Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit FTV Girls

Visit Site
FTV Girls Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. HD Porn
3. Young Adults

RHS Photography, LLC
7 Sites Listed
Partner:   FTV Cash

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $99.95 (5 months, non-recurring)

View all FTV Girls Site Facts at TBP.

88.2
Feedback History  (51)

Active Reviews 25
Newbie Reviews 5
Ratings 8
Comments 13
Review by TheBestPorn:

93.3
TBP Review

Date: 02-26-08

Type: Follow-Up

Maggie
+  Exclusive content.
+  Huge collection.
+  High quality photos.
+  Great looking videos.
-  Could use a few more browse features.
-  Not cheap.

User Reviews (30)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 30 Next Page >

Newbie
90*
parahelion (3) 05-30-08  02:40pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A large amount of beautiful young women and high quality pictures and videos. High definition videos are available for newer content.
Cons: Most videos are in segments. This can be annoying for downloading a complete scene. The site layout could be a little better; it is pretty much a simple list of latest updates, and then a large (really big) index of each woman.
Bottom Line: FTV is a great website featuring a wide array of women doing their thing to get off. Both the solo and girl-girl photos/videos are in excellent quality. Lastly, some well known porn stars are on here under different names (like Tiffany Taylor is called Celine here).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
95
Mr Fountain (24) 04-14-08  09:31am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: # this site spoils video lovers
# offers 1440 X 1080 Ultra HD video; 8000 bper second
# offers 720 x 480 HD video
# every update from now on will include HD, and Ultra HD video
# Great looking models- usually students who send in sample photos and live in Phoenix.
# straightforward, magazine style layout
# the hd feeds are great; show great detail, def an upgrade over regular wmv watching that models booty jiggle in her skirt in Ultra HD is addicting.
# 30-45 minutes of vid comes with each shoot setting; comprises about 2 + hours of video per model; with some much more than that.
# photo shoots are hi quality; around 4 shoots/4 different settings 40- 60 pics per. Fewer, well chosen pics: almost every pic is background material
# Offers super sized pics 2000x 3000 format
# FTV girls Co. lavishes these girls; they are shot in hotels; inside lavish homes, taken away in expensive cars making hi class shoot settings.
# offers an extensive DVDs: each 1.5 to 2 hours long
Cons: # HD vids are only a recent addition- 24 models have updates that include the HD- the rest are
#the ultra HD vid feeds will take five- 7 minutes to load for like a six minute segment DSL- don't know about other connections
# not a site for those with dial up connections: downloads can take hours. as this is not a site where you would join just for the pics
# The updates come on schedule; but your not going to get an update a day- about one model every couple of weeks.
Bottom Line: Ftv Girls are for vid lovers who have the hi speed connection to be able to enjoy this site.

Mostly college age students are dared to expose themselves in a public setting. Usually in a place- like a mall parking lot, or city park when no one is there. Its almost a requirement for a photo shoot; and some of them are nervous about it; some shoots are even interrupted by security; but some of the models end up loving it. One model Kara, who at first was too shy to do it, surprises as she strips down naked in a parking lot as she walks to the photgraphers car.. and that one was in offered in HD. Its fun to see some of these girls turn from shy girl to exhibitionist; passing the point of no return; almost becoming addicted to the thrill of it themselves.

There's booty jiggling, upskirts, dressing room shots where they try on clothes (high end lingerie and dresses), interviews, poolside vids, panty stuffing in their vagina, and tons of masterbation.

# each model comes with around three seperate shoot settings: usually one shoot where they take clothes off in a public setting; one where they primp- dress in a bathroom try on different clothes and lingerie; and a hardcore shoot where they masterbate with or without a dildo.

The other plus with a vid site is that I can do other things while the HD vids download; You can get other things done while these vids are downloading.

