Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit First Anal Quest

Visit Site

First Anal Quest

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Anal Sex
2. Young Adults
3. HD Porn

DeluxeCoin
5 Sites Listed
Partner: Deluxe Coin

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all First Anal Quest Site Facts at TBP.

87.0
Feedback History  (18)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 9
Review by TheBestPorn:

85.0
TBP Review

Date: 12-05-13

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Exclusive Teen Anal Content.
+  HD Videos.

User Reviews (8)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
94
pat362 (367) 03-09-13  08:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The bulk of the content is exclusif.
+They have 209 scenes and they add one new scene each week.
+These guys still manage to get the first anal from some really hot Eastern European girls.
+The scenes are well lit, well shot and offer a variety of angles in which to see the action.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 versions from 580x328 1000kbps, 800x450 2500kbps and 1280x720 4000kbps.
+They offer photosets of all the scenes and these can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from 680x1024 up to 1280x854.
+You get access to 4 other sites.
Cons: -The only bonus site with any kind of decent content is double view casting but the content and performers are almsot all the same as FAQ so you aren't really getting anything different.
-The other bonus sites have very little content and most of it was not of any interest to me.
-Some of the older content doesn't appears to be exclusif.
Bottom Line: *This is a site that I keep joining because they are one of the few Eastern European site that doesn't seem to have any problem finding new girls willing to do anal. It also doesn't hurt that they shoot some really great scenes and tend to avoid doing circus acts. Now that's not to say that verything is perfect because sometimes there is very little heat between the players but I find that those are on the rare side.

*This site's name tells you everything you need to know about the content so if you want to see young hot Eastern European women have anal sex than you have to join this site. You can visit the bonus sites but I don't know if you will download a lot of the content on these sites. I know that I only downloaded a couple.

**The bonus sites are:
Double View casting: This is basically the same type of anal themed porn as FAQ except that you can download a special viewer which then allows you to view the action from two different angle. The downside is that you have to also download the two version of the same scene to be able to do that and that will eat up a lot of Gig space rather quickly. There are 83 scenes which are dated and they update with about 1-2 new scenes per month.

Jizz on teens: This is basically a two girl on one guy oral sex themed site. Content is not dated but based on the performer for some of the more recent stuff then they are still updating. I' just can't say how often and what the amount is. There are only 24 scenes.

Fuck N Drive: This is basically a site where the girls have sex near, on or inside somekind of vehicle. There are 35 scenes on the site and they were updating wih one new scene about once a month but the last update was in January.

Wanted GFS: This appears to be a mostly photoset only site where the content is largely softcore with some mild midcore as well. I didn't recognize all the girls but some are professional performers. Content is not dated so no way of knowing if and when they update. There are over 210 sets at the moment.

**I increased my score vs my last review by two because these guys have managed to stay on track with their update and they have also managed to introduce so many new girls to us.**
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply
Archived: pat362 wrote 1 review (12-18-11) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

Active
80
TheSquirrel (53) 08-20-12  05:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: There are no DRM, download limits, regional discrimination, pre checked cross sells, or dirty tricks.
Beautiful girls.
Some very orginal and erotic poses.
Good lighting and overall sense of professionalism.
Good quality videos.
Zipped photos.
Easy log in.
Still updating.
Cons: Same style and angles every time resulting in a mass produced look.
The picture sets contain too many of the same pose and have little continuity.
Very little ethnic, age, or shape diversity. Models are mainly thin, white, and young.
Few picture or download options. Top quality video is now mp4, not wmv. You have to drop lower in quality to obtain wmv.
Navigation not the best.
No teasing or build up in the pics or videos.
Occasionally annoying male leads.
Although you get some bonus sites, it is a relatively small network.
Bottom Line: Video Downloads - Best Quality 1280x720 at 4000kbps (4838), High Quality 800x452 at 2500 kbps, Normal Quality 580x328 at 1000 kbps. Recently, for some reason, they changed their "Best Quality" downloads from wmv to mp4. The 4000 kbps wmv is now unavailable, and has been changed to 4500 kbps mp4, so if you want wmv, you have to download a lower quality video.

