| User Reviews (8) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Still the most realistic masturbation site out there - no make-up encrusted, siliconed-injected models, just women enjoying themselves
+ Unlike other masturbation sites, the women here don't typically play to the camera
+ The site is moving into Hi-def (see bottom line and my comment at right)
+ Files available in high and low resolution wmv and high and low resolution mov
+ 1000+ episodes up, running an average of 5-10 minute each
+ Daily updates (with one con below)
+ They seem to be getting away from the same old "bird's eye view", dimly lit shoots. More women are doing shoots outdoors and in locations other than a bed
+ The member's forum is as alive as ever, with people commenting on the site and the girls daily |
| Cons: |
- Update schedule is still light with only one episode added per day
- Found out the hard way that there's a 3 gig a day download limit. Go over and you're locked out for 24 hours |
| Bottom Line: |
Well... I still don't have a job but I couldn't resist this one. This has always been one of my favorite sites and I just happened to be checking the site to see what's what. I saw exactly what I'd been looking for - IFM is moving to hi-def! So, the credit card took a hit and back in I went.
As of the date of this review there's about a week's worth of 720x576 video up and I have to say it's a most welcome addition. Bitrates have jumped from 900+ to 1600+ so the files look GOOD. Now I'm eagerly awaiting the the higher resolutions. The updates still just come one a day so I think this is still one of those sites you join, download for the month, then leave to join again after the content has built up. Just be careful when you go back and try to catch up that you don't download more than 3 gigs a day or you get locked out for 24 hours.
Definitely tops in it's niche as it is, if they could get more than an episode a day up, I'd say this site would be about as perfect as you can get. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
RagingBuddhist wrote 1 review (02-19-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-All other masturbation oriented sites fade to a pale pink in comparison.
-The Female orgasm, not a phrase usually associated with porn, is on full display.
-A host of fresh faces. Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere? Other than its non-nude sister site beautifulagony.com
-Most lose themselves to their pleasures, others stare straight into the lens. Some of each group generate yells and groans that are klaxon-loud. I dare say the building has no mice.
-During the post-orgasm, the sensation overload leaves some barely ambulant as good sex is a gentle cathartic.
-While some don't get naked, I enjoy the slow undressing of those that do. Many begin by rubbing thru their garments & this may continue for some time before blouse, bra and panties are removed at leisure. |
| Cons: |
-Understandably, a vid only site, as moans/groans don't translate well to pics.
-Some updates are merely a previously released scene now shown at a wider crop or via another camera.
-Perhaps two gals old enough to have bought a beta tape. The rest are just past legal age.
-The home page naviagation links are squashed into a small area. I clicked into wrong sections thru out my m'ship.
-Its a one-trick pony site: the desire to film big O's reaches something not far from mania.
-Concolourous sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is one of the tiny number of porn sites whose members aren't 98% male. Don't write that your sexy wife is devoted to Abbeywinters.com or the latest female conquest really grooves to your old downloads of Jeanna Fine fuck-fests. No, I'm guessing this is one of a very few with a sizable m'ship of single females who tracked it down on their own accord. Others would be adultfriendfinder.com and, maybe, hegre-art.com
-If your idea of perfect porn is non-plot fucking conducted at breakneck speed, hup-two-three-four! then you won't incur an erection. If you prefer women being fucked into the floorboards, so hard she ends up with a nosebleed or concussion, this site won't raise your blood pressure.
-A reminder of what gets many women off: fully half don't finger themselves internally, the dildos are small-ish, I don't recall any anal probing. Judging by the twitches and moaning, any desire for cock is a passing velleity compared to the yearning for mons venus stimulation. Gentlemen, take notice. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Extremely high quality content
- Updated often
- Some of the models are very hot; if you have a British Accent fetish, this site will feed it often
- FINALLY, realistic orgasms--not the feigned screaming, shouting and gasping in typical porn
- Deviates from the annoying fish-eye camera lens extreme close-ups; very organic, stable videography for maximum viewing enjoyment
- Some of the videos have outdoor solo shots
- DRM-free WMV files at 900kbit/sec. bitrate; high quality videos that will play on any decent PC. |
| Cons: |
- Absolutely, positively NO intercourse--even when "Friends" are in the picture (unless you get off watching dudes give their girl a hand job)
- Porn very clearly aimed at the female demographic; the bisexuals/Lesbians aren't the sort you would find in porn aimed at heterosexual men
- Many videos will cheat you out of a good view, lots of models never take off all of their clothes
- The camera angles, while pleasantly stable and pointed at the important stuff - girl's faces, their bits - it can get old. Videos with different angles with girls in different positions is very rare.
- "Mood" lighting overused; the better videos are shot in daylight |
| Bottom Line: |
Highly erotic content, I've downloaded A NUMBER of videos, so there's lots to enjoy here. I honestly thing there isn't enough realistic "females masturbating" porn out there; the only other site I can think of with material this engaging is AbbyWinters.com and I honestly think ifeelmyself.com is more compelling--especially with their 900k bitrate WMVs. Nevertheless, I was only able to find 2 videos on each page to be keep-worthy. So my recommendation would be to sign up, download what you like, and then sign back up in another 3 or 4 months for the next batch of goodies. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Thought the price was reasonable and lured me in the first time.
I came back a second time about 1 year later and updates are regular (daily actually)
The little window that informs me about upcoming updates.
The difference in scenes...some are outdoors and very "sneaky."
Download speeds are good. |
| Cons: |
Like other reviews, the close facial view during the orgasm, I would like to see the full view sometimes.
Sometimes the reshoots or re-edited shoots, aren't all the much better than the original. AND sometimes...they are.
Very few women of color...the ones here are WOW! |
| Bottom Line: |
If you enjoy the looks and sounds of a women during orgasm...this site is great. The price makes it reasonable. The site updates daily, so there is no question on "when?"
The ladies are not porn stars, so there is the uniqueness of the site. Just every day ladies being willing to allow us to see a very intimate and sexy moment.
I will be returning in the future and am confident I will be satisfied. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (7) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All I Feel Myself Activity - I Feel Myself Reviews - I Feel Myself Comments - I Feel Myself News
