| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Weekly updates
-Easy navigation, but no search engine
-Photo sets for every video, however the photos are at best 750x500.
-Extreme throat fucking
-No download limits, DRM or broken links.
-Supports download managers with fast downloads. |
| Cons: |
-Too expensive for the quality and quantity of content. Comes with only one other site, americanbukkake.com.
-Sparse download options. WMV or streaming as weaker WMV. Can download clips that are 320x240.
-The videos posted after February 2008 are at best 720x480, 2000 kbps. That is ok, but hardly hi def. The videos from 2004 to 2008 were all useless as they were at best 320x240. |
| Bottom Line: |
Everything here has been released on DVD before. The models are nearly all pornstars, with very few amateurs.
This site is about forceful throat fucking. There is nothing kind or gentle; it is about male gratification. Using mostly pornstars, the action is quite strong.
The closest comparison that comes to mind is facialabuse.com. The videos here are of much lower quality, but they are still definitely watchable. Facialabuse emphasizes nonsexual turnoffs such as vomiting, face slapping and spitting, but here there is a lot less of that. I would describe the action as facialabuse light. While there is still some of these featured, there is so much less that the tone of the site is dramatically different.
On facialbuse the cumshots are from at least two guys and are on the model's face. It is portrayed as the ultimate humiliation. Here, in stark contrast, the cum shots are inside her mouth while it is closed. It is only when she shows it to you that you know that the scene is over. This seems much more like a real blow job.
This site is about fun for the viewer. The models don't seem disturbed by the action and some even say in an interview they are looking forward to it. I find that a bit hard to believe, but remember these are pornstars. Unlike amateurs, they are used to pretending they enjoy sex that they are actually doing only for the money. You get the feeling in many videos that the action is staged and preplanned. Compared to the vomiting scenes on facialabuse, I can live with that. A bit less reality is fine with me. Here they take a throat pounding and appear to be none the worse for wear. No limp, worn out models who will never be willing to do porn again.
Some scenes start off slowly with a normal bj and then it gets a bit forceful. In contrast, in some you get action that seems angry or that happens after the couple was arguing at the beginning of the scene. Some scenes even have outdoor introductory parts before the action begins. Often there is even a shred of a plot. The contrast is refreshing in that so much porn seems always the same. Seeing the participants interact is always a plus for me.
The only serious negative is that the videos before February 2008 are of unwatchable quality. The site has 75 videos of higher quality, each about 8 to 12 minutes long and updates weekly.
I would have rated the site higher if it had HD quality videos, more amateurs and more scenes with either two males or two females. A lower price would make this more attractive as well. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Pretty large collection.
- No videos DRM protection.
- No download limit.
- Navigation is kinda easy.
- Multiple download options for videos.
- Full length videos.
- Photosets offered.
- 1 bonus website offered with membership.
- Unique content.
- Behind the scenes content.
- Site has it's own personality. |
| Cons: |
- Website design could be better.
- No ZIP download option for photosets / screencaps.
- No trial option.
- Expensive monthly subscription price.
- Not exclusive content (DVDs offered as well).
- Quality needs improvement.
- No DVD's access included with membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
GagFactor is surely a unique website with it's own personality that has some small room for improvement.
Site's collection is large and members will surely not be dissapointed. Videos can be downloaded in two format (.mwv and .mpg) in parts or as full length movies. At this point I have to say that their quality is about average (especially old content's) and need some improvement. ZIP download option is not offered for photosets / screecaps but they are sure a good addition to the site.
Website's design could be better but navigation is not hard. Content is not exclusive as you can buy their DVD's. I believe that some of DVD's content should be included to membership. Moreover, there is one website included with membership.
Monthly subscription price could be lower plus there is no trial option available which would be cool.
In conclusion, I think that this site, as I said above, is has unique content and surely has it's own personality but collection's quality needs improvement. Recommended. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|