Pics 1024x682, 1280x853.

You get four bonus sites, although only FAQ's sister site, Double View Casting, is top class. The other three are Fuck n Drive, Jizz On Teens, and Wanted GFS.

Pics, and sometimes videos, are ridiculously frustrating because although they choose some original and erotic angles to shoot from, they continually miss out the lower legs and feet, and concentrate far too much on the groin, ass, and upper thigh, turning the models into amputees. I have seen criticism elsewhere on PU, concerning the gynaecological focus of their shoots. A great shame because the models are fantastic, and they think up some original angles to shoot from, then they undermine this eroticism by turning the models into amputees 80 per cent of the time. It is particularly annoying in the pics, where it would appear, feet do not exist.

Although they have great and original angles and ways of shooting models, that mould is set, and they rarely stray from doing exactly the same thing on each shoot, making everything look mass produced.

The pics are adequate but a lot of the time there is little continuity or thought put into the sets. You see a girl starting with clothes, but you don't see much of the strip or lead up to sex. It is like watching six frames from a video, forward winding for four minutes, then watching another six frames, then forward winding, and so on. There are four to eight almost identical pictures of a model in one pose, then four to eight in another pose, with little idea of continuity or progression in the shoot.

Sometimes the male leads can be very irritating. Whether this is by direction or not I don't know. Some continually slap the asses of the models, grunt, groan, and paw their female co workers like they were terrorists abusing their hostages. That can be unerotic for some of us.

Okay, let's be honest, let's come out of the closet. Female genitalia just by itself isn't all that attractive, neither is chopped liver, or any type of roadkill. It is what leads up to that genitalia that is attractive. The whole package, the eyes, the face, the breasts, the legs, the everything. It's the genitalia in context, along with the whole package. I so wish some of these sites would realise that. We've got past the shock of penetration about 40 years ago in Europe, 30 years ago in America, amd 10 years ago in Britain. So we don't need closeups of two thrusting groins and nothing else. We know they're having sex, we get to see it all the time.

I know sites have to keep production costs as cheap as possible, but surely it's possible to see two whole people having sex, and give us some idea of the beauty of the whole girl. It's done professionally, but with little love for the subject. This is true of 99% of porn, both today and in the past so I can't complain too much.

Their visitors preview site probably gives a better preview of what's on offer than the members' home page as there you get a better idea of how the girls look, and what the sets are like.

It may just me being stupid again but once I got into browsing a picture set, I couldn't get back to home again without going through my favourites option.

There is a model search option from the home page (in very small print), but when you access the model using this, the video and picture download options are dead links. You therefore have to look at the date, then go back to the home pages and work out where the model is on the chronologically listed update pages in order to download pics and videos.

It seems there is a six simultaneous downloads limit.

Logging in is easy, and you can return to the site without re entering your password.

The lighting, production and photography are mainly very good. If you go back to the first few girls recorded in 2009 you can see how much this has improved. The early ones look very different, with a different style, angles, and lighting.

You would think by the title of "First Anal Quest" its close relative "Double View Casting," and the comments "real teenagers craving to get their cherries popped," and "no fake scenes no bullshit," these are mostly first timers, but not a bit of it. Some of these girls (for example Britney, Stonell, and Kristina) have been around for a long long time, and have appeared on many other sites featuring Eastern European Girls. Some of these girls have pussies more pounded than when a juggernaut lorry crashed into the local Pets At Home.

