Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Fling.com

Visit Site
Fling.com Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Adult Dating
2. Communities
3. Amateur Girls

Redfan of Panama
1 Site Listed
Partner: Huge Traffic

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $34.95 (recurring)

View all Fling.com Site Facts at TBP.

68.0
Feedback History  (2)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 0
Review by TheBestPorn:

78.5
TBP Review

Date: 06-23-07

Type: Express

Maggie
+  Plenty of members to choose from.
+  Some good live features.
-  Expensive Gold membership.
-  Could use more search features.
-  Not enough member info.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
68
ace of aces (173) 07-23-09  01:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + 1.mass girls
+ 2.all kind of content
+ 3.no monthly fees
+ 4.sometimes good video quailty
+ 5.making of favorite list
+ 6.billing by watching- no exact billing staying one second costs the same like 1 minute
+ 7 own favourite list
Cons: - 1.high fees from 0,99-4,99 € !
- 2.getting billed even if you join privat for one second
- 3.mostly average till low video quality
- 4.girls are shown often twice in search engine but with different names -.-
- 5.no live preview pic
- 6.no possibility to see prior if the girl is in private
- 7.no sneak preview of the private feeds
- 8.girls can bann you a lifetime :)
- 9.search engine to complicated and not detailled enough
- 10.girls are not exclusive
Bottom Line: this is a review of flingcams which is (or a part of) fling.com.

at first flingcams and Cam Crush are the rather the same sites. other outfit, same old women :)
to the PROS
there are around 600 girls online (1.) who do all kind of sexual things (2.) mastrubating, stripping, couplesex e.g. (depends on the girl)
there is no monthly fee (3.). the videoquality (4.)can be great, but like any other videoroomsite there is no possibility to filter the good from the bad. Only hint you get is a small HD what doesn`t mean that you don`t get a diashow 
one very strong pro is that you are billed by watching (6.), what means, that you are not forced to buy credits for 19,99 e.g., no you get directly billed at youre credit card. Combined with the possibility to create youre own favourite list (7.) which can have so many girls as you want, makes that funny.

but the CONS are bigger:
the price is much to high (1.)with 0,99-4,99 € per minute (better go to a real whore :) )
the billing (2.) of only looking into a room in a private section for one second is a joke. you have to pay for every started minute the full price!
mostly the videos have medium till low video quality (3.) which is like diashow sometimes the girls are often shown twice with different pictures and different names (4.), what is quite uncool.
as every site there is no livepreview (5.) pic of a room therfore you get only a recoreded and no live preview pic (7.) what could be very misleading (girl is in stocking with hairy pussy, you join the livecam and she is naked and with a bald pussy -.-). what a rubbish. the search engine does no search for e.g. socks or high quality. not good! There is also no possibility to see from the mainpaige, which girl is in private an who isn`t (6.) .
the bigger con is that all the girls can bann (8.) you from theire room, just for a while or a lifetime. and the girls will do this with a favour if you don`t type and watch what is going on in the room. that`s a no go!
At last the searchengine (9.) is not detailed enough to get a good search result. There are to less specific options to enter. Better searchengine is in livejasmin. The girls aren`t exclusive (10.) and seen on other livecamesites too e.g. camcrush.

lower the fees for all others, make the quality better and live preview pics, take away the banning function for the girls, make the search engine better then will my rating go up until then
low recommendation
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
62
DigglerFL (16) 03-08-07  06:13am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (0)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

 Be the first to comment on Fling.com!

 Add Comment

RSS FeedsAll Fling.com Activity - Fling.com Reviews - Fling.com Comments - Fling.com News

Visit Fling.com

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Fling.com (1) 68.0 78.5

RSS Feed : Redfan of Panama Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.