| User Reviews (14) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Very natural looking models
- Classy, semi artistic and professional photography
- The atmosphere of the photos are very nice
- Constant updates to the site |
| Cons: |
- No hardcore |
| Bottom Line: |
Femjoy is not a site for everyone. It's not smut and not a blood pressure raising hard core site. The site studies the enigma of natural beauty itself and put it in place in softcore orientation. Although the term 'erotic' can be applied semi-heartedly, Femjoy can be catergorized as 'classical nude glamour softcore', something you would find in the photography sections of book stores.
In my mind, Femjoy is one of the most natural softcore photography sites I have visted. The models are usually in their most natural state, in many sizes and for some seeing, models with untrimmed pubes can be something we think back to in the 1970s and 1980s. The lack of using heavy makeup also brings the perspective of realistic beauty back to life. If you're bored of looking at nudes, also check out the scenaries of the photos.
As for the photography, it is professional and definately classic glamour. Some of the photo's artistic styles are cleary taught out from master glamour photographer John Kelly.
I would rank this site as one of the top 5 natural softcore sites on the Internet. Other than Femjoy, I'd also recommend MetArt, like what other reviewers have mentioned. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-No DRM
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company |
| Cons: |
PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
CONS:
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
BOTTOM LINE:
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.
There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
· tons of new teens
· images up to 4000px
· hdv movies (several formats)
· 100 contributing artists
· clean and simple design
· good update frequence
· iPhone version |
| Cons: |
· speed occasionally low
· download limit
· worst search ever
· flip-book photography
· 99% nude girls from the first image
· 1-3 sets for most of the teens |
| Bottom Line: |
Like Met Art, Femjoy offers a good variance and tremendious amount of teen content.
You seek for young and innocent looking teens and natural photography, you're at the right place. Femjoy will blast you away with thrilling softcore and fulltime nudes.
I am personally overdozed with the teen-niché and seek for a site with real women now. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models |
| Cons: |
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.
While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.
Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen) |
| Cons: |
-- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search |
| Bottom Line: |
After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.
But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.
Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.
Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Beautiful Girls
* Lots and lots of Girls
* Very High Quality Pics & Videos
* Download Different Video Formats
* Regularly updated |
| Cons: |
* Download limits do apply
* Lack of Creativity
* A little bit expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
* For those who are only willing to fork out a few months worth of membership, download limits do apply, 2 gigs an hour, might seem like a lot, but for those with fast and unlimited internet access, and a mind set to download a lot of content, that is really not much, (this is called leeching).
* Gorgeous naked girls, no doubts about it, young hotties, and a whole lot of them,(which might collide against my previous comment).
* Easy and simple to use menus.
* Above all, absolutely amazing and stunning girls, and well worth getting a membership, just sit back and relax, this site is surely worth it. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# this site spoils pic lovers; models are shot either in lavish interior settings or beautiful outdoor settings.
#if you have a large flatscreen monitor, these Femjoy pics, vids will rock on that monitor
# beautiful woman in beautiful setting is mastered; probably the best aesthetic photography of its type.
# two updates per day; and 10 new HDV films per month.
# many video options: WMV 640 x 360;WM HDV 1280 x 720; Quicktime 640 x 360; Quicktime HDV 1280 x 720; iphone 320 x 240
# some of the pics made me gasp, simply beautiful
# some updates are marked best of to identify exceptional and popular shoots
# navigation is non convoluted, large magazine style avatars; simple to see what they have; you just click on the month of the year that you want on the left hand side.
# pics come in three sizes either 4000 X 2667, 4000x 2667 or 3500 X 2333, 2333 X 3500; and 1200 X 800, 800 X 1200 pics; 800 X 533, 533 X 800
# offers two months for $49.95 which is $25/ mo |
| Cons: |
# this is not atk style photography, no pussy play- just models posing.
# vids are models posing, are of lesbian models posing, dancing, walking in scenery, interacting in scenery- but not hardcore
# $34.95 a month is on the higher end for those who want to pay on a month to month basis
# models do wear clothes to start out the set, but most sets are strictly nude for those who want to see the models wear clothes |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like enjoy the shape of a woman in the nude posing or being filmed in natural light of a beautiful indoor or outdoor settings. Then this site will interest you.
I recommend this site especially to those with large flat screen monitors - these pics are gorgeous. videos too. Previously, I had a flatscreen when I was a member a few months ago. I rejoined 2 months for $49. I currenlty have a small laptop so I don't have the advantage of seeing the full potential of these pics/ vids.
