| User Reviews (11) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video and photograph in which it took a picture of a lot of amateur women
Search engine with a lot of choices
Update at nearly every day
The overall lovely design
Openhearted forum space |
| Cons: |
There are a lot of photographs and videos that do not contain sex.
The video of B/G is not an enough number.
Divided video |
| Bottom Line: |
I like G/G video. I love B/G than them.
The B/G video of the amount for which I hope doesn't exist here.
However, I should have expected it because I saw the tour and the review.
In this site, there are women who did a lot of Pierce.
And, there are women who did a lot of tattoos.
I do not like it.
I did not download videos of women who did Pierce to genitals and women who had done a lot of Pierce to her face.
I came to like Kim's B/G video a little.
The Kim is a really usual amateur woman.
She sits on the motorcycle, and is caressed by a man.
She seems to want a man to kiss.
And, she says to a man, "Kiss me".
She is lovely.
It was able to be seen in not only the video but also the photograph.
The G/G video of Page and Rochelle is hot.
Page is very sensitive.
She shakes oneself twitching only by a little being touched.
Her orgasm can be seen.
It is regrettable that there is only one kind of G/G video of her.
I was a member of G/G in abbywinters before.
I think that it is a good site.
I think that becoming a member on this site after you enjoy abbywinters is a good idea. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Uniquely natural / real models (average women).
- Natural settings without glossy editing.
- Genuine amateurs (not even pro-am!) |
| Cons: |
- Little or no chemistry or sexual excitement in most videos.
- Most videos are older, and have very poor resolution.
- Often (not always) very jerky camera work. Makes me seasick!
- Many videos have low contrast, no real blacks, so are like watching through a steamy window. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was intrigued by the Annie's truly unique approach and values, as I understood them from the reviews here and from looking at the site as a non-member. I definitely appreciate porn done by women with real female arousal -- at least I think I do (need more cases now). I watched the 4 trailers for boy/girl videos, and they seemed promising. The site says 500 videos -- so I figured there must be at least 100 b/g videos. So I joined hoping for some b/g videos with real arousal, female orgasms, and other things that I like (see my profile, and the forum "Against the grain").
Unfortunately, I have to agree with PU reviewer ramscrota. As a whole, the b/g videos offered by this site are pathetic.
First, quantity and resolution. Only 24 are listed, 2 of which are mis-indexed (they have no boys). Half of these, 13, are available only in very low resolution, highly compressed blurry 480 x 360 pixels mpg. Later vids move up to 640 x 360 wmv, then more recentlhy 770 x 435 mp4 or wmv without the blurring compression.
Worst of all, in most of the b/g videos, the couple seems to be working for the camera woman, trying hard (sometimes difficulty with erection) without being very horny or aroused. Sometimes they are clearly too hot, sweaty, and uncomfortable, and in some outdoor scenes the flies are quite distracting/disgusting.
So, after looking at all of the b/g scenes and finding very little, I looked at some of the g/g or solo videos. Since I find genuine arousal exciting, I looked mostly at the ones where the description indicated an orgasm. Again, most of these were simply unexciting. Natural down to earth people, just not very expressive or excited people.
As others have said, the models are a cross section of body types, ages, and personalities -- but all presented in very natural form, little or no makeup. I like that approach, but not the results here. Also one of the two camera women is often crossing the viewport, or her shadow, which I found realistic but somewhat distracting.
Overall, I have to say that for me, joining this site was a waste of money.
All that said, I did find a few vids that I downloaded and didn't erase after one viewing. Larissa's Manhunt is hilarious and she is really entertaining and sexy. Unfortunately, the 4 segments end without any sex or orgasms. (I deleted those.) The following b/g videos had some real sexual energy, excitement, and orgasms:
- Jasmine & Lee, Caravan Sex
- Timbo fucks Kim (silly overacting, but real multiple orgasms)
- Samantha and Maxwell was a really tender, affectionate, and hot video.
- Vince and Miah were fun.
After watching a couple of dozen solo and g/g videos (generally not my thing) the only one I am keeping is
- Daisy Duke & Alma (real horny excitement and energy and orgasms)
All of the above except Timbo were available in reasonable resolution.
Honorable mention goes to Kim's motorcycle video (3 parts). No orgasms but an amazing concept, pretty well done. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Easy site to navigate.
2. Amateur content. |
| Cons: |
1. A lot of the girls are quite unattractive.
2. The updates get drawn way out, need to have more variety.
3. Some of the areas where the scenes are shot are very dingy looking. Needs to spruce it up a bit.
4. Video quality is very poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would not recommend this site at all, there are a lot of better options out there. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Real looking amateurs
- Generally a good sense of the erotic
- Being an Austraian, it is exciting seeing the shoots in some locations known to me.
- Great sense of fun on the site. Forum is one of the most enjoyable I've ever seen. |
| Cons: |
- Little HC sex. The BG scenes are pathetic.
- Pic sets are often far too long
- Many sets look chaotic and disorganized
- Many sets photographed or videoed in untidy, dingy surroundings. Annie needs to get a cleaner in, and put some attractive decor around her place. |
| Bottom Line: |
A good site for those who love pics, and a sense of fun (the forum is great!). But this site is a lot like Australian society and culture - some good things, but messy, chaotic and unplanned. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons |
| Cons: |
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25 |
| Bottom Line: |
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Others have given all the details (quality, regularity of updates and navigation etc. etc.) regarding this site, so allow me to generalize and simply state, or shout: This is without a doubt the best amateur site I have come across so far.
Instead of a bevy of aspiring porn stars (read clones) here be found real women! Arghh!
There are the skinny, the chubby, the shaved, the hairy, the teens and the mature. There are teeth that aren't capped, pimples that aren't hidden under layers of make-up, hair that's not always perfect, instead there's simply a bunch of models who are for the most part unabashed exhibitionists, cheered on by photographers (female) who don't give a hoot if they end up in the picture now and then, by accident or design.
I think the web mistress defiantly proclaims through every set and video: take us or leave us!
Well, I gladly take it! The site is one of the few that's true to its niche, yet the pictures and videos are of good to excellent quality. |
| Cons: |
I really can't find any cons, except for the usual one: that some of the older material is obviously not as high quality as the newer stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
Summing up: this is my second subscription to this site. I was so delighted with it first time around that I put down money for a three month subscription this time. (Billing through CCBill, another plus)
After reading tons of reviews from my fellow PU members I must warn those who express disappointment in connection with other sites because they always find some models that fall short of their ideal, that this might not be the perfect site for them.
However, for those who long for natural rather than "porn queen pretty", this could easily become their second home.
I know that I find ALL of the girls gorgeous because they almost manage to convince an old cynic that they are not just posing for money.
They ARE the girls/women next door who like to be naughty now and then. Three cheers for our friends from Oz for running a great site. |
| Respond: |
14 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Girls Out West Activity - Girls Out West Reviews - Girls Out West Comments - Girls Out West News
