+ Great quality photos and videos.
+ Exclusive, consistant content. - Full download of content before you can view it. - Site design/navigation is a pain. - Expensive, annoying token system.
User Reviews (1)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The models are true amateurs from the Northwest USA who responded to adds in papers.
Every model is worth looking at. Quality is the rule
"in your face" style' perspective hardcore porn; with each set offering a little tease. They show who's boss, pose if they really feel they are beautiful. The sets just blew me away, wow.
Models ages are mostly college age with a few milfs
Darchives has a site called Dattic which offers the same hi quality images as this site with the only difference being they were shot between '01 and '03
offers archive site Dattic; which is only $15 a month; or $36 for three months. This if for 100 models with sets from 3; with some up to 50 sets
Dattic is an incredible deal for the kind of material I saw there.
Cons:
the token system: you have to buy tokens with a token charge for each download 4 for large file 720x480 vids; 1042x1600; and 2 tokens for small versions;336x224 video; and 500x768
not updated anymore; last update in 2004
though I think the webmaster stopped this one to start a new site but I am not sure.
41 models are all that are offered.
Bottom Line:
Darchives is not a quantity site but believe me, it IS a quality site. There are few models (41). Some of them have a lot of sets.
no filler models just there to fill space or quota. The college age girls look like real students- not ex-playboy, or hired models
This is well worth the money with material that could last about four or five months. But these are five or six good months. Man the material is hot.
If you don't like the token system; join Dattic for $15 a month or $36 for 3 months. The material there blew me away.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
They call their archives site "The Attic". Well... because I think the token system on D'Archives is RIDICULOUS & the Attic is $15 for a month & no rebilling, I took a shot at it.
Video quality is great. The MIDI files they play instead of live sound matches their token system - absolutely ridiculous! Equally idiotic is the need to enter your user name & password on each download. Download speed is horrible (150-180 k/s) with no use of accelerators allowed AND they limit you to one download at a time. All files - even pictures - come in zips with semi-cryptic names. Plus, you only get 3 preview thumbnails per set.
The videos are redundant as hell. To me, it looked like a masturbation site. What it turns out to be are a bunch of young women spreading their legs & playing with their vaginas. Yes - I said vaginas - it's almost that clinical looking. A few get a toy working, a few others decide to pee, some even have a friend with 'em. But, all in all, it's just boring as hell. The Attic is roughly 100 models, each with a few picture sets (some more than a few) & about 2/3 with a video or two. But it's all the same stuff. Raise the skirt or take of the pants, spread the legs...
So... because The Attic appears to be laid out exactly like the main site, I think it'd be safe to assume (despite the hazards of doing so) that it'd be no different in the main site. And for that, I think you'd be either very foolish or have more money than you know what to do with if you sign up there
An outrageous pay system for a bunch of thunder thighed plain janes that you could photograph yourself at any local nightclub. They have the audacity to sell this stuff by the file, as if you are acquiring something rare and special. P.T. Barnum porn! I know there are some who get a strange kick at seeing "amateurs", as if they are some sort of different creature. IMO, since they are not professionals, professional prices should not be charged. If ordinary, homely girls are your bag---go for it!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All D Archives Activity - D Archives Reviews - D Archives Comments - D Archives News