All in all it is worth a visit, but very few seasoned downloaders will find any need to stay more than a month, or maybe two.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
69
joekramer08 (12) 09-25-11  09:40am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85*
DirtyOldMan6969 (0) 05-05-10  06:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
70
BadMrFrosty (56) 03-05-10  06:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
dracken (246) 08-01-09  10:28am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
75
TalonIcefire (6) 07-22-09  04:38pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80*
Dmander6 (0) 05-08-09  08:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (5)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (9)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

martinlongbow (0) 07-27-13  11:32am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)

still updated ?

interested to join this site, wondering if it is still regularly updated?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

BadMrFrosty (56) 03-15-13  06:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Gone all arty?

I was thinking about coming back to this site after a year or so's break and by the look of the latest scenes it has gone all artsy fartsy, something like what the Porn Pro network did a while back. Is this the case or is it just a massive overuse of white décor that gives it that feel?

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

selphy (15) 03-11-11  10:54pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)

Good site few updates

I became a member about a month ago (today I'm an active member)
The site is good: good model, not so bad download speed (there are not so many files to view and dwn....), but in one month I received 3 updates !!
Not 1 in one week ! The updates are random and you don't know the next date of the new episode you can see in home page.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

BadMrFrosty (56) 12-15-10  04:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Blocked access

Well sometime in the last 3 months or so they have decided in their infinite wisdom to block access to the site to users in the Czech Republic. Seems like a strange thing to do as I dont remember seeing hardly any Czech models on the site (Nessa Devil being a notible exception). Have they made a switch from Russians to Czechs? I remember fistinginaction.com doing something simular. They started out with a all Russian lineup, access was fine, then switched to Czech models and access got blocked. Screw em, another site off of my watch list. Plenty more on the list to take my money.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

BadMrFrosty (56) 07-22-10  03:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Download speeds

I used to get very fast download speeds (30mbit +) on this site but at the end of my membership a couple of months ago speeds slowed to a crawl. Can a current member let me know how they are now?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

BadMrFrosty (56) 06-02-10  03:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Better value

It seems when joining doubleviewcasting.com you also get access to firstanalquest.com but not the other way round. As the price is the same on both sites it makes sense to join doubleviewcasting.com and get more bang for your buck.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

dracken (246) 09-08-09  06:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)

hmm

For the past two weeks I've been having trouble signing on to this site. Whenever I click on the member's area I get sent to google. This happens both in firefox and chrome...weird. I contacted customer support today, curious how long it will take them to answer.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Dmander6 (0) 05-08-09  07:36am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (5)

Polina

Polina is a VERY sexy sexy cute TEEN brunette with a perfect super slim girly body and a very pretty face. This must be one of Polina's first hardcore scenes as she shows resistance every time the stud goes just a little rough on her.

At the first attempt to get the cock up Polina's ass it's a clear case of "push away - no go"

-So as Polina finally gets the cock up the ass it is super EXTRA pleasing to see her totally tense and twitching, gritting her teeth as she feebly tries to hold of the cock with her hands with that pained look on her face and in her eyes.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Dmander6 (0) 05-08-09  06:55am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (5)

New ANAL teen site with some promise!

First Anal Quest is a new ANAL-TEEN site -and that is my thing. The site is new site and only features 24 flicks and only recently picture sets as of writing. Membership is only 25 US bucks so thats OK. The video quality is up to the grade. They feature some nice teen girls getting fucked in the ass like they should but the cocks a little to small and the ANAL pounding is not hard enough for my taste. Secondly all movies I have seen so far also feature VAGINAL sex and that is a BIG downside!

BUT - there are some very nice moments of ANAL penetration here with some really cute young girls especially Polina, Kristina and Brittney

Overall First Anal Quest is promising - and if they skip all the vaginal waste of time and stick to ALL ANAL -with BIGGER cocks it will be a very satisfying site indeed

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit First Anal Quest

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. First Anal Quest (2) 87.0 85.0
2. Double View Casting (1) 75.0 76.0
3. Fuck 'N Drive (0) N/A 74.5
4. Jizz On Teens (0) N/A 74.0
5. Wanted GFs (0) N/A N/A

View All: Company Sites (5)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.42 seconds.