| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login.
-Streaming option for each video.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM. (This is a guess, based on rest of the network. I was unable to download any videos, but the rest of the network videos have no DRM, so I
assume, if you could download these site videos, as you are supposed to be able to, they would have no DRM.) |
| Cons: |
-You are supposed to be able to download a low-quality video file for each video at the site. I tried to download 10 different videos, and each time I got the error message, "404 Not Found".
-There is no medium-quality or high-quality download option for a video.
And since none of the links for the low-quality download option work, you can't save these videos (Unless you use a special program to capture
screen images. But any video you might get using a special screen-capture program would be low quality because the streaming image itself is not high quality).
-Models not identified. No name is given for the models. So if you wanted to save videos or photosets, it would be difficult to sort them by model.
-No model bios (obviously, since the models are not named).
-No search.
-No updates for over one year. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Teen Mega World network.
This is an archive site: the last update was 2010-03-29, a little over a year ago.
Number of videos: 60.
Number of photosets: 60.
Video runtime: 15-35 minutes.
Video quality: low (based on file size of the video, and the visual quality of the video).
Photoset: 110-260 photos per photoset.
There is a single-size zip file available for each photoset. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot.
The photos are low quality in terms of photographic quality. The technical statistics for a single photo indicates the photos could be high quality if a competent photographer had taken the time to shoot them, but that wasn't the case: the photos are often blurry and out of focus, and are more like screen caps than well-shot photos. An individual photo is 300-400 KB, 1280x720 pixels. Which is just a waste of file size for blurry, poorly shot photos.
There are a number of attractive models at this site. And the videos are competently shot: good sound control, no annoying background music, OK to good lighting, OK to good colors (skin tone, background, foreground). The definition of the videos is low quality. If the definition was high
quality, a number of these videos would be worth saving. But you can't save these videos, because you get an error message when you try to save
them. Also, the video quality is low (in terms of definition).
The sex action is straight fucking. No story or plot, no buildup to the sex. It's one boy, one girl.
The site has little value. It's a small archive site, not updating. The videos and photos are poor in terms of image quality. You can't download any videos from the site (because of technical problems). The photosets are not worth downloading. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Home Teen Vids Activity - Home Teen Vids Reviews - Home Teen Vids Comments - Home Teen Vids News
