| User Reviews (40) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great looking girls
-Natural (no airbrushed crap)
-No music!
-Solo masturbation shoots (NO DUDES!)
-Lots of squirting |
| Cons: |
-VERY Slow download time
-Many low quality pics
-Not enough high quality photgraph/pics
-Not as much content as advertised
-You can find the best parts of vids and better quality pics for free. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV girls is a good site with a great selection of girls that do exactly what I like... High quality solo shoots. Problem is as I see advertised this site is not devoted to PICTURES but VIDEOS. Though they are great quality vids, they take too daggum long to Download! I have found my favorite parts in many of these vids for free. Plus I can find HIGH quality PICS for FREE for my detailed viewing pleasure. If you want to take a look at their content because you can't help yourself go ahead and pay the month fee but I wouldn't go past that time frame cause overall the frustration isn't worth it. They need to make DLs faster and have full photo shoots for me to become a ftv website customer again. I believe you can buy DVDs I'm not 100% sure on that but I think you can somewhere and if they do then I certainly will be buying some. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge Collection.
- HD option for videos available.
- ZIP download option for photosets.
- Hot models.
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Good website design.
- Frequent updates. |
| Cons: |
- Expensive.
- Navigation needs improvement.
- Old content's quality is average.
- Download limit (25 Gb/day).
- No hardcore content.
- Updates could be faster.
- Not enough bonus content offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls is a good babes adult website that surely needs improvements.
First of all, it's current collection is huge at the moment with lots of models to choose from but please notice that there is NO hardcore content offered.
Videos (new ones) can be downloaded in two formats (.wmv and .DivX), HD (.wmv 8000kb/sec) is available which is totally awesome. Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and new ones quality is excellent.
There is no DRM videos protection but there is a daily download limit of 25 Gp. Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
Website design is cool but there navigation needs lots of improvement because there is no search feature just a models name list and site's collection seems chaotic. In general lines, models are very hot.
Monthly subscription price is expensive (30 USD) and there is no trial feature. Bonus content is tiny as it contains only a few scenes.
Site updates weekly and content is daited. Updates could come faster, at my opinion.
In conclusion, if you are into such content you can try this one. Recommended. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill.
-Mostly extremely attractive girls.
-Large website. Presently has 380 girls, 658,500+ MB of video, and 106,000+ photos.
-Updates weekly. This is fine for such a large site. I don't expect several updates a day as these are not copied from an archive of DVD's.
-All videos exclusively shot for the site. |
| Cons: |
-Close to zero ethnic diversity. Of the 380 girls, I found only three Asian and three Black. A lot of variety as long as all you want are white girls.
-No variety as to age. I did not find one model over 25. If there are please, let me know.
-A few are short or tall, but I saw no other variety as to body type. None I could find are even remotely out of the norm of slim and thin. There is a little variety as to breast size, but most are small breasted.
-While not a glamour model site, not exactly not glamour either. The girls are nicely made up, but few seem to be completely natural. It felt to me that the girls are made to look how the site wants them to look. Since the site sells itself as ordinary girls, I feel this is a negative. I was expecting girls who looked more like real amateurs. Too professional and artificial.
-Most videos are only very poor quality Divx or 680x420 WMV. Adequate but not the greatest quality. Since January 2008 the site is updating with true HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Considering how many reviews as well as the number of exceptionally high scores, I was rather disappointed. Many of the videos were not of the best quality and the videos are not easily downloaded. Each girl has a page or pages of her. On each page there are usually four videos. There is no way to download all four, so you have to do this individually. Every video on the page is labelled by number, so the next page or the next girl has the same number as the last page. You have to download individually and then change the file name. Otherwise you have files by number only and after downloading have a completely disorganized mess to sort through. The search is only by date or model name, so it is difficult to find what you want if say, you want to see all the public nudity videos. Are they seriously expecting me to go through 380 models, and some have multiple pages, to search? The types of videos are of several types-public nudity, solo nude scenes and masturbation. Most of the videos are masturbation; probably at least half. I am mostly into the public nudity and solo nude scenes and finding good quality scenes to download is unnecessarily difficult and time consuming. The public nude scenes are fairly tame in my opinion, and lack the fun and spontaneity of, for example Publicflash.com. The nude scenes are ok, comparable to the ATK sites videos. The masturbation scenes had a lot of dildo use, fingering, as well as fisting, not my taste. You often hear the photographer in the background. Not intrusive or terribly annoying, but not spontaneous either. Comparable to, but not worse than Simonscans.com or Mattsmodels.com in this regard. Overall, a lot of attractive girls, a big site, some HD videos, a lot of inadequate quality videos, some interesting masturbation scenes, and too much glamour posed by the numbers model photos and videos. Many times I had the feeling the site had no genuine erotic passion and lacked a feeling of fun. However I cannot deny this is a good site for those who like this kind of material because it is so large. |
| Respond: |
12 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Each girl has a boatload of content. A lot of videos, a lot of pictures. Each page has the girl's measurements and other data.
