+ Fun Exclusive Hardcore Episodes, Creative Massage Theme.
+ Cute, Sexy, & Beautiful Models, Great Group of Young Adult Girls.
- No HD Level on the Older Videos, Standard Quality Only.
- Average Niche Categories, Hit-and-Miss Search Results.
User Reviews (11)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- 240 videos
- Streaming and downloads available
- Updates with one video per week
- Pics offered (with zips)
- File names use the model’s name
- Male talent knows their role
- Excellent selection of lesser-known models
- Simple but effective site design
- Supports download managers
- Only one file type for download (wmv)
- Model name usually only includes her first name
- Only one anal scene
- Files added after May 2, 2009 start streaming when you open the link (make sure your sound is turned down!)
- Odd process won’t allow you to browse the site while downloading anything – you get a message that the server is down for maintenance
- No search function but can browse by model name and categories (tags)
- Not much variety
- Site name doesn’t give clue of the specific niche
Fucked Hard 18 is a single themed site, the theme being massages that end in sex. I learned I had an interest in this niche when I was a member of Massage Creep and have been looking for good massage sites since then. Thankfully several PU members recommended this site because the site name gives no indication of the theme.
The site started on December 29, 2008 and now has 240 videos posted. The site updates by adding one new video a week. For those who prefer files other than wmv format, you’re out of luck. That’s all they offer for downloads. Streaming is also available. The files changed as of May 2, 2009. Prior to that there is only one resolution offered, 640x480 @1200 kb/s. After that date two resolutions are offered for downloads, 1260x720 @ 3200kb/s and 1000x564 @1600kb/s. Streaming is unchanged. All files use wmv codec 9 and play at 30fps. Subjectively, both versions look good. One word of caution for the post-May 2009 videos – selecting the link opens to a new page (as happens with the pre-May videos too) and when the page loads the video starts streaming. This is a pet peeve of mine as it hogs bandwidth and can be an unpleasant surprise for anyone who forgets to turn their speakers off. Webmasters: please don’t do this!
All scenes run from approximately 35 mins to just under an hour.
A potential problem with single-themed sites like this is that the scenes can be repetitive. That criticism can be directed at FH18 because the only thing that changes in the scenes is the girl. The setup is pretty much identical in every scene: the camera opens on a long view of a massage table, the girl walks in, usually by the camera so we can see her ass, she sits on the table and waits for the masseur to come in. He comes in, they introduce themselves. The setup is that she has been selected for a free massage because they are filming a training video. The girl gets naked, gets on the table and the massage begins. One thing I really like is that the masseur (who is the same in all the scenes) uses lots of oil.
One aspect of the scenes that I wish was different is what happens before the sex starts. I think Massage Creep does the setup better. MC has the masseur introduce himself to the girl and then he leaves the room while the girl gets undressed and slips under a sheet on the table. The camera acts as sort of a Peeping Tom while this is going on and the masseur peeks in too. Then the massage starts and it is played straight for a while before it becomes sexualized. With FH18 the masseur is in the room as the girl undresses and gets on the table. The massage quickly becomes sexualized with the masseur deliberately going for the naughty bits very quickly.
There is almost no variety in the scenes. There is only one anal scene, one lesbian scene, and one or two scenes with two girls. Model types are almost exclusively young, petite and natural. There are a few ‘enhanced’ girls, but not that many, and only a few sport a lot of ink.
Two things take this site from ordinary to extraordinary:
1) The models are stunning. The models are mostly ‘porn stars’ in that most of them have a listing on IAFD, but they aren’t ‘big’ stars in that they usually only have a handful of titles to their credit. Some A-listers do appear. While I like most of the A-listers, it is refreshing to see some models that I don’t know. (One beef is that while the site uses the model name in the scene name, they only use her first name. That can be frustrating with some obscure models with relatively common stage names like ‘Amber’ or ‘Natalie.’ I’d prefer her full name so I can source more if I want.)
2) The male talent and crew know how to make good porn. The guy in the scene does an excellent job of never getting in the way or trying to upstage the girl. The cameraman and male talent clearly understand that the scene is about the girl, not the guy. They both do their best to show the girl off. Many other websites could learn a lesson from these guys.
Pictures are available, but this isn’t a picture site so they are really just an afterthought. Zips are available. Resolutions on newer pics are good at 996x1500.