Ive joined Ftv Girls wtihout regret 5 times. Though the first time I had dial up.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Active
78
turboshaft (8) 04-01-08  12:35pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Tons of content, all archived
+ Hot young models, most are unknowns
+ Some good videos, with masturbation, anal, toys, including some in HD
+ Pretty easy and simple navigation
+ Selected photos are available in gigantic sizes (2000 x 3000!)
Cons: - Normal photos could be a lot bigger and clearer
- Content can get repitive and boring, sometimes pretty softcore, even for a girl-only site
- Downloads could be faster
- Too much clothed and public nudity scenes
- Not every model has videos
- Better content descriptions needed for the model listings (it's not clear whether something is in a video or photo)
Bottom Line: First off, this is a huge site - lots of exclusive content, available to all users. Unfortunately, all this content was not created equal. A model could be doing some big insertions in a scene, but half the photos will just be of her undressing, or doing some stupid public nudity, and this gets frustrating very fast. The vast majority of these women are very attractive; it just takes too long to see them nude. The photos themselves are good, but really way too small (1100 x 800 max). There are huge photos available in a big pics section, but they are only available in zip packs, so you have to DL a whole scene (some 100mb+, a slow DL on this site) just to get a few good ones.

This site gets high marks for the sheer amount of content available, the beauty of its models, and its videos, but they seem to fail to reach the full potential of it all by not offering bigger size normal pics and more nudity (it is a porn site after all). Fortunately, navigating and finding the goods is quick and easy, though they are not always clear what is what on the model listing pages (whether something is in a video or photo), and some stuff I stumbled upon by accident, but it's not mentioned (a few pissing photos, for example). Still, this is not a hardcore site, so if you looking for rough hard content with guys, then this isn’t the place.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Active
92
MargulisAZ (42) 03-01-08  01:03pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Tons of content.
Great video options and quality.
Very attractive models.
Good price.
Webmaster always responds to e-mails.
Consistent updates.
Great solo masturbation content.
Good bit of fisting and large toy use.
Model comments on some scenes are interesting.
Some lesbian material.
Many models aren't seen all over the place.
Shoot locations are gorgeous.
Cons: No hardcore for the hardcore fan.
Older shoots do not have the same quality of video.
Some older shoots don't even have video.
Occasionally the models aren't very attractive, but it's rare for this.
Bottom Line: Easily one of the best sites out there. The amount of content is staggering since this site has been up and running for a long long time now. Almost all of the models are attractive, although lately there have been a few unattractive ones. Still, it's 95% cute-hot girls to 5% not so much, which is a damn good ratio.

The content itself hasn't changed a bit over the years, except now there seems to be a focus on public nudity more than there used to be. Still, there are usually at least 1-2 extreme shoots per month, which consists of large toy use, weird insertions, or fisting. Many of these girls are damn hot too that do this stuff. If it's not extreme, it's usually at least some masturbation.

Another topic worth noting is the fact that the webmaster is very responsive to e-mails. That is a big thing with me, and there are only a few other sites I've been a member of where I got consistent responses to suggestions and feedback. I actually brought Alicia Angel to Rob's attention and he shot her. Pretty cool. I will say that in my years of communication with Rob, he can be brusque at times, but overall he's a cool guy.

