Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Errotica Archives

Visit Site
Errotica Archives Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. HD Porn

SEE-Erik Mk.
1 Site Listed
Partner: Errotica Archives Partners

Monthly: $19.99 (recurs at $14.99/mo.)
Multi-Mo: $34.99 (3 mo. recurs $29.99/3 mo.)
1 Year: $99.99 (non-recurring)

View all Errotica Archives Site Facts at TBP.

82.7
Feedback History  (13)

Active Reviews 4
Newbie Reviews 1
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 4
Review by TheBestPorn:

88.5
TBP Review

Date: 01-23-10

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Hot exclusive content.
+  Large collection!
-  Older scenes aren't as sharp.

User Reviews (8)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
80*
hockeyman (2) 07-20-09  12:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful women
Great photography
High quality videos
Cons: Not much Adult content
Some masturbation, but more modeling than anything else
Definitely no penetration
Bottom Line: Well, the site has some of the most beautiful women you will ever see on the web. The lack of penetration is almost refreshing as the site focuses on the beauty of the women and modeling their gorgeous form.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
78
nutcrackr (8) 07-18-09  07:14am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Clean site design
-Consistent quality
-Some interesting videos
-Great set locations
-Good variety in sets
Cons: -Medium sets ~80pics (1 update per day)
-Very little tease (mostly nude)
-Too many ultra closeups
-Models are more curvy than other sites
Bottom Line: Errotica Archives is an interesting site, those familiar with met-art may know Erro. Currently number 1 user voted photographer on Met-Art. He's generally a good photographer, he produces consistent good quality shots, there is a certain texture to his work. He is fairly good at bringing out the good parts of models. This might be making them smile, making them more natural, this is seen in some of his videos.

He does love his close ups, and I mean really close. Super high resolution pictures of vagina in particular. So close I can clearly make out the 3D shapes of the grains of sand nestled in between pubic hair. It's really quite something to behold. For some it's a huge bonus, but for me I'd rather see more of the model.

One set a day and sets aren't huge, they range from around 50 to 120 images. Recent sets are around the 70-80 shot mark which is decent. The variety in the sets is pretty good, different locations, models have fairly good poses. Available in small, medium, large and sometimes extra large (for huge resolution). Download sizes are not that big, even extra large might only be a few hundred MB, depends on the size of the set mainly.

There are quite a few well known European models, verunka, iveta, danae, monika, marketa among the current 214 model count. Many from met-art, along with a few new models. Generally the models very curvy in comparison to met-art / hegre-art, which I don't enjoy as much. Another thing is that the sets feature very little clothing in general. Many sets are nude from picture one taking out another huge variable element and tease factor. Of the last 10 sets, only 2 had some form of clothing.

Overall I'd recommend the site. It does support download managers (flashget) and quality sets overall. The combination of lighting, location and Erro magic can produce some real gems. Navigation is alright, not having to reload the page if you change resolution is handy, but having to click twice to get to the set is a nuisance. Members area is the same as free tour and you can re-rate models. Personally I'd rather see more tease with clothes, less ultra close genital shots and perhaps some more petite models.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
80
oogles (9) 07-07-09  08:41pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + gorgeous women
+ high quality photos and photography
+ video
+ daily updates
+ women are natural (breasts)
Cons: + a little too much bend over 'brown-eye' shots for my taste. I prefer to see some more modest photos ~ more asses and less assholes and pussy closeups
+ models are mostly shaved
+ updates could be more frequent
+ videos are mostly just the photoshoot which is interesting at first, but gets old fast
Bottom Line: A good site to try for awhile, but you may get bored after awhile. I let my membership lapse for a few months now, but may go back for a month in the future to see what's new.

Photos are great, this is not the site for you if you're looking for spankworthy video.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
aesop7 (10) 01-17-09  11:21pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - ohmygod gorgeous babes
- with curves
- umm, what else do you want???????
- The photog here is an Artist with an Eye for Beauty, Anatomy and Color (see below)
- Plenty of content
Cons: - no hardcore
- lot of vids are just filming the photoshoot
Bottom Line: Some of the most beautiful pictures I've seen are here. A few of the girls (take Perla for example) are jawdropping.
Now, here, to me, is what sets this site apart: The photographer here has an Incredible Eye. He just seems to pick poses that I love. And he has a unique eye for color: many of the shots, at first blush, seem... washed out. But give them a chance and keep looking... he sees something most other glam photographers miss. I can't describe it well... perhaps... the way the color palate he uses makes the women appear even more beautiful. If you watch a super saturated site like, say, Hand on Hardcore [great site], and pull Down the saturation, and and pull the tint away from pink just a bit, you get a whole different feeling... or, am I just watching Way too much of this stuff?#%&*^$(*&*(&@& OMG!... Anyway, what I mean is that his choice of colors makes many of these pics even sexier. The vids, to me, are just a throw-in, even though they're 1280x720. It's the Pics that I dig here. And they are Beautiful.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Active
90
hondaman (7) 11-13-08  07:53pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some)
Cons: -sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some)
Bottom Line: Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
80
Denner (200) 11-05-07  09:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (6 Replies)

Expired
85
cblodg (9) 10-13-07  06:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
81
Drooler (192) 05-03-07  05:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (4)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

TalonIcefire (6) 01-09-09  03:56pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)

Just Beautiful

Site was part of the MET Portal along with MET Art & MET Models when I had membership from Oct-Nov 2008. Only issue with the site was the model naming index. No uniformity. Otherwise, models are simply stunning. Will be returning in 6 months for the updates.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 07-24-08  02:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Rocker (0) 01-27-08  08:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

most pic resolution sux

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 10-09-07  11:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.

Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)

Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Errotica Archives Activity - Errotica Archives Reviews - Errotica Archives Comments - Errotica Archives News

Visit Errotica Archives

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Errotica Archives (4) 82.7 88.5

RSS Feed : SEE-Erik Mk. Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.