Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ohmygod gorgeous babes
- with curves
- umm, what else do you want???????
- The photog here is an Artist with an Eye for Beauty, Anatomy and Color (see below)
- Plenty of content
Cons:
- no hardcore
- lot of vids are just filming the photoshoot
Bottom Line:
Some of the most beautiful pictures I've seen are here. A few of the girls (take Perla for example) are jawdropping.
Now, here, to me, is what sets this site apart: The photographer here has an Incredible Eye. He just seems to pick poses that I love. And he has a unique eye for color: many of the shots, at first blush, seem... washed out. But give them a chance and keep looking... he sees something most other glam photographers miss. I can't describe it well... perhaps... the way the color palate he uses makes the women appear even more beautiful. If you watch a super saturated site like, say, Hand on Hardcore [great site], and pull Down the saturation, and and pull the tint away from pink just a bit, you get a whole different feeling... or, am I just watching Way too much of this stuff?#%&*^$(*&*(&@& OMG!... Anyway, what I mean is that his choice of colors makes many of these pics even sexier. The vids, to me, are just a throw-in, even though they're 1280x720. It's the Pics that I dig here. And they are Beautiful.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some)
Cons:
-sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some)
Bottom Line:
Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content - and I mean exclusive!
Even the girls here - a good amount are exclusive for this site.
Fine/great video-quality, AVI 1280x720.
Good photo-quality
Easy navigation
Zip for photos also
And a pretty good price: $19.95 for a month.
Cons:
Download of videos comes in zip-files - a little annoying.
Photo-navigation/photo preview is dammed slow. You have to wait for all thumbnail to download in what seems to be the size of full photos.
But foremost cons: A lot of the videos are based on photoshoots.
Bottom Line:
This COULD be a swell site.
But the majority of videos based on photoshoots tends to downgrade it quite a lot.
I like to see some of these fine eateuropean girls doing sexy stuff, strip and masturbating, but it's spoiled in most videos by a guy walking around taking photos and telling the girl how to act and what to do - too bad.
It too bad because Errotica Archives has some very rare girls here. And it's great that some of the rarest ones has a few good videos, like the skinny blond Olga doing two fine beach-videos - maybe the best videos in the whole site.
As a video-freak I'm a little disapointed with most - but I somewhat turned to photos on this special site. And the photos are great - in quality and style.
But bottom line: If you're into videos it's still OK, but just ok. If you're more into photos this site is close to great. If you go for young easteuropean teens.
And again: This site could grow quite a lot with less videos based on photoshoots.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Absolutely gorgeous women
-Photo quality is excelent
-Huge archive of photos
-Fair price for what you get
-Navigation is fairly easy
Cons:
-site not updated quite as often as one would hope
-lighting quality varies between sets
-Videos are interesting (see bottom line)
Bottom Line:
Well... this is one of those sites that you run across and can be amazed by the amount of absolutely gorgeous girls that are on it. The site is primarily a photo site, on the softcore side. This is okay, because in never tries to sell itself otherwise.
Though this is a photo heavy site, there are still some videos. This where my "videos are interesting" comes in. Most sites will do a seperate shoot for the photos and the videos. That's not the case on this site as the average vid is simply a same shoot of the photo set.
If you like softcore sites that are photo heavy, then this is a great site for you! And if you're curious as to a good model to start at; I recomend Danae.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (4)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Site was part of the MET Portal along with MET Art & MET Models when I had membership from Oct-Nov 2008. Only issue with the site was the model naming index. No uniformity. Otherwise, models are simply stunning. Will be returning in 6 months for the updates.
Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.
The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.
But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.
And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?
There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.
But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!
So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.
Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!
No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.
The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.
Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.
Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)
Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All Errotica Archives Activity - Errotica Archives Reviews - Errotica Archives Comments - Errotica Archives News
