| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- About 190 videos available as WMV (320x 240) or quicktime. A lot of the more recent scenes also available in HD (1200x 720).Very fast download speeds.
- Around 270 photo galleries with more or less 400 images each (1024px × 682px). No zipped files though.
- Good looking model, with a wonderful smile. She also has a bunch of different hairstyles and dresses up a lot. However, her back kinda put me off (her spine is very pronounced and looks kinda reptile like in some videos... only a few though)
- A decent variation of dildo, vibrator, strip and some photoshoot videos. But no sex scenes and no anal that I could find.
- Access to a whole network of 7 other solo girls and around 50 other websites.
- Really good HD in the more recent videos. The content is very good in terms of quality. |
| Cons: |
- Although the site is a solo model type it doesn't really connect the girl to the audience. No forums or chats, no special request videos section or web-chats. It's good content but why not go the extra step and make it an interactive experience?
- It's only one model who doesn't have sex or do anal. How often can you see the same girl play with herself? On the positive side the network access compensates more than enough, offering access to many sites.
- Lack of a search function is bothersome at times. A category search (strip, play with self, roleplay, etc. ) would have helped.
- An update schedule would have also been nice.
- Many of the videos are cut after 12 minutes in several parts. This can get frustrating as you have to download 3 videos for one scene.
- Interviews with the girl would have made the site much better, helped us connect to her. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall the site is nice for a solo girl site. There is a lot of content and the model looks beautiful, especially with pony tails.
My main problem was that the site doesn't try to establish a connection between the users and the model. Solo sites work well when the girl responds to users, does videos that they ask her to do, chats with them and so on. Even something as simple as adding a brief interview at the beginning of each video would help. Having her say a few silly things about her week would make people feel closer and enjoy the site more, IMO.
Also in many of the videos the soundtrack covers her noises or she doesn't make any...this results in a somewhat awkward video. More natural sounds, maybe let her play with herself until she cums and record that...I think it would make for a much better site.
Finally, I feel like the girl used to look a lot better in the older videos, which is a shame since the HD is so crisp and nice, but this could be just me so no points off for that.
What I am taking points off are the lack of a search function, no photo zipped archives, no easy to access update schedule...small things that gather up to make for a slightly less than satisfying experience.
What brings the grade back up is that cute smile Kelly has in some videos, the slight awkwardness when she fingers herself and those huge, gorgeous eyes. A great model and a site that could be improved. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Dream Kelly Activity - Dream Kelly Reviews - Dream Kelly Comments - Dream Kelly News