Also worth noting is the fact that most of the models on his site aren't porn models you see all over the place. A few are, but maybe only 20-30%. That's refreshing since it gets tiring seeing the same women over and over on the web.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
85
Thaeral (6) 01-26-08  01:32am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: *A ton of content
*Lots of attractive women
*A lot of videos usually following a pattern of themes (primary focus of the site)
*Thumbnail images (vid-cap) at regular intervals to preview the clips. (can be enlarged to full resolution)
*Photo sets with every update - professional quality (natural lighting) - this isn't studio style stuff, though.
*Female masturbation to usually real orgasms.
*Some bizarre insertions (if you're into that) - extra large toys, champagne bottles, baseball bats, etc.
*Sets offer plenty of material in usually a variety of locations (2-3 locations per set).
*Public masturbation and nudity - sometimes high risk locations (they do get caught and thrown out sometimes)
*Variety of video resolutions (real High Definition started in December)
*Many of the models are known and popular porn stars or ladies who have since become popular porn stars.
*There is a section devoted to Girl-Girl shoots (best part of the site)
Cons: *Mostly solo content.
*Not every model shoots video.
*Not every model goes into extra-curricular activities (masturbation public or private, public nudity, etc)
*Definitely on the pricey side.
*Can get repetitive.
*No hardcore at all.
*File names for videos are terrible. (1a, 2a, 3a - requires more effort when saving since you have to rename them or create individual folders for each model & shoot)
*Since the photo shoots aren't studio style - the quality of the shots really depends on the skill of the photographer and how lucky they get with the lighting. Pretty much a best effort given the situation and location.
*Mega-size section for photo sets are almost all just a zip file so you have to commit to the entire download.
*Mega-size photo sets are completely untouched - these are jpgs of exactly what comes out of the camera's memory card - so it's not exactly like the ones in the preview.
Bottom Line: This is a fantastic video site that features very attractive women doing as much extreme solo subject matter as the videographer can get them to do. So it can range from simple nudity & interviews to masturbation, fisting, extreme insertions, girl/girl action and fetish material. There is no hardcore action or boy/girl, but I never missed it. Usually things are very personal/intimate - more so than any other site I've found.

There is a general theme to the majority of the sets. The videographer definitely has favorite places (both public and in the "FTV House") to do shoots, but he tries to mix things up as much as possible to try to keep things fresh. And for all of the really popular models, he takes them to Hawaii.

The site is organized very well. Everything is accessible from the main page and the entire catalog is split into 3 sections of the alphabet except for the girl-girl stuff which is in its own section.

There is a system set up with descriptions so you can see what might be worth your time and what might not. They identify photo-only shoots and use a color coding system to identify standard masturbation shoots (yellow) and extreme shoots (red).

I signed up for 3 months and I needed it. Someone with a higher speed connection could likely leech everything in a month, though, but there is a daily cap of 25GB*(littlejoe). I wouldn't stay subscribed year-round, though. Maybe once a year for me to get the updates, but it's definitely worth resubscribing.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Active
87
elephant (22) 01-20-08  01:51am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Great fun girl they work with who are up for a laugh
Now HD vids so thats always a plus.
Huge archive of babes now as been going a good few years.
Lots of sexy insertions and pussies being stretched to their max, which is different
Nice public nude stuff which I really enjoyed and worth the price alone to see the girls kissing and feeling each other up outside in public areas

87 but thats mainly cause of the great lesbian stuff even though it is too and far between here which is a great shame, I'll probs join every two years just to get the new lesbian stuff
Cons: Too much solo stuff for my liking
Some vids are of photoshoots which is totally dull
Hardcore doesn't happen here
Needs more lesbian
Quality of the vids isn't the best
Files named the same which is very annoying indeed
Bottom Line: Its a great site and quite unique in lots of ways, I enjoy things a little out of the norm porn bracket and this site had great insertions, excellent lesbian material with some vids making my favs of all time. Milk play on one vid which was weird but interesting.
I adore public nudity and girls flashing their pussies in naughty no underwear scenes, great indeed, love the kissing scenes in public too. nice touch.

Lots of the scenes are fresh of the top of the models head and you never know were its going, some are disapointing in the end, others are like wow, the naughty babe.

All is downloadable and yeah some of the older stuff not the best of quality, I think it would be good to re edit them like sapphic erotica did but that could take forever as u can guess, still the the quality is improved which is the main thing.

All the solo stuff for me is kind of boring, really wished they would do more lesbian scenes as they do it so well and could be one of the leaders if they got more of the girls to pair up, theres loasds of models who have done lesbian stuff on other sites so its not like they aren't willing.

For the lesbian and some of the fetish stuff off the wall scenes I really liked but its mainly solo stuff, if thats your thing you'll be in your element, some stunning girls. Solo masturbation though bores me and always has.

Overall its got stuff to warrant a membership here for most porn seekers apart from the hardcore crew, none of that here.