When I joined this site, I wasn't sure that I'd like it. I was unsure about joining a nude site. But there are gorgeous updates like Koysusha, under the tree..or Larissa. some of the models arch their back and tilt their head back and let lose with their hair flowing in the breeze such as on top of a rock; or wade through a gorgeous field of yellow flowers or purple thistles, and it is gratifying to look at in a way that I didn't think was possible.
You can get your rocks off to this style photography believe me. This site proved to me that it can be done; and quashed the hardcore-is always-better theory. The gorgeous models in beautiful landscapes: mountains, shoreline, river, meadow can grow on you just the same as hardcore. So I would suggest this site for those who want to try it. There are many backgroundable pics in this site and very few wasted pics. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High quality site that has a site full of content
- Videos checking in 1280 on high end over 5000 bitrates
- Pictures go as high as 4000 on high end and come in zip files as well
- Good download speeds for me, about 20% faster than my average download speed.
- Site navigation is good enough, which is important for a site with this much content
- Couple of updates per day
- Thank goodness, they have some models here that are well built, some of these artsy sites stick to those 102 pound models, but this one has some different sizes. |
| Cons: |
- Videos can be a little on the tame side, not quite as bad as Met-Art
- Something that I am not real fond of, starting out nude. This for me takes away part of the fantasy
- Nothing close to hardcore, though they don't advertise that they do, wanted to mention it for anyone reading this.
- Price is too high at $34.95 |
| Bottom Line: |
I have mixed feelings about this site. I really like their quality, the large pictures and HD video, but keep in mind that the older sets of pics and videos are not this high quality. Also, if you are like me and like to see the girl clothed, then stripping down to nothing, you won't find much of that on this site.
I really didn't take much off my score for those negatives because the site is trying to stress the beauty of a naked female, not the beauty of a stripper!
The site navigation is easy, but you will still get the feeling that you are missing something, because there is so much content. I was happy with the download speeds, and the speed of the site, despite having so many things on each page.
I was also happy to see models that weren't tiny skinny, this to me is important when trying to show the beauty of a naked woman. And it was a worry I had before joining the site.
There also are some exotic looking models, which you rarely see on these art sites. Still, there could be more and need to be more. You will find some well-known models like Eufrat, Ariel and Suzie Carina. One slight complaint is that the g/g photo sets are just boring. I don't know how many more g/g sets I can look at of the women leaning against each other.
Oh and you can't use any download manager that I know of. I tried 3 different ones.
Overall for a month, I was satisfied, even with this high price, and I will recommend it for one month, maybe 2 times per year. Recommended! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best Erotic Photo sites on the web.
Exceptional models and photography
Frequent updates
Good search tools |
| Cons: |
One of the highest priced sites on the web |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are willing to pay the price the qaulity will not dissapoint you. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- First Class Erotic Photography.
- Ton Of Material.
- Beautiful Models.
- Hi-Res Photos, Zip Files.
- No Download limit.
- Hi-Def Video, NO DRM Protection.
- Frequent Updates.
- Useful Member Interaction.
- Fast Download Speed.
- Very Attractive, Fun, Interactive Site.
- Exclusive Content. |
| Cons: |
- Expensive.
- No Hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
I couldn't wait to review this site because it may be the best one I've seen, and I've spent a lot of time there and haven't scratched the surface. A treasure trove of high class material. Photos go up to 4000px, available in quickly DL'd zips. Browse them by thumbnail or flash slide show. You can rate the sets, and leave comments, and add to favorites. Here's why this is great: there is an option to view what everyone else is picking as a favorite, it continually updates. It's fun, and you find great stuff that way by viewing someone's fave photo, which is linked to the set. It's easy to get lost here, there's so much stuff. The videos are great too, with a hi-def option of 1280x720 (wmv & QT), plus a more standard size of 640x360. You can preview a vid before DL. I'm not always a fan of the softcore vid, but these are very nice. They look great, and BTW, the girls here are gorgeous. So many of them, many well known, others not. Photography and videography is total first class, not some schmoe with a camera. It's fun just to be in the site, the search engine could be better, but Femjoy is well built. The price was recently increased to $34.95, the high end of steep. But if any site could justify this, I guess this one could.It updates frequently. You will not find any hardcore action here.It's difficult to know where to start, they do have a random selection link that brings up different sets each time. But you can get lost in this site and never find your way out. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (21) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All FEMJOY Activity - FEMJOY Reviews - FEMJOY Comments - FEMJOY News