The site itself is simple, but it doesn’t need to be complex. There are multiple pages of scenes and you can sort by model and categories.
There are four bonus sites and several ‘DVD’ sites offered with the membership but those are streaming only.
One annoyance is that you can’t browse the site while downloading. Attempting to do so gives you a blank screen with a message that the server is down for service.
Overall, this is a site that is really better than I expected. The single theme and the lack of variety would suggest a lower score, but the amazing models and the site’s ability to show them off to their best without the guy ever upstaging the girl pushes the site beyond the average. I highly recommend this site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
This is the second time I have signed up to this site and the content is excellent! However the download speeds are awful!!!!
After 6.00pm (GMT) the average speed per download is between
30-40 Mb/ps. I have a superfast fibreoptic broadband connection so it isnt at my end!!!
I did leave feedback for the webmaster but got no response... Has to be a consideration when signing up
There really was a time I liked this site fro Web Ventures with its great arsenal of the hottest videos. At certain points in 2009/2010 it had upstaged even massageparlor.com & its sister sites soapy massage/nuru massaage etc.
This was however before massage creep came into the fold & started the now excessively prevalent practice of having MILF's; matures, , busty & big titted women as clients for a massage. The notable ones being Kitty Diamond, Mckenzie Miles, Aletta Ocean, Chanel Preston etc. This became a trend on most sites so much so that you will see & find one such specimen in every 3 videos on massagecreep.com. However, the site is big & part of porn pros so things are better
Recent trends show that Fucked Hard 18 is really shooting itself in the foot as they have reduced the length of their videos considerably which is a shame as that was their strong point. Plus one the best sexual positions was the doggie fuck over the wedge which has been done away with altogether. That according to me was a poor & unpardonable move. Plus they have not really any good bonus sites to speak of other than teenagewhores.com
Ultimately, these have exposed other grey areas like Price, girl quality & scene impact. At $30 in Non-HD, it's quite expensive & not really worth the effort. Also none of the recent girls like Brittany, Evelyn, Natalie can be considered. They had the nerve to include Rebecca Linares in between her boob job & that episode
was a real fiasco!
Its one reason I abstained from being a repeat member there as it will really have to reach out to its fans to prevent slippage
I was a member of this site back in the spring so I decided another review would be overkill. I joined again after seeing the TBP review. Fucked Hard 18 is still producing some great hardcore sex with stunning models. They recently started publishing in full HD: 1280x720/3 Mbps.
The updates are infrequent for my tastes (once a week) and the sex scene can get a bit monotonous.
Went back to this great site - and found a new star - new is she???
Hayden Winters! - a "sweet girl"!
Found out that she's done some at Mano, Amateur Allure, a full movie "My Little Panties" and not much else...
At Fucked Hard she just great, but in the scene at "My Little Panties" she's probably the most tender and erotic girl I've seen in a long time with a US-model - she is US, is she not?
BTW: This site - Fucked Hard - is getting better and better....
OK, Drooler, nice review! Two questions. Did you run into any of the locked-out/support issues that Sandfly encountered? And, do some of the girls get excited and cum, or do they all just lie there with their (according to Sandfly) large plastic tits (I prefer natural) while getting boned from behind?
I had no end of trouble getting this site to actually let me in to download movies. I had to get my Username/Password reset 4 times in 4 days! which all takes valuable time when your on the other side of the world.
I then discovered that the site will only accept 4 downloads simultaneously at which point the site itself stops responding to clicks on links until at least one of the downloads finishes.
The "Support" is limited to reseting the Username/password lock out and seems unwilling or unable to actually answer questions about daily download limits etc. as they are so good at resting this it makes me wonder how much practice they have had and why? One comment I got from the support person was that "the system will lock you sometimes" but with no explanation as to why this should be, just a blank acceptance of this as a fact without any thought to actually fixing it.
The content is boring and repetitive although most of the girls look good, despite some having the worst plastic tits I've ever had the misfortune to see.
Lastly the search engine in the "new" members area doesn't seem to care what criteria you give it, it pulls up the same list of movies with every search.
All in all a woefull experience; as you can see I didn't enjoy this site one little bit, it is over priced and amateurish, and I have cancelled my subscription and will not be going back there ever again.
Hope this puts anyprospective customers off for life!!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.