I'm giving 87
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
s1vus1 (11) 12-26-07  06:18pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + Real HD videos (Only started in december)
+ Standard video is Good Quality
+ Lots of images for video previews
+ Massive amounts of both Video and Images
+ Great scenes with pulic scenes also
+ Interveiws
+ Download Speed around (600k)
+ Girl Cum (with tasting)
+ Mainly Above average girls
+ Preview Image before Video starts
+ Video decription
+ the camera man doesnt get in camera veiw only talks
Cons: - No search engine
- Download limit 15g per day (Increased from 5Gig)
- Model names arnt always correct and sometimes made up
- Navigation needs improvments
- No Niches to search from
- Few lesbian scenes
- not enuf updates (every 5 days i think but they are big updates)
- File names are really anoying and are all the same. (see 1a.)
Bottom Line: One Year Member

This is my fav site and would remended it to anyone.
The some of the girls are totaly amazing and unscripted scenes (as far as i can tell)

They started doing HD videos (which are hd and dont just clame to be)

1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)

Improvements: I like the layout but it needs a revamp and it badly needs a niche search engine.
Make the split videos avlible into one complete video.

1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)

All My reviews are non profit and 100% honest.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
71
PosterDude (14) 12-18-07  08:11am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Nice Magazine Covers
+ Nice Web Design
+ Have to cancel to get lower membership price offer of $19,95 USD
+ Set of large pictures given every 4-6 months
+ Just started HD video
Cons: - No Daily Updates – up to a week for single model update
- Blurry and porly lit pictures
- Girls seem forced into uncomfortable situations and not very happy.
- Only one size small pictures offered weekly
- No customer service. Tried to cancel and charged again. No email back
- Not so many pretty models
Bottom Line: I originally join site because of TheBestPorn review but was very sad. TBP review not honest about site. Ftv updates every 6-7 days which makes it not worth money. Only single model updates so when model not pretty you have to wait 1 more week and wish a pretty girl is added. To many bigger sites for money update daily like met-art, ronharris, alscans, and 1by-day with higher quality pictures and better video. Ftv trys to shoot glamore but Met-art is very much better quality and value. Site not first time video because always same models do video for Ronharris and other sites many months before ftv.

Many pictures are blurry/graney that is why pictures are only given in one small size for download. Every 4-6 month site releases a set of supersize pictures hand selected to find no blurry pictures. They should give all picture sizes in each weekly update. Site has nice magazine covers to get peoples money. Almost no Hi-Def video, only few models. Rest of site is low def video.

Same models shot at other sites look much better. I collect pretty models from many sites and ftv pictures and video are never as good. In videos man filming makes models uncomfortable and makes me sad for them. This is true review that so many more better sites for money with daily updates. Site does have some pretty girls but not enough. Members site layout is very good. Site was better 3 years before but now compatition much better then Ftv.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Active
89
cwpuk (8) 11-15-07  12:44am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Lots of content
+ Great looking girls
+ Nice reality - they look like they are having fun
+ Good video quality (especially later videos)
+ Nice website design in members area
+ 248+ GB of movies (as of June 2007)
Cons: - After a while can get a little repetitive
- Very little girl/girl
Bottom Line: Overall I like this site although I think it is a little repetitive. As of June 2007 they had over 5000 movies. Each model has lots of individual movies, which I would prefer to be available in one download.

I've been a member of this site twice (once in May/June) the previous time was 20 months earlier.

The site is different to a lot of others out there which is definitely a plus point. The interviews and scenes are very believable.

If they offered full HD movies and had more girl/girl scenes this would make it a really great site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
82
jd1961 (78) 09-30-07  04:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A Lot Of Material
- Hi Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Many Videos
- Decent DL Speed
Cons: - Much Of The Material Is Somewhat Boring
- NO Hardcore
- Infrequent Updating
Bottom Line: After thumbing through their extensive preview, I was anxious to see the site. I was somewhat disappointed. It's a very attractive site, and easy to navigate. It does have an awful lot of material, photos and videos. But, something is missing. It's not exciting. A bit bland. Some of the sets seem to be nudity optional! Others, the old statue posing. There is no hardcore. That would be fine if the material was highly erotic, but most of it is not. I guess if you never saw a girl nude before, it would be. But for jaded porn surfers, nah! It's not that there isn't good material here, there is, but you have to search for it. The photos are hi-res, at the lower end of the scale (1200px), and zipped for convenience. They do have a page of larger sized photos (2000x3000), but just 1 page.The videos are offered in wmv (640x480), and divx (360x240). Being First Time Videos, the girls are basically presented as the archetypal "girl next door". I don't know about your neighborhood, but the girls nowadays are a little more wild than those presented here!
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 30 Next Page >
User Comments (13)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 13 Next Page >

plan b (9) 05-13-08  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)

Be wary if ordering DVDs

A word of caution if you want to buy their DVDs. I used to order from them every now and then and delivery was really slow, but reliable. On average it took 3-4 weeks before delivery. Late last year I placed an order from them after they outsourced the DVD business to DVDHotties. I got a shipment confirmation within a few days but it took nearly 4 weeks for the discs to be delivered and one of them had the wrong content burned onto it. After a few emaila & calls, a promise to get me the right DVD and 2 months of waiting, I gave up. Stick with the online content, it's top notch (except having to hear "3, 2, 1" over and over again).

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Robare (6) 12-16-07  10:06am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)

New Format and Download Limit Update

FTVGirls has started releasing videos in HD (1440x1080) at a 8256kbs bit rate in the WMV format. AFAIK, this is the highest resolution available for porn on the net. And, the resultant image is almost like being there... :)
Mind you, this does come at a cost. For instance, the third video release totals a little over 79 minutes in length but is 4,563 MB in size.
I understand the site owner's decision not to go with a full HD resolution (1920x1080). Wide screen monitors (24" or larger) aren't ubiquitous. I'd be interested to learn of the viewing experience of users with 22" monitors (1680x1050) or CRT monitors at 1600x1200.
Should this new format prove, for some reason, to be problematic, users can still get DIVX videos at 352x256 with a bit rate of 64kbs and WMV videos at 720x480 (widescreen) with a bit rate of 3155kbs. It should be noted that the lower rate of WMV videos is an increase over that of previously offered WMV videos at 640x480 with a bit rate of 2079kbs.
Also of interest, the daily download limit has been raised to 15GB.
So, it seems that, once again, FTVGirls has leap-frogged the competition and succeeded in demonstrating it's commitment to providing customers an experience of superior quality.

Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

exotics4me (283) 12-04-07  01:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (3)

Wow Lenka/Eufrat

This is probably my 10th time as a member on FTV over the last several years. I've always enjoyed getting the exclusive content that they have. They may have just topped themselves. A new update coming tomorrow 12-5 listed as Lenka, is aka as the gorgeous Eufrat on most Euro sites. Check out the video specs 1440x1080 at 8,000 kbps bitrate. That is Blue Ray DVD quality. I'm only worried about whether my computer will be powerful enough to play this movie. FTV still is one of my all-time favorites. The sets that sold me on the site were the old Ava sets, aka Eva Angelina. If you haven't joined FTV, the time is here to give it a try.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Monahan (27) 10-02-07  07:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (3)

I Bit The Bullet and I'm Glad I Did

After reading all the reviews and the comments, and after checking out the previews, and after reading the replies to my concerns about the apparent paucity of updates, I finally signed up last month.

Wow! This site is far better than I expected (I've had plenty of lousy experiences, as I'm sure many others have had). After spending a few weeks on the site I'm literally overwhelmed.

It's way too soon for me to write a full review on FTV but so far I can't see any way I'll give it less than a 90. At $1.00 per day to start (and a 5 month deal at 67 cents per day) I suspect I'll be signing up for the long-term plan just to get through some of the material in which I know I have an interest.

So far the big pluses are the quality of the videos (even the old scenes that are on DivX only) and the length of each set of scenes. They are going HD later this year so it's only getting better.

The minuses, for me, are the fact that they do not permit a download of an entire "episode" but require multiple downloads (a minor annoyance) and rather small and modest quality photos of most of the babes (again a minor annoyance because I'm in it for the video).