+Two very high quality download options - DivX and WMV (640x480)
+Except for the FTV image that lasts 2 seconds at the start of each video, there are no watermarks.
+The interviews are rather fun to listen to.
+Image sets downloadable as ZIP's.
+Complete model directory with description of what type of content is offered for the girl, size of the videos, and number of pics available.
+Sneak peek page to see what upcoming updates will be.
+Girl-girl updates are separate from all the solo content.
+Newer content is available in HD 720p.
+If there is more than one set of content for a girl then the pages will link to each other - very nice.
+Site is super fast as are the downloads.
+Friendly to Europeans, cheaper to buy from EU Direct Pay (20.31EUR = $26.52 at 1EUR=$1.306 today)
+100% original content |
| Cons: |
-Weak update schedule (1girl/wk)
-Pictures watermarked (although subtly)
-Newer updates require secondary login (only once though)
-Majority of content is all solo material (sans the separate girl-girl content which smaller in size) and mostly softcore (but there are masturbation videos)
-All movies are split file.
-Girl-girl movies not updated as frequently as solo material (looks like 1 update per month)
-Girls don't have last names, so like Karups and other sites, you get girls named with numbers (Andrea, Andrea 2, Andrea 3, etc.)
-Bonus content is nothing more than some more content that could otherwise be featured as future updates (besides the fact that they are hosted on the FTV domain)
-There are other FTV owned sites (DanielleFTV) but they are not included with membership.
-No site search.
-What do the colored bars next to each girl mean? Intensity???
-Expensive, $30/mo - no special from TBP, and no multi-month deal. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not going to say the site is lacking, quite the contrary, but the site is pretty straightforward and doesn't make it hard at all to find all their content, so there isn't much to complain or boast about with regards to the site.
The content is super high quality. Be it the videos or the photos, you will not be disappointed nor will you be unable to enjoy it. Obviously if you don't fancy softcore or solo masturbation, you will be out of place. There is no boy/girl content (unless you consider the guy off screen conducting interviews b/g). The girl/girl content is OK, but pornstar-quality lesbian content is never that good when you compare it to true amateur lesbian content, and FTV lesbian content is pornstar-quality. This is not to say the content is bad, it just is not what some people are looking for.
Overall it is a good site, but the biggest problem I have is that there is only 1 update per week, for mostly solo content, at a costly $30/mo. Yikes!
I can understand the update schedule especially if they are putting a lot of effort into producing one girl's worth of updates per week, and I can understand the focus (hey every site has their calling card), but $30/mo with NO available discounts in any shape or fashion? Urrrrrr... Make it cheaper per month ($10-$15/mo...because this is all I think it is worth) and you have a 90+ rated site in my book. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.
Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.
Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate
Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.
The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.
The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.
Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.
In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.
If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.
