Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Errotica Archives

Visit Site

Errotica Archives

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. HD Porn

HLP General Partner Inc.
16 Sites Listed
Partner: Met Art Money

Monthly: $29.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.99 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.99 (non-recurring)

View all Errotica Archives Site Facts at TBP.

94.0
Feedback History  (21)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 7
Review by TheBestPorn:

87.5
TBP Review

Date: 05-31-13

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Large Archive of Original Content.
+  Great Quality Content.
-  Older Videos Don't Have Same Options/Quality.

User Reviews (12)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >

Active
94
skippy (36) 09-23-12  10:04pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is the second best site in the Met-Art network behind Met-Art itself. Very large volume of high quality images of truly beautiful women in natural indoor and outdoor settings. See details below.
Cons: Nothing much in the way of cons as long as you remember it is a nude modelling site. No hardcore here!
Bottom Line: This site rates up there with the best nude photography sites on the Internet. Tons of photo sets (not much video, though), many, many different models of all shapes and sizes. The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. And many of the models you know now were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With 10 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. (At least 1 new set a day, 50 images per set, that's 3600+ sets and 180,000 imaegs!)

Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network..)

Small, medium and large zip files are available for every set since 2004 (although "large" wasn't that large in 2004)

The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photograper. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind, um, showing us the money.

There is a new set every day. Very few of them are continuations of earlier sets and there does not seem to be any common location where the majority of shoots are done. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set, but unlike some other sites, I don't think they are re-releasing anything. For example, a set came out earlier this year of Marketa when she was relatively young. The set may have been 8 years old, but it had never been released anywhere before as far as I could tell. Contrast this with DDG or Earl Miller, who fairly consistently re-release older stuff.

All sets come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution.

Now, if you are looking for ANYTHING other than straight images of unbelieveably beautiful girls, then this might not be the site for you. There are a very few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude girls site.


I got in this time on a discount because I was a member of Met-Art. Once in Met-Art, it was just $12.50 to join additional sites in the network. Well, I'm dropping the lesser met-art network sites but will keep this one for at least another month or two.

As I mentioned above, overall this is one of the best nude photography sites on the net. Every time I log in, I find myself surfing the site for an hour or more. I don't think I've ever been dissapointed with this site...and for me...that says a lot.

Go check it out!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Expired
93
The Collector (7) 06-24-11  11:02am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
78
graymane (29) 10-18-10  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Expired
95*
dougleen (0) 04-14-10  09:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
80*
hockeyman (2) 07-20-09  12:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
78
nutcrackr (10) 07-18-09  07:14am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
oogles (9) 07-07-09  08:41pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90
aesop7 (10) 01-17-09  11:21pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
90
hondaman (7) 11-13-08  07:53pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
Denner (233) 11-05-07  09:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >
User Comments (7)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

RLane (16) 12-22-11  01:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)

Holiday special offer

There is a special by Met-Art for Erroctica Archives for $14.97. The only thing is, that the special is received through your email if you signed up for Met-Art's promo offers. I would love to help anyone out, but I can't post a link to the offer.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

bobbylassen (0) 03-31-11  11:02am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

A Real Winner

Fifteen years of porn surfing and this is what I was looking for the whole time. Absolutely stunning in every respect. Hell, I'd recommend this site to my mom if she went both ways.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

gregdd (0) 12-03-10  11:22am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Breathtaking

This site is truly amazing and presents the beauty and passion of the femal form like never before. The models are delicious and the photography is top notch, not to mention the stunning quality of the erotic movies.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

TalonIcefire (6) 01-09-09  03:56pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

Just Beautiful

Site was part of the MET Portal along with MET Art & MET Models when I had membership from Oct-Nov 2008. Only issue with the site was the model naming index. No uniformity. Otherwise, models are simply stunning. Will be returning in 6 months for the updates.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Drooler (218) 07-24-08  02:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Rocker (0) 01-27-08  08:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)

most pic resolution sux

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 10-09-07  11:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.

Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)

Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Errotica Archives

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. DOMAI (1) 100.0 83.5
2. Met Art (4) 94.3 95.0
3. Errotica Archives (1) 94.0 87.5
4. ALS Scan (2) 91.0 89.0
5. Viv Thomas (1) 90.0 87.5
6. Rylsky Art (1) 89.0 82.5
7. The Life Erotic (2) 88.6 89.0
8. Sex Art (4) 87.5 87.0
9. Erotic Beauty (2) 86.5 89.0
10. Holly Randall (1) 83.0 84.5

View All: Company Sites (16)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.71 seconds.