Download speeds are slow, but not terrible.

As should be known by all who spend anytime doing front end research, there's no hard-core sex, but the goings on should provide any guy with a heartbeat a lot of woodies...per episode.

So far all I can say is that this is an amazing site!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

nygiants03 (150) 10-02-07  09:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (2)

Jamie Returns also HD

On October 8th- finally jamie lynn returns with some squirting action.

Updates seem to be pretty consistent now. Every 6 days.

FTV girls will have HD videos starting in December.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Monahan (27) 09-15-07  07:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (3)

Updates seem to be much slower

The updates are now down to about 1 per week. I've been dragging my feet before signing up to see if this site is like others where they are selling their existing content rather than working on new stuff.

Is there anyone out there who has any information about the rate of updates expected in the future? $30 per month for 4 new updates seems really very steep. (Seven or eight, as previously suggested is OK but 4 is rather thin.)

Also, does anyone know if the 5 Gb D/L maximum per day is still the limit?

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

jd1961 (78) 09-15-07  02:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (2)

Great Site Preview

I have yet to join this site, but the preview makes it tempting. I wish more sites would follow their example.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Monahan (27) 09-05-07  06:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (3)

Frequency of Updates

Reading all of the reviews, I found only one (5/25/07 by 4nic8) that said the site updates only once a week. A later comment (7/23 by iporn)says there are two updates a week.

At $30 a month, and if there are 2 updates per week, that means only 8 - 10 updates per month which is quite light. Conversely, the volume of material I found on a tour suggests that it could take a long while to check out all that is there already.

The two questions -

1) is the update schedule still just 2 per week (or 1 per week)?
20 one review says there's a download limit of 5 Gb per day that is penalized by a one day time out. Is that still true?

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Robare (6) 08-30-07  08:51am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)

Supplement to review

Along with my review, I'm adding a comment, due to space limitations. The creator of FTVGirls is dedicated to presenting the women who appear on his site as whole human beings, not just performers who show up, do a sex scene, then are gone (to sleep, crazy, away, whatever). That's all too rare in the industry and FTVGirls does it consistently better than anyone else I've seen and, I suspect, better than anyone else, period.
The total figures I presented in my Pro's section are those that I personally verified. The site indicates that there is 256 GB of video and 78,000 photos available and I have no reason to doubt those figures. For this review, I didn't download earlier work (01/03-02/04), spot-checked newer work, and focused on the more recent work. I strongly suspect, though, that it's the rare exception where one can't see at least 40 mins. of video/model. I've verified one can see 1.5 to even 4.5 hours of video/model for some models.
Other aspects: Model & videographer comments/set, easy site navigation, preview videos for recent updates, fast downloads
The rating I gave this site is high and, given the qualities, quantities, and variety, it's deservedly so. A bump in video resolution would put this site as close to perfection for this genre as one could reasonably expect. Having been a member of more than 25 sites over the years (and having surveyed several others), I've yet to find a site that surpasses FTVGirls and very, very few that come close.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

iporn (9) 07-23-07  04:23am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)

discount-on-cancel

I am a FTV member for a couple of months now and I recently decided that it was time to cancel and move on. The site is pretty expensive -not much but, hey, 30 US $ a month for two updates a week it's not cheap. Then, when I was tranfered to CCBill to cancel, The FTV made me an offer: 19.95 a month, 10 $ less than the previous price. I took it, what else could I do? :-)
Nice thinking.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-10 of 13 Next Page >

RSS FeedsAll FTV Girls Activity - FTV Girls Reviews - FTV Girls Comments - FTV Girls News

Visit FTV Girls

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Alison Angel (1) 90.0 81.8
2. FTV Girls (25) 88.2 93.3
3. Lia 19 (2) 81.7 84.0
4. Alexa Model (1) 80.0 81.9
5. Fiona Luv (0) N/A 80.9
6. Jezebele (0) N/A N/A
7. Selena Luv (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : RHS Photography, LLC Activity

View All: Company Sites (7)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.