| User Reviews (8) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful women
Great photography
High quality videos |
| Cons: |
Not much Adult content
Some masturbation, but more modeling than anything else
Definitely no penetration |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, the site has some of the most beautiful women you will ever see on the web. The lack of penetration is almost refreshing as the site focuses on the beauty of the women and modeling their gorgeous form. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Clean site design
-Consistent quality
-Some interesting videos
-Great set locations
-Good variety in sets |
| Cons: |
-Medium sets ~80pics (1 update per day)
-Very little tease (mostly nude)
-Too many ultra closeups
-Models are more curvy than other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is an interesting site, those familiar with met-art may know Erro. Currently number 1 user voted photographer on Met-Art. He's generally a good photographer, he produces consistent good quality shots, there is a certain texture to his work. He is fairly good at bringing out the good parts of models. This might be making them smile, making them more natural, this is seen in some of his videos.
He does love his close ups, and I mean really close. Super high resolution pictures of vagina in particular. So close I can clearly make out the 3D shapes of the grains of sand nestled in between pubic hair. It's really quite something to behold. For some it's a huge bonus, but for me I'd rather see more of the model.
One set a day and sets aren't huge, they range from around 50 to 120 images. Recent sets are around the 70-80 shot mark which is decent. The variety in the sets is pretty good, different locations, models have fairly good poses. Available in small, medium, large and sometimes extra large (for huge resolution). Download sizes are not that big, even extra large might only be a few hundred MB, depends on the size of the set mainly.
There are quite a few well known European models, verunka, iveta, danae, monika, marketa among the current 214 model count. Many from met-art, along with a few new models. Generally the models very curvy in comparison to met-art / hegre-art, which I don't enjoy as much. Another thing is that the sets feature very little clothing in general. Many sets are nude from picture one taking out another huge variable element and tease factor. Of the last 10 sets, only 2 had some form of clothing.
Overall I'd recommend the site. It does support download managers (flashget) and quality sets overall. The combination of lighting, location and Erro magic can produce some real gems. Navigation is alright, not having to reload the page if you change resolution is handy, but having to click twice to get to the set is a nuisance. Members area is the same as free tour and you can re-rate models. Personally I'd rather see more tease with clothes, less ultra close genital shots and perhaps some more petite models. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ gorgeous women
+ high quality photos and photography
+ video
+ daily updates
+ women are natural (breasts) |
| Cons: |
+ a little too much bend over 'brown-eye' shots for my taste. I prefer to see some more modest photos ~ more asses and less assholes and pussy closeups
+ models are mostly shaved
+ updates could be more frequent
+ videos are mostly just the photoshoot which is interesting at first, but gets old fast |
| Bottom Line: |
A good site to try for awhile, but you may get bored after awhile. I let my membership lapse for a few months now, but may go back for a month in the future to see what's new.
Photos are great, this is not the site for you if you're looking for spankworthy video. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- ohmygod gorgeous babes
- with curves
- umm, what else do you want???????
- The photog here is an Artist with an Eye for Beauty, Anatomy and Color (see below)
- Plenty of content |
| Cons: |
- no hardcore
- lot of vids are just filming the photoshoot |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the most beautiful pictures I've seen are here. A few of the girls (take Perla for example) are jawdropping.
Now, here, to me, is what sets this site apart: The photographer here has an Incredible Eye. He just seems to pick poses that I love. And he has a unique eye for color: many of the shots, at first blush, seem... washed out. But give them a chance and keep looking... he sees something most other glam photographers miss. I can't describe it well... perhaps... the way the color palate he uses makes the women appear even more beautiful. If you watch a super saturated site like, say, Hand on Hardcore [great site], and pull Down the saturation, and and pull the tint away from pink just a bit, you get a whole different feeling... or, am I just watching Way too much of this stuff?#%&*^$(*&*(&@& OMG!... Anyway, what I mean is that his choice of colors makes many of these pics even sexier. The vids, to me, are just a throw-in, even though they're 1280x720. It's the Pics that I dig here. And they are Beautiful. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some) |
| Cons: |
-sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some) |
| Bottom Line: |
Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (4) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Errotica Archives Activity - Errotica Archives Reviews - Errotica Archives Comments - Errotica Archives News
