Digital Desire - User Reviews & Comments (ddgirls) at pornusers.com

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

Site Feedback

Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.

Visit Site

Digital Desire

Type: Pay Site

NICHES

COMPANY

COST

1. Nude Photography

2. Soft Content

3. Glamour Models

J. Stephen Hicks, Inc.

1 Site Listed

Partner: DDG Cash

Monthly:		$18.00 (recurring)
Multi-Mo:		$59.95 (3 months, recurring)
1 Year:		$119.95 (non-recurring)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $33.95.

View all Digital Desire Site Facts at TBP.

88.0

Feedback History (27)

Active Reviews	1
Newbie Reviews	1
Active Ratings	0
Newbie Ratings	2
Comments	14

Review by TheBestPorn:

88.0

TBP Review

Date: 09-20-09

Type: 2.0

Maggie

+  Huge collection!
+  All exclusive content.
-  Navigation could use a few tweaks.
-  Not all content high resolution/definition.

User Reviews (10)

User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active

IKnoPorn (22)

07-02-08 09:53pm

TRUST USER? YES (24), NO (0)

Status:

Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.

Pros:

+ Alot of models, most are extremely hot 9's-10's
+ Among the best solo video content on the web
+ Huge amount of content
+ No DRM
+ High quality images and videos
+ Easy to navigate, alphabetical model index is well organized
+ Only $18 until October 1

Cons:

- Too many confusing categories: Dreamgirls, Dreamheat, Creamgirls, Raw Heat, Girlz-on-Girlz, Toi Story, Seasonal Spotlight, ????
- Photo sets tend to be split across categories
- Different mixes of the same video: a very softcore version as well as an "Extreme" version
- Some women look bored or overly posed in the photo sets
- Alot of makeup and airbrushing

Bottom Line:

Stephen Hicks has set many standards for photography, and this site illustrates the reasons why. Extremely beautiful, almost surrealistic women perform for your enjoyment. I won't belabor this point, if you haven't checked the site out and you're a glamour or solo model fan, then this site is a must see, for at least 1 month.

Also old news is that this site has dropped the DRM, which is a huge improvement.

Where the site falls apart in a bad way is with the categories and the division of content. The category names I listed above are real (believe it or not) and it is difficult to tell which is which. Perhaps these are just artifacts of when the site was split into an "extreme" section that used to cost extra, and the "normal" (read: softcore) section. What makes no sense at all is with all of the closeups of lubed up women, many of which you can find in the "normal" section, I do not understand why similar content is split off into "extreme" - which often just has more closeups or more "spread-eagle" shots. Don't get me wrong, the photos are hot, but the split up of photo sets and videos into the different confusing categories gets tiresome fast.

However, if you're willing to put up with the categories, and stick to the model index, you can find some excellent content, you just have to piece together the photo sets on your own. Also, the "extreme" solo videos are among the best I've seen.

Bottom line: Very hot solo models, tedious categories.

UPDATE: No major changes to my comments, but a score increase from 84 to 88, and also for continuing to offer the $18/month deal. Compared with other glamour sites, this is one of the best, in spite of the crazy categories.

Respond:

8 Replies - Add Reply

Expired

80*

SirCumference (2)

01-16-08 01:09pm

No Badges

TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

Thaeral (8)

01-14-08 10:16pm

TRUST USER? YES (21), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

Cybertoad (62)

01-01-08 10:07am

TRUST USER? YES (34), NO (1)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (14 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

jd1961 (95)

12-24-07 11:49am

TRUST USER? YES (47), NO (1)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

Denner (200)

12-09-07 09:07am

TRUST USER? YES (60), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (3 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

Getreal (Disabled)

08-26-07 02:31pm

TRUST USER? YES (8), NO (1)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (1 Reply) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

nygiants03 (160)

07-29-07 11:41am

TRUST USER? YES (59), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (1 Reply) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

exotics4me (361)

07-21-07 12:34am

TRUST USER? YES (66), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired

Drooler (192)

06-08-07 05:16am

TRUST USER? YES (68), NO (0)

Status:

Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.

View:

Read Expired Review (4 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

User Comments (14)

Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 14

Next Page >

Mr Fountain (46)	08-14-09 06:42pm
	TRUST USER? YES (34), NO (0)

$18 special on digital desire/ navigation comment

The special got me to try this site out for the first time.