In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful selection of young models
- High quality pictures (1600px × 1064px latest)
- Over an hour with each model
- Very intimate videos – Real Orgasms
- Huge selection ( cant count)
- 64 HD videos ( incredible quality)
- Exhibitionism
- Girls are able to be themselves
- Crazy Insertions for those with fetish
- Appealing site design |
| Cons: |
-Full scene with every part combined would be nice
-Old stuff isn’t digitally enhanced, and quality lacks slightly
-The HD videos take forever to download
-No boy/girl sex
-Search features are limited to model
-no forum for interaction with any model
-updates are usually around once a week |
| Bottom Line: |
Ah FTV girls, one of my very first reviews. This site is still my number one site after all this time. You get real girls who send in their amateur pics and FTV pays them to get off and be natural. Obviously not all are amateur, but there are some girls who are only found on this site. Love the fact there is not to many fake boobs, or famous porn stars. There are not to many other sites where you get to see a girl truly orgasm and enjoy herself on tape. You even get close ups of the girls juices flowing. The videos are genuine and real as they get and the quality is extraordinary. Each girl’s personality really shines in each video, and you get to see every inch of the girl. Sometimes you get some kinky stuff like speculums, gigantic dildos, fisting, and pregnant woman(HOT). You can literally download all the HD videos from the site and make a DVD collection which is worth WAY more than the monthly asking price. The site is gigantic; it would take months to download everything on this site. If you never joined this site then you have seriously been missing out even if hardcore is your thing. This site is about enjoying the beauty and eroticism of woman at its best. I know some people say the material is repetitive but so is most hardcore sites material. If you’re looking for the kinky masturbation stuff, this is the the best site. I’m leaving my previous score of 94, because even though FTV improved so did some of the other similar sites. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
nygiants03 wrote 1 review (04-15-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of very attractive models.
The new Super HD videos are crystal clear with
a size of 1440x1080 and a total bitrate of 8000 kbps.
Picture sets are zipped. |
| Cons: |
Older videos (even as recent as 2007 and 2006) are of mediocre quality. Just as an experiment I went to the models' list and downloaded two video segments each from the first two models that were listed with a 2000 bitrate, wmv. I also downloaded the same two segments in divx.
Divx was an unmitigated disaster, the wmv files were better but far from crisp and clear as one would expect from something shot as recently as one - two years ago. One video shot in 2004 and downloaded because I really liked the model hit the recycle bin within seconds it was so awful.
The segments are numbered in a most awkward way. Each you will download will be called 01dx (for DVX), 01w (WMV), 01HD (HD) and you will be forced to rename it. Even if a model has two separate sets, both are named the same.
There is no search engine.
Some pictures can be obtained zipped in super size but the choice of pictures is arbitrary!
The regular pictures themselves are only so-so in size and definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
There should be two scores: One for what FTV are offering NOW (for that I would give them a ninety even if the updates ARE slow) and one for the rest of their material which is really mediocre in my eyes. The girls are great and are doing some daring things in a natural way which I find appealing but what good is that if the picture is small and blurred as is so often the case with the older material.
September 16: I will not lower the original score because the site deserves it but the more I read the site's derogatory comments on some of the models' looks or performance, the angrier I got.
It is demeaning to them and uncalled for. Let us users make up our minds if someone's body needs "tone" (a comment in today's update) or if their actions weren't as enthusiastic as they could have been. This site will NOT be revisited by me. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Interaction with the Models
- Models are young and very fresh looking
- Public Nudity is very good in this sight. I usually don't care for it much. This feels real and the anticipation/trepidation of getting caught is evident, nervous laughter, etc.
- Ultra HD video is great! Runs well on my machine and looks fantastic.
- Huge Library - |
| Cons: |
- No Search Function
- Should have super sized photos for every set
- No Hardcore Boy/Girl Action |
| Bottom Line: |
This site provides what they promise! That is unusual in this industry. The videos have gotten tons better over the years. I was first a member in 2002 and still have the photosets and vids. It makes me laugh at what I though quality was.
I will be making my way to the older sets, I'm interested in seeing if FTV has updated any of the older content, now that the rendering process is much more advanced. The speed of data transfer alone allows so much more terms of quality.
I would rate this a quality site... off the charts if they added Hardcore. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
exclusive content
great looking young women
a lot of hardcore masturbation
excellent quality for both pictures and videos |
| Cons: |
the price is a bit high
there is very little male female sexual contact
some of the scenes shot in public areas have a lot of noise in the background
all girls are shaved |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an exclusive site that deserves to be in a category by itself. The high quality coupled with the dedication to the praise and showing off of the female body is beyond compare.
If you can handle the somewhat expensive price, this is well-worth subscribing to. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hot, natural looking chicks
- Lots of public nudity (good if you like that)
- Lots of large dildos (this is not a softcore site!)
- High quality videos
- Frequent updates |
| Cons: |
None |
| Bottom Line: |
This is just one of the best porn sites out there. Hot chicks, great bodies, fun videos, tons of video, and not too prudish: these girls get very enthusiastic even though it's not hardcore (b/g). |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (17) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All FTV Girls Activity - FTV Girls Reviews - FTV Girls Comments - FTV Girls News
