you can get.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply
Archived: RagingBuddhist wrote 1 review (02-19-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

Active
95
careylowell (13) 02-16-09  04:53pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -All other masturbation oriented sites fade to a pale pink in comparison.
-The Female orgasm, not a phrase usually associated with porn, is on full display.
-A host of fresh faces. Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere? Other than its non-nude sister site beautifulagony.com
-Most lose themselves to their pleasures, others stare straight into the lens. Some of each group generate yells and groans that are klaxon-loud. I dare say the building has no mice.
-During the post-orgasm, the sensation overload leaves some barely ambulant as good sex is a gentle cathartic.
-While some don't get naked, I enjoy the slow undressing of those that do. Many begin by rubbing thru their garments & this may continue for some time before blouse, bra and panties are removed at leisure.
Cons: -Understandably, a vid only site, as moans/groans don't translate well to pics.
-Some updates are merely a previously released scene now shown at a wider crop or via another camera.
-Perhaps two gals old enough to have bought a beta tape. The rest are just past legal age.
-The home page naviagation links are squashed into a small area. I clicked into wrong sections thru out my m'ship.
-Its a one-trick pony site: the desire to film big O's reaches something not far from mania.
-Concolourous sets.
Bottom Line: -This is one of the tiny number of porn sites whose members aren't 98% male. Don't write that your sexy wife is devoted to Abbeywinters.com or the latest female conquest really grooves to your old downloads of Jeanna Fine fuck-fests. No, I'm guessing this is one of a very few with a sizable m'ship of single females who tracked it down on their own accord. Others would be adultfriendfinder.com and, maybe, hegre-art.com
-If your idea of perfect porn is non-plot fucking conducted at breakneck speed, hup-two-three-four! then you won't incur an erection. If you prefer women being fucked into the floorboards, so hard she ends up with a nosebleed or concussion, this site won't raise your blood pressure.
-A reminder of what gets many women off: fully half don't finger themselves internally, the dildos are small-ish, I don't recall any anal probing. Judging by the twitches and moaning, any desire for cock is a passing velleity compared to the yearning for mons venus stimulation. Gentlemen, take notice.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
LAmahogany (31) 05-31-08  11:02pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extremely high quality content
- Updated often
- Some of the models are very hot; if you have a British Accent fetish, this site will feed it often
- FINALLY, realistic orgasms--not the feigned screaming, shouting and gasping in typical porn
- Deviates from the annoying fish-eye camera lens extreme close-ups; very organic, stable videography for maximum viewing enjoyment
- Some of the videos have outdoor solo shots
- DRM-free WMV files at 900kbit/sec. bitrate; high quality videos that will play on any decent PC.
Cons: - Absolutely, positively NO intercourse--even when "Friends" are in the picture (unless you get off watching dudes give their girl a hand job)
- Porn very clearly aimed at the female demographic; the bisexuals/Lesbians aren't the sort you would find in porn aimed at heterosexual men
- Many videos will cheat you out of a good view, lots of models never take off all of their clothes
- The camera angles, while pleasantly stable and pointed at the important stuff - girl's faces, their bits - it can get old. Videos with different angles with girls in different positions is very rare.
- "Mood" lighting overused; the better videos are shot in daylight
Bottom Line: Highly erotic content, I've downloaded A NUMBER of videos, so there's lots to enjoy here. I honestly thing there isn't enough realistic "females masturbating" porn out there; the only other site I can think of with material this engaging is AbbyWinters.com and I honestly think ifeelmyself.com is more compelling--especially with their 900k bitrate WMVs. Nevertheless, I was only able to find 2 videos on each page to be keep-worthy. So my recommendation would be to sign up, download what you like, and then sign back up in another 3 or 4 months for the next batch of goodies.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Newbie
89*
pornojoe (1) 04-12-08  11:25am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Thought the price was reasonable and lured me in the first time.
I came back a second time about 1 year later and updates are regular (daily actually)
The little window that informs me about upcoming updates.
The difference in scenes...some are outdoors and very "sneaky."
Download speeds are good.
Cons: Like other reviews, the close facial view during the orgasm, I would like to see the full view sometimes.

Sometimes the reshoots or re-edited shoots, aren't all the much better than the original. AND sometimes...they are.

Very few women of color...the ones here are WOW!
Bottom Line: If you enjoy the looks and sounds of a women during orgasm...this site is great. The price makes it reasonable. The site updates daily, so there is no question on "when?"

The ladies are not porn stars, so there is the uniqueness of the site. Just every day ladies being willing to allow us to see a very intimate and sexy moment.

I will be returning in the future and am confident I will be satisfied.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
80
exotics4me (339) 12-24-07  11:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Was recommened by a Sex Psychologist friend, highly erotic site
- Nearly 800 videos, res is good over 600 on high end, but bitrate is a bit jumpy at 700k on my machine.
- Videos are downloadable in full scenes
- Real women, not models, most are average to above average in looks which is important (will explain)
- Definitely real, probably the most realistic porn site on the internet that I have seen
Cons: - No photos
- Very little nudity (will explain in BL)
- Average girls can become boring to look at, especially for $30 a month
- Borders on mind-numbingly repititive, get the feeling of seen one, seen them all.
- Sometimes tries to become very artsy with the settings, lighting, example white lace wrapped around the women in a very dark room.
Bottom Line: A Sex Psychologist, or Therapist for you Politically Correct types that believe the Sex Organs have not a brain of their own, recommended this site to me as a highly erotic site.