I have seen beautiful models. But the navigation is one of the worst here. Watch4beauty is a glamour site whose format I'd like to see this site use; or at least a magazine style set up.
Looking through; I really don't like how they dont have a chronological search option.( to look for the newer sets that offer the hi rez option. I have to hunt for the sets I want to see under the alphabetical model setting. There are yet later sets with small rez photos which I don't know if someone would want to look at that. But that said, please at least make the navigation easier so the member does not have to spend time hunting for sets like on an easter egg hunt. The navigation is one of the most convoluted I've seen- Its my third day and I still really don't know where all of the great models sets that I saw on the tour are.

Respond:

3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

giggitygiggity (0)	06-09-09 04:19am
No Badges	TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (1)

Blah

Maybe it's just my tastes, but I found the poses boring (and too many are identical from one girl to the next). Also, the girls have a noticeably 80's look to them. not for me.

Respond:

1 Reply - Add Reply

badandy400 (99)	09-28-08 08:28pm
	TRUST USER? YES (46), NO (0)

Download Help

I just joined this site after seeing the special price. I am wondering if any of you guys have any pointers for downloading in any seemingly efficient manor. After a few minutes of browsing around the site I can usually determine a reasonably efficient method. I am at a loss at this point.

Please let me know of any creative methods you might have come up with for this one.

Respond:

7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

IKnoPorn (22)	09-26-08 04:02pm
	TRUST USER? YES (24), NO (0)

Only $18 Until October 1st

This is a very nice site, one of the best sites for glamour model content, especially with the $18 price tag (see my review). At that price, this is really hard to pass up. A must join if you've never joined, or haven't for a while.

Respond:

8 Replies - Add Reply

Cybertoad (62)	07-25-08 09:37am
	TRUST USER? YES (34), NO (1)

Toadmix Review

For those interested I did a followup today, 7/25/08 to update my previous review done back in Jan 08

Thanks Enjoy.

Respond:

0 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200)	12-05-07 04:10pm
	TRUST USER? YES (60), NO (0)

Not much new here

Paid for another turn here at DD.
Been there 2-3 times before. Last time half a year ago or maybe a little earlier.
Since then - not much new - so slow update.
A couple of new HD videos and some (few) other videos and photosets.
Ok, the DRM is gone, but....

Generally this site is overrated. Can't figure out how it can get a 91,9 at TBP - even IF it's a first time around.

Respond:

4 Replies - Add Reply

jd1961 (95)	11-16-07 07:18pm
	TRUST USER? YES (47), NO (1)

Thanksgiving Special

$19.95 based on 3 months apparently.

Respond:

0 Replies - Add Reply

badboy504 (0)	10-16-07 09:34am
No Badges	TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (0)

DRM protection?

Hi, Is the videos in this site are DRM protected? Can somebody tell me?

Respond:

4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

jd1961 (95)	09-25-07 08:46pm
	TRUST USER? YES (47), NO (1)

Artificially Slow?

It seems to me that downloading has been artificially slowed here. Anyone else have that feeling?

Respond:

2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Drooler (192)	08-22-07 02:34am
	TRUST USER? YES (68), NO (0)

Dream Girls to Desire

2.5 months ago, when I reviewed this site, it was called "Digital Dreamgirls," as it had been for years. Now that it's "Digital Desire," you may wonder what has changed.

Instead of one pic set with 3000px photos per month, they've been doing two. They still recycle old content into larger pic sizes (with varying results of quality), but it seems like a little less of that than before.

Other than that, I don't see any change at all. I've been through their content to the present, except for the videos (not interested). A lot of the girls are hot, but I'm tired of the pileups of pussy closeups, "tight" shots (excessively cropped, that is), and pics of girls staring away into space (as if they've got nothing better to do ;).

They have made a recent visit to Prague and shot several of the beauties there, but the results are underwhelming. Even Marina/Euphrat can't save them from their often mediocre approach to presentations of fine women. And their descriptions of the shoots are so canned and superficial -- give me a break! Gee, I hope they don't actually spend time COMPOSING this drivel.

What's in a name? A rose by any other would smell pretty much the same.

At least they still offer a 15.95 price for renewing members. Not many sites are that generous.

Respond:

2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Shown : 1-10 of 14

Next Page >

RSS Feeds : All Digital Desire Activity - Digital Desire Reviews - Digital Desire Comments - Digital Desire News

Visit Digital Desire

Site News

Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).

Company Sites

Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s): zachvenice (16)

No site news added yet.

Site Name (Reviews)	Score	TBP
1. Digital Desire (1)	88.0	88.0

RSS Feed : J. Stephen Hicks, Inc. Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.42 seconds.