| User Reviews (5) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pink Visual has some great series! |
| Cons: |
MOST videos are NOT downloadable!
Many videos that say "downloadable" are not--when you click on that video's page you get a statement that the video is not currently downloadable but that it should be in the next 30 days. Yeah, right! |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined specifically to download some of the earliest videos--Montana, Taylor, etc. These involve girls who truly seem to be surprised that they are having G-G sex. These early scenes involve one-hit wonders. These are wondeful videos.
Unfortunately, they are NOT downloadable.
The links to other Pink Visual series reveals the same concern--many, if not most, are NOT downloadable!
If you are okay with streaming video, then I guess you might be happy. I'm not. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
.new faces, new places
.most output is in HD now (what a difference!)
.still the best site for guys who like girls who like girls.
.more closeups, and thus more intimate.
.downloadable in clips or complete video.
.several downloadable/streaming viewing options.
.part of Pink Visual banner, which has unlimited great sites that accompany HFLS. |
| Cons: |
..a little expensive compared to others, though there is a special being offered at this writing.
..needs to keep cameraperson out of the mix. Not needed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site appears to at long last be making a venture into other realms of fantasy, as the latest update indicates. To wit....4 girls in a workout gym decide it is much too "warm in here" so get naked, and at the same time aid their girlfriend who has hurt her back. Working her over with toys and massage makes her well again. Now this is more like it!! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
shooterbo wrote 1 review (05-04-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots and lots of videos. Nearly 200 different ones.
Always updated every week
Delivers what it promises |
| Cons: |
High price
New material is of very low quality
Most of the videos are ruined by male host talking too much
Newer videos are fully of ratty porn girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is a mixed bag. When it started out, I think it was shot in Canada. They were able to get lots of models that didn't look like the typical ratty LA porn girls. But they did some really good stuff in the first 120 or so videos. The only weakness was the male cameraman talking too much. A note to anyone doing this type of site: Find an older/ugly woman who can talk/act decently to do the camera work. Nobody wants guys talking in a video like this. The host is necessary because most porn girls can't act or talk well enough but a female host is much better than a male one. It also would have made more sense.
After about the first 120 videos, the site went into decline. First they hired Sammy Rhodes to sleepwalk through way too many videos. More recently they abandoned the old format and went to lame three-ways with LA porn rats.
The other thing that anyone doing 1st time style videos should remember is to have the girls playing the inexperienced role take the metal out of their piercings for the shoot.
The series is at its best when they have an experienced girl who can talk and act paired with someone fresh who is either inexperienced or can at least act that way.
There are 15 or 20 videos on this site that are hands down the best done in this format on the net. At one time with a little bit more effort it could have reached a whole other level. If you want to look at a large library of good material, I would recommend the site. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|