The first thing you should know is that the majority of these videos do not show much more than breasts and some don't even show that. Instead, the focus is on the woman's face as she masturbates. The moans are excellent if you like to hear the moaning, racing breathing patterns, this is erotic. But the effect wore off very fast for me. After 3 videos I was saying, "Come on camera, move down".

The women look to range in age from 18 to probably mid-30s. Most are pretty enough or cute enough. But lets face it, not all pretty women make the most desirable faces during masturbation and especially in orgasm. If I could ever recommend anything to the webmaster it would be to make the last 30 seconds more of a full body shot even if at a distance. The body shaking, full body orgasms are not on here since you can't see the whole body. In my opinion this detracts a great deal from the erotic nature of the videos.

Video quality is about all there is to comment on, the resolution is very good, but that bitrate on a high end computer is stuttering a little. Which you can imagine hurts the erotic nature as well. This isn't Eve Angel or Sophie Moone quality masturbation, but it does have a place for those who maybe want to see something different and original. Recommended for those people only!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
87*
barnowl (2) 10-15-07  05:13pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: As basic as you can get with models of all varieties. Not all you want to watch but many are incredibly sexy. Also interesting to spot models from the other Aussie sites. An unfussy, uncomplicated site with, no doubt, genuine orgasms
Cons: Would like better lighting on the models which seems to be happening. And maybe more on the different camera angles
Bottom Line: A very erotic site. Updated daily - you don't always like the latest model but as a genre it works so well. I would like to see more of the models in outdoors shoots. And please keep male partners out of it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
82
HeatherMcXxx (7) 08-20-07  04:31pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a hard site not to like. It features natural women exploring their bodies in erotic settings, and the orgasms -- thank goodness -- are real and powerful. Categories include "Solo," "Friends" (where the actress is joined by others), "Lubrications" (interviews) and "Homemade." The full collection of each model's videos on the site are listed when you're watching one of her scenes (in the event you wish to sample another ... and another). This site can be VERY erotic.
Cons: The content is so consistent, it can be, at times, too predictable and not as arousing. Some will find too many of the women unappealing to their tastes (these are not glamour models), and the scenes may not be exciting enough for some (there are a couple of camera angles for each shoot, and that's it).
Bottom Line: For a limited amount of time, this site can be a welcome respite from other porn sites, given that its sole reason for existence is the celebration of women masturbating. It is well worth a month's subscription fee to experience its unique qualities.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
79
BostonPJR (72) 01-08-07  03:35pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (6)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

RagingBuddhist (27) 06-23-09  01:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)

A question before I go back

Nope - I can't stay away from this one. But I always try to go back after the content has built up. Since there's a 3 gig download limit, I'm trying to calculate the best time to rejoin, so I'm curious if anyone currently with the site can tell me the average file size of the new HD files. I'm most interested in the wmv files.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

gingersaurus (0) 06-10-09  07:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

HD-tastic!

WOW! The new HD videos started going up in May - look amazing!!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RagingBuddhist (27) 03-15-09  04:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)

IFM is going Hi Def

Taken directly from the IFM site:

"In November 2008 we began a $100,000 upgrade of our production facilities for conversion to Hi Def, Widescreen video. The first step was the purchase of Sony EX1 XDCAM cameras, which record in full Hi Def at 1920 x 1080 pixels (not HDV 1440 x 1080 as used by most of the industry). We began using the cameras immediately and so all material recorded since November 2008 is ready for encoding into various hi definition formats for release on IFM. We also have some footage recorded since 2007 in HDV which will transfer quite nicely to the new format.

Of course this means we'll soon be upgrading the video playback facilities on the site, making the high def versions of new videos available to those who have the connection speed. We'll still support dialup customers with small versions of the videos, and the current standard sizes will increase as well. Additional file formats will be offered.

For a while, not all videos will be available in hi def, as we run out all the SD footage still in the system. All the existing videos will be unchanged, and won't be deleted from our back catalogue. Subsequent re-releases will be in higher res, if not widescreen."

Very nice!

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

TheRizzo (23) 01-02-09  10:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)

Interesting site

I stumbled across this site a couple days ago and the sample video looked amazing and very hot.

Has anyone been a recent member and know if they have put in more variation of the poses like some of the comments and reviews seem to indicate was an issue?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

ChuckW (0) 07-30-08  05:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Yes....

They should try some different poses. Who wants to watch 99% of the girls in one pose (on their back). They have a few sitting, but the hottest of all was Cle standing up. How about more standing, sitting, etc poses?

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RagingBuddhist (27) 01-08-08  10:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)

It's cooling off

Yeah... it's gotten a bit repetitious, as one woman after another is seen in the same poses, from the same angles, as dozens of others. Still a few novelties poppping up from time to time, but it just doesn't seem as cutting edge as it did last year.

But the biggest reason for my disappointment in IFM is the site's seeming disregard for their customers. I'd put up a post on their forum about the disappearance of a couple of their videos and it was removed without explanation. I then got absolutely no response to the two emails I sent, asking about the missing videos AND the post being pulled. Seems to me even a plausible lie would've been in order on this one.

Are you watching this IFM? Here's a chance for a bit of redemption!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll I Feel Myself Activity - I Feel Myself Reviews - I Feel Myself Comments - I Feel Myself News

Visit I Feel Myself

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. I Shot Myself (2) 90.7 86.5
2. I Feel Myself (5) 86.3 79.9
3. Beautiful Agony (0) N/A 82.6

RSS Feed : Feck P/L (Australia) Activity

View All: Company Sites (3)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.