| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Entrypoint to 4 sites, content from one studio so treat as 1 site. Click on thebestporn.com link, girls in the banner/logo are two prettiest girls on site. You might think they're not pretty. That wont matter. After 3 seconds girls faces are no longer inframe. If camera goes for wide shots you wont be looking at their faces. Girls do not need expressions, your eyes will be elsewhere.
Under Welcome message an exact description of what you get, read it, you'll know to decide to join.
Downloads are quick. Didn't use downloader but if you do you'll get the whole site in a few hours.
Girls are not slapped up with makeup like Porn Stars. They actually look innocent. The positions are incredible. I love the fact, take a Gymnast and make her wear PornStar Heels. So corrupt. Second biggest turn on for me.
First is the only thing seperating you from Heaven is a stretched piece of lycra with the gusset under strain and you can see every crease underneath. If only for HD-DVD. |
| Cons: |
Too Expensive, should be $19.99. For $39.99 you need HD, and buy some new leotoards for the girls. I think the leotards are shared.
Sasha's squint is annoying & sexy, a bit Rabbit caught in the headlights, but whose car?
Don't bother with archive site. Archive Photos struggle to fill a cell/mobile screen.
There are only a few Hi(ish)-Res videos, 100MB+. I seem to remember finding 3 over 150MB. Most 10-16Mb chunk files, approx 6-12 each set. Indicates most of content is old. Photosets not high-res. at most 1024px.
Repeating theme is boring. Like watching adverts on TV, Sitting there waiting for the main feature and eventually you realise there isn't one. Mind you it took me 8 days to work it out. I only went back once a week to pick up infrequent updates until my membership expired.
Loads of Girls but some mingers. Navigation basic but works.
Studio environment. You feel like its shot in someones house. Unfortunately it's not my neighbours otherwise I'd become a window cleaner. |
| Bottom Line: |
I couldn't work out was in most shoots they pose next to a camera tripod. Weird, what are they saying, Hey! we have two cameras?
If you like girls who suspend their bodies between two wooden chairs aka Golden Gate Bridge, you'll like this site. Where's the toll gate please.
How did that come about anyway, the chairs? Limited props? They look like old school chairs. creepy.
A few Girls look innocent. Having said that there are some shots where you can tell either the photographers jaw is on the floor, he's drooling or he's got a boner because the girl looks off camera and smiles. They know you're undressing them where the sun shines.
There is something very erotic about these girls. The problem is there's something missing. The poses are too posed, you feel like you're watching girls turn themselves into Rubik's Cubes...they never get to show us who they are. It is almost like they aren't there either.
I've got it. This is how women feel like when they go to the gynaecologists. It's like, please warm that up while I look over here because you look creepy drooling all over my 2nd hand leotard with your camera.
If you got these girls into a studio like inthecrack.com, gave them Estee Lauder makeup, not Avon, film them in HD DVD, I'd pay $39.99. (need to do nude though). Sad thing, none of them will get to the Olympics so this is it for them in Mother Russia / Eastern Block
Don't pay this much. Hate to say it. It's my money and I don't like being ripped off. |
| Respond: |
10 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All CL Pass Activity - CL Pass Reviews - CL Pass Comments - CL Pass News
