PornUsers Newsletter!   Exclusive Discounts, News & Prizes  
E-mail:
Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Errotica Archives

Visit Site

Errotica Archives

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. HD Porn

SEE-Erik Mk.
1 Site Listed
Partner: Errotica Archives Partners

Monthly: $24.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $34.99 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $54.99 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $64.99 (6 months, non-recurring)

View all Errotica Archives Site Facts at TBP.

88.0
Feedback History  (20)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 2
Comments 7
Review by TheBestPorn:

88.0
TBP Review

Date: 04-14-11

Type: 2.0

Spencer
+  Great quality all around here.
+  Sexy models and scenes.
-  Layout and navigation still aren't perfect.
-  Older quality not as good.

User Reviews (11)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 11 Next Page >

Active
93
The Collector (7) 06-24-11  11:02am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - All of the content is all-exclusive
- A user friendly layout and model index
- Search function available
- Low, Med, and HI photo galleries
- Zip files for all picture galleries
- Most models are an ELITE level of beauty
- Photo galleries have a high avarage photo count
- Large model selection
- No download limit and they are download manager friendly
- Steady stream of updates
- There are model bios however, (see cons)
Cons: (To have a fair review there must be a few cons but all are rather minor)
- Most videos are of just the photo shoots
- They do not offer video streaming
- Videos come in a zip file, ugh!
- No discount available, (see bottom line)
- Model bios are very basic, if they could start getting interviews or something a bit more personal it would really help their cause.
Bottom Line: Bottom line

This site is an amazing for those who love glamour, if you are into more hardcore sites then I would advise you to move on. That being said, this site was one of my favorites sites, its up there with Met-Art. This site concentrates mainly on its pictures, the photographers take you to many exotic places and show amazing models there. They put on an erotic show for you and end with some stunning close ups. Most sets are full nude and some bring in light masterbation.

Most of the videos are just of the photo sets and in my opnion unnecessary. Also, They are not offered in a flash or streaming format and must be downloaded. On top of that they download as a zip file is and extra set you must take that can be highly annoying for most.

Unfortunately there isnt a discount offered for this site however a dual memberships can be purchased with Met-Art. Not a good idea in my opinion because both sites are so large and if your goal was to collect all of the content from both sites it would take just about two months. Now figure in some simple math: the dual sites monthly price is 30.00 and if it does take you two months that brings you to a total of 60.00. My advice is to purchase then seperately where Errotica Archives is 25 per month and MetArt has a discount for 20 per month.

Before I wrote this review I read all of the other user reviews in an attempt to make mine unique. I found that some reviews complain that the sets are "boring" that the models are just there smiling and not much more. I believe thats the point, the models are so stunning and the photographers are such geniuses on how the are able to use the natural lighting and geographical settings to really highlight the models true beautiful. Every set seems to be planned and executed flawlessly. If you read other users reviews who rated this site poorly, most of thier complaints have little validity. Yes I understand that the videos are a bit disappointing but this site is not meant to be a hardcore anal penetration site (not that there is anything wrong with those sites). Just look at the sites name "Errotica Archives" I believe the webmasters and photographers accomplished it precisely. They provide you with content that explores true feminine beauty, many close up shots, and many shots that show off the models amazing curves. I would say its very difficult to not fall in love with every model on this site.

Overall I do recommend this site for those who do enjoy Euro glamour, yes it could use a bit of tweaking and the videos could be given a new approach but other then that you will love this site. It is one of the best I have seen for this criteria and I look forwar to re joinning in a few months to get caught up on all of the updates. I have given this site a 93 because it isn't perfect but the effort given is flawless.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Active
78
graymane (20) 10-18-10  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.
Cons: + My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.
Bottom Line: I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
95*
dougleen (0) 04-14-10  09:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive Women in well shot photos and videos. Great video quality and clarity. Classy all around. Very sensual styling of models. Picture sets with x-large photos. Plenty of content with updates daily. You won't find better looking women photographed and filmed any better on the net.
Cons: Could have more videos and be a little more hard core. If you want penetration this is not the site for you. Files are very large, but download speed is fine.
Bottom Line: A well structured site with beautiful women shot in stunning sets and videos. Could be a little soft for some tastes.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
80*
hockeyman (2) 07-20-09  12:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
78
nutcrackr (8) 07-18-09  07:14am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
oogles (9) 07-07-09  08:41pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90
aesop7 (10) 01-17-09  11:21pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
90
hondaman (7) 11-13-08  07:53pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
Denner (227) 11-05-07  09:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

Expired
85
cblodg (9) 10-13-07  06:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 11 Next Page >
User Comments (7)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

RLane (2) 12-22-11  01:56pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)

Holiday special offer

There is a special by Met-Art for Erroctica Archives for $14.97. The only thing is, that the special is received through your email if you signed up for Met-Art's promo offers. I would love to help anyone out, but I can't post a link to the offer.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

bobbylassen (0) 03-31-11  11:02am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

A Real Winner

Fifteen years of porn surfing and this is what I was looking for the whole time. Absolutely stunning in every respect. Hell, I'd recommend this site to my mom if she went both ways.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

gregdd (0) 12-03-10  11:22am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Breathtaking

This site is truly amazing and presents the beauty and passion of the femal form like never before. The models are delicious and the photography is top notch, not to mention the stunning quality of the erotic movies.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

TalonIcefire (6) 01-09-09  03:56pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)

Just Beautiful

Site was part of the MET Portal along with MET Art & MET Models when I had membership from Oct-Nov 2008. Only issue with the site was the model naming index. No uniformity. Otherwise, models are simply stunning. Will be returning in 6 months for the updates.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Drooler (218) 07-24-08  02:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Rocker (0) 01-27-08  08:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

most pic resolution sux

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (227) 10-09-07  11:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (0)

Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.

Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)

Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Errotica Archives Activity - Errotica Archives Reviews - Errotica Archives Comments - Errotica Archives News

Visit Errotica Archives

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Errotica Archives (2) 88.0 88.0

RSS Feed : SEE-Erik Mk